How Research in Space Helps Doctors Treat People on Earth
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,730,998 (-1.35%)       Melbourne $1,052,750 (-0.63%)       Brisbane $1,213,162 (-0.55%)       Adelaide $1,088,669 (-1.01%)       Perth $1,109,065 (-0.03%)       Hobart $857,011 (-0.15%)       Darwin $850,231 (-5.88%)       Canberra $1,057,418 (+2.13%)       National Capitals $1,179,457 (-0.85%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $812,882 (-0.02%)       Melbourne $547,522 (-0.39%)       Brisbane $775,633 (-1.81%)       Adelaide $583,866 (+1.25%)       Perth $661,533 (-0.91%)       Hobart $583,528 (+2.34%)       Darwin $488,291 (-0.29%)       Canberra $502,282 (+1.20%)       National Capitals $640,074 (-0.20%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 14,388 (-149)       Melbourne 16,400 (-697)       Brisbane 9,524 (+147)       Adelaide 2,995 (+70)       Perth 7,340 (+170)       Hobart 758 (-2)       Darwin 142 (+4)       Canberra 1,228 (-5)       National Capitals 52,775 (-462)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,737 (+19)       Melbourne 6,931 (-54)       Brisbane 1,794 (+10)       Adelaide 449 (+21)       Perth 1,390 (+12)       Hobart 145 (-6)       Darwin 212 (+3)       Canberra 1,245 (+31)       National Capitals 21,903 (+36)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $870 ($0)       Melbourne $610 (+$10)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $625 ($0)       Darwin $875 (+$25)       Canberra $730 (-$20)       National Capitals $739 (+$3)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $815 (-$5)       Melbourne $630 ($0)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $555 (-$5)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $545 (+$45)       Darwin $655 (+$5)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $658 (+$3)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,162 (+59)       Melbourne 7,192 (+17)       Brisbane 3,645 (-54)       Adelaide 1,428 (+38)       Perth 2,339 (-34)       Hobart 280 (+15)       Darwin 38 (-7)       Canberra 456 (+28)       National Capitals 21,540 (+62)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,135 (+92)       Melbourne 5,909 (+25)       Brisbane 1,996 (+38)       Adelaide 446 (-20)       Perth 714 (-5)       Hobart 70 (+3)       Darwin 78 (+8)       Canberra 695 (-26)       National Capitals 19,043 (+115)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.61% (↑)      Melbourne 3.01% (↑)      Brisbane 3.00% (↑)      Adelaide 3.10% (↑)      Perth 3.52% (↑)      Hobart 3.79% (↑)      Darwin 5.35% (↑)        Canberra 3.59% (↓)     National Capitals 3.26% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.21% (↓)     Melbourne 5.98% (↑)      Brisbane 4.56% (↑)        Adelaide 4.94% (↓)     Perth 5.50% (↑)      Hobart 4.86% (↑)      Darwin 6.98% (↑)        Canberra 6.21% (↓)     National Capitals 5.34% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 32.7 (↑)      Melbourne 32.4 (↑)        Brisbane 33.3 (↓)     Adelaide 27.4 (↑)        Perth 37.9 (↓)       Hobart 27.4 (↓)     Darwin 27.7 (↑)      Canberra 29.7 (↑)      National Capitals 31.1 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 30.5 (↓)     Melbourne 29.9 (↑)      Brisbane 33.2 (↑)        Adelaide 21.3 (↓)       Perth 38.5 (↓)     Hobart 31.1 (↑)        Darwin 38.7 (↓)       Canberra 38.0 (↓)       National Capitals 32.6 (↓)           
Share Button

How Research in Space Helps Doctors Treat People on Earth

Removing gravity allows researchers to do experiments they could never duplicate on the ground

By BRIAN GORMLEY
Mon, Sep 25, 2023 9:12amGrey Clock 6 min

Medical research in space is leading to advances that could help patients on Earth.

Several technologies developed for space exploration have afterward contributed to medical products. Infrared thermometers, for example, stem from infrared sensors created to remotely measure the temperature of distant stars and planets.

But increasingly, scientists aim to perform research in space specifically for human health. Interest in conducting medical research in space has grown as researchers recognise possibilities enabled by microgravity, in which objects appear to be weightless, aboard the International Space Station, or ISS, which orbits the Earth about 250 miles from its surface.

Removing gravity’s influence alters biological systems, enabling experiments that can’t be done on the ground. Researchers are sending materials into space to study treatments for cancer, heart disease, neurological disorders, blindness and other conditions.

Such investigations extend beyond civilian medicine. With preparations under way for long-term missions to the moon, and eventually to Mars, scientists are advancing technologies to help astronauts endure extended space travel and confront illnesses and medical emergencies.

Justifying the expense

Several factors complicate space-based research. The cost of transporting materials, for one, as well as preparations needed to convert experiments conducted on Earth into ones that can be run on the ISS, which is itself a complicated partnership of five space agencies from 15 countries. The station has been occupied continuously since November 2000.

Space studies’ potential to discover cures and create tools that make healthcare more accessible justify the expense and complexity, some scientists say.

“Everything we do onboard has potential applications for healthcare on Earth,” says Dr. Dave Williams, who conducted neuroscience research on space shuttle Columbia, and is now chief executive of Leap Biosystems, a developer of medical devices for virtual clinical care in space and on Earth.

Space travel itself, for example, is known to cause bone and muscle loss, immune suppression, central nervous system changes and other effects. Detrimental as these effects are, they are of particular interest to scientists.

For the most part, health concerns astronauts develop in space resolve when they return, says Dr. Christopher Austin, former director of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and now CEO of biotechnology startup Vesalius Therapeutics. Studying how this reversal occurs could provide insight on turning back the clock on disorders of aging on Earth, he adds.

Exposure to microgravity seems to replicate the effects of ageing at the cellular level, says Michael Roberts, chief scientific officer of the U.S. National Laboratory on the ISS. As a result, investigators in months can glean insights from studies that might require years of research on Earth.

“What happens in space is akin to accelerated ageing,” says Arun Sharma, assistant professor at the Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, who says his experience with space research includes sending stem-cell-derived heart cells to the ISS. “We can study these aging processes in a faster way in microgravity.”

Anticancer drug

Meantime, companies including drugmaker Merck and biotechnology concerns Axonis Therapeutics and LambdaVision aim to capitalize on microgravity to improve existing treatments or optimise experimental ones.

Merck has been conducting experiments aboard the ISS to determine whether it can come up with a crystalline form of an anticancer drug in its portfolio, Keytruda. The drug, which treats several cancers, generated $20.9 billion in sales in 2022. Patients receive it in 30-minute intravenous infusions. Its active ingredient, pembrolizumab, a large molecule known as a monoclonal antibody, isn’t highly soluble, so developing a high-concentration liquid formulation that can be given through a simple injection is difficult, says Paul Reichert, a Merck Research Laboratories scientist.

One solution is to produce it in crystallised form, a routine process for small-molecule drugs taken as pills. But making an optimal crystalline suspension is challenging for large-molecule, antibody drugs, Reichert says.

So Merck decided to attempt it in space. In 2017 it sent pembrolizumab to the ISS to see whether crystals would form better in space. Without gravity, molecules move more slowly and forces including convection currents are limited. Crystals produced on the ISS were smaller and more uniform than Earth counterparts, Reichert says.

On the ground, Merck identified techniques to mimic these effects and enable high-quality crystals. Now it is conducting long-term stability research to enable a Keytruda formulation that is injectable and, unlike today’s version, stable at room temperature. That would make it more accessible in areas with limited refrigeration.

Such studies will take years, but could lead to a lower-cost version of Keytruda that is easier to administer and cheaper to transport, Reichert says.

“That would be a game-changer for biologics drug delivery,” he adds.

Surprising results

Sometimes space research yields surprising results.

Biotech startup Angiex sought to better understand how an experimental cancer drug interacted with normal cells lining blood vessels, known as endothelial cells, says Paul Jaminet, co-founder, president and chief operating officer. The problem was these cells, when cultured on Earth, typically die quickly unless they are cultured with growth factors and changed to a proliferative state similar to that of endothelial cells in tumours. As a result, there is no good cell-culture model for the normal endothelial cells in which Angiex’s drugs are expected to have their toxicity, he says.

Angiex’s team hypothesised that culturing them in microgravity would be a solution, sending endothelial cells to the ISS in 2018. The cells did grow in space, but as they adapted to microgravity, they took on unusual characteristics that may not have a counterpart on Earth, Jaminet says.

The findings may advance understanding of how microgravity affects astronauts, he says. “In science, unexpected results are very precious,” he adds.

But since it appears the cells cultured in microgravity don’t resemble normal endothelial cells, and acquired a novel pathological state not previously seen, it isn’t yet clear if these cells are useful for drug-development purposes. Further work, he says, will be needed to understand this novel state and see if it is useful for understanding diseases on Earth.

“When you put cells into a completely new system, you’re going to get intended results and unintended results,” says Dr. Serena Auñón-Chancellor, an astronaut who worked on the Angiex research on the ISS, and a clinical associate professor of medicine for the LSU Health Sciences Center in Baton Rouge.

Axonis in August had good luck with a project to coax two kinds of human brain cells, neurons and astrocytes, to unite into a three-dimensional model of the brain in microgravity. It used the model to test a gene therapy designed to restore neural connections damaged by neurodegenerative diseases or spinal-cord injury.

The experiment provided evidence that Axonis’s gene therapy travels to its intended target, neurons, and avoids astrocytes, says co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer Shane Hegarty. In labs on Earth, neurons and astrocytes would form a carpet-like, two-dimensional layer. This doesn’t fully represent the brain’s complexity and is less useful for advancing the gene therapy, Hegarty adds.

The implications of this research are that scientists could use patients’ own cells to create models of their disease in space to speed their search for treatments, he says.

“For any drug-development effort, you need a good model first,” Hegarty says.

Restoring sight

One long-term research program on the ISS is LambdaVision’s effort to restore vision to people blinded by diseases of the retina, the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye.

LambdaVision has flown eight payloads to the ISS since 2016, says Chief Scientific Officer Jordan Greco, adding that the company has found that its artificial retina seems to come together better in microgravity.

Microgravity enables more ordered and even packing of protein molecules onto the scaffold, CEO Nicole Wagner says. If its artificial retina, expected to enter clinical trials in about three years, earns regulatory approval, LambdaVision will manufacture it on the ISS or a commercial space station, she says.

Considering the demand for vision-restoration therapy, reimbursement from insurers should be sufficient to justify this expense, Wagner says. “With artificial retinas, there’s a clear unmet need,” she says.

To convert its lab process into one viable for the ISS, LambdaVision teamed with space-biotech company Space Tango to condense the process into a device that looks like a metal shoebox. The automated system contains proteins, polymers and solutions to assemble the artificial retina layers, and cameras that let researchers monitor and control the process from the ground, Wagner says.

Also using Space Tango is Encapsulate, a biotech with grant funding to launch into space biochips containing micro tumours made from patient cancer cells. The chips could predict an individual’s response to drugs, helping oncologists tailor treatment, Encapsulate co-founder and CEO Armin Rad says.

When adapting scientists’ projects for space “we have to take the human out of it and stuff it all into a box,” Space Tango Chief Strategy Officer Alain Berinstain says. Biotechs also express interest in the automated system for ground use, which was unexpected, he says. “It’s turned into a new business opportunity for us,” he adds.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration plans a crewed mission to the lunar surface in 2025 and eventually a mission to Mars. Astronauts will require medications for the trip, and they can’t pack every drug they might need, says Phil Williams, a professor of biophysics in the School of Pharmacy at the University of Nottingham.

Medications degrade faster in space because of high radiation levels, says Williams, who is working with NASA researcher Lynn Rothschild on an astropharmacy, a briefcase-like system enabling astronauts to produce medications on demand.

In one version under study, cellular machinery that certain microbes use to make proteins would be combined with genetic sequences that code for specific biological medicines, Williams says. This could be paired with a production system to express the therapeutic protein and DNA-synthesis technology, he adds.

The notion of an astropharmacy extends to other extreme environments. If the technology proves effective in space it could also be used in hard-to-reach locations on Earth, he says.

“If we can make the drug for the astronaut, then we can make it for anybody,” Williams says.



MOST POPULAR

A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.

As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.

Related Stories
Money
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians
By Opinion, Anthony Hunt 22/06/2026
Money
WHY COMING HOME CAN BE MORE FINANCIALLY COMPLICATED THAN LEAVING
By Brett Evans, Opinion 15/06/2026
Money
Everything You Need to Know About the SpaceX Trading Debut
By CORRIE DRIEBUSCH 12/06/2026
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians

The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.

By Opinion, Anthony Hunt
Mon, Jun 22, 2026 3 min

For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.

The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:

Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?

In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.

The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.

This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.

The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.

For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.

We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.

Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.

They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.

The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.

The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.

Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.

Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.

And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.

Anthony Hunt

The real issue is complacency.

Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.

Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.

We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.

Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.

At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.

How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?

How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?

These are the questions families should be asking now.

The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.

But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.

Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.

The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.

They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.

Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.

It is about preparing for it.

Because the greatest risk is not change itself.

It is losing the ability to respond to it.

Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer

MOST POPULAR

From snow-dusted valleys to festival-filled autumns, Bhutan reveals itself as a rare destination where culture, nature and spirituality unfold year-round.

The megamansion was built for Tony Pritzker, heir to the Hyatt Hotel fortune and brother of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Pop Stars: Six Champagnes For Every Festive Moment
By Jeni O'Dowd 21/11/2025
Motors
ROLLS-ROYCE MARKS A CENTURY OF PHANTOM WITH ULTRA-LIMITED PRIVATE COLLECTION
By Staff Writer 27/10/2025
Lifestyle
One Night. One Chef. One Chance: Join Dan Arnold for Michelin-Inspired Dining
By Staff Writer 15/09/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop