Australian shoppers adopt new strategy for Boxing Day sales
The thrill of bargain shopping is no longer the strongest draw for the post Christmas sales period
The thrill of bargain shopping is no longer the strongest draw for the post Christmas sales period
Cost of living pressures are expected to impact Boxing Day sales with more Australians planning to spend less, new consumer research shows.
The survey conducted on behalf of the Commonwealth Bank showed almost one in two people, or 49 percent of Australians, expect to spend during the annual post Christmas sale period, up from 42 percent last year and 40 percent in 2021. However, the average planned spend this year is expected to be $475.70, or $4.6bn nationally, down from $483.20 in 2022 and $557.05 in 2021.
People under the age of 39 are most likely to spend over this period as they use the sales to buy necessities, CBA chief economist Stephen Hlamarick said.
“The increase we’ve seen in spending at discount and variety stores in November is partly explained by Christmas and holiday shopping with discretionary spend up 1.9 percent,” he said. “However, people are also using the sales to stock up on essentials – with essential spending edging up 0.3 per cent.
“Essential spending usually falls after the “gift giving” period. However, given consumers are clearly seeking sales bargains for both essential and discretionary items, Boxing Day sales could also see a similar trend with a larger share of essential spending.”
CBA personal finance expert Jess Irvine said it was important for shoppers to have a plan before heading out.
“For anyone planning to use Boxing Day as an opportunity to bag a bargain, it is important to have a clear plan in advance of which items you plan to purchase. Write a list and stick to it to limit impulse purchases” said Ms Irvine.
“A good rule of thumb is that if the first time it occurs to you to purchase something is during a sale period, you probably don’t need it.
“If you are stocking up, make sure to do your research and check first for any cashback offers that may be available for that retailer.
She also warned to be wary of suspicious text messages or online scams.
“Stay scam aware when shopping, as scammers are known to be more active during sales periods,” Ms Irvine said. “Always remember to remain cautious, especially at this busy time of year, and stop, check and reject any suspicious websites or text messages.”
Ophora Tallawong has launched its final release of quality apartments priced under $700,000.
From bushland greens to valley reds, the country’s most awarded designers are proving that the best colour palette was never on a swatch card; it was outside the window all along.
The federal budget has rattled property investors. But the biggest mistake isn’t the tax changes, it’s the conclusion many are drawing from them.
The recent budget has forced a reckoning for property investors.
Negative gearing now restricted to new residential builds, the CGT discount gone and on paper, the numbers look different.
And many investors are responding by pivoting toward yield, prioritising cash flow over capital growth in a way that property strategists say misses the point entirely.
“The debate has shifted to yield versus growth as if they are opposing forces,” says Abdullah Nouh, founder of Melbourne-based buyers’ agency Mecca Property Group. “But that framing is itself the mistake.”
Nouh, who works with high-net-worth families and investors on long-term acquisition strategy, argues that capital growth remains the primary driver of genuine wealth creation and that the post-budget environment has made quality assets more important, not less.
The numbers make his case plainly. An additional $500 per week in rental income is welcome. A prestige asset appreciating by $1 million over a market cycle is transformative.
These are not equivalent outcomes, and portfolios built around yield at the expense of location and land value tend to generate income while wealth stands largely still.
The more nuanced shift Nouh is seeing among sophisticated investors is a move toward assets where both outcomes can be engineered simultaneously – established homes on substantial land in quality locations, where the existing dwelling can be repositioned, rental returns improved, and the underlying land value compounds independent of what sits on it.
For investors with existing equity, commercial property is also entering the conversation in a more serious way.
Prestige industrial assets, medical centres and long-leased essential retail offer income profiles that residential property in most capital city markets cannot currently match: longer lease terms, tenants covering outgoings, and greater predictability than the residential tenancy cycle.
“The investors who build lasting wealth are rarely the ones who chased yield or growth exclusively,” says Nouh.
“They are the ones who built a strategy they could sustain – one that generated enough income to hold quality assets through multiple cycles while those assets compounded in value.”
The budget has changed the settings. It has not changed the fundamentals.
Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.
From citrus oils to warming spices, the classic G&T is being reimagined at home as a more thoughtful, seasonal ritual for modern entertaining.