More millionaires call New York City home than anywhere else in the world, according to a report from international wealth migration specialists Henley & Partners.
The Big Apple, which has seen its high-net-worth population jump by 48% over the past decade, is home to 349,500 millionaires, 744 centi-millionaires—those with liquid investable wealth of over US$100 million—and 60 billionaires, according to the firm, which collaborated with data intelligence firm New World Wealth for the analysis.
The city also ranked as the top spot for millionaires last year.
California’s Bay Area, encompassing San Francisco and the tech-mecca of Silicon Valley, ranked second. Wealth in the Bay Area has grown at one of the fastest rates in the world, increasing its number of wealthy citizens by a sizeable 82% over the past decade. It’s now home to 305,700 millionaires, 675 centi-millionaires, and 68 billionaires.
New York and the Bay Area were among 11 areas in the U.S. on the top 50 ranking, making the country the world’s foremost hub of moneyed residents.
Across the pond, London, which ranked as the wealthiest city in the world for many years, tumbled down the ranking, and now sits in fifth place with just 227,000 millionaires, 370 centi-millionaires, and 35 billionaires, a decline of 10% over the past decade, said the report, which was released earlier this week.
Cities with the fastest growing wealth, meanwhile, can be found in China.
Shenzhen’s wealthy population is snowballing most, with their numbers surging by 140% in the last 10 years, the report said.
“Hangzhou has also experienced a massive 125% increase in its [high-net-worth] residents, and Guangzhou’s millionaires have grown by 110% over the past decade,” said Andrew Amoils, head of research at New World Wealth, in the report.
Looking ahead, when it comes to wealth growth potential over the next decade, “cities to watch include Bengaluru, India; Scottsdale, Arizona; and Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam,” he added. “All three have enjoyed exceptional growth rates of over 100% in their resident millionaire populations over the past 10 years.”
Underpinning the growth of the world’s wealthiest cities has been the robust performance of financial markets of late, from the S&P 500 to Bitcoin, according to Juerg Steffen, CEO of Henley & Partners.
Plus, “rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, robotics, and blockchain technology have provided new opportunities for wealth creation and accumulation,” Steffen said. “Yet, even as new opportunities emerge, old risks persist. The war in Ukraine, which has seen Moscow’s millionaire population plummet by 24% to 30,300, is a stark reminder of the fragility of wealth in an uncertain and unstable world.”
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
When will Berkshire Hathaway stop selling Bank of America stock?
Berkshire began liquidating its big stake in the banking company in mid-July—and has already unloaded about 15% of its interest. The selling has been fairly aggressive and has totaled about $6 billion. (Berkshire still holds 883 million shares, an 11.3% interest worth $35 billion based on its most recent filing on Aug. 30.)
The selling has prompted speculation about when CEO Warren Buffett, who oversees Berkshire’s $300 billion equity portfolio, will stop. The sales have depressed Bank of America stock, which has underperformed peers since Berkshire began its sell program. The stock closed down 0.9% Thursday at $40.14.
It’s possible that Berkshire will stop selling when the stake drops to 700 million shares. Taxes and history would be the reasons why.
Berkshire accumulated its Bank of America stake in two stages—and at vastly different prices. Berkshire’s initial stake came in 2017 , when it swapped $5 billion of Bank of America preferred stock for 700 million shares of common stock via warrants it received as part of the original preferred investment in 2011.
Berkshire got a sweet deal in that 2011 transaction. At the time, Bank of America was looking for a Buffett imprimatur—and the bank’s stock price was weak and under $10 a share.
Berkshire paid about $7 a share for that initial stake of 700 million common shares. The rest of the Berkshire stake, more than 300 million shares, was mostly purchased in 2018 at around $30 a share.
With Bank of America stock currently trading around $40, Berkshire faces a high tax burden from selling shares from the original stake of 700 million shares, given the low cost basis, and a much lighter tax hit from unloading the rest. Berkshire is subject to corporate taxes—an estimated 25% including local taxes—on gains on any sales of stock. The tax bite is stark.
Berkshire might own $2 to $3 a share in taxes on sales of high-cost stock and $8 a share on low-cost stock purchased for $7 a share.
New York tax expert Robert Willens says corporations, like individuals, can specify the particular lots when they sell stock with multiple cost levels.
“If stock is held in the custody of a broker, an adequate identification is made if the taxpayer specifies to the broker having custody of the stock the particular stock to be sold and, within a reasonable time thereafter, confirmation of such specification is set forth in a written document from the broker,” Willens told Barron’s in an email.
He assumes that Berkshire will identify the high-cost Bank of America stock for the recent sales to minimize its tax liability.
If sellers don’t specify, they generally are subject to “first in, first out,” or FIFO, accounting, meaning that the stock bought first would be subject to any tax on gains.
Buffett tends to be tax-averse—and that may prompt him to keep the original stake of 700 million shares. He could also mull any loyalty he may feel toward Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan , whom Buffett has praised in the past.
Another reason for Berkshire to hold Bank of America is that it’s the company’s only big equity holding among traditional banks after selling shares of U.S. Bancorp , Bank of New York Mellon , JPMorgan Chase , and Wells Fargo in recent years.
Buffett, however, often eliminates stock holdings after he begins selling them down, as he did with the other bank stocks. Berkshire does retain a smaller stake of about $3 billion in Citigroup.
There could be a new filing on sales of Bank of America stock by Berkshire on Thursday evening. It has been three business days since the last one.
Berkshire must file within two business days of any sales of Bank of America stock since it owns more than 10%. The conglomerate will need to get its stake under about 777 million shares, about 100 million below the current level, before it can avoid the two-day filing rule.
It should be said that taxes haven’t deterred Buffett from selling over half of Berkshire’s stake in Apple this year—an estimated $85 billion or more of stock. Barron’s has estimated that Berkshire may owe $15 billion on the bulk of the sales that occurred in the second quarter.
Berkshire now holds 400 million shares of Apple and Barron’s has argued that Buffett may be finished reducing the Apple stake at that round number, which is the same number of shares that Berkshire has held in Coca-Cola for more than two decades.
Buffett may like round numbers—and 700 million could be just the right figure for Bank of America.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.