China’s Overcapacity Is Already Backfiring
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,619,543 (+1.02%)       Melbourne $993,415 (+0.43%)       Brisbane $975,058 (+1.20%)       Adelaide $879,284 (+0.61%)       Perth $852,259 (+2.21%)       Hobart $758,052 (+0.47%)       Darwin $664,462 (-0.58%)       Canberra $1,008,338 (+1.48%)       National $1,044,192 (+1.00%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $750,850 (+0.34%)       Melbourne $495,457 (-0.48%)       Brisbane $530,547 (-1.93%)       Adelaide $452,618 (+2.41%)       Perth $435,880 (-1.44%)       Hobart $520,910 (-0.84%)       Darwin $351,137 (+1.16%)       Canberra $486,921 (-1.93%)       National $526,132 (-0.40%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,060 (-129)       Melbourne 14,838 (+125)       Brisbane 7,930 (-41)       Adelaide 2,474 (+54)       Perth 6,387 (+4)       Hobart 1,349 (+13)       Darwin 237 (+9)       Canberra 988 (-41)       National 44,263 (-6)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,768 (-27)       Melbourne 8,244 (+37)       Brisbane 1,610 (-26)       Adelaide 427 (+6)       Perth 1,632 (-32)       Hobart 199 (-5)       Darwin 399 (-5)       Canberra 989 (+1)       National 22,268 (-51)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $800 ($0)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $640 ($0)       Adelaide $600 ($0)       Perth $650 (-$10)       Hobart $550 ($0)       Darwin $700 ($0)       Canberra $680 (-$10)       National $660 (-$3)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $750 ($0)       Melbourne $585 (-$5)       Brisbane $635 (+$5)       Adelaide $495 (+$5)       Perth $600 ($0)       Hobart $450 (-$25)       Darwin $550 ($0)       Canberra $570 ($0)       National $592 (-$1)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,449 (+85)       Melbourne 5,466 (+38)       Brisbane 3,843 (-159)       Adelaide 1,312 (-17)       Perth 2,155 (+42)       Hobart 398 (0)       Darwin 102 (+3)       Canberra 579 (+5)       National 19,304 (-3)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 7,769 (+82)       Melbourne 4,815 (+22)       Brisbane 2,071 (-27)       Adelaide 356 (+2)       Perth 644 (-6)       Hobart 137 (+2)       Darwin 172 (-4)       Canberra 575 (+6)       National 16,539 (+77)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.57% (↓)       Melbourne 3.14% (↓)       Brisbane 3.41% (↓)       Adelaide 3.55% (↓)       Perth 3.97% (↓)       Hobart 3.77% (↓)     Darwin 5.48% (↑)        Canberra 3.51% (↓)       National 3.29% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.19% (↓)       Melbourne 6.14% (↓)     Brisbane 6.22% (↑)        Adelaide 5.69% (↓)     Perth 7.16% (↑)        Hobart 4.49% (↓)       Darwin 8.14% (↓)     Canberra 6.09% (↑)      National 5.85% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 0.8% (↑)      Melbourne 0.7% (↑)      Brisbane 0.7% (↑)      Adelaide 0.4% (↑)      Perth 0.4% (↑)      Hobart 0.9% (↑)      Darwin 0.8% (↑)      Canberra 1.0% (↑)      National 0.7% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 0.9% (↑)      Melbourne 1.1% (↑)      Brisbane 1.0% (↑)      Adelaide 0.5% (↑)      Perth 0.5% (↑)      Hobart 1.4% (↑)      Darwin 1.7% (↑)      Canberra 1.4% (↑)      National 1.1% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 30.2 (↑)      Melbourne 31.9 (↑)      Brisbane 31.5 (↑)      Adelaide 26.3 (↑)      Perth 35.7 (↑)        Hobart 32.0 (↓)     Darwin 36.4 (↑)      Canberra 30.8 (↑)      National 31.8 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 30.8 (↑)      Melbourne 31.3 (↑)      Brisbane 30.2 (↑)        Adelaide 24.1 (↓)     Perth 39.4 (↑)      Hobart 35.1 (↑)      Darwin 47.9 (↑)      Canberra 41.7 (↑)      National 35.1 (↑)            
Share Button

China’s Overcapacity Is Already Backfiring

Excess investment in industry isn’t made up by trading partners, and it has domestic consequences

By NATHANIEL TAPLIN
Wed, Apr 17, 2024 12:06pmGrey Clock 2 min

In the “ China Shock 2.0 ” narrative, not only is China a security threat and a low-end factory competitor, but it is also angling to swamp the West with cut-rate high-tech goods. There has been less focus on the downsides of such a strategy for China itself.

China’s first-quarter growth beat most estimates , rising 5.3% on the year—thanks mostly to strong industrial output and exports. But the economic data released Tuesday also showed that excess capacity is very real, and could be damaging to China itself.

While China’s industrial engine revved up in January and February , it downshifted again in March: output rose just 4.5% on the year, down sharply from January and February’s 7%. More tellingly, manufacturing capacity utilisation plummeted to 73.8% in the first quarter—its weakest, excluding the pandemic-affected first quarter of 2020, since at least 2015. In volume terms, China’s exports hit a nearly 10-year high in March. But in value terms they were barely above where they sat in October.

In other words, firms’ pricing power both at home and abroad is weakening and margin pressure is probably mounting: The March industrial financial data, which will be released later this month, will be worth watching.

So will private investment in manufacturing. If external demand, in value terms, doesn’t find a stronger footing soon and China’s domestic economy remains weak, then eventually such investment will need to slow. Otherwise the government, or state-owned banks, will have to start absorbing the cost of too many loans to industry more directly, as they already have with real estate and infrastructure .

Particularly interesting is the breakdown of that capacity utilisation data itself. Falling run rates were especially obvious in Beijing’s favourite sectors like automobiles and electrical equipment—the so-called “new productive forces,” including electric vehicles, chips and solar panels, which policymakers have highlighted in recent speeches and have been stalking Western politicians’ nightmares. Automobile manufacturing utilisation rates fell below 65% in the first quarter: well below their previous low (excluding the first quarter of 2020) of 69.1% in mid-2016.

China’s traditional export sectors, on the other hand, have actually held up relatively well. Textiles utilisation rose in the first quarter, while run rates for computer and communication gear fell, but much less sharply.

Meanwhile, economy wide borrowing—excluding government bond issuance—weakened further in March, despite bond yields and interest rates near multiyear lows. If margin pressure starts to force some “new productive forces” to start slowing investment, fiscal policy would need to step in to prop up growth.

Alternatively, China can keep funnelling its excess savings into new manufacturing overcapacity—but Chinese banks and Beijing, not just China’s trade partners, will eventually end up footing the bill.



MOST POPULAR
11 ACRES ROAD, KELLYVILLE, NSW

This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan

35 North Street Windsor

Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.

Related Stories
Money
Less Is More: The Case for ‘Slow Productivity’ at Work
By RACHEL FEINTZEIG 30/04/2024
Money
Picasso Painting of Muse Dora Maar Comes to Auction for the First Time
By GEOFF NUDELMAN 30/04/2024
Money
Anglo American Rejects $39 Billion BHP Bid, Setting Up Likely Bidding War
By JULIE STEINBERG 29/04/2024
Less Is More: The Case for ‘Slow Productivity’ at Work

We’re thinking about productivity at work all wrong, Cal Newport says. But how do we tell the boss that?

By RACHEL FEINTZEIG
Tue, Apr 30, 2024 4 min

You’re oh so busy. You’re on Slack and email and back-to-back Zoom calls , sometimes all at once . Are you actually getting real work done?

Cal Newport doesn’t think so.

“It’s like, wait a second, none of this mattered,” says the Georgetown University computer science professor and crusader for focus in a distracted age.

Newport, 41, says we can accomplish more by shedding the overload. He calls his solution “slow productivity”—and has a book by the same name —a way for high achievers to say yes to fewer things, do them better and even slack off in strategic doses. Top-notch quality is the goal, and frenetic activity the enemy.

This, he told me, is the thing that can save our jobs from AI and layoffs, and even make shareholders happy.

I had questions. Can we really be less is more at work, or have we grown addicted to constantly crossing endless tasks off our to-do lists? What will our bosses think?

After all, so many of us yearn for a burnout cure-all that will preserve our high-achiever status, and this isn’t the first you-can-have-it-all proposition we’ve heard. Champions of the four-day workweek promise we can ditch an entire workday just by working smarter. Remote-work die-hards swear it’s a win for employers and employees. Few dreams are more seductive than bidding goodbye to hustle culture, while still reaping the benefits of said hustle.

Newport acknowledges that saying no to preserve our productivity can be a delicate act. He knows that entrepreneurs have more flexibility, but says those of us who answer to managers can carve this out too. We might even find we have more power and value to our employers.

“You should take that value out for a little bit of a spin,” he suggests. He offers some pointers.

Less is more

The way we work now is a “serious economic drag,” Newport says. Knowledge workers have devolved into a form of productivity that’s more about the vibes—stressed!—than actually making money for the company. Data from Microsoft finds that lots of us spend the equivalent of two workdays a week on meetings and email alone.

One mistake we make, Newport says, is taking on too many projects, then getting bogged down in the administrative overload—talking about the work, coordinating with others—that each requires. Work becomes a string of planning meetings, waiting on someone from another department to give us a go-ahead.

Newport recommends giving priority to a couple projects, then bumping the others to a waiting list in order of importance. Make that list public, say, in a Google doc you share with bosses and colleagues.

“When workloads are obfuscated behind black boxes, it’s just people throwing stuff at each other, it’s very dangerous to say no,” Newport says.

If someone comes to you with more work, have them consider where it should go on your list, Newport says.

When you do say yes, double the estimated timelines you set to complete a project. That’s how long it’ll take to do it well, he says. And try what he calls a “one for you, one for me strategy.” Every time you book an hour-long meeting, block an hour for independent work on your calendar.

Be the one to trust

It’s a foreign and bracing approach for those of us who reflexively say yes to work requests. Newport’s philosophy requires transparency and confidence. Instead of “let me see how fast I can turn that around!”, try, “This request will take six hours. I’ll have that time in three weeks.”

This could be heresy at some companies. The trick is in the delivery, he says. Never make it seem like work tasks are a burden you shouldn’t have to face. Instead, stress that you’re trying to be as effective as you can for the team and the company. Be positive, and deliver on the timelines you promise. You’ll be seen as someone who’s organised and on top of your game.

We think bosses want someone who’s always accessible—fast to respond, fast to jump into action, Newport says. But what bosses really want is to know that a project they hand you will get done.

Bite-size shirking

Quiet quitting permanently is a bad idea, Newport says, but a little bit is good.

Don’t feel guilty, he adds. You’re working under a new, better system. We weren’t meant to work all out , every day, without seasonal shifts and pauses.

Pick a time—say, the month of July—to slow down. Don’t volunteer for extra work. Don’t offer Mondays as a possibility for meetings. Take on an easier project for cover.

He also recommends taking yourself out to a monthly movie during the workday. Say it’s a personal appointment, and enjoy the sense of control and creativity it brings.

You don’t have to nail a manifesto to the wall, he adds, or try to change the whole company culture. Instead, quietly carve out change for yourself.

Coming into your power

The catch: You have to be really good at the part of your job that matters. And you have to get big stuff done. Remember, this is about being a happier high performer, not slacking.

“There’s no hiding,” Newport says.

I suspect this terrifies a lot of people. They’ve gotten good at being always on and typing up yet another meeting agenda. Tackling a major project or goal is often harder, and comes without a guarantee that you’re going to nail it.

Scary or not, real work is becoming imperative. AI is coming for the rote parts of our jobs. Leaders are sussing out the “nonsense” projects and roles in their ranks as they cut jobs, Newport says. No boss wants to be left with a team of people who are aces at responding to emails.

Mastering a valuable skill puts you in control. Newport writes of people who leave corporate America behind and move where they want , working remotely as contractors, charging wild fees for fewer hours of work. The more you shed the work that doesn’t matter, and spend that time getting better at the stuff that does, the more leeway you’ll get.

“The marketplace doesn’t care about your personal interest in slowing down,” Newport writes. “If you want more control over your schedule, you need something to offer in return.”

Figure that puzzle out, and you might just be able to have it all—high achievement, and your sanity.

MOST POPULAR

Consumers are going to gravitate toward applications powered by the buzzy new technology, analyst Michael Wolf predicts

11 ACRES ROAD, KELLYVILLE, NSW

This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Everrati Builds the Electric Porsche 911 of Your Dreams
By Jim Motavalli 15/04/2024
Money
The Best Stock Funds of 2023
By LAWRENCE STRAUSS 08/01/2024
Money
Welcome to the Era of BadGPTs
By BELLE LIN 29/02/2024
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop