Heavyweights Lift the ASX as Small Caps and Technology Fall Behind: Kanebridge’s Weekly ASX Wrap
The ASX 200 gained 0.4 per cent in the week ended 9 October as property and energy rose while technology and small caps declined.
5 min
Heavyweights Lift the ASX as Small Caps and Technology Fall Behind
The S&P/ASX 200 finished the week ended 9 October at 8,716.6, up 0.4 per cent, but the headline concealed a sharply divided market as listed property, energy and selected blue chips advanced while technology, iron ore miners and smaller companies fell.
Australia’s sharemarket finished the week higher, but the gain was less convincing than the index alone suggested.
The S&P/ASX 200 closed Friday, 9 October at 8,716.6, gaining 0.4 per cent over the five trading sessions. The broader All Ordinaries added 0.26 per cent to 8,877.7. By contrast, the Small Ordinaries fell 1.34 per cent to 3,281.9, showing that the market’s progress relied heavily on larger, more liquid companies rather than a broad increase in investor confidence.
The index’s path was uneven. It edged up on Monday, rose 0.57 per cent on Tuesday, slipped 0.09 per cent on Wednesday and lost 0.77 per cent on Thursday before recovering 0.64 per cent on Friday.
That final-session rise of 55.7 points allowed the benchmark to finish the week in positive territory and brought it approximately back to break-even for the calendar year.
The strongest sector was listed property, which gained 3.73 per cent. The move was visible in Goodman Group, one of the market’s largest property securities, which rose 4.82 per cent across the week based on adjusted closing prices.
A-REITs remain sensitive to movements in global bond yields, funding costs and asset valuations, so the sector’s strength indicated a meaningful rotation towards income-producing real assets. It did not eliminate the longer-term questions surrounding office demand, asset valuations, development pipelines or refinancing costs.
Energy gained 2 per cent as Brent crude finished the week around US$101.42 a barrel, up approximately 0.85 per cent. Woodside Energy rose 3.46 per cent over the week, although the sector was far from uniform.
Uranium shares came under pressure on Friday, with several names falling sharply. That demonstrated why a supportive move in the energy index should not be interpreted as a universal signal for every energy commodity or producer.
Technology was the weakest major sector, declining 1.97 per cent over the week despite a substantial rebound on Friday. Pro Medicus, WiseTech Global and Life360 all rallied in the final session after suffering sizeable drawdowns from their August levels. The late recovery softened the weekly damage without erasing the market’s broader caution towards higher-valuation growth shares.
Materials also struggled. BHP fell 0.44 per cent over the week, Rio Tinto lost 1.48 per cent and Fortescue declined 5.25 per cent. The size of those companies meant their weakness offset part of the support supplied by property, energy and healthcare.
The banks were another drag. Commonwealth Bank fell 1.43 per cent, Westpac declined 1.75 per cent, National Australia Bank lost 2.13 per cent and ANZ eased 0.51 per cent.
Macquarie Group moved in the other direction, gaining 1.12 per cent. With the major banks representing an unusually large share of the Australian index, even modest simultaneous falls can materially restrain the benchmark.
Healthcare provided some of the strongest large-cap performances. CSL rose 4.84 per cent and ResMed gained 2.49 per cent. General insurer QBE advanced 5.63 per cent, making it the strongest performer among the 20 large-cap companies tracked below.
Consumer-facing companies also contributed. Woolworths rose 3.23 per cent, Coles gained 1.22 per cent and Wesfarmers added 1.48 per cent. Aristocrat Leisure finished 2.91 per cent higher. Those gains helped balance the losses across the banks and diversified miners.
How the ASX’s top 20 moved
The following figures compare adjusted closing prices on Friday, 2 October with Friday, 9 October. Percentages have been rounded to two decimal places.
The top 20 is based on the largest-company framework used for this wrap. Rankings can change with share prices, index reviews and corporate actions.
Commonwealth Bank (CBA): Down 1.43 per cent, from $151.45 to $149.29.
BHP Group (BHP): Down 0.44 per cent, from $61.21 to $60.94.
Westpac Banking Corporation (WBC): Down 1.75 per cent, from $34.32 to $33.72.
National Australia Bank (NAB): Down 2.13 per cent, from $38.50 to $37.68.
ANZ Group (ANZ): Down 0.51 per cent, from $37.37 to $37.18.
Wesfarmers (WES): Up 1.48 per cent, from $76.22 to $77.35.
Macquarie Group (MQG): Up 1.12 per cent, from $245.63 to $248.37.
CSL (CSL): Up 4.84 per cent, from $175.35 to $183.84.
Woodside Energy (WDS): Up 3.46 per cent, from $31.24 to $32.32.
Rio Tinto (RIO): Down 1.48 per cent, from $164.81 to $162.37.
Goodman Group (GMG): Up 4.82 per cent, from $25.91 to $27.16.
Woolworths Group (WOW): Up 3.23 per cent, from $38.35 to $39.59.
Telstra Group (TLS): Down 1.24 per cent, from $4.83 to $4.77.
Fortescue (FMG): Down 5.25 per cent, from $16.19 to $15.34.
Coles Group (COL): Up 1.22 per cent, from $23.03 to $23.31.
Northern Star Resources (NST): Up 1.54 per cent, from $24.02 to $24.39.
QBE Insurance Group (QBE): Up 5.63 per cent, from $23.81 to $25.15.
Aristocrat Leisure (ALL): Up 2.91 per cent, from $59.76 to $61.50.
ResMed (RMD): Up 2.49 per cent, from $31.79 to $32.58.
James Hardie Industries (JHX): Up 0.06 per cent, from $36.07 to $36.09.
The Top 20 results show why the overall index could advance despite weakness in the banks and miners. Eleven of the 20 companies finished higher, but more importantly, several of the gains were substantial.
QBE, CSL and Goodman rose close to or above 5 per cent, while Woodside and Woolworths advanced more than 3 per cent. Those moves countered falls across all four major banks and the three largest diversified iron ore exposures.
Fortescue was the weakest company in the group, down 5.25 per cent. National Australia Bank recorded the largest decline among the major banks, while Rio Tinto was the weaker of the two larger diversified miners after Fortescue.
It is important not to invent a company-specific explanation where none was confirmed. Some weekly movements reflected sector rotations, commodity prices, interest-rate expectations and changes in investor positioning rather than a fresh announcement by the company.
Where no material ASX announcement clearly explained the move, the percentage should be treated as market performance rather than evidence of a particular event.
Weekly market dashboard
Trading week: 5–9 October 2026.
S&P/ASX 200: 8,716.6, up 0.40 per cent.
All Ordinaries: 8,877.7, up 0.26 per cent.
Small Ordinaries: 3,281.9, down 1.34 per cent.
Best sector: Listed property, up 3.73 per cent.
Weakest sector: Information technology, down 1.97 per cent.
Energy: Up 2.00 per cent.
Brent crude: Approximately US$101.42 a barrel, up 0.85 per cent.
AUD/USD at Friday’s close: Approximately US69.81 cents.
Strongest tracked large cap: QBE Insurance, up 5.63 per cent.
Weakest tracked large cap: Fortescue, down 5.25 per cent.
What investors will watch next
The immediate question is whether the rally can broaden. A market supported by a handful of large companies can continue rising, but it is more vulnerable if those leaders reverse.
Improvement in the Small Ordinaries and technology sector would provide stronger evidence that investors are becoming comfortable taking risk beyond defensive and income-producing assets.
Oil remains another major variable. Prices above US$100 a barrel can support producers such as Woodside, but they also increase transport, manufacturing and household costs. That creates a complicated backdrop for inflation and interest-rate expectations.
Global bond yields, US earnings and local company announcements will also shape the coming week. For Australian investors, the concentration of the domestic market means movements in the banks, BHP, Rio Tinto, CSL, Wesfarmers, Goodman and Woodside can overwhelm an otherwise mixed session.
The week’s 0.4 per cent gain was constructive, but it was not a declaration that risk had disappeared. The more accurate reading is that investors favoured selected large companies, listed property, energy and defensive consumer names while remaining cautious about smaller companies, technology and iron ore exposure.
That distinction matters. An investor whose portfolio resembled the headline index may have finished ahead. Someone weighted towards smaller companies, technology or bulk miners may have experienced a very different week.
This article provides general information only. It does not constitute personal financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Market prices and index composition can change rapidly.
Studio apartments have almost disappeared from new Australian developments. Lura is bringing them back to Burleigh Heads from $495,000.
Porsche’s Cayenne Turbo Electric produces up to 1,156PS and reaches 100km/h in a claimed 2.5 seconds.
Strong family financial planning can help reduce taxes and support younger generations. From intrafamily loans and asset gifts to inheritance disclaimers, strategic cooperation can create meaningful financial benefits—when families have the trust and structure to make it work.
4 min
Happy is the family whose members—parents, grandparents and grown children—trust each other enough to cooperate on shared goals, especially financial ones. When that is truly the case, Uncle Sam’s tax rules can help as well.
This matters especially now that mortgage rates are above 7%, and many families are looking for ways to help younger members. If the elders have resources and are confident younger ones can cooperate, a family loan could make homeownership possible while providing the elders with a useful income stream.
Other strategies can actually lower taxes, such as when funding 529 plans or Roth IRAs, or when someone inherits a traditional IRA with required withdrawals larger than they will need.
Here are three strategies useful for functional families.
Intrafamily loans
It is perfectly legal for families to lend money to a relative for a down payment or even a private mortgage.
But it is important not to cut corners, says Ryan McKeown, a CPA with Modern Wealth Enhancement in Minnesota. If the loan is for a down payment, be honest with the mortgage provider and have a formal agreement. The lender owes tax on the interest payments received.
If the loan is for a private mortgage, both sides should have legal representation with a formal written agreement, including payment terms. The lender owes tax on the interest, and the borrower often can deduct it if he or she itemizes.
To avoid IRS trouble, the interest rate shouldn’t be lower than the agency’s Applicable Federal Rate at the time of the loan. Currently that is about 5% for loans longer than nine years; about 4.5% for loans three to nine years; and about 4% for loans three years or less. Currently, traditional mortgage rates are generally above 7%.
In addition, the lender could use the $19,000 annual gift-tax exemption (described below) to forgive some or all of the interest or principal annually. If both lenders and borrowers are married, that is up to $76,000 a year. There is no tax for the borrower on such forgiveness, because it is from a gift.
If you’re going this route, McKeown advises against having a fixed plan to forgive the debt. Instead, do it in one-off letters specifying the amount—and keep careful records. Otherwise the IRS might try to treat the loan as a taxable gift.
Asset gifts
Powerful tax-saving moves for families often use gift-tax provisions. Under current law, anyone can give anyone else up to $19,000 of assets annually, free of gift tax. That means a married couple with three grandchildren could give them a total of $114,000 in 2026.
The gifts can be cash or other assets, like stock. For noncash gifts, the cost basis—which is the starting point for measuring taxable gain after a sale—“carries over” to the recipient. So if someone buys $1,000 of stock and gives it away when it is worth $5,000, the recipient’s cost basis is $1,000. If the recipient later sells the shares for $8,000, the taxable gain is $7,000.
Here’s an example showing how gifts could save a family taxes. Grandma is a widow of modest means, while her child and spouse have prospered. The couple has two children, and they want to contribute $5,000 to a 529 college-savings plan for each—but they need to sell stock to do it. Their tax rate on the sale would be 18.8%, and they would need to sell about $11,000 of stock.
However, Grandma’s federal tax rate on the stock sale is 0%. If the couple gives $10,000 of shares to Grandma, she could sell them, pay no tax, and fund the grandchildren’s 529 plans. This saves about $1,000 of tax.
These moves are legal, and they could be used in other ways, such as to help a young person fund a Roth IRA.
But trust among family members is essential: Under the law, givers can’t put conditions on a gift. Grandma could use her stock proceeds to take a cruise, but she makes 529 contributions instead.
Mark Sellner, a retired tax attorney and CPA living in Sarasota, Fla., uses this strategy. His children sell stock he gives them and fund 529 plans for his grandchildren.
The family’s tax savings aren’t huge, but he likes other benefits. The sales by his children don’t boost his adjusted gross income, which in turn could raise his Medicare Irmaa premiums or his 3.8% surtax on net investment income.
Sellner doesn’t worry about his children using the funds for another purpose.
“There can’t be any strings attached to gifts. Of course, it is up to us to decide whether to make them in the future,” he says.
Two caveats: The “kiddie tax” applies to most children under age 24, and it is levied at the parents’ rate on investment income above $2,700 in 2026. Consider this before making gifts to a young person.
Investors who give away stock also forgo the step-up, an important provision that exempts assets held at death from capital-gains tax.
Sellner knows he’s losing a step-up, but says, “The children could use a little more now. Why should they wait 20 years to get it?”
Disclaimers
A disclaimer is a highly useful strategy in which one heir renounces an inheritance in favor of another heir. Assuming family members cooperate, this can save taxes.
Here’s one example. Dad died and had a large traditional IRA that he left to Mom. She has enough assets and income to cover her expenses, and she lives in a state with a stiff estate tax. The inherited IRA would put her estate over the threshold.
Also surviving are three young-adult children. If Mom disclaims all or part of Dad’s IRA within nine months of his death, that amount could go directly to the children. They will have 10 years to empty the account, and the family as a whole will likely save estate and income taxes.
Disclaimers have many key details, especially regarding beneficiary documents. Although heirs have great freedom in choosing what assets to disclaim, the rules about who gets disclaimed property are rigid. It is best if the original owner names tiers of heirs so that if one disclaims, the next recipient is clear.
A long-standing cultural cruise and a new expedition-style offering will soon operate side by side in French Polynesia.
From Tokyo backstreets to quiet coastal towns and off-grid cabins, top executives reveal where they holiday and why stepping away makes the grind worthwhile.
