Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,720,356 (-0.49%)       Melbourne $1,032,164 (+0.03%)       Brisbane $1,202,525 (-0.01%)       Adelaide $1,059,532 (-1.15%)       Perth $1,096,286 (-0.29%)       Hobart $849,704 (-0.37%)       Darwin $877,272 (+3.98%)       Canberra $995,722 (-0.75%)       National Capitals $1,163,582 (-0.23%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $795,900 (-0.08%)       Melbourne $545,068 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $777,731 (-0.07%)       Adelaide $576,738 (-0.14%)       Perth $645,865 (-0.73%)       Hobart $574,457 (+1.02%)       Darwin $464,473 (-1.78%)       Canberra $499,147 (+2.13%)       National Capitals $631,243 (-0.02%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,852 (+48)       Melbourne 16,321 (+165)       Brisbane 9,348 (-171)       Adelaide 3,241 (+62)       Perth 8,046 (+66)       Hobart 725 (+8)       Darwin 162 (0)       Canberra 1,155 (+37)       National Capitals 52,850 (+215)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,523 (-44)       Melbourne 6,961 (+55)       Brisbane 2,097 (-8)       Adelaide 561 (+17)       Perth 1,557 (+21)       Hobart 167 (+6)       Darwin 221 (+2)       Canberra 1,239 (+5)       National Capitals 22,326 (+54)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $875 (-$5)       Melbourne $620 (+$10)       Brisbane $710 (-$10)       Adelaide $665 (+$5)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $620 (+$5)       Darwin $850 ($0)       Canberra $750 (+$10)       National Capitals $741 (+$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $850 ($0)       Melbourne $630 (-$5)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $570 (+$10)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $545 (+$23)       Darwin $650 ($0)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $665 (+$2)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,498 (+32)       Melbourne 7,465 (-11)       Brisbane 3,655 (-41)       Adelaide 1,394 (+25)       Perth 2,273 (-9)       Hobart 247 (-6)       Darwin 41 (-1)       Canberra 470 (+19)       National Capitals 22,043 (+8)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,261 (+44)       Melbourne 6,264 (+33)       Brisbane 2,022 (+13)       Adelaide 418 (+5)       Perth 817 (-31)       Hobart 72 (-4)       Darwin 69 (-18)       Canberra 763 (+1)       National Capitals 20,686 (+43)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.64% (↓)     Melbourne 3.12% (↑)        Brisbane 3.07% (↓)     Adelaide 3.26% (↑)      Perth 3.56% (↑)      Hobart 3.79% (↑)        Darwin 5.04% (↓)     Canberra 3.92% (↑)      National Capitals 3.31% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 5.55% (↑)        Melbourne 6.01% (↓)     Brisbane 4.55% (↑)      Adelaide 5.14% (↑)      Perth 5.64% (↑)      Hobart 4.93% (↑)      Darwin 7.28% (↑)        Canberra 6.25% (↓)     National Capitals 5.48% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 35.2 (↑)      Melbourne 34.9 (↑)      Brisbane 38.0 (↑)      Adelaide 28.3 (↑)      Perth 41.9 (↑)      Hobart 31.0 (↑)      Darwin 29.9 (↑)      Canberra 34.7 (↑)      National Capitals 34.2 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 32.7 (↑)        Melbourne 30.5 (↓)     Brisbane 34.6 (↑)      Adelaide 29.5 (↑)        Perth 39.2 (↓)     Hobart 29.5 (↑)      Darwin 31.9 (↑)        Canberra 37.9 (↓)       National Capitals 33.2 (↓)           
Share Button

Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.

Ad campaigns for online dating companies have become flashpoints for frustrated online daters

By SARA ASHLEY O’BRIEN
Tue, Jun 25, 2024 9:13amGrey Clock 6 min

As online-dating apps court new and younger audiences, some of their marketing efforts are turning off daters instead.

Bumble last month apologised for ads making light of women so frustrated with online dating that they would consider celibacy. The League, a dating app targeting “the overly ambitious,” was called “ick-inducing” for its recent ad campaign, which included taglines like “Date someone with a 5-year-plan that makes you want to ovulate.” And Hinge’s years-long “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign has started to fall flat for longtime users still looking for love on their phones.

Online dating continues to play a lead role in the romantic lives of millions of Americans. Around half of all U.S. adults under 30 have used a dating site or app at some point in their lives, and one in 10 adults with partners say they met their significant other by dating online, according to Pew Research Center data. And the industry’s biggest players, Match Group and Bumble, now generate annual revenues north of $3.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

But the ad campaigns have high stakes for online dating companies trying to achieve the right mix of user acquisition and pricing power to re-interest Wall Street in a saturated sector.

Online-dating growth has been slowing. Paying users declined 6% in the first quarter of the year at Match Group, whose portfolio includes the League, Tinder and Hinge, compared with a 3% dip in the first quarter of 2023. The Bumble app grew paying users 18% in the first quarter, compared with 31% growth in the period a year earlier.

Shares in both have fallen this year even as the S&P 500 rose. And some singles have become perhaps as wary as investors.

Nearly half of all online daters and more than half of female daters say their experiences have been negative, according to Pew , and a growing tide of users are sharing their dissatisfaction in popular Facebook forums and on TikTok. People bemoan a perceived rise in bad dating etiquette such as “ghosting” and the sending of unsolicited sexual messages, and blame the way online romance makes it easier to discard potential partners at a touch of a button. “Hacks,” or tricks designed to game the apps for better dates, abound, demonstrating the shortcomings of their designs.

And the companies’ growing emphasis on pricier premium services is giving users new reasons to scrutinise the algorithmically driven path to romance.

Bumble made its name as a free app that only let women make the first move, for example. But since 2016, it has charged for advantages such as unlimited “swipes” to connect with prospects. The most expensive plan today costs $80 a month. Nonpaying users on Bumble and other apps can hit a limit, which some say leaves them taunted by the nagging fear that their perfect partners are hidden just on the other side of a paywall.

In this environment, new ad campaigns have become a release valve for the tension.

Lidiane Jones, CEO, Bumble, at The Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything Festival in New York on May 21. PHOTO: GARY HE FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Failure to launch

Bumble users had hoped change was on the way after a teaser campaign depicted a discouraged dater joining a convent but happily leaving after being handed the Bumble app. “We’ve changed so you don’t have to,” one of the ads promised.

“At this point, it’s the app’s responsibility not to rebrand, but to pivot technologically,” said Michelle Khouri , the founder of creator platform Recordical , who has been using dating apps on and off for 10 years following her divorce from a man she met through online dating service eHarmony.

But Bumble’s big move wasn’t a fundamental overhaul: The company was letting women put questions on their profiles to which men they matched with could respond without a specific invitation.

Disappointment became backlash when the full ad campaign included billboards that declared, “Thou shalt not give up on dating and become a nun” and “You know full well a vow of celibacy is not the answer.”

Female daters often thinly disguise their dissatisfaction with modern dating by joking about giving it up for a life of spinsterhood, and Bumble had done what all marketers try to do—joined the conversation 

The problem for many was that Bumble’s quips about nunneries located the problem in daters’ resilience, as opposed to the dating apps themselves, and the unfavourable dating culture some users say the apps’ owners have been complicit in fuelling.

“Bumble was a brand that built its identity on empowering women and then they absolutely laughed in our faces,” said Michelle Wintersteen, the founder and chief executive of branding and marketing agency MKW Creative and a former Bumble user who grew frustrated by its paywalls.

Bumble took down the billboards and made several public apologies.

“We just made a mistake in how that landed. It was not good and we felt really terrible about it,” Bumble CEO Lidiane Jones said at a Wall Street Journal event last month.

Jones added in an emailed statement that the company is enhancing its internal and external review processes, and “actively engaging in conversations to ensure our marketing tone matches the 10 years Bumble has dedicated to championing women and creating safe, respectful, and empowering spaces for connection.”

Some online-dating executives and observers think the gripes with dating apps are largely an extension of age-old ennui over the search for lasting love.

“This is not a new phenomenon, and I think that dating apps have crystallised and brought those concerns to the fore, primarily because the prior institutions that were responsible for connecting individuals—such as family, friends, churches, other homes of worship—were not able to assume blame in the same way,” said Jess Carbino, a sociologist who has worked as a consultant for Bumble and Tinder.

Pickup lines

When the League introduced its “Be a GoalDigger” brand campaign in 2023, its first big marketing effort since being acquired by Match Group in 2022, some had visceral reactions.

“Whoever is behind this truly thought they were like, hitting Gen -Z, being super edgy and cool,” said the TikTok user who reported getting the “ick” from its campaign. “In reality, it is the most millennial, cringy thing that makes you want to actually convulse.”

The app has “never been afraid of speaking up or speaking out about the kind of people that The League attracts,” said Lisa Kraynak, senior vice president of marketing for the League, in a statement. In addition to its ad mentioning ovulation, others read: “Find Your Goal Mate” and “Date Someone With Big Goal Energy.”

“We know that we aren’t for everyone, and that is a core part of our value proposition,” Kraynak added, noting that a number of people responded well to it.

Unlike apps such as Tinder and Bumble, the League requires profile approval to join. On the app, users get three to five prospects a day unless they upgrade to become a paying member, which runs $99 a week or $399 for a three-month subscription. Once a match is made in the app, users have 14 days to initiate a conversation before the matches expire.

Fighting flakes

These components, as well as features such as a “flakiness score” indicating which users have a habit of matching but not chatting, are why Kraynak said the League is “designed to combat the dissatisfaction with apps today .”

Tinder has leaned away from the celebration of singledom that it embraced in a 2018 brand campaign that called single “a terrible thing to waste.” While the app has long been associated with hookups, the company has more recently emphasised the various relationships that can result from its app. Its marketing now romanticizes “a toothbrush at their place” and “comfortable silences,” all while it seeks to upsell users.

“It was about shedding a perception that was too narrow and not accurate,” said Melissa Hobley, chief marketing officer at Tinder.

Hinge, the Match Group brand that has long positioned itself as an app for finding relationships rather than hookups, continues to iterate on its “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign launched in 2019. The company has refreshed the campaign every year since then with the same tagline.

On social media, some dissatisfied users say they have deleted the app—not because they found love but because the app didn’t work for them. Hinge said every feature is designed to help daters be intentional and that it is looking for ways to address dating burnout.

Chief Marketing Officer Jackie Jantos said Hinge is the fastest-growing major dating app.

“‘Designed to Be Deleted,’ as an idea and a marketing program, continues to help us build our base of users,” Jantos said.

Match Group said Hinge’s direct revenue grew 50% in the first quarter of the year as paying members increased 31% and revenue per payer rose 14%. It offers two types of subscriptions, Hinge+ and HingeX, which start at $14.99 and $24.99, respectively, a week.

More recently, the company partnered with a social-media brand that interviews couples on the street, to circulate their love stories that involve Hinge.

“We know that our best growth comes from organic success stories of people meeting on Hinge,” added Jantos.



MOST POPULAR

Set on one of the city’s last absolute riverfront sites, The Riversdale by Mosaic combines irreplaceable waterfront ownership with one of Brisbane’s most significant residential opportunities.

Margot Robbie may have travelled from a Queensland farm to the highest reaches of Hollywood, but a reported $28 million property deal suggests the Gold Coast has never lost its hold on her. The Australian actor and producer is believed to be the mystery buyer of Redwood, a seven-acre Currumbin Valley estate transformed into the …

Related Stories
Lifestyle
The Rise of Million-Dollar Companies With Just One Employee
By 30/07/2026
Lifestyle
Dubai’s Property Boom Is Splitting Into Two Markets
By Staff Writer 29/07/2026
Lifestyle
Property of the Week: Longueville harbour home listed for the first time in a quarter of a century
By Staff Writer 17/07/2026
Why Chasing Yield After the Budget Could Cost You Everything

The federal budget has rattled property investors. But the biggest mistake isn’t the tax changes, it’s the conclusion many are drawing from them.

By Jeni O'Dowd
Tue, Jun 30, 2026 2 min

The recent budget has forced a reckoning for property investors.

Negative gearing now restricted to new residential builds, the CGT discount gone and on paper, the numbers look different.

And many investors are responding by pivoting toward yield, prioritising cash flow over capital growth in a way that property strategists say misses the point entirely.

“The debate has shifted to yield versus growth as if they are opposing forces,” says Abdullah Nouh, founder of Melbourne-based buyers’ agency Mecca Property Group. “But that framing is itself the mistake.”

Nouh, who works with high-net-worth families and investors on long-term acquisition strategy, argues that capital growth remains the primary driver of genuine wealth creation and that the post-budget environment has made quality assets more important, not less.

The numbers make his case plainly. An additional $500 per week in rental income is welcome. A prestige asset appreciating by $1 million over a market cycle is transformative.

These are not equivalent outcomes, and portfolios built around yield at the expense of location and land value tend to generate income while wealth stands largely still.

The more nuanced shift Nouh is seeing among sophisticated investors is a move toward assets where both outcomes can be engineered simultaneously – established homes on substantial land in quality locations, where the existing dwelling can be repositioned, rental returns improved, and the underlying land value compounds independent of what sits on it.

For investors with existing equity, commercial property is also entering the conversation in a more serious way.

Prestige industrial assets, medical centres and long-leased essential retail offer income profiles that residential property in most capital city markets cannot currently match: longer lease terms, tenants covering outgoings, and greater predictability than the residential tenancy cycle.

“The investors who build lasting wealth are rarely the ones who chased yield or growth exclusively,” says Nouh.

“They are the ones who built a strategy they could sustain – one that generated enough income to hold quality assets through multiple cycles while those assets compounded in value.”

The budget has changed the settings. It has not changed the fundamentals.

MOST POPULAR

Scotch whisky expert, luxury hospitality strategist and Keeper of the Quaich inductee Ross Blainey is bringing a new philosophy of luxury experiences to Citizen Kanebridge.

Warmer minimalism, tactile materials and wellness focused layouts are redefining luxury interiors as homeowners design for comfort, connection and lasting appeal.

Related Stories
Property
DOUBLE-DIGIT HOUSE PRICE GROWTH ARRIVES AHEAD OF EXPECTATIONS
By Staff Writer 04/11/2025
Property
BYRON HINTERLAND TROPHY HOME WITH STAR POWER RETURNS TO MARKET
By Kirsten Craze 06/02/2026
Lifestyle
A NEW SEASON FOR AUSTRALIA’S MOST EXPRESSIVE WINES
By Jeni O'Dowd 23/02/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop