China Increases Bond Issuance to Help Its Economy
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,652,125 (+0.36%)       Melbourne $1,015,932 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $1,056,185 (+0.90%)       Adelaide $949,564 (-0.31%)       Perth $930,113 (-0.43%)       Hobart $758,047 (-0.12%)       Darwin $770,874 (+0.08%)       Canberra $974,828 (+1.29%)       National $1,080,843 (+0.32%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $773,554 (-0.54%)       Melbourne $476,399 (-0.13%)       Brisbane $647,991 (+0.62%)       Adelaide $518,665 (+5.34%)       Perth $529,479 (+0.45%)       Hobart $532,297 (+1.33%)       Darwin $383,399 (-0.28%)       Canberra $503,041 (-0.52%)       National $567,716 (+0.54%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 12,442 (+293)       Melbourne 15,352 (+169)       Brisbane 8,617 (-52)       Adelaide 2,903 (+8)       Perth 7,845 (+199)       Hobart 1,292 (+64)       Darwin 178 (-2)       Canberra 1,222 (-28)       National 49,851 (+651)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,437 (+198)       Melbourne 6,911 (+35)       Brisbane 1,658 (-47)       Adelaide 431 (+6)       Perth 1,719 (+11)       Hobart 228 (+4)       Darwin 285 (+1)       Canberra 1,195 (+24)       National 21,864 (+232)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $795 (-$5)       Melbourne $590 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $630 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $575 (+$8)       Darwin $790 (-$10)       Canberra $700 ($0)       National $688 (-$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $730 ($0)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $620 (-$5)       Adelaide $520 ($0)       Perth $650 ($0)       Hobart $490 ($0)       Darwin $560 (+$10)       Canberra $570 ($0)       National $601 (+$)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,996 (-7)       Melbourne 7,677 (+16)       Brisbane 3,782 (-11)       Adelaide 1,351 (+11)       Perth 2,134 (+95)       Hobart 234 (0)       Darwin 106 (-5)       Canberra 573 (+7)       National 21,853 (+106)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 7,911 (-78)       Melbourne 5,695 (-60)       Brisbane 1,735 (-76)       Adelaide 345 (+11)       Perth 693 (+44)       Hobart 95 (-6)       Darwin 121 (-15)       Canberra 520 (-15)       National 17,115 (-195)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.50% (↓)     Melbourne 3.02% (↑)        Brisbane 3.20% (↓)     Adelaide 3.45% (↑)      Perth 3.91% (↑)      Hobart 3.94% (↑)        Darwin 5.33% (↓)       Canberra 3.73% (↓)       National 3.31% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 4.91% (↑)      Melbourne 6.55% (↑)        Brisbane 4.98% (↓)       Adelaide 5.21% (↓)       Perth 6.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.79% (↓)     Darwin 7.60% (↑)      Canberra 5.89% (↑)        National 5.50% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.0% (↑)      Melbourne 1.9% (↑)      Brisbane 1.4% (↑)      Adelaide 1.3% (↑)      Perth 1.2% (↑)      Hobart 1.0% (↑)      Darwin 1.6% (↑)      Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National 1.7% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.4% (↑)      Melbourne 3.8% (↑)      Brisbane 2.0% (↑)      Adelaide 1.1% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.4% (↑)      Darwin 2.8% (↑)      Canberra 2.9% (↑)      National 2.2% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 26.6 (↑)        Melbourne 27.2 (↓)       Brisbane 27.1 (↓)       Adelaide 23.6 (↓)       Perth 32.7 (↓)       Hobart 25.3 (↓)     Darwin 27.6 (↑)      Canberra 26.9 (↑)        National 27.1 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 24.0 (↑)        Melbourne 26.2 (↓)     Brisbane 26.5 (↑)        Adelaide 22.0 (↓)       Perth 34.7 (↓)     Hobart 23.8 (↑)      Darwin 33.6 (↑)        Canberra 29.4 (↓)     National 27.5 (↑)            
Share Button

China Increases Bond Issuance to Help Its Economy

Move to fund infrastructure projects comes alongside unusual increase of budget-deficit target

By Stella Yifan Xie and Lingling Wei
Wed, Oct 25, 2023 11:05amGrey Clock 3 min

China ramped up efforts to stimulate its beleaguered economy, issuing additional sovereign bonds and raising its budget-deficit target, the first time it revised its budget outside the regular legislative session in more than a decade.

The country’s top legislative body approved on Tuesday a plan to raise 1 trillion yuan, equivalent to around $137 billion, in additional sovereign debt, half for use before the end of this year and half for next year, according to the official Xinhua News Agency. Policy makers said the bond issuance was intended for infrastructure projects in the wake of severe flooding and other natural disasters, Xinhua reported.

The latest stimulus, which follows a flurry of piecemeal measures such as interest-rate cuts and the lowering of mortgage costs for home buyers, signals that Beijing continues to worry about the weakness of the economic rebound it had counted on after doing away with all pandemic restrictions.

Part of the problem is a mounting debt burden for local governments in more areas of the country and a real-estate crisis that shows little sign of abating. Beijing has so far avoided offering support to households to help the economy transition into one more driven by consumption, in large part because of leader Xi Jinping’s focus on ideology and reluctance to resort to handouts to consumers.

While many economists puzzled over the timing of the announcement as growth in recent weeks has appeared to stabilize, they viewed the new debt issuance as incremental in nature and said it wouldn’t be enough to reverse longstanding headwinds for the economy such as a lack of demand from businesses and consumers.

The 1 trillion yuan of sovereign bonds make up less than 1% of China’s gross domestic product. By comparison, the stimulus China launched in the 2008 global financial crisis accounted for more than 12% of its GDP at the time.

“It’s certainly not a game changer,” said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie Group. “But it confirms that the overall policy stance stays supportive given the recovery is still fragile.”

Some economists say the stimulus bill sent an unusual signal that the central government is willing to shoulder responsibility in funding infrastructure projects, after leaving the task to local governments for much of the past few decades.

The Wall Street Journal reported in June that policy makers weighed issuing around 1 trillion yuan in special treasury bonds to help indebted local governments and prop up business confidence. The policy proposal didn’t get approved at the time by Xi, who has centralized decision-making. In the top leader’s view, austerity is preferred over stimulus, according to people close to Beijing’s policy-making process.

But the heavy flooding this summer displaced millions of people and further strained finances in northeast China, especially the province of Hebei that neighbors Beijing. Public anger flared up following the losses caused by the flood.

The decision to help the disaster-struck regions was made at a high-level meeting presided over by Xi in August, according to Tuesday’s Xinhua article.

Much of the new debt raised will be used to help with reconstruction after recent flooding, improve urban drainage and help fend off other natural disasters, according to the plan that was approved by the standing committee of the National People’s Congress this week, Xinhua said.

As a result, China’s official fiscal deficit, which doesn’t count special bonds issued by local governments, will rise to 3.8% of GDP, up from the 3% ceiling set by the government in March.

While the fresh stimulus should help China maintain 10% growth in infrastructure investments for the remainder of the year, according to Hu from Macquarie Group, it falls short of the type of stimulus that economists say China desperately needs: direct or indirect transfer of wealth to households to boost consumption.

Chinese officials last week reported a stronger-than-expected 4.9% on-year growth in the third quarter, a result that will likely ensure China will hit around 5% growth this year as desired, dimming the prospect for Beijing to unleash more relief measures urgently, economists said.

China last changed its budget outside the legislative session in 2008, when officials said they planned to spend 1 trillion yuan in funds raised through local government funding, bank loans, donations from residents and other channels to rebuild areas devastated by the Sichuan earthquake. Later that year, Beijing announced a stimulus package it billed as totaling $586 billion to bolster domestic demand and help avert a global recession.

“It is rare for the central government’s fiscal plans to be revised outside the usual budget cycle, so this move signals clear concern about near-term growth,” economists from Capital Economics said in a note to clients.

The funding gap for local officials has been exacerbated by the bursting property bubble, since local governments long have counted on land sales as a source of revenue, said Wei Yao, chief Asia economist at Société Générale.

“At minimum, Beijing recognized that local governments face structural fiscal constraints,” she said. “That’s a pretty big deal.”



MOST POPULAR

With the debut of DeepSeek’s buzzy chatbot and updates to others, we tried applying the technology—and a little human common sense—to the most mind-melting aspect of home cooking: weekly meal planning.

An intriguing new holiday home concept is emerging for high net worth Australians. 

Related Stories
Money
Health Is Wealth When Tariffs Are Denting Profit Forecasts
By JACOB SONENSHINE 18/03/2025
Money
CEOs Face More Accountability When a Board Member Has Military Experience
By Lisa Ward 17/03/2025
Money
Wall Street Wants You to Buy Gold. It’s Still Risky.
By KARISHMA VANJANI 14/03/2025
Health Is Wealth When Tariffs Are Denting Profit Forecasts
By JACOB SONENSHINE
Tue, Mar 18, 2025 3 min

President Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on trading partners have moved analysts to reduce forecasts for U.S. companies. Many stocks look vulnerable to declines, while some seem relatively immune.

Since the start of the year, analysts’ expectations for aggregate first-quarter sales of S&P 500 component companies have dropped about 0.4%, according to FactSet. The hundreds of billions of dollars worth of imports from China, Mexico, and Canada the Trump administration is placing tariffs on, including metals and basic materials for retail and food sellers, will raise costs for U.S. companies. That will force them to lift prices, reducing the number of goods and services they’ll sell to consumers and businesses.

This outlook has pressured first-quarter earnings estimates by 3.8%. Companies will cut back on marketing and perhaps labour, but many have substantial fixed expenses that can’t easily be reduced, such as depreciation and interest to lenders. Profit margins will drop in the face of lower revenue, thus weighing on profit estimates. The estimates dropped mildly in January, and then picked up steam in February, just after the initial tariff announcements.

“We are starting to see the first instances of analysts cutting numbers on tariff impacts,” writes Citi strategist Scott Chronert.

The reductions aren’t concentrated in one sector; they’re widespread, a concrete indication that the downward revisions are partly related to tariffs, which affect many sectors. The percentage of all analyst earnings-estimate revisions in March for S&P 500 companies that have been downward this year has been 60.1%, according to Citi, worse than the historical average of 53.5% for March.

The consumer-discretionary sector has seen just over 62% of March revisions to be lower, almost 10 percentage points worse than the historical average. The aggregate first-quarter earnings expectation for all consumer-discretionary companies in the S&P 500 has dropped 11% since the start of the year.

That could hurt the stocks going forward, even though the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded fund has already dropped 11% for the year. The declines have been led by Tesla and Amazon.com , which account for trillions of dollars of market value and comprise a large portion of the fund. The average name in the fund is down about 4% this year, so there could easily be more downside.

That’s especially true because another slew of downward earnings revisions look likely. Analysts have barely changed their full-year 2025 sales projections for the consumer-discretionary sector, and have lowered full-year earnings by only 2%, even though they’ve more dramatically reduced first-quarter forecasts. The current expectation calls for a sharp increase in quarterly sales and earnings from the first quarter through the rest of the year, but that’s unrealistic, assuming tariffs remain in place for the rest of the year.

“The relative estimate achievability of the consumer discretionary earnings are below average,” Trivariate Research’s Adam Parker wrote in a report.

That makes these stocks look still too expensive—and vulnerable to declines. The consumer-discretionary ETF trades at 21.2 times expected earnings for this year, but if those expectations tumble as much as they have for the first quarter, then the fund’s current price/earnings multiple looks closer to 25 times. That’s too high, given that it’s where the multiple was before markets began reflecting ongoing risk to earnings from tariffs and any continued economic consequences. So, another drop in earnings estimates would drag these consumer stocks down even further.

Industrials are in a similar position. Many of them make equipment and machines that would become more costly to import. The sector has seen about two thirds of March earnings revisions move downward, about 13 percentage points worse that the historical average. Analysts have lowered first-quarter-earnings estimates by 6%, but only 3% for the full year, suggesting that more tariff-related downward revisions are likely for the rest of the year.

That would weigh on the stocks. The Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF is about flat for the year but would look more expensive than it is today if earnings estimates drop more. The stocks face a high probability of downside from here.

The stocks to own are the “defensive” ones, those that are unlikely to see much tariff-related earnings impact, namely healthcare. Demand for drugs and insurance is much sturdier versus less essential goods and services when consumers have less money to spend. The Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF has produced a 6% gain this year.

That’s supported by earnings trends that are just fine. First-quarter earnings estimates have even ticked slightly higher this year. These stocks should remain relatively strong as long as analysts continue to forecast stable, albeit mild, sales and earnings growth for the coming few years.

“This leads us to recommend healthcare and disfavour consumer discretionary,” Parker writes.

MOST POPULAR

Architect Mark Rios and his husband, Dr. Guy Ringler, spent 18 months renovating the house, which was originally designed by John Elgin Woolf.

Renovations in Yorkshire included the revamp of a 30-room wing where a descendant of the estate’s builder still lives.

Related Stories
Money
China Pumps Up Support for Country’s Stock Markets
By TRACY QU 23/01/2025
Property of the Week
Property of the Week: 26-27 Olola Rd, Vaucluse
By KIRSTEN CRAZE 13/12/2024
Money
Wall Street Wants You to Buy Gold. It’s Still Risky.
By KARISHMA VANJANI 14/03/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop