GameStop Confirms Plans to Invest in Bitcoin. The Stock Is Climbing.
GameStop has approved adding Bitcoin to its balance sheet, confirming speculation as the company explores new growth avenues.
GameStop has approved adding Bitcoin to its balance sheet, confirming speculation as the company explores new growth avenues.
Videogame seller and meme stock GameStop said its board approved adding Bitcoin as an investment.
The company announced its board unanimously approved an update to its investment policy to add Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset. In a filing, it said “a portion of our cash or future debt and equity issuances may be invested in Bitcoin” and that it had not set a maximum on the amount of Bitcoin it could accumulate or sell. The move had been the subject of recent speculation as GameStop seeks new sources of growth.
For the fourth quarter ended Feb. 1, GameStop reported net sales of $1.28 billion, below the $1.48 billion analysts surveyed by FactSet had expected.
Adjusted earnings of 29 cents a share beat the 8 cents a share analysts expected. Net income of $131.3 million was also above the $33 million expected.
Shares were up 6% in late trading, after closing down 0.8% on Tuesday, at $25.80. Shares traded as low as $24.99 intraday, down 2.4%, the largest intraday percentage decline since March 12, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
Analysts and investors have been more interested in updates on the company’s strategic direction than its earnings results, as GameStop faces questions about the profitability of its core business. It has been closing physical stores and expanding beyond videogames amid the continuing shift to digital gaming.
The company said it completed its divestiture in Italy and the wind-down of store operations in Germany.
For the full fiscal year ended Feb. 1, GameStop reported net sales of $3.82 billion, below the $4.02 billion expected.
Net income of $131.3 million and earnings of 33 cents a share both beat analysts’ expectations.
GameStop stock has risen 64% over the past 12 months, in part because of the return of investor Keith Gill, also known as “Roaring Kitty,” who said in a YouTube livestream in June 2024 that he is still a “ believer ” in GameStop. The shares are down 19% this year through Tuesday’s close.
“Roaring Kitty’s” social media posts helped fuel the meme stock frenzy in early 2021, pushing GameStop’s stock to its record high of $86.88 on Jan. 27, 2021.
Michael Pachter, a managing director at Wedbush Securities and former CEO of Take-Two Interactive Software who specializes in the videogame sector, said the company’s recent moves into trading cards was unlikely to be the catalyst that would turn around the core business.
“It is unfathomable that they will ever turn their core business (selling games) around by offering trading cards in their stores,” he told Barron’s in an email. When GameStop announced it was getting into the collectible trading cards business last October, he noted the company’s “utter lack of competitive advantage” in the “wildly fragmented” business.
“The company has once again accelerated store closures in an attempt to save its way to prosperity, and its plans to enter the trading card business and to invest in cryptocurrency are striking in their lack of specificity,” Wedbush analysts led by Pachter wrote in a research note Monday.
They said that GameStop’s entry into trading cards and crypto followed its last two attempts at a turnaround, and that its shares “trade at a level that ignores the company’s many challenges ahead.” They called its entry into cryptocurrency “an unsubtle attempt to emulate the success of MicroStrategy , which trades at less than 2x the value of its Bitcoin holdings.” They reiterated their Underperform rating and their 12-month price target of $10.
“Far more likely, they will continue to slowly liquidate by selling off assets” and by closing stores when their leases expire, Pachter said Monday. “That leaves them with ‘profits’ on investment income from their $4.6 billion cash hoard, which they raised by virtue of their meme stock status.”
GameStop management doesn’t hold conference calls to discuss results, and because few analysts follow the company, the consensus forecast as tracked by FactSet includes just two estimates.
Based in Grapevine, Texas, the company offers games and entertainment products online and in stores in the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Europe.
Pachter noted that GameStop’s stock price, trading around 2.5 times cash, suggests investors have faith in CEO Ryan Cohen’s ability to pick investments for them.
In February, Cohen posted a photo of himself on social media with Michael Saylor, co-founder and executive chairman of MicroStrategy, the largest institutional holder of Bitcoin , apparently helping to fuel the rumors about GameStop’s own crypto ambitions.
“MicroStrategy trades as around twice the value of its Bitcoin holdings, so it remains to be seen if Ryan Cohen can find a better cryptocurrency to invest in and drive GME share to 2.6 times the value of its assets,” Pachter said.
On March 3, GameStop announced a deal with digital financial services company Zip Co. to let U.S. customers pay in installments for their online and in-store gaming purchases.
Zip U.S. CEO Joe Heck said at the time that nearly 84% of Zip’s U.S. customers shop for gaming and accessories at GameStop. “Gaming is one of Zip’s most popular categories overall, making Zip an ideal partner for helping these shoppers responsibly purchase goods and services from one of the industry’s fan-favorites and top businesses.”
From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
A sharp technology sell-off has exposed a new anxiety on global markets: whether the enormous borrowing behind the artificial-intelligence infrastructure boom can generate sufficient returns as interest rates rise and Chinese competition intensifies.
The artificial-intelligence investment boom has powered technology shares, semiconductor manufacturers and data-centre operators to extraordinary heights. Last week, investors were given a reminder that much of this expansion is being built with borrowed money.
The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 4.5 per cent over the week ended October 16, its weakest performance since late June. Semiconductor shares suffered an even deeper correction, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index losing about 11.4 per cent.
The selling spread quickly through global markets. Micron Technology fell 14.6 per cent over the week, while South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix dropped approximately 18 per cent and 24 per cent respectively.
This was more than a routine bout of profit-taking. Investors were reassessing three interconnected risks: higher interest rates, the rapidly expanding debt burden attached to AI infrastructure and the prospect of stronger competition from Chinese memory-chip manufacturers.
Artificial intelligence requires a physical infrastructure network of enormous scale. Data centres must be built, advanced processors purchased, power supplies secured and cooling systems installed before customers begin generating meaningful revenue from them.
Technology companies are increasingly supplementing their own cash with corporate bonds, syndicated loans, equipment leases, private credit and project-level financing.
JPMorgan describes the emerging funding model as a combination of conventional corporate borrowing and project finance tied to individual data-centre assets. In Australia, the Reserve Bank estimates that syndicated loans accounted for approximately three-quarters of data-centre financing during 2025 and 2026 to date.
The numbers are becoming large enough to affect broader credit markets. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas has cited Wall Street estimates suggesting AI-related investment-grade bond issuance could approach US$300 billion in 2026 alone.
That borrowing is not automatically problematic. Debt can be an efficient way to finance long-lived infrastructure when future revenue is sufficiently predictable. The concern is that AI technology, customer demand and computing economics are changing much faster than the repayment schedules attached to the assets.
A data centre financed today may carry debt for years. Investors must therefore make assumptions about future utilisation rates, electricity prices, chip performance, customer concentration and the amount businesses will ultimately pay for AI computing.
When interest rates rise, those assumptions become less forgiving.
September’s US inflation data intensified the pressure. Consumer prices increased 3.7 per cent over the year, ahead of market expectations and up from 3.4 per cent in August.
The hotter reading reduced confidence that interest rates would fall quickly and pushed bond yields higher. That matters particularly for companies whose valuations depend on profits expected well into the future, as well as highly leveraged infrastructure operators that may need to refinance.
CoreWeave has emerged as a closely watched test case. The specialist cloud-computing company has accumulated substantial debt and lease obligations to build AI capacity, while relying on a concentrated group of large technology customers.
Its shares fell sharply during the sell-off, while the cost of insuring its debt against default climbed. CoreWeave has argued that its contracted backlog more than covers its obligations and that financial markets do not always understand its business model. Nevertheless, its securities have become a proxy for investor confidence in debt-funded AI infrastructure.
Oracle, another major investor in AI computing capacity, fell 8.8 per cent in Friday trading, while CoreWeave dropped 15.5 per cent.
The question is shifting from how much AI infrastructure can be built to how profitably it can be operated.
Interest rates were not the only catalyst. Reports of advances by Chinese memory-chip producer ChangXin Memory Technologies raised concerns that lower-cost Chinese products could increase competition across the global semiconductor industry.
Memory chips are essential to AI systems, but the industry is historically cyclical. Periods of tight supply and high pricing can encourage rapid investment, eventually producing oversupply and falling margins.
The prospect of a well-funded Chinese competitor expanding its technological capabilities unsettled investors in Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron. It also demonstrated that AI-related demand does not insulate chipmakers from conventional competitive pressures.
That combination—slower rate cuts, more expensive financing and potentially cheaper supply—challenged the assumption that every company exposed to AI would enjoy continually expanding margins.
The sell-off does not establish that the AI boom is ending. Demand for computing power remains strong, the largest technology companies continue to generate formidable cash flows and many infrastructure projects are backed by long-term customer contracts.
What has changed is the market’s willingness to overlook the price and financing structure of that growth.
The most resilient companies are likely to be those able to fund investment from operating cash flow, secure long-duration customers and demonstrate that new capacity will earn returns comfortably above its financing costs.
More speculative operators may face greater scrutiny, particularly where debt is expensive, customers are concentrated or expected revenue depends on demand that has not yet materialised.
For Australian investors, the lesson extends beyond US technology shares. Local data-centre operators, infrastructure funds, electricity suppliers and property groups are increasingly exposed to the same investment cycle.
Artificial intelligence may remain one of the defining growth themes of the decade. But last week’s correction showed that enthusiasm for the technology does not eliminate financial discipline.
The next stage of the AI boom will be judged not only by computing power, model performance or demand for chips, but by something more traditional: whether the assets being financed can generate enough cash to repay the money borrowed to build them.
Nasdaq Composite: Down 4.5 per cent for the week ended October 16, 2026
Philadelphia Semiconductor Index: Down approximately 11.4 per cent
Micron Technology: Down approximately 14.6 per cent
Samsung Electronics: Down approximately 18 per cent
SK Hynix: Down approximately 24 per cent
US September inflation: 3.7 per cent annually
Estimated 2026 AI-related investment-grade issuance: Approximately US$300 billion
Rugged coastal drives and fireside drams define a slow, indulgent journey through Scotland’s far north.
From warmer neutrals to tactile finishes, Australian homes are moving away from stark minimalism and towards spaces that feel more human.