How Much Can You Spend In Retirement?
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,614,335 (+0.67%)       Melbourne $994,236 (-0.05%)       Brisbane $963,341 (+1.45%)       Adelaide $854,556 (-1.91%)       Perth $827,309 (-0.33%)       Hobart $759,718 (-0.29%)       Darwin $667,381 (+0.62%)       Canberra $1,007,406 (-0.44%)       National $1,037,260 (+0.22%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $750,961 (+0.91%)       Melbourne $497,942 (-0.57%)       Brisbane $535,693 (+0.31%)       Adelaide $419,051 (-1.28%)       Perth $437,584 (-0.67)       Hobart $516,868 (-0.64%)       Darwin $347,954 (-4.64%)       Canberra $497,324 (-0.10%)       National $524,930 (-0.09%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,416 (-208)       Melbourne 14,951 (-211)       Brisbane 8,223 (+52)       Adelaide 2,527 (+10)       Perth 6,514 (+149)       Hobart 1,343 (+29)       Darwin 248 (-7)       Canberra 1,065 (+22)       National 45,287 (-164)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,842 (+1)       Melbourne 8,108 (+15)       Brisbane 1,720 (+26)       Adelaide 459 (+19)       Perth 1,750 (+6)       Hobart 209 (+4)       Darwin 403 (+1)       Canberra 928 (+7)       National 22,419 (+79)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $790 (+$10)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $630 ($0)       Adelaide $620 (+$20)       Perth $660 ($0)       Hobart $550 ($0)       Darwin $700 ($0)       Canberra $690 (-$10)       National $662 (+$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $750 ($0)       Melbourne $590 ($0)       Brisbane $625 ($0)       Adelaide $480 (+$5)       Perth $590 (-$5)       Hobart $470 ($0)       Darwin $550 (+$15)       Canberra $565 (-$5)       National $589 (+$1)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,061 (-35)       Melbourne 5,308 (+108)       Brisbane 3,854 (+1)       Adelaide 1,161 (-25)       Perth 1,835 (+6)       Hobart 376 (-10)       Darwin 138 (+1)       Canberra 525 (-5)       National 18,258 (+41)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,806 (-66)       Melbourne 4,431 (+62)       Brisbane 1,997 (-30)       Adelaide 323 (-15)       Perth 609 (+30)       Hobart 153 (+3)       Darwin 210 (-15)       Canberra 537 (+30)       National 15,066 (-1)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.54% (↑)      Melbourne 3.14% (↑)        Brisbane 3.40% (↓)     Adelaide 3.77% (↑)      Perth 4.15% (↑)      Hobart 3.76% (↑)        Darwin 5.45% (↓)       Canberra 3.56% (↓)     National 3.32% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.19% (↓)     Melbourne 6.16% (↑)        Brisbane 6.07% (↓)     Adelaide 5.96% (↑)        Perth 7.01% (↓)     Hobart 4.73% (↑)      Darwin 8.22% (↑)        Canberra 5.91% (↓)     National 5.84% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 0.8% (↑)        Melbourne 0.7% (↓)     Brisbane 0.7% (↑)      Adelaide 0.4% (↑)        Perth 0.4% (↓)     Hobart 0.9% (↑)        Darwin 0.8% (↓)     Canberra 1.0% (↑)      National 0.7% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 0.9% (↑)        Melbourne 1.1% (↓)     Brisbane 1.0% (↑)      Adelaide 0.5% (↑)      Perth 0.5% (↑)        Hobart 1.4% (↓)     Darwin 1.7% (↑)      Canberra 1.4% (↑)      National 1.1% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 25.8 (↑)      Melbourne 26.6 (↑)        Brisbane 26.8 (↓)     Adelaide 22.5 (↑)      Perth 31.4 (↑)      Hobart 24.3 (↑)        Darwin 26.7 (↓)     Canberra 25.5 (↑)        National 26.2 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 24.5 (↑)      Melbourne 25.5 (↑)      Brisbane 26.1 (↑)      Adelaide 23.6 (↑)      Perth 31.2 (↑)      Hobart 24.6 (↑)      Darwin 38.8 (↑)      Canberra 28.0 (↑)      National 27.8 (↑)            
Share Button

How Much Can You Spend In Retirement?

Here’s how small adjustments can make a big difference.

By SHLOMO BENARTZI
Tue, Sep 13, 2022 11:22amGrey Clock 7 min

As people prepare for retirement, much of their focus is on making sure they save as much as possible, or at least as much as they think they’ll need.

Too often, though, we forget that people don’t just accumulate savings over time—they also accumulate differences. By the time workers are approaching retirement, some are in excellent health; others have multiple health risk factors. Some want to claim Social Security right away; others want to delay claiming for a bigger benefit. Some want to cross items off their bucket lists; others want to put money aside for bequests.

These individual differences and others will affect how much workers will be able to spend as they start drawing on their savings for their retirement income. Combined, they can make a huge difference.

Unfortunately, the providers of 401(k) retirement plans typically offer minimal guidance on how to account for such differences, although some are trying to close the gaps. Retirement-income calculators generally are no better, forcing retirees to rely on a generic set of assumptions about factors such as their health and retirement goals.

In a recent survey of workers in their 60s, I asked them a series of questions about their health and their retirement preferences. I found that the assumptions of the typical retirement-income calculator—people are in good health, don’t want to make a bequest and will claim Social Security as soon as they retire, among others—fit only 4% of people.

That means it’s mostly up to individuals to factor in their own preferences and needs as they think about their income stream from retirement savings. With that in mind, below are some questions to help them through that process.

To illustrate the differences that decisions can make, my colleague Ehud Peleg, an adjunct associate professor of finance at UCLA, and I calculated the effect of various circumstances and choices by a hypothetical 60-year-old man with an annual income of $150,000 before retirement and a 401(k) balance of $750,000. Keep in mind that in each case below, a woman with the same account balance should expect to draw a slightly lower monthly income from retirement savings than our man, because her slightly longer expected lifespan means her money will have to last longer.

Health

How would you describe your current health status?

  • Poor
  • Fair
  • Good
  • Very good
  • Excellent

When it comes to planning for retirement, perhaps the most important uncertainty is how long you’ll need your money to last, which is highly correlated with your health.

For some guidance on this score, numerous research studies have found that the simple question above can go a long way toward predicting longevity. One review of more than 22 studies found that the difference in longevity at the point of retirement between someone who says they’re in poor health versus someone who says they’re in excellent health is about five years.

If the 60-year-old man in our model is in excellent health, he has a roughly 30% chance of living into his 90s, studies show. To make his savings last over that extended lifespan, our model estimates that he could withdraw $2,014 every month if he retired and started taking Social Security at age 65, chose a moderate-risk drawdown strategy, spread his monthly income evenly over time and opted not to leave a bequest.

If he’s in good health, which is most common, he could withdraw $2,166 monthly from his retirement savings, or 8% more, without running out of money. That’s because he needs his savings to last for a shorter time, given the shorter projected lifespan for someone in good versus excellent health. If he’s in poor health, he could withdraw US$2,546 monthly, or 26% more than if he were in excellent health.

Of course, poor health at retirement could mean that his medical expenses will be higher than if he were in good or excellent health. But that wouldn’t change how much he could withdraw from his savings each month without raising the likelihood of outliving his money. It would simply mean that more of that money would go to healthcare.

This won’t always be the case, however, because studies have found that medical expenses in retirement, unlike expected lifespan, aren’t highly correlated with health status at the time of retirement.

Retirement timing

At what age are you thinking of retiring?

  • 60 or earlier
  • 62
  • 65
  • 67
  • 70 or later

One of the most important financial decisions you’ll ever make involves the timing of your retirement.

As we noted in our first question, a 60-year-old man in good health could withdraw $2,166 a month from his retirement savings if he retired at age 65. But if he chose to retire at 62, he could withdraw only US$1,846 monthly to ensure that he doesn’t run out of money before he dies. That’s a decrease of 15%.

But what if he loves his job and wants to work until age 70? By working longer, he will be able to take $2,892 a month from his savings. That means his monthly retirement income will be 57% larger than if he retired at 62.

Given the impact of retirement timing on your lifelong income, it’s essential to fully consider the implications of this decision. Many retirees return to work part time, often to make up for income shortfalls. But people might also want to consider working a couple of years longer before retiring.

Social Security

When are you planning on claiming Social Security?

  • 62, or as soon as I can get it
  • 63-64
  • 65-67, or at the “full retirement age”
  • 68-69
  • 70, when I can get the biggest benefit

Social Security claiming is such a complex and consequential decision that nearly everyone could benefit from additional guidance and personalization.

If our 60-year-old man begins collecting Social Security at age 62, his monthly benefit will be US$2,129. If he collects just one year later, at 63, it will increase to US$2,281, a boost of 7%. And if he waits until he’s at full retirement age, or 67, he will receive $3,042, an increase of 43%.

But if he plans on working until he’s 70 and won’t start claiming Social Security until then, he will get his maximum possible benefit of US$3,772 a month, an increase of 77% from what he would get if he started collecting benefits at age 62.

Health also comes into play here. If the 60-year-old is currently in poor health, delaying Social Security might not be the best option, as the bigger monthly benefit is offset by the reduced number of years he is projected to live. He likely would collect more over his lifetime if he started taking Social Security sooner. In contrast, a person in good health should consider delaying claiming Social Security, even if it requires creating a so-called Social Security bridge—using more retirement savings to fund the early years of retirement, until Social Security kicks in.

In addition to health, a person’s claiming strategy could also be influenced by their marital status and the benefit amounts of their partner, highlighting the importance of a personalized claiming strategy. The Social Security Administration’s website offers useful planning guidance.

Risk tolerance

Which risk strategy do you prefer?

  • Low risk: the smallest monthly income and the safest plan
  • Moderate risk: an average income and an average plan
  • High risk: the largest income and the riskiest plan

It’s no surprise that if you spend more each month—drawing down your assets at a faster pace—you also increase your risk of outliving your savings.

But looking at the exact options faced by retirees gives a better sense of the risks of running out of money. If our model retiree wants an extremely safe plan, which gives him only a 1 in 100 chance of outliving his savings, his monthly income from savings would be $1,628, assuming he retires at 65. However, he could sleep well knowing that he’s very unlikely to run out of money.

A more moderate approach to risk, which gives retirees a 1 in 20 chance of running out of money, increases that monthly income by 33%, to $2,166.

And then there’s a riskier strategy, which gives retirees a 1 in 5 chance of outliving their savings. For our man, this leads to a monthly withdrawal of $3,022, which is 86% higher than the safest plan.

There is no right or wrong approach to risk in retirement. There is only the plan that best fits a person’s own risk preferences.

Spending over time

Which spending plan do you prefer?

  • I want to spend more earlier in retirement.
  • I want to spend more later in retirement.
  • I want to spend the same year after year.

Although withdrawing the same amount from savings every month is the only option in the typical retirement-income calculator, I found that many people prefer a personalized spending path that gradually changes over time.

Some people want to spend more earlier in retirement, often because they’re eager to travel while they’re still healthy. Others want to spend more later—they want their income to grow over time, perhaps to ensure they have enough money for possible future medical expenses. (I wrote about these preferences in a previous piece in The Wall Street Journal.)

If our 65-year-old retiree wants to spend more early in retirement, one possible path is to start his monthly income from his retirement savings at $2,809 and gradually decrease it to US$1,818 by the time he is 85. On the other hand, if he wants to spend more later, another possible path would be to start his income at $1,564 and gradually increase it to US$2,489 by the time he is 85.

Bequests

How interested are you in leaving a bequest?

  • Not interested at all
  • Slightly interested
  • Moderately interested
  • Very interested
  • Extremely interested

According to an estimate by researchers at Columbia University and the Federal Reserve, roughly 75% of single retirees are motivated to leave some form of bequest. Of course, the exact size of that bequest can have big consequences for retirement income.

In our model, a man in good health who retires and claims Social Security at 65 and has a moderate risk tolerance can expect to draw down US$2,166 monthly from his US$750,000 of savings if he doesn’t want to leave a bequest.

If he chooses a relatively small bequest—say, US$75,000, or 10% of his retirement assets—his monthly withdrawals would decline by roughly 10%, to $1,936.

If he leaves a bigger bequest of, say, US$250,000, however, his monthly income would decline to US$1,350, which is 38% less than if he made no bequest.

As these questions illustrate, the impact of relatively small changes in any one of a variety of preferences can significantly alter the amount of money you can safely withdraw each month from your retirement savings. Differences in several preferences combined can result in extremely different outcomes.

Consider this combination: A 60-year-old man who wants to maximize his monthly retirement income could retire and take Social Security at 70, opt for a higher-risk drawdown plan and choose to spend more early in retirement. His initial monthly withdrawals from his US$750,000 retirement savings would be US$4,959.

A colleague with the same 401(k) balance could create a very different income stream. If he retired and took Social Security at 62, chose the lowest-risk drawdown plan, decided to increase his income over time and made a $75,000 bequest, his initial monthly income from his retirement savings would be only $761—less than one-sixth of the amount his colleague is taking.

The questions above are only the start of figuring out the right retirement income stream for you. Many retirees might also want to tailor their plan to account for long-term care, or to optimize their withdrawal strategy for tax reasons. Some retirees might have a partial pension or additional spousal considerations.

Unfortunately, we have failed to create an easy process that helps retirees to better personalize their income plans. It’s like being stuck in a shoe store with thousands of options, but there’s no one to help you find a pair that fits. In the 21 century, we can and should create a process that helps Americans save and spend in ways that fit their current financial circumstances and future financial dreams.

Reprinted by permission of The Wall Street Journal, Copyright 2021 Dow Jones & Company. Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Original date of publication: September 11, 2022.



MOST POPULAR
11 ACRES ROAD, KELLYVILLE, NSW

This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan

35 North Street Windsor

Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.

Related Stories
Money
The 7 lasting impacts of COVID for Australian investors
By Bronwyn Allen 29/03/2024
Money
Australia’s February Inflation Comes in Lower Than Expected
By JAMES GLYNN 28/03/2024
Money
Taylor Swift Joins Elon Musk on Global Billionaire Rankings
By Michael Kaminer 27/03/2024
The 7 lasting impacts of COVID for Australian investors

A leading Australian economist says two years on, the long term implications of COVID for the economy have emerged

By Bronwyn Allen
Fri, Mar 29, 2024 3 min

AMP chief economist Dr Shane Oliver says the effects of the pandemic continue to reverberate across the world, with seven key lasting impacts leading to a more fragmented and volatile world for investment returns”.

Perhaps the biggest impact is that the pandemic related stimulus broke the back of the ultra-low inflation seen pre-pandemic,” said Dr Oliver. Together with bigger government and reduced globalisation, this means a more inflation-prone world. So, a return to pre-pandemic ultra-low inflation and interest rates looks unlikely.

Here is a summary of Dr Oliver’s explanation of the seven key lasting impacts of COVID for investors.

1. Bigger government

The pandemic added to support for bigger government by showcasing the power of government to protect households and businesses from shocks, enhancing perceptions of inequality, and adding support to the view that governments should ensure supply chains by bringing production back home. IMF projections for government spending in advanced countries show it settling nearly 2 percent of GDP higher than pre-COVID levels.

Implications for investors: likely to be less productive economies, lower than otherwise living standards and less personal freedom.

2. Tighter labour markets and faster wages growth

After the pandemic, labour markets have tightened reflecting the rebound in demand post-pandemic, lower participation rates in some countries and a degree of labour hoarding as labour shortages made companies reluctant to let workers go. As a result, wages growth increased, possibly breaking the pre-pandemic malaise of weak wages growth.

Implications for investors: Tighter labour markets run the risk that wages growth exceeds levels consistent with two to three percent inflation.

3. Reduced globalisation

A backlash against globalisation became evident last decade in the rise of Trump, Brexit and populist leaders. Also, geopolitical tensions were on the rise with the relative decline of the US and faith in liberal democracies waning ... The pandemic inflamed both with supply side disruptions adding to pressure for the onshoring of production [and] heightened tensions between the west and China we are seeing more protectionism (e.g.,with subsidies and regulation favouring local production) and increased defence spending.

Implications for investors: Reduced globalisation risks leading to reduced potential economic growth for the emerging world and reduced productivity if supply chains are managed on other than economic grounds.

4. Higher prices, inflation and interest rates

Inflation [due to stimulus payments to households and supply chain disruptions] is now starting to come under control but the pandemic has likely ushered in a more inflation-prone world by boosting bigger government, adding to a reversal in globalisation and adding to geopolitical tensions. All of which combine with ageing populations to potentially result in higher rates of inflation.

Implications for investors: Higher inflation than seen pre-pandemic means higher than otherwise interest rates over the medium term, which reduces the upside potential for growth assets like shares and property.

5. Worsening housing affordability

the lockdowns and working from home drove increased demand for houses over units and interest in smaller cities and regional locations. As a result, Australian home prices surged to record levels. Meanwhile, the impact of higher interest rates in the last two years on home prices was swamped by housing shortages as immigration surged in a catch-up. The end result is now record low levels of housing affordability for buyers

Implications for investors: Ever worse housing affordability means ongoing intergenerational inequality and even higher household debt.

6. Working from home

There are huge benefits to physically working together around culture, collaboration, idea generation and learning but there are also benefits to working from home with no commute time, greater focus, less damage to the environment, better life balance and for companies lower costs, more diverse workforces and happier staff. So the ideal is probably a hybrid model.

Implications for investors: Less office space demand as leases expire resulting in higher vacancy rates/lower rents, more people living in cities as vacated office space is converted, and reinvigorated life in suburbs and regions.

7. Faster embrace of technology

Lockdowns dramatically accelerated the move to a digital world. Many have now embraced online retail, working from home and virtual meetings. It may be argued that this fuller embrace of technology will enable the full productivity-enhancing potential of technology to be unleashed. The rapid adoption of AI will likely help.

Implications for investors: a faster embrace of online retailing at the expense of traditional retailing, virtual meeting attendance becoming the norm for many and business travel settling at a lower level.

MOST POPULAR
11 ACRES ROAD, KELLYVILLE, NSW

This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan

Consumers are going to gravitate toward applications powered by the buzzy new technology, analyst Michael Wolf predicts

Related Stories
Lifestyle
‘Look Them in the Eye.’ As Maui Rebuilds, Returning Tourists Need to Be Mindful of the Trauma, Says Cultural Advisor.
By DANIELLE BERNABE 19/03/2024
Money
The Stocks Investors Are Putting Under the Tree
By HARDIKA SINGH 04/12/2023
Property
Australian construction and property industries tackle modern slavery
By KANEBRIDGE NEWS 25/03/2024
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop