Rising Interest Rates Mean Deficits Finally Matter
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,702,906 (-1.01%)       Melbourne $1,027,687 (-0.43%)       Brisbane $1,188,506 (-1.17%)       Adelaide $1,040,164 (-1.83%)       Perth $1,093,053 (-0.29%)       Hobart $848,961 (-0.09%)       Darwin $857,095 (-2.30%)       Canberra $982,629 (-1.33%)       National Capitals $1,151,606 (-1.04%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $794,268 (-0.20%)       Melbourne $545,029 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $775,077 (-0.34%)       Adelaide $575,261 (-0.26%)       Perth $641,686 (-0.65%)       Hobart $577,016 (+0.45%)       Darwin $463,462 (-0.22%)       Canberra $480,245 (-3.79%)       National Capitals $628,545 (-0.43%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,829 (-23)       Melbourne 16,088 (-233)       Brisbane 9,659 (+311)       Adelaide 3,284 (+43)       Perth 8,149 (+103)       Hobart 705 (-20)       Darwin 165 (+3)       Canberra 1,168 (+13)       National Capitals 53,047 (+197)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,436 (-87)       Melbourne 6,839 (-122)       Brisbane 2,104 (+7)       Adelaide 566 (+5)       Perth 1,567 (+10)       Hobart 161 (-6)       Darwin 222 (+1)       Canberra 1,230 (-9)       National Capitals 22,125 (-201)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $870 (-$5)       Melbourne $620 ($0)       Brisbane $700 (-$10)       Adelaide $670 (+$5)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $613 (-$8)       Darwin $850 ($0)       Canberra $750 ($0)       National Capitals $739 (-$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $840 (-$10)       Melbourne $630 ($0)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $560 (-$10)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $538 (-$8)       Darwin $650 ($0)       Canberra $595 (-$5)       National Capitals $661 (-$4)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,441 (-57)       Melbourne 7,404 (-61)       Brisbane 3,528 (-127)       Adelaide 1,303 (-91)       Perth 2,272 (-1)       Hobart 230 (-17)       Darwin 47 (+6)       Canberra 474 (+4)       National Capitals 21,699 (-344)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,223 (-38)       Melbourne 6,146 (-118)       Brisbane 1,994 (-28)       Adelaide 409 (-9)       Perth 799 (-18)       Hobart 78 (+6)       Darwin 89 (+20)       Canberra 765 (+2)       National Capitals 20,503 (-183)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.66% (↑)      Melbourne 3.14% (↑)        Brisbane 3.06% (↓)     Adelaide 3.35% (↑)      Perth 3.57% (↑)        Hobart 3.75% (↓)     Darwin 5.16% (↑)      Canberra 3.97% (↑)      National Capitals 3.34% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.50% (↓)     Melbourne 6.01% (↑)      Brisbane 4.56% (↑)        Adelaide 5.06% (↓)     Perth 5.67% (↑)        Hobart 4.84% (↓)     Darwin 7.29% (↑)      Canberra 6.44% (↑)        National Capitals 5.47% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 36.5 (↑)      Melbourne 35.4 (↑)        Brisbane 37.5 (↓)     Adelaide 29.0 (↑)      Perth 42.3 (↑)        Hobart 30.9 (↓)     Darwin 30.1 (↑)        Canberra 34.3 (↓)     National Capitals 34.5 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 33.6 (↑)      Melbourne 30.7 (↑)      Brisbane 36.2 (↑)      Adelaide 29.0 (↑)        Perth 39.0 (↓)       Hobart 26.4 (↓)     Darwin 33.1 (↑)      Canberra 38.9 (↑)      National Capitals 33.4 (↑)            
Share Button

Rising Interest Rates Mean Deficits Finally Matter

Investors ignored deficits when inflation was low. Now they are paying attention and getting worried.

By GREG IP
Mon, Oct 9, 2023 9:17amGrey Clock 4 min

The U.S. has long been the lender of last resort to the world. During the emerging-market panics of the 1990s, the global financial crisis of 2007-09 and the pandemic shutdown of 2020, it was the Treasury’s unmatched capacity to borrow that came to the rescue.

Now, the Treasury itself is a source of risk. No, the U.S. isn’t about to default or fail to sell enough bonds at its next auction. But the scale and upward trajectory of U.S. borrowing and absence of any political corrective now threaten markets and the economy in ways they haven’t for at least a generation.

That’s the takeaway from the sudden sharp rise in Treasury yields in recent weeks. The usual suspects can’t explain it: The inflation picture has gotten marginally better, and the Federal Reserve has signalled it’s nearly done raising rates.

Instead, most of the increase is due to the part of yields, called the term premium, which has nothing to do with inflation or short-term rates. Numerous factors affect the term premium, and rising government deficits are a prime suspect.

Deficits have been wide for years. Why would they matter now? A better question might be: What took so long?

That larger deficits push up long-term rates had long been economic orthodoxy. But for the past 20 years, interest-rate models that incorporated fiscal policy didn’t work, noted Riccardo Trezzi, a former Fed economist who now runs his own research firm, Underlying Inflation.

That’s understandable. Central banks—worried about too-low inflation and stagnant growth—had kept interest rates around zero while buying up government bonds (“quantitative easing”). Private demand for credit was weak. This trumped any concern about deficits.

“We had a blissful 25 years of not having to worry about this problem,” said Mark Wiedman, senior managing director at BlackRock.

Today, though, central banks are worried about inflation being too high and have stopped buying and in some cases are shedding their bondholdings (“quantitative tightening”). Suddenly, fiscal policy matters again.

To paraphrase Hemingway, deficits can affect interest rates gradually or suddenly. Investors, asked to buy more bonds, gradually make room in their portfolios by buying less of something else, such as equities. Eventually, the risk-adjusted returns of these assets equalise, which means higher bond yields and lower price/earnings ratios on stocks. That has been happening for the past month.

Sometimes, though, markets can move suddenly, such as when Mexico threatened to default in 1994 and Greece did default a decade later. Even in countries that, unlike Mexico or Greece, borrow in currencies they control, interest rates can become hostage to deficits, such as in Canada in the early 1990s or Italy in the 1980s and early 1990s.

The U.S. isn’t Canada or Italy; it controls the world’s reserve currency, and its inflation and interest rates are mostly driven by domestic, not foreign, factors. On the other hand, the U.S. has also exploited those advantages to accumulate debt and run deficits that are much larger than those of peer economies.

There’s not much sign that this has yet imposed a penalty. Investors still project that the Fed will get inflation down to its 2% goal. At 2.4%, real (inflation-adjusted) Treasury yields are comparable to those in the mid-2000s and lower than in the 1990s, when the U.S. government’s debts and deficits were much lower.

Still, sometimes bad news accumulates below investors’ radar until something brings their collective attention to bear. Could a point come when “all the headlines will be about the fiscal unsustainability of the U.S.?” asked Wiedman. “I don’t hear this today from global investors. But do I think it could happen? Absolutely, that paradigm shift is possible. It’s not that no one shows up to buy Treasurys. It’s that they ask for a much higher yield.”

It’s notable that the recent rise in bond yields came as Fitch Ratings downgraded its U.S. credit rating, Treasury upped the size of its bond auctions, analysts began revising upward this year’s federal deficit, and Congress nearly shut down parts of the government over a failure to pass spending bills.

The federal deficit was over 7% of gross domestic product in fiscal 2023, after adjusting for accounting distortions related to student debt, Barclays analysts noted last week. That’s larger than any deficit since 1930 outside of wars and recessions. And this is occurring at a time of low unemployment and strong economic growth, suggesting that in normal times, “deficits may be much higher,” Barclays added.

Abroad, fiscal policy has clearly begun to matter. Last fall, a proposed U.K. tax cut triggered a surge in British bond yields; the government scrapped the proposal, then resigned. Italian yields have risen since the government last week delayed reducing its deficit to below European guidelines. Trezzi said that for the past decade the European Central Bank had bought more than 100% of net Italian government bond issuance, but that’s coming to an end.

Foreign investors, worried about inflation and deficits, have been selling Italian bonds, while Italian households have been buying, Trezzi said. “With a weakening economy, it is unclear for how long…households can offset the selloff of foreigners.”

Investors looking for U.S. political will to rein in deficits would take note that both former President Donald Trump and President Biden, their parties’ front-runners for the 2024 presidential nomination, have signed deficit-busting legislation and that both of their parties have pledged not to cut the two largest spending programs, Medicare and Social Security, or raise taxes on most households.

They would also notice that the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives was just ousted by rebels in his own party because he had passed a bipartisan spending bill to prevent the government from shutting down. True, the rebels wanted less spending. But shutdowns, Barclays noted, represent “erosion of governance.” This isn’t how a country trying to reassure the bond market acts.



MOST POPULAR

The 1860s Darlinghurst mansion Stoneleigh could become Sydney’s most expensive home ever sold under the hammer when it goes to auction. Clint Ballard is giving buyers a $28 million guide for the heritage-listed mansion on Darley Street, opposite Iona, the former home of Hollywood royalty Baz Luhrmann. Stoneleigh is being offered for sale for the …

Set on one of the city’s last absolute riverfront sites, The Riversdale by Mosaic combines irreplaceable waterfront ownership with one of Brisbane’s most significant residential opportunities.

Related Stories
Money
Why These Bargain Stocks Can Outshine Gold
By Paul R. La Monica 06/08/2026
Money
Rolex Celebrates Its Waterproof Pioneer With a Centenary Watch
By 06/08/2026
Money
Australia’s Top 10 Finance Influencers of 2026
By Kanebridge News Editorial 03/08/2026
Why These Bargain Stocks Can Outshine Gold

Gold miners are emerging as a compelling way to navigate market uncertainty, with analysts pointing to strong cash flows, attractive valuations and rising profit margins. As gold prices stabilize above US$4,000 an ounce, mining stocks could offer investors both downside protection and long-term upside.

By Paul R. La Monica
Thu, Aug 6, 2026 3 min

Gold is one of the market’s go-to hedges in rocky times. Don’t forget that gold miners’ stocks are too.

The stock market’s gains in 2026 belie the rocky macroeconomic picture: elevated inflation, heightened geopolitical tensions, and jitters about the artificial-intelligence trade. That backdrop, in theory, should be the time for gold to shine. Instead, the price of the yellow metal has tumbled more than 5% so far, after last year’s blistering 65% rally. In part, the U.S. dollar’s recovery has stymied gold, which benefited from the greenback’s weakness in 2025.

Even with the precious metal’s recent weakness, gold mining stocks could be the best way to profit from this year’s uncertainty.

Gold miners “are a valuable hedge against macro risks that would likely be damaging for equities,” BCA Research’s Noah Weisberger and Rishabh Shah wrote this week.

Concerns about the Federal Reserve’s next moves to tackle inflation, the increasingly crowded AI trade, and steep valuations for tech stocks are just some of the drivers that could help gold’s price get on even footing— and lead to even bigger gains for miner stocks.

These stocks’ prices tend to outpace gold’s moves, because the companies have fixed operational costs. So when gold’s price rallies, their profit margins soar, and vice versa. For instance, the VanEck Gold Miners GDX +7.39% exchange-traded fund has fallen 11% this year as the metal has slumped.

Now, gold’s price just needs to stabilize to help miners’ stocks take off, and that seems to be happening. The precious metal has recently found support above the $4,000 level, and has stuck in a narrow range since the end of June. But its price rose ever so slightly in July, ending a four-month losing streak for the metal. Technical analysis also suggests that gold is due for a comeback.

Barron’s recently wrote that the pullbacks for both gold miners and the metal itself are overdone. Senior technical analyst Doug Busch noted that the VanEck ETF is on the “verge of a breakout” and has the potential to hit $11o in early 2027, up more than 40% from its current price.

Gold miners also have more than their role as a market hedge going for them. Their fundamentals are solid, too, says Chris Mancini, portfolio co-manager of the Gabelli Gold Fund.

“Precious metals miners are generating substantial amounts of free cash flow given profit margins of over $2,000 per ounce, and are returning this cash to shareholders through buybacks and dividends,” he said in an email.

“Buying the miners is a cheap way to get exposure to the price of gold,” he added. His fund owns Newmont NEM +6.71%, a Barron’s stock pick last year, and Agnico Eagle Mines as top holdings, as well as miners Northern Star Resources, Endeavour Mining, and Kinross Gold K+8.59%.

Miners are better businesses than they used to be, the BCA team added.

“Capex is more disciplined, margins are high and rising…and they are largely independent of the AI story,” Weisberger, BCA’s head of equities, and Shah, a senior analyst, wrote.

That last part is key. AI is disrupting the software industry and many other services and information-oriented businesses, and investors have piled into AI stocks. But ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and other large-language models aren’t going to replace the need to mine for metals.

“Equity portfolios can benefit from exposure to quality that is uncorrelated to AI risk, and gold miners fit the bill,” the BCA team said.

They recommend that investors buy the VanEck Gold Miners ETF, which owns top miners such as Agnico, Barrick Mining ABX +7.24%, and Newmont.

An important bonus for big gold miners’ stocks is that their valuations are attractive after the gold’s pullback, too. The VanEck ETF is now trading at just a little more than nine times next year’s earnings estimates. That’s a big discount to its five-year average price-to-earnings ratio of 14, according to FactSet.

What’s more, the ETF is currently valued at a more than 50% discount to the S&P 500 SPX -0.17%, which is trading for about 19 times earnings estimates for 2027. Mining stocks have typically traded at just a 25% discount to the broader market over the past five years. So there is significant upside for the group if valuations move back toward normal levels.

One factor that complicates mining stocks as a market hedge, of course, is if stocks bounce back, which has been the case so far in August.

But both the market and economic outlooks remain cloudy, and investors remain nervous about the Fed’s next moves and AI stocks. Gold miners should do just fine, even if the anxious mood on Wall Street persists.

MOST POPULAR

Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.

High-end homeowners are choosing to upgrade rather than relocate, investing in bespoke design, premium finishes and long-term lifestyle value.

Related Stories
Property
Where to Invest in 2025: Top-Performing Suburbs in Australia’s Property Market
By Staff Writer 12/08/2025
Lifestyle
Compact electric hatch set to join Australia’s EV market
By Jeni O'Dowd 19/01/2026
Property
Sonny Bono’s Palm Springs Home Hits the Market for Nearly $7.5 Million
By Liz Lucking 17/12/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop