Trade Woes in Asia Bring Inflation Relief to U.S. Consumers
But slowing exports to Western nations won’t alone stem rapidly rising prices
But slowing exports to Western nations won’t alone stem rapidly rising prices
SINGAPORE—Sinking global trade is pummelling Asian exports, bringing some relief on inflation to U.S. and other Western consumers.
But easing prices for home furnishings, electronics and other manufactured goods don’t signal high inflation will soon be defeated. Wage growth and services price gains are still elevated. And central banks in the U.S. and Europe are warning they aren’t finished raising interest rates in their fight to cool inflation.
Cheap Asian goods helped keep a lid on price growth for decades before the pandemic. Economists say that phenomenon is unlikely to return with the same intensity now that the high-water mark of globalisation has passed.
Asia’s powerhouse exporters enjoyed a boom in overseas sales during the pandemic as locked-down consumers splurged on new computers, workout gear and home improvements.
On a rolling 12-month basis, the U.S. dollar value of exports from China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore peaked last year in September at $6.1 trillion. That was 40% higher than recorded over the 12 months through March 2020, when the pandemic began, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of official figures compiled by data provider CEIC.
Asian exports started sliding late last year as rising interest rates took some heat out of economic growth. Western consumers have slowed spending on goods in favour of eating out, traveling and other services they missed during the pandemic. Hopes that China’s reopening would spur a rebound in trade have fizzled along with the country’s consumer-led recovery.
Exports from South Korea over the 12 months through May were 11% lower than they were in the year through September. Taiwan exports were down 14% over the same period. Singapore’s were down 6%, Japan’s 4% and China’s by 3%.
The weakness in trade is showing up in the prices charged for goods when they leave Asia’s factories. Chinese producer prices fell 4.6% in May compared with a year earlier, the eighth straight month of declining supplier prices in the world’s largest factory floor. Similar gauges of inflation in other Asian exporter economies are weakening, too, as lower commodity prices reduce costs and collapsing demand for goods saps companies’ pricing power.
The effects of cooling Asia trade are starting to be felt in the U.S., where the Federal Reserve signalled it expects to further increase interest rates after holding them steady this month.
U.S. import prices for goods from Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea were down 6.3% in May compared with a year earlier, according to the Labor Department. Import prices were down 2% from China and 3.7% from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, a 10-member group that includes Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.
The prices paid by importers don’t quite line up with the prices faced by consumers, as companies need to cover labor, shipping and other costs to get products into stores.
Nonetheless, prices declined in May from a year earlier for a variety of goods in the U.S. that are often sourced from Asia, including furniture, home appliances, televisions, sports equipment, computers and smartphones.
Overall U.S. inflation is proving resilient, though. The consumer-price index, which measures what Americans pay for goods and services, rose 4% in May from a year earlier—twice the Fed’s 2% goal. Core consumer prices, which exclude food and energy, climbed 5.3%.
If surging prices for goods during the pandemic delivered the first burst of inflation, and rocketing energy prices after Russia invaded Ukraine propelled the second, then the current stickiness of inflation is being fuelled by increases in wages and the price of services. So while easing goods-price inflation is welcome, it doesn’t mean central banks have won the battle, economists say.
“The disinflation impulse coming from Asia is not going to be the magic bullet for the West’s inflation problem,” said Frederic Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC in Hong Kong, referring to the slowing pace of price increases.
In the decades before the pandemic, the integration of China into the global economy contributed to a long spell of low and stable inflation enjoyed by many Western economies. The broader integration of markets for goods, services, labor and capital under the banner of globalisation meant cheaper goods for consumers and fewer inflation worries for central banks, though economists debate just how big the effects were.
Now, governments and corporations are tiptoeing away from unfettered globalisation in the interests of security and economic resilience. Manufacturers are adding factories in Vietnam or India while reducing their reliance on China, reflecting concern over icy relations between the U.S.-led West and Beijing. Governments are dangling subsidies in strategic industries such as semiconductors and green-technology products to bring investment and jobs home.
Such trade fractures can increase costs for manufacturers, which, alongside healthier global demand, suggests that inflation in the future won’t be as subdued as it was in the recent past, economists say.
That doesn’t mean globalisation is over or that Asia won’t remain a competitive place to manufacture. But it does mean Asia is unlikely to be as potent a force in tempering price gains as it once was.
“The golden era of globalisation—and the disinflationary pressure associated with that—I think that has gone,” said Neil Shearing, group chief economist at Capital Economics in London.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
When will Berkshire Hathaway stop selling Bank of America stock?
Berkshire began liquidating its big stake in the banking company in mid-July—and has already unloaded about 15% of its interest. The selling has been fairly aggressive and has totaled about $6 billion. (Berkshire still holds 883 million shares, an 11.3% interest worth $35 billion based on its most recent filing on Aug. 30.)
The selling has prompted speculation about when CEO Warren Buffett, who oversees Berkshire’s $300 billion equity portfolio, will stop. The sales have depressed Bank of America stock, which has underperformed peers since Berkshire began its sell program. The stock closed down 0.9% Thursday at $40.14.
It’s possible that Berkshire will stop selling when the stake drops to 700 million shares. Taxes and history would be the reasons why.
Berkshire accumulated its Bank of America stake in two stages—and at vastly different prices. Berkshire’s initial stake came in 2017 , when it swapped $5 billion of Bank of America preferred stock for 700 million shares of common stock via warrants it received as part of the original preferred investment in 2011.
Berkshire got a sweet deal in that 2011 transaction. At the time, Bank of America was looking for a Buffett imprimatur—and the bank’s stock price was weak and under $10 a share.
Berkshire paid about $7 a share for that initial stake of 700 million common shares. The rest of the Berkshire stake, more than 300 million shares, was mostly purchased in 2018 at around $30 a share.
With Bank of America stock currently trading around $40, Berkshire faces a high tax burden from selling shares from the original stake of 700 million shares, given the low cost basis, and a much lighter tax hit from unloading the rest. Berkshire is subject to corporate taxes—an estimated 25% including local taxes—on gains on any sales of stock. The tax bite is stark.
Berkshire might own $2 to $3 a share in taxes on sales of high-cost stock and $8 a share on low-cost stock purchased for $7 a share.
New York tax expert Robert Willens says corporations, like individuals, can specify the particular lots when they sell stock with multiple cost levels.
“If stock is held in the custody of a broker, an adequate identification is made if the taxpayer specifies to the broker having custody of the stock the particular stock to be sold and, within a reasonable time thereafter, confirmation of such specification is set forth in a written document from the broker,” Willens told Barron’s in an email.
He assumes that Berkshire will identify the high-cost Bank of America stock for the recent sales to minimize its tax liability.
If sellers don’t specify, they generally are subject to “first in, first out,” or FIFO, accounting, meaning that the stock bought first would be subject to any tax on gains.
Buffett tends to be tax-averse—and that may prompt him to keep the original stake of 700 million shares. He could also mull any loyalty he may feel toward Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan , whom Buffett has praised in the past.
Another reason for Berkshire to hold Bank of America is that it’s the company’s only big equity holding among traditional banks after selling shares of U.S. Bancorp , Bank of New York Mellon , JPMorgan Chase , and Wells Fargo in recent years.
Buffett, however, often eliminates stock holdings after he begins selling them down, as he did with the other bank stocks. Berkshire does retain a smaller stake of about $3 billion in Citigroup.
There could be a new filing on sales of Bank of America stock by Berkshire on Thursday evening. It has been three business days since the last one.
Berkshire must file within two business days of any sales of Bank of America stock since it owns more than 10%. The conglomerate will need to get its stake under about 777 million shares, about 100 million below the current level, before it can avoid the two-day filing rule.
It should be said that taxes haven’t deterred Buffett from selling over half of Berkshire’s stake in Apple this year—an estimated $85 billion or more of stock. Barron’s has estimated that Berkshire may owe $15 billion on the bulk of the sales that occurred in the second quarter.
Berkshire now holds 400 million shares of Apple and Barron’s has argued that Buffett may be finished reducing the Apple stake at that round number, which is the same number of shares that Berkshire has held in Coca-Cola for more than two decades.
Buffett may like round numbers—and 700 million could be just the right figure for Bank of America.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.