Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,694,137 (+0.07%)       Melbourne $1,032,352 (+0.13%)       Brisbane $1,180,671 (-0.55%)       Adelaide $1,049,309 (+0.70%)       Perth $1,084,212 (-0.24%)       Hobart $845,475 (+2.08%)       Darwin $854,475 (-0.20%)       Canberra $977,295 (-0.45%)       National Capitals $1,147,803 (+0.05%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $794,556 (+0.48%)       Melbourne $547,365 (+0.09%)       Brisbane $754,072 (-0.37%)       Adelaide $572,519 (-0.29%)       Perth $640,628 (-0.82%)       Hobart $573,985 (-0.37%)       Darwin $470,510 (+2.22%)       Canberra $476,938 (-0.38%)       National Capitals $624,365 (-0.05%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 14,033 (+82)       Melbourne 16,031 (+18)       Brisbane 9,761 (+19)       Adelaide 3,349 (+15)       Perth 8,242 (+9)       Hobart 702 (-12)       Darwin 168 (+1)       Canberra 1,163 (-6)       National Capitals 53,449 (+126)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,492 (+86)       Melbourne 6,692 (-44)       Brisbane 2,164 (+15)       Adelaide 575 (-4)       Perth 1,586 (+4)       Hobart 156 (-4)       Darwin 206 (-23)       Canberra 1,237 (-1)       National Capitals 22,108 (+29)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $880 (+$5)       Melbourne $620 ($0)       Brisbane $703 (-$8)       Adelaide $660 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $620 (-$5)       Darwin $838 (+$8)       Canberra $730 (-$5)       National Capitals $736 (+$)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $840 ($0)       Melbourne $630 (+$60)       Brisbane $670 (-$10)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $520 (-$30)       Darwin $655 (+$5)       Canberra $590 ($0)       National Capitals $658 (+$3)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,137 (-310)       Melbourne 7,411 (+17)       Brisbane 3,549 (+4)       Adelaide 1,283 (-27)       Perth 2,180 (-40)       Hobart 240 (+17)       Darwin 52 (+3)       Canberra 471 (-1)       National Capitals 21,323 (-337)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,130 (-68)       Melbourne 6,144 (-2,264)       Brisbane 1,981 (+9)       Adelaide 436 (+26)       Perth 732 (-32)       Hobart 67 (-13)       Darwin 112 (+5)       Canberra 769 (0)       National Capitals 20,371 (-2,337)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.70% (↑)        Melbourne 3.12% (↓)       Brisbane 3.09% (↓)       Adelaide 3.27% (↓)     Perth 3.60% (↑)        Hobart 3.81% (↓)     Darwin 5.10% (↑)        Canberra 3.88% (↓)       National Capitals 3.33% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.50% (↓)     Melbourne 5.99% (↑)        Brisbane 4.62% (↓)     Adelaide 5.00% (↑)      Perth 5.68% (↑)        Hobart 4.71% (↓)       Darwin 7.24% (↓)     Canberra 6.43% (↑)      National Capitals 5.48% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND         Sydney 35.5 (↓)       Melbourne 34.2 (↓)       Brisbane 37.6 (↓)     Adelaide 30.4 (↑)      Perth 44.4 (↑)        Hobart 29.0 (↓)       Darwin 27.9 (↓)     Canberra 35.1 (↑)        National Capitals 34.3 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 34.1 (↑)      Melbourne 33.0 (↑)      Brisbane 37.2 (↑)      Adelaide 29.9 (↑)        Perth 42.1 (↓)       Hobart 30.2 (↓)     Darwin 48.2 (↑)        Canberra 39.1 (↓)     National Capitals 36.7 (↑)            
Share Button

Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.

Ad campaigns for online dating companies have become flashpoints for frustrated online daters

By SARA ASHLEY O’BRIEN
Tue, Jun 25, 2024 9:13amGrey Clock 6 min

As online-dating apps court new and younger audiences, some of their marketing efforts are turning off daters instead.

Bumble last month apologised for ads making light of women so frustrated with online dating that they would consider celibacy. The League, a dating app targeting “the overly ambitious,” was called “ick-inducing” for its recent ad campaign, which included taglines like “Date someone with a 5-year-plan that makes you want to ovulate.” And Hinge’s years-long “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign has started to fall flat for longtime users still looking for love on their phones.

