China Unleashes Crackdown on ‘Pig Butchering.’ (It Isn’t What You Think.)
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,720,356 (-0.49%)       Melbourne $1,032,164 (+0.03%)       Brisbane $1,202,525 (-0.01%)       Adelaide $1,059,532 (-1.15%)       Perth $1,096,286 (-0.29%)       Hobart $849,704 (-0.37%)       Darwin $877,272 (+3.98%)       Canberra $995,722 (-0.75%)       National Capitals $1,163,582 (-0.23%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $795,900 (-0.08%)       Melbourne $545,068 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $777,731 (-0.07%)       Adelaide $576,738 (-0.14%)       Perth $645,865 (-0.73%)       Hobart $574,457 (+1.02%)       Darwin $464,473 (-1.78%)       Canberra $499,147 (+2.13%)       National Capitals $631,243 (-0.02%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,852 (+48)       Melbourne 16,321 (+165)       Brisbane 9,348 (-171)       Adelaide 3,241 (+62)       Perth 8,046 (+66)       Hobart 725 (+8)       Darwin 162 (0)       Canberra 1,155 (+37)       National Capitals 52,850 (+215)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,523 (-44)       Melbourne 6,961 (+55)       Brisbane 2,097 (-8)       Adelaide 561 (+17)       Perth 1,557 (+21)       Hobart 167 (+6)       Darwin 221 (+2)       Canberra 1,239 (+5)       National Capitals 22,326 (+54)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $875 (-$5)       Melbourne $620 (+$10)       Brisbane $710 (-$10)       Adelaide $665 (+$5)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $620 (+$5)       Darwin $850 ($0)       Canberra $750 (+$10)       National Capitals $741 (+$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $850 ($0)       Melbourne $630 (-$5)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $570 (+$10)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $545 (+$23)       Darwin $650 ($0)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $665 (+$2)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,498 (+32)       Melbourne 7,465 (-11)       Brisbane 3,655 (-41)       Adelaide 1,394 (+25)       Perth 2,273 (-9)       Hobart 247 (-6)       Darwin 41 (-1)       Canberra 470 (+19)       National Capitals 22,043 (+8)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,261 (+44)       Melbourne 6,264 (+33)       Brisbane 2,022 (+13)       Adelaide 418 (+5)       Perth 817 (-31)       Hobart 72 (-4)       Darwin 69 (-18)       Canberra 763 (+1)       National Capitals 20,686 (+43)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.64% (↓)     Melbourne 3.12% (↑)        Brisbane 3.07% (↓)     Adelaide 3.26% (↑)      Perth 3.56% (↑)      Hobart 3.79% (↑)        Darwin 5.04% (↓)     Canberra 3.92% (↑)      National Capitals 3.31% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 5.55% (↑)        Melbourne 6.01% (↓)     Brisbane 4.55% (↑)      Adelaide 5.14% (↑)      Perth 5.64% (↑)      Hobart 4.93% (↑)      Darwin 7.28% (↑)        Canberra 6.25% (↓)     National Capitals 5.48% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 35.2 (↑)      Melbourne 34.9 (↑)      Brisbane 38.0 (↑)      Adelaide 28.3 (↑)      Perth 41.9 (↑)      Hobart 31.0 (↑)      Darwin 29.9 (↑)      Canberra 34.7 (↑)      National Capitals 34.2 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 32.7 (↑)        Melbourne 30.5 (↓)     Brisbane 34.6 (↑)      Adelaide 29.5 (↑)        Perth 39.2 (↓)     Hobart 29.5 (↑)      Darwin 31.9 (↑)        Canberra 37.9 (↓)       National Capitals 33.2 (↓)           
Share Button

China Unleashes Crackdown on ‘Pig Butchering.’ (It Isn’t What You Think.)

Beijing is going after scam mills that operate out of secretive, dystopian compounds and swindle people worldwide

By FELIZ SOLOMON
Mon, Nov 6, 2023 8:29amGrey Clock 4 min

It’s called “pig butchering.”

Armies of scammers operating from lawless corners of Southeast Asia—often controlled by Chinese crime bosses—connect with people all over the world through online messages. They foster elaborate, sometimes romantic, relationships, and then coax their targets into making bogus investments. Over time, they make it appear that the investments are growing to get victims to send more money. Then, they disappear.

In recent months, China has unleashed its most aggressive effort to crack down on the proliferation of the scam mills, reaching beyond its territory and netting thousands of people in mass arrests. Its main target is a notorious stretch of its border with Myanmar controlled by narcotics traffickers and warlords.

For decades, frontier fiefdoms such as those in Myanmar have been havens for gambling and trafficking of everything from drugs to wildlife to people. Now, they are dens for pig-butchering operations.

The scammers operate out of secretive, dystopian compounds, many of which are run by Chinese fugitives who fled their country to places where it was easier to flout the law. They cheat Chinese citizens out of billions of dollars each year, as well as victims across the globe. The U.S. Treasury Department in September warned Americans about the scams.

In addition to remote hillside towns in Myanmar, these heavily guarded enclaves are also found in gambling hubs such as Cambodia’s Sihanoukville and Poipet. Cambodian authorities have carried out sporadic raids with China’s help, but the problem has persisted.

For Beijing, it is a significant source of embarrassment that Chinese criminals are at the centre of scams ensnaring people the world over, said Jason Tower, Myanmar country director for the United States Institute of Peace, an independent research organisation founded by the U.S. Congress that specialises in conflict mitigation.

China is “quite sensitive to the narratives that could potentially emerge,” he said. “These are largely Chinese crime groups which China, for years, did very little to check.”

The operations flourished during the Covid-19 pandemic when border trade stopped and internet use surged. They have also fuelled a human-trafficking crisis.

Many of the scammers entrapping people are themselves victims of human trafficking, lured abroad by fake job ads and held captive by withholding pay and passports. The United Nations human-rights office says more than 120,000 people may be forced to work as scammers in Myanmar, with another 100,000 in Cambodia.

One Malaysian trafficking victim told The Wall Street Journal that he was trained to spend weeks or months “fattening” his victims by gaining their trust before “butchering” them. His story was similar to those told by others lured into working in the scam mills. After responding to an ad on a job-recruitment website, he said he accepted an offer for a customer-service role in Cambodia. Once there, he was driven to a prison-like complex in Sihanoukville and forced to work as a scammer under threats of violence.

He said he had a handler who trained him, supplying him with a smartphone preloaded with fake social-media accounts, a “victim list” containing contact information of potential targets and various scripts designed to break the ice and build their trust. After several weeks, he said he convinced a driver who brought people and supplies to the compound to help him escape.

Regional migration researchers have documented trafficking from dozens of countries. Many victims come from Southeast Asia but some from as far as Brazil and Kenya.

“China is starting to signal that enough is enough,” said Inshik Sim, a Bangkok-based lead analyst for the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime’s regional operations.

In August, China launched a “special joint operation” with three nearby countries and increased pressure on armed groups that oversee remote parts of Myanmar, convincing them to hunt down, round up and repatriate almost 5,000 Chinese nationals suspected of illicit activity.

Chinese authorities have zeroed in on several border areas that are part of Myanmar but are fully controlled by armed groups. These places have often drawn large investments from Chinese nationals—both legal and illicit. Many Chinese people, including notorious fugitives, live in these enclaves, where the Mandarin language and Chinese currency are commonplace.

The Wa Self-Administered Division, located along China’s southwestern border, is of particular interest to China, in part because Beijing has so much leverage over it. The area is home to the ethnic minority Wa people, who claim the territory as their ancestral home. China has been the group’s main benefactor for decades; historians say they helped the Chinese Communist Party flush out enemies who fled across the border in the 1950s and ’60s. The area later became a major economic gateway to resource-rich Myanmar.

Independent researchers say its de facto leadership, the United Wa State Army, commands a force of more than 20,000 people armed with modern Chinese equipment such as portable surface-to-air missiles and armoured vehicles.

The area has been a major source of opium for almost two centuries, and in recent decades has become a leading producer of synthetic drugs such as methamphetamine. The U.S. Treasury blacklisted the UWSA in 2003 under the Kingpin Act, and has sanctioned dozens of people and businesses linked to the group, calling it “the largest and most powerful drug trafficking organisation in Southeast Asia.”

The UWSA and other criminal networks have increasingly turned to scamming in addition to the drug trade.

According to a 2022 report in Chinese state media, authorities blocked 2.1 million fraudulent websites and some $51.6 billion in suspicious transactions over the previous year. Beijing has warned citizens to look out for dubious rebate offers, investment schemes and unsolicited contact from anyone claiming to represent a company or law enforcement.

The first sign of a serious cleanup came in early September, when China worked with the UWSA to orchestrate two days of raids that ended with more than 1,000 suspects being marched across the border into Chinese custody. Then China upped the ante, taking aim at the group’s leadership.

On Oct. 12, China’s Ministry of Public Security said arrest warrants had been issued for two senior Wa officials accused of leading scam networks: the state’s construction minister Chen Yanban and a mayor named Xiao Yankui. Four days later, the UWSA said both had been stripped of their roles. Their whereabouts is unknown.

The same day, Chinese authorities said they had transferred 2,349 “telecommunication fraud” suspects from Myanmar two days prior—the single largest such handover. China says 4,666 suspects have been repatriated from Myanmar since the crackdown began earlier this year.

“This is by any measure a major operation, which speaks to the impact on China and Chinese citizens, and the seriousness with which Beijing is approaching this,” said Richard Horsey, senior adviser on Myanmar for the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based think tank specializing in conflict prevention.

While China may be turning up the heat on cybercriminals along its border, experts say scamming is so lucrative that the ringleaders are likely to simply look for more fertile ground—areas in weak states where law enforcement is lax.

“These groups are not going to go away easily,” said Tower, of the U.S. Institute of Peace. “They’re sitting on a massive source of capital and there are many fragile places in the world that they’ll be able to exploit.”



MOST POPULAR

From bushland greens to valley reds, the country’s most awarded designers are proving that the best colour palette was never on a swatch card; it was outside the window all along.

The Australian leather house has opened an immersive four-day pop-up in Manhattan, unveiling its Bloom Collection and redefining what a product launch can look like.

Related Stories
Money
Why Chasing Yield After the Budget Could Cost You Everything
By Jeni O'Dowd 30/06/2026
Money
$3.6 Million an Hour—and Other Ways to Measure Elon Musk’s Fortune
By THEO FRANCIS, JULIET CHUNG & MAX RUST 29/06/2026
Money
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians
By Opinion, Anthony Hunt 22/06/2026
Why Chasing Yield After the Budget Could Cost You Everything

The federal budget has rattled property investors. But the biggest mistake isn’t the tax changes, it’s the conclusion many are drawing from them.

By Jeni O'Dowd
Tue, Jun 30, 2026 2 min

The recent budget has forced a reckoning for property investors.

Negative gearing now restricted to new residential builds, the CGT discount gone and on paper, the numbers look different.

And many investors are responding by pivoting toward yield, prioritising cash flow over capital growth in a way that property strategists say misses the point entirely.

“The debate has shifted to yield versus growth as if they are opposing forces,” says Abdullah Nouh, founder of Melbourne-based buyers’ agency Mecca Property Group. “But that framing is itself the mistake.”

Nouh, who works with high-net-worth families and investors on long-term acquisition strategy, argues that capital growth remains the primary driver of genuine wealth creation and that the post-budget environment has made quality assets more important, not less.

The numbers make his case plainly. An additional $500 per week in rental income is welcome. A prestige asset appreciating by $1 million over a market cycle is transformative.

These are not equivalent outcomes, and portfolios built around yield at the expense of location and land value tend to generate income while wealth stands largely still.

The more nuanced shift Nouh is seeing among sophisticated investors is a move toward assets where both outcomes can be engineered simultaneously – established homes on substantial land in quality locations, where the existing dwelling can be repositioned, rental returns improved, and the underlying land value compounds independent of what sits on it.

For investors with existing equity, commercial property is also entering the conversation in a more serious way.

Prestige industrial assets, medical centres and long-leased essential retail offer income profiles that residential property in most capital city markets cannot currently match: longer lease terms, tenants covering outgoings, and greater predictability than the residential tenancy cycle.

“The investors who build lasting wealth are rarely the ones who chased yield or growth exclusively,” says Nouh.

“They are the ones who built a strategy they could sustain – one that generated enough income to hold quality assets through multiple cycles while those assets compounded in value.”

The budget has changed the settings. It has not changed the fundamentals.

MOST POPULAR

From the Caribbean to Australia’s east coast, Oyster’s latest world rally promises a bluewater voyage designed for owners seeking ultimate sailing experiences.

Limited to 630 units, Lamborghini’s latest Urus Capsule pushes personalisation further than ever, blending hybrid performance with over 70 bespoke design combinations.

Related Stories
Property
Late Swarovski Billionaire’s Private Island Near Venice, Italy, Asks €24 Million
By Casey Farmer 23/04/2026
Lifestyle
Cold Plunges Are Hot. But Can You Do It in Your Home Pool?
By ERIC GROSSMAN 09/01/2026
Lifestyle
The Stylish New Must-Have for Aussies Who Love the Sun
By Jeni O'Dowd 21/11/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop