ANALYSIS:
As the final-term Reserve Bank Governor, Philip Lowe, faced the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics last Friday, a sigh of relief was shared amongst mortgage holders that “the worst is over” regarding the fight against inflation. It only took 12 interest rate hikes to bring inflation at bay in the quickest contraction in monetary policy in Australia’s modern history. As many Australian mortgage holders are now tipping over the wretched mortgage cliff, we see signs within leading economic indicators such as retail sales, consumer business confidence and mortgage arrears, that there is much more pain to come.
To many people’s surprise, the economy has been incredibly resilient, despite stubbornly persistent rental and service inflation. Raising interest rates is unlikely to reduce these two lingering inflationary pests substantially. As further critical economic data comes to light, we believe the justification for further interest rises will soon abate.
At the same time, Australia’s largest trading partner, China, is experiencing the unthinkable ‘deflation’, which may have a contagion impact on our economy and prompt us to anticipate rate cuts sooner than we expect, leading to revisions in rate forecasts.
As the inflation storm clouds begin to settle down, we can assess the damage caused, especially concerning ongoing cost-of-living crises, inequitable wealth distribution, rental crises and falling labour productivity.
The Structural Problem
The most significant casualty is the housing market, specifically its ability to supply sufficient housing to keep rents stable and improve affordability. At the peak of the interest rate cycle and property unaffordability, it is economically strange that property prices are bucking the trend and have increased 9% from the trough to its current heights, reinforcing that something is fundamentally wrong with the housing market.
The first glaring issue in our current structural problem is rampant rental growth. CoreLogic’s latest July figures confirm annual national rental growth at 9.4% p.a. In the months ahead, there will surely be a vibrant, albeit distressing, public debate examining perhaps one of the biggest threats to our economy and quality of life: the dreaded ‘Housing Crisis’.
Our current Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, will no doubt attempt to unify the states and territories to find an appropriate, balanced solution to ease the rental crisis and increase the supply of properties as he goes into this week’s cabinet meeting.
Rental Market and Rent Freezes
Sydney, and Australia more broadly, grapple with a clear rental crisis as we observe low vacancy rates (0.9%) and soaring rents.11 With 31% of Australians being renters,12 these issues impact a large, vulnerable demographic, who feel the full impacts associated with cost-of-living pressures. This is playing out not only as an economic issue but as an ongoing social issue that warrants immediate attention from politicians.
11 Vacancy rates: August 2022 (domain.com.au).
12 Housing statistics in Australia: home ownership & rent | Savings.com.au.
13The ACT is the only territory to limit rent increases but tenant groups say gaps in protection leave tenants vulnerable | The Canberra Times | Canberra, ACT.
14 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-11/asx-markets-business-live-news-philip-lowe-rba-inflation/102716942.
As a result, many people across the political spectrum propose rent control as a solution. However, such measures may backfire, as seen in ACT.13 As Philip Lowe recently made clear, rent control could be a short-term solution to improve housing affordability; however, in the long-term, such a solution will prove inadequate as the fundamental structural problem of low housing supply will persist.14
This is because a cap on rent increases would discourage property development and investment, leading to a lower supply and higher rents in the long-term, as observed in San Francisco and Ireland.15 These rental rules burden property investors as they are not given a reprieve from an increase in mortgage repayments and holding costs, which will drive much-needed investment away from the property sector.
When it comes to increasing supply, property developers and investors are the essential lubrication that enable the property machine to function. Therefore, even rumours of
additional tax for property investors is enough to spook and jeopardise the pipeline for much-needed developments, which is already significantly insufficient to meet current demand.
As Philip Lowe echoed his view on this matter at the parliamentary committee, government interventions in the rental market via rent freezes and caps have immediate short-term gains. However, it does not resolve long-term structural problems and only exacerbates these issues in the future.16
The key to addressing the crisis lies in increasing the housing supply. Government inefficiencies, especially with regard to planning systems, stifle progress. Efforts to aid homebuyers through subsidies, which has been a popular policy in the past, can also inadvertently drive-up housing prices.
Why has so Much Gone so Wrong so Quickly
There has been a long history of housing stock deficiency in Australia; we need to build enough property to meet demand, especially since the immigration reprieve experienced during COVID-19 lockdowns is slowly fading away. Once international borders reopened, net migration skyrocketed, with future forecasts migration and total population growth remaining elevated.
This is placing further pressure on our fragile construction industry, which has experienced a once-in-a-lifetime perfect storm. This is especially so for builders operating within the residential sector, who are locked into fixed-price contracts, and have dealt with construction costs flying up by 30%-40%, La Niña (a climate pattern leading to greater rainfall in Australia), supply chain issues, rising interest costs, labour shortages, as well as COVID-19 lockdowns and disruptions, whilst on thin margins. Unsurprisingly, ASIC data shows 1031 construction companies falling to the liquidator’s knife – more than anytime experienced over the past decade.
Project Feasibility
Traditionally, many medium to large-scale development projects take 3-6 years to obtain necessary approvals, then a further 8-12 months to obtain construction certificates. This is followed by off-plan marketing campaigns to get enough sales to meet financiers’ requirements even before the first shovel hits the ground. Not to mention it also takes time for councils to consider re-zoning.
Construction costs over the past three years have skyrocketed by 30-40% due to inflation and labour shortages within the sector. Land values typically remain constant and do not provide room for adjustment. This has resulted in many approved projects being shelved as developers wait for property prices to increase enough to compensate for construction costs, holding costs and greater demand for purchasers to buy off-the-plan.
Ultimately, the supply component of the property market is driven by the private sector – an army of mum-and-dad investors to established property developers. Unfortunately, making money on property projects is at one of its most challenging times in decades, further contributing to the challenge of providing property supply to the system.
Planning and Rezoning Process
We also want to avoid knee-jerk, desperate planning outcomes as well as unnecessary rezoning of more farmland and urban sprawl, which have only been short-term fixes to the underlying problem of inadequate supply; however, in most cases, this does not generate net gains as the benefits are outweighed by government spending and immense costs on infrastructure projects.
It takes 4-8 years for councils to consider large-scale rezoning projects properly. Nevertheless, we should look at best practices and improve the bureaucratic red tape to avoid future property price and rental increases; however, make no mistake – there is no quick fix.
Solutions to the housing crisis will involve all levels of government coordination, patience, well-measured policies, and a deep understanding of the delicate balance between different stakeholders’ interests.
In short, the housing crisis is here to stay for several years. We will continue having to talk about it and lay blame to governments, developers, builders, and investors. The government’s job is to make the planning system more efficient, promote property development and investment, and let the market deliver supply based on demand.
Ultimately, market forces will result in property prices remaining elevated and, over time, property will attract capital once the perceived market risk normalises. We should then see the necessary supply to meet demand.
Msquared Capital is a private credit provider with investment opportunities backed by quality property along the Eastern Seaboard; we ensure that all investment opportunities are based on risk-to-reward as our core offering and performance. Mortgage funds perform well during volatile times, and capital preservation is regular, with a reliable monthly income that gives our investors peace of mind.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
The Republican nominee says it would help bring down home prices, though these buyers account for a fraction of U.S. home sales
Former President Donald Trump said he would ban undocumented immigrants from obtaining home mortgages, a move he indicated would help ease home prices even though these buyers account for a tiny fraction of U.S. home sales.
Home loans to undocumented people living in the U.S. are legal but they aren’t especially common. Between 5,000 and 6,000 mortgages of this kind were issued last year, according to estimates from researchers at the Urban Institute in Washington.
Overall, lenders issued more than 3.4 million mortgages to all home purchasers in 2023, federal government data show.
Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, made his comments Thursday during a policy speech to the Economic Club of New York in Manhattan.
Housing remains a top economic issue for voters during this presidential election. Rent and home prices grew at historic rates during the pandemic and mortgage rates climbed to levels not seen in more than two decades. A July Wall Street Journal poll showed that voters rank housing as their second-biggest inflation concern after groceries.
Both major candidates for the 2024 presidential election have made appeals to voters on housing during recent campaign stops, though the issue has so far featured more prominently in Vice President Kamala Harris ’s campaign.
Trump has blamed immigrants for many of the nation’s woes, including crime and unemployment. Now, he is pointing to immigrants as a cause of the nation’s housing-affordability crisis. Yet some affordable-housing advocates and real-estate professionals said Trump’s mortgage proposal would fail to bring relief to priced-out home buyers.
“It’s unfortunate that given the significant housing affordability crisis that is widely acknowledged across most partisan lines, we are arguing about a minuscule segment of the market,” said David Dworkin, president of the National Housing Conference, an affordable-housing advocacy group.
Gary Acosta, chief executive of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals, a trade organization, said, “It’s just another effort to vilify immigrants and to continue to scapegoat them for any issues that we have here in the United States.”
A Trump campaign spokeswoman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Undocumented immigrants in the U.S. can obtain an obscure type of mortgage designed for taxpayers without Social Security numbers, most of whom are Hispanic. The passage of the USA Patriot Act of 2001 allowed banks to use identification numbers from the Internal Revenue Service as an alternative to Social Security, extending a number of financial services to people without legal status for the first time.
Mortgage loans for undocumented immigrants are typically higher interest and borrowers include legal residents who have undocumented spouses, Acosta said. Lenders include regional credit unions and community-development financial institutions.
In his speech, Trump said that “the flood” of undocumented immigrants is driving up housing costs. “That’s why my plan will ban mortgages for illegal aliens,” he said.
Trump didn’t elaborate on how he would enact a ban on such loans.
Though mortgages for undocumented people living in the U.S. are relatively rare, residential real-estate purchases by foreign nationals are big business , especially in expensive coastal cities such as New York and Los Angeles. These sales have declined in recent years, however.
Close to half of foreign purchases are made by people residing abroad, while the other half are made by recent immigrants or residents on nonimmigrant visas, according to an annual survey by the National Association of Realtors. Many affluent foreigners buy U.S. homes with cash instead of obtaining mortgage financing.
In his Thursday speech, which focused mostly on other economic matters such as energy and taxation, Trump proposed other measures to bring down housing costs, including cutting regulations for builders and allowing more building on federal land. Similar ideas appeared in the housing policy outline Harris released in August .
The former president has spoken on housing-related issues in speeches at other recent campaign stops, including in Michigan last month, where he touted his administration’s 2020 overturn of a policy that had encouraged cities to reduce racial segregation .
“I keep the suburbs safe,” Trump said. “I stopped low-income towers from rising right alongside of their house. And I’m keeping the illegal aliens away from the suburbs.”
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.