Online dating continues to play a lead role in the romantic lives of millions of Americans. Around half of all U.S. adults under 30 have used a dating site or app at some point in their lives, and one in 10 adults with partners say they met their significant other by dating online, according to Pew Research Center data. And the industry’s biggest players, Match Group and Bumble, now generate annual revenues north of $3.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

But the ad campaigns have high stakes for online dating companies trying to achieve the right mix of user acquisition and pricing power to re-interest Wall Street in a saturated sector.

Online-dating growth has been slowing. Paying users declined 6% in the first quarter of the year at Match Group, whose portfolio includes the League, Tinder and Hinge, compared with a 3% dip in the first quarter of 2023. The Bumble app grew paying users 18% in the first quarter, compared with 31% growth in the period a year earlier.

Shares in both have fallen this year even as the S&P 500 rose. And some singles have become perhaps as wary as investors.

Nearly half of all online daters and more than half of female daters say their experiences have been negative, according to Pew , and a growing tide of users are sharing their dissatisfaction in popular Facebook forums and on TikTok. People bemoan a perceived rise in bad dating etiquette such as “ghosting” and the sending of unsolicited sexual messages, and blame the way online romance makes it easier to discard potential partners at a touch of a button. “Hacks,” or tricks designed to game the apps for better dates, abound, demonstrating the shortcomings of their designs.

And the companies’ growing emphasis on pricier premium services is giving users new reasons to scrutinise the algorithmically driven path to romance.

Bumble made its name as a free app that only let women make the first move, for example. But since 2016, it has charged for advantages such as unlimited “swipes” to connect with prospects. The most expensive plan today costs $80 a month. Nonpaying users on Bumble and other apps can hit a limit, which some say leaves them taunted by the nagging fear that their perfect partners are hidden just on the other side of a paywall.

In this environment, new ad campaigns have become a release valve for the tension.

Lidiane Jones, CEO, Bumble, at The Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything Festival in New York on May 21. PHOTO: GARY HE FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Failure to launch

Bumble users had hoped change was on the way after a teaser campaign depicted a discouraged dater joining a convent but happily leaving after being handed the Bumble app. “We’ve changed so you don’t have to,” one of the ads promised.

“At this point, it’s the app’s responsibility not to rebrand, but to pivot technologically,” said Michelle Khouri , the founder of creator platform Recordical , who has been using dating apps on and off for 10 years following her divorce from a man she met through online dating service eHarmony.

But Bumble’s big move wasn’t a fundamental overhaul: The company was letting women put questions on their profiles to which men they matched with could respond without a specific invitation.

Disappointment became backlash when the full ad campaign included billboards that declared, “Thou shalt not give up on dating and become a nun” and “You know full well a vow of celibacy is not the answer.”

Female daters often thinly disguise their dissatisfaction with modern dating by joking about giving it up for a life of spinsterhood, and Bumble had done what all marketers try to do—joined the conversation 

The problem for many was that Bumble’s quips about nunneries located the problem in daters’ resilience, as opposed to the dating apps themselves, and the unfavourable dating culture some users say the apps’ owners have been complicit in fuelling.

“Bumble was a brand that built its identity on empowering women and then they absolutely laughed in our faces,” said Michelle Wintersteen, the founder and chief executive of branding and marketing agency MKW Creative and a former Bumble user who grew frustrated by its paywalls.

Bumble took down the billboards and made several public apologies.

“We just made a mistake in how that landed. It was not good and we felt really terrible about it,” Bumble CEO Lidiane Jones said at a Wall Street Journal event last month.

Jones added in an emailed statement that the company is enhancing its internal and external review processes, and “actively engaging in conversations to ensure our marketing tone matches the 10 years Bumble has dedicated to championing women and creating safe, respectful, and empowering spaces for connection.”

Some online-dating executives and observers think the gripes with dating apps are largely an extension of age-old ennui over the search for lasting love.

“This is not a new phenomenon, and I think that dating apps have crystallised and brought those concerns to the fore, primarily because the prior institutions that were responsible for connecting individuals—such as family, friends, churches, other homes of worship—were not able to assume blame in the same way,” said Jess Carbino, a sociologist who has worked as a consultant for Bumble and Tinder.

Pickup lines

When the League introduced its “Be a GoalDigger” brand campaign in 2023, its first big marketing effort since being acquired by Match Group in 2022, some had visceral reactions.

“Whoever is behind this truly thought they were like, hitting Gen -Z, being super edgy and cool,” said the TikTok user who reported getting the “ick” from its campaign. “In reality, it is the most millennial, cringy thing that makes you want to actually convulse.”

