Stocks Are Wobbling. Follow These 3 Rules for Better Returns.
3 min
Suddenly, stocks look shaky. After briefly touching 40,000 earlier this month, the Dow has since shed more than 1,000 points, as worries flare about where interest rates are headed next . The index posted another loss on Wednesday, down 411 points, or 1.06%, to 38,442.
While volatility can be frustrating. It has always been part of the two-steps forward, one-step back nature of the stock market. So keep in mind: Stocks may still have room to run , and they perform their best when investors feel least confident.
Here are three smart rules for interpreting the current market culled from new stock research.
Don’t assume the market is in a bubble
Anytime the market hits a new high, then pulls back sharply, it’s natural to wonder: Could it be all downhill from here? It isn’t an idle concern. Even after the recent dip, stocks are trading at more than 25 times trailing 12-month earnings, their highest level since 2021, according to FactSet.
Still, investors shouldn’t necessarily assume the market has become irrational, suggests a recent note by Leuthold Group, a stock research firm known for compiling dozens of bespoke indicators to measure market sentiment.
Leuthold recently compared large capitalisation stock prices to four separate valuation thresholds it thinks mark out bubble territory.
The results? This year, prices have approached three of these thresholds—one focused on forecast earnings, one based on average earnings and one based on cash flow. But after getting close, stocks didn’t blow through these thresholds as might be expected during a bubble. Instead, they stalled or pulled back. “‘Resistance’ proves formidable,” the firm concluded, citing a term common in technical analysis.
The fourth valuation threshold, which Leuthold calls “P/E on trailing peak GAAP EPS” has yet to be reached. The indicator compares stock prices not to companies’ most recent earnings, but to the market’s record for earnings, in this case set in the first quarter of 2022.
While stocks are trading at 25 times their peak earnings—a very high figure by historical standards—they are still below the 30 times level Leuthold thinks signals bubble territory. The upshot: “We don’t think U.S. large caps quite qualify as a mania,” writes Chief Investment Officer Doug Ramsey.
Don’t sweat the short-term
It’s natural after a short, sharp pullback to worry where the market is headed next. But trying to make short-term market calls is usually a fool’s errand, according to Trivariate Research, another investment firm.
Trivariate recently tested more than two dozen stock market metrics it says are commonly used to predict short-term stock market declines. These indicators included the S&P 500 put-to-call ratio, mutual fund flows, the futures-based VIX fear gauge, the price of oil and more.
The results were “terrible,” according to the firm. “The factors’ large loss predictions were correct at about the same rate as random selection,” Trivariate said in its note.
The firm found that during many months when signals like the VIX and the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Indicators Index predicted a big drop, the market actually showed bigger-than-average gains. The indicators were signalling volatility not declines, the firm noted.
In another test, a model that Trivariate built based on several other indicators also wasn’t much help either. When the model predicted a large stock market loss, defined as a 2.5% monthly drop, the decline failed to materialise 60% of the time.
Do embrace the uncertainty
While uncertainty isn’t always comfortable, it can be to investors’ advantage. If you are willing to run with it.
Retired Wall Street economist Jim Paulsen points to a metric known as the Monetary Policy Uncertainty Index , which tallies newspaper reports and other data to measure uncertainty about what the Fed will do next.
Since 1985 the index has averaged just under 100, but since 2020 it has been elevated most of the time. It’s currently at 144, a higher level than during about 80% of its history.
Still, Paulsen argues this is good news. He compares the Fed’s Jerome Powell era, where the index has averaged 110, to eras of three earlier Fed Chairs: Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Alan Greenspan, where it averaged about 75.
Investors have been rewarded for enduring the lack of clarity. The S&P 500 has posted average annual returns of more than 12% during Powell’s term, compared with less than 10% under his three predecessors, according to the note.
“All investors long for clarity,” Paulsen writes. “But the stock market never does that well when you and I are comfortable. The great bulk of the returns generated by the stock market typically occur when most are still in their bunkers waiting for conditions to improve.”
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
When will Berkshire Hathaway stop selling Bank of America stock?
3 minBerkshire began liquidating its big stake in the banking company in mid-July—and has already unloaded about 15% of its interest. The selling has been fairly aggressive and has totaled about $6 billion. (Berkshire still holds 883 million shares, an 11.3% interest worth $35 billion based on its most recent filing on Aug. 30.)
The selling has prompted speculation about when CEO Warren Buffett, who oversees Berkshire’s $300 billion equity portfolio, will stop. The sales have depressed Bank of America stock, which has underperformed peers since Berkshire began its sell program. The stock closed down 0.9% Thursday at $40.14.
It’s possible that Berkshire will stop selling when the stake drops to 700 million shares. Taxes and history would be the reasons why.
Berkshire accumulated its Bank of America stake in two stages—and at vastly different prices. Berkshire’s initial stake came in 2017 , when it swapped $5 billion of Bank of America preferred stock for 700 million shares of common stock via warrants it received as part of the original preferred investment in 2011.
Berkshire got a sweet deal in that 2011 transaction. At the time, Bank of America was looking for a Buffett imprimatur—and the bank’s stock price was weak and under $10 a share.
Berkshire paid about $7 a share for that initial stake of 700 million common shares. The rest of the Berkshire stake, more than 300 million shares, was mostly purchased in 2018 at around $30 a share.
With Bank of America stock currently trading around $40, Berkshire faces a high tax burden from selling shares from the original stake of 700 million shares, given the low cost basis, and a much lighter tax hit from unloading the rest. Berkshire is subject to corporate taxes—an estimated 25% including local taxes—on gains on any sales of stock. The tax bite is stark.
Berkshire might own $2 to $3 a share in taxes on sales of high-cost stock and $8 a share on low-cost stock purchased for $7 a share.
New York tax expert Robert Willens says corporations, like individuals, can specify the particular lots when they sell stock with multiple cost levels.
“If stock is held in the custody of a broker, an adequate identification is made if the taxpayer specifies to the broker having custody of the stock the particular stock to be sold and, within a reasonable time thereafter, confirmation of such specification is set forth in a written document from the broker,” Willens told Barron’s in an email.
He assumes that Berkshire will identify the high-cost Bank of America stock for the recent sales to minimize its tax liability.
If sellers don’t specify, they generally are subject to “first in, first out,” or FIFO, accounting, meaning that the stock bought first would be subject to any tax on gains.
Buffett tends to be tax-averse—and that may prompt him to keep the original stake of 700 million shares. He could also mull any loyalty he may feel toward Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan , whom Buffett has praised in the past.
Another reason for Berkshire to hold Bank of America is that it’s the company’s only big equity holding among traditional banks after selling shares of U.S. Bancorp , Bank of New York Mellon , JPMorgan Chase , and Wells Fargo in recent years.
Buffett, however, often eliminates stock holdings after he begins selling them down, as he did with the other bank stocks. Berkshire does retain a smaller stake of about $3 billion in Citigroup.
There could be a new filing on sales of Bank of America stock by Berkshire on Thursday evening. It has been three business days since the last one.
Berkshire must file within two business days of any sales of Bank of America stock since it owns more than 10%. The conglomerate will need to get its stake under about 777 million shares, about 100 million below the current level, before it can avoid the two-day filing rule.
It should be said that taxes haven’t deterred Buffett from selling over half of Berkshire’s stake in Apple this year—an estimated $85 billion or more of stock. Barron’s has estimated that Berkshire may owe $15 billion on the bulk of the sales that occurred in the second quarter.
Berkshire now holds 400 million shares of Apple and Barron’s has argued that Buffett may be finished reducing the Apple stake at that round number, which is the same number of shares that Berkshire has held in Coca-Cola for more than two decades.
Buffett may like round numbers—and 700 million could be just the right figure for Bank of America.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