The app has “never been afraid of speaking up or speaking out about the kind of people that The League attracts,” said Lisa Kraynak, senior vice president of marketing for the League, in a statement. In addition to its ad mentioning ovulation, others read: “Find Your Goal Mate” and “Date Someone With Big Goal Energy.”

“We know that we aren’t for everyone, and that is a core part of our value proposition,” Kraynak added, noting that a number of people responded well to it.

Unlike apps such as Tinder and Bumble, the League requires profile approval to join. On the app, users get three to five prospects a day unless they upgrade to become a paying member, which runs $99 a week or $399 for a three-month subscription. Once a match is made in the app, users have 14 days to initiate a conversation before the matches expire.

Fighting flakes

These components, as well as features such as a “flakiness score” indicating which users have a habit of matching but not chatting, are why Kraynak said the League is “designed to combat the dissatisfaction with apps today .”

Tinder has leaned away from the celebration of singledom that it embraced in a 2018 brand campaign that called single “a terrible thing to waste.” While the app has long been associated with hookups, the company has more recently emphasised the various relationships that can result from its app. Its marketing now romanticizes “a toothbrush at their place” and “comfortable silences,” all while it seeks to upsell users.

“It was about shedding a perception that was too narrow and not accurate,” said Melissa Hobley, chief marketing officer at Tinder.

Hinge, the Match Group brand that has long positioned itself as an app for finding relationships rather than hookups, continues to iterate on its “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign launched in 2019. The company has refreshed the campaign every year since then with the same tagline.

On social media, some dissatisfied users say they have deleted the app—not because they found love but because the app didn’t work for them. Hinge said every feature is designed to help daters be intentional and that it is looking for ways to address dating burnout.

Chief Marketing Officer Jackie Jantos said Hinge is the fastest-growing major dating app.

“‘Designed to Be Deleted,’ as an idea and a marketing program, continues to help us build our base of users,” Jantos said.

Match Group said Hinge’s direct revenue grew 50% in the first quarter of the year as paying members increased 31% and revenue per payer rose 14%. It offers two types of subscriptions, Hinge+ and HingeX, which start at $14.99 and $24.99, respectively, a week.

More recently, the company partnered with a social-media brand that interviews couples on the street, to circulate their love stories that involve Hinge.

“We know that our best growth comes from organic success stories of people meeting on Hinge,” added Jantos.



MOST POPULAR

Australian actor Chris Hemsworth has joined Archie Rose Distilling Co. as co-owner and strategic business partner as the Sydney spirits company prepares to enter the United States. The partnership brings Hemsworth together with Archie Rose founder Will Edwards, with the pair aiming to build greater international recognition for Australian whisky. Founded in Sydney in 2014, …

Porsche has revealed a one-off 911 GT2 RS that brings the extraordinary silhouette of its 935/78 “Moby Dick” racing car onto the road. Created by Porsche Sonderwunsch with Manthey, the commission began with a near-new GT2 RS. The owner requested greater performance, a Slantnose profile and a rear wing influenced by the limited 911 GT3 …

Related Stories
Lifestyle
AUSTRALIA’S PREMIER PRIVATE MEMBERS’ CLUB OPENS NEW SYDNEY CHAPTER
By Kanebridge News 26/08/2026
Lifestyle
Chris Hemsworth Joins Archie Rose as Co-Owner Ahead of Global Expansion
By Ruba Jaajaa 26/08/2026
Lifestyle
GRAYA Secures Approval for Silk, St Lucia Apartments
By Ruba Jaajaa 26/08/2026
Wall Street Is Counting on Nvidia to Keep the AI Party Going

Nvidia’s earnings will test Wall Street’s confidence in the AI boom.

By David Uberti and Krystal Hur
Mon, Aug 24, 2026 3 min

Chip makers are fighting to assure investors that the artificial-intelligence boom is racing forward. Wall Street might not believe it until Nvidia’s NVDA -0.98%decrease; down pointing triangle Jensen Huang says so.

When Huang steps up to the mic for his company’s earnings call Wednesday, he will have the world’s attention. What he says about Nvidia’s present will preview the future of AI, dictate the path forward for a tech-crazed stock market and influence an American economy increasingly tethered to hopes that the boom won’t go bust.

The $5 trillion chip maker has provided the key building blocks for AI since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022 set off a race for dominance among OpenAI, Anthropic and established Silicon Valley giants. Now, as Nvidia backstops sprawling data-center projects and an exotic money pipeline to boost chip demand, the company’s influence is arguably bigger than ever.

But there are signs of trouble ahead. Political pushback to AI is growing. A bond selloff propelled borrowing costs to their highest levels in years. The hyperscalers that include some of Nvidia’s key customers—once cash-printing machines—are relying more on debt. OpenAI recently told investors its revenue rose by a tepid 18% in the second quarter while its losses deepened.

Nvidia is increasingly stepping in to shore up potential weak points across the market. Earlier this month, the company teamed up with six of Wall Street’s biggest firms on a $500 billion AI-financing plan, pledging to backstop lending to customers that can’t afford its chips otherwise. The chip maker last week also took a stake in Cloverleaf Infrastructure, which arranges power for data centers, and struck a $6 billion deal with startup Poolside aimed at developing a powerful open-weight AI model.

After watching shares in other chip makers and the so-called Magnificent Seven tech companies swing wildly in recent months, Wall Street is hoping Nvidia can beat expectations—again. The countdown is on.

“It’s kind of becoming more and more like the World Cup final than the Super Bowl at this point,” said Brian Mulberry, chief market strategist at Zacks Investment Management. “It’s just gotten to be that big.”

The company has smashed analysts’ earnings estimates for each of the 14 quarters since the AI boom kicked into high gear. Nvidia posted 210% annual growth in net income in its last three-month period, according to FactSet, making Wall Street’s 126% projection look pedestrian.

Expectations for a blowout second quarter have risen rapidly over the course of this year. All Nvidia will have to do to beat this target: outrun 95% annual earnings growth to more than $51.5 billion. Analysts project the chip maker will report record sales of $92 billion for the period, up from a forecast of $78 billion at the start of this year.

In July, big-tech earnings sparked volatility. Concerns about runaway capital spending spread across the sector after Alphabet’s and Tesla’s results, driving a $890 billion wipeout that contributed to the unwind of hedge fund Situational Awareness. Microsoft posted the largest one-day gain in market capitalization by any company, ever, after a quarter proving that it could still show investors the money. SpaceX rocketed higher after a record-breaking initial public offering, only to see $1 trillion in value evaporate.

Surging memory prices and borrowing costs have fueled fears that those and other companies will be unable to keep plowing more money into supplies including Nvidia chips. Shaia Hosseinzadeh, founder of OnyxPoint Global Management, has recently bought dips in AI-infrastructure stocks when Wall Street has strained to absorb massive debt issued by Silicon Valley.

“The macro data is really quite robust,” he said. “Of course, there’s a level at which everything breaks.”

Investors have kept pumping money into the AI trade despite concerns around chip consumers—and to the benefit of chip producers. That is why Nvidia’s outlook for semiconductor demand could send ripples through counterparts such as Micron Technology and Sandisk, developers of the data centers in which their chips reside, and a supply chain of power producers, contractors and other specialists that underpin the globe-spanning AI build-out.

“We joke internally that we’re all Nvidia analysts now,” said David Lefkowitz, head of U.S. equities at UBS Global Wealth Management.

The irony is that investors have tended to sell Nvidia stock immediately after blockbuster earnings, with shares falling each trading session after its four past quarterly reports. Some are betting that will be the case this time around, too.

The options market is pricing in a 5.3% swing, higher or lower, in Nvidia shares during the session following earnings, according to Option Research & Technology Services. That is higher than the 4.8% average move in Nvidia’s stock over the last 12 months after the company reports quarterly results.

In recent days, some of the most actively traded Nvidia options have been put contracts tied to the stock falling from its Friday value of $214.75 to $205 and $210 apiece, according to Cboe Global Markets data. Put options give the right to sell a stock by a set price and typically represent a bearish wager.

Many analysts remain optimistic. Frank Lee, global head of tech hardware and semiconductor research at HSBC Global Investment Research, recently raised his price target for Nvidia shares to $360 from $325, citing, among other things, Nvidia’s strategic partnerships with suppliers and its role as a top contributor to open-source AI.

MOST POPULAR

BMW has unveiled the Neue Klasse in Munich, marking its biggest investment to date and a new era of electrification, digitalisation and sustainable design.

Hand-built in Melbourne and limited to just 10 cars a year, the Zeigler/Bailey Z/B 4.4 is reshaping what a modern collector car can be.

Related Stories
Property
WHY THE HOUSING CRISIS IS ABOUT TO GET MUCH WORSE
By Paul Miron, Opinion 08/05/2026
Property
Futureproofing the Workplace: Inside the Offices of 2050
By Jeni O'Dowd 04/12/2025
Lifestyle
Inside The Craft-Led Luxury Dog Brand Changing Pet Style
By Jeni O'Dowd 18/03/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop