Meet the HENRYS: The Six-Figure Earners Who Don’t Feel Rich
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,730,998 (-1.35%)       Melbourne $1,052,750 (-0.63%)       Brisbane $1,213,162 (-0.55%)       Adelaide $1,088,669 (-1.01%)       Perth $1,109,065 (-0.03%)       Hobart $857,011 (-0.15%)       Darwin $850,231 (-5.88%)       Canberra $1,057,418 (+2.13%)       National Capitals $1,179,457 (-0.85%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $812,882 (-0.02%)       Melbourne $547,522 (-0.39%)       Brisbane $775,633 (-1.81%)       Adelaide $583,866 (+1.25%)       Perth $661,533 (-0.91%)       Hobart $583,528 (+2.34%)       Darwin $488,291 (-0.29%)       Canberra $502,282 (+1.20%)       National Capitals $640,074 (-0.20%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 14,388 (-149)       Melbourne 16,400 (-697)       Brisbane 9,524 (+147)       Adelaide 2,995 (+70)       Perth 7,340 (+170)       Hobart 758 (-2)       Darwin 142 (+4)       Canberra 1,228 (-5)       National Capitals 52,775 (-462)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,737 (+19)       Melbourne 6,931 (-54)       Brisbane 1,794 (+10)       Adelaide 449 (+21)       Perth 1,390 (+12)       Hobart 145 (-6)       Darwin 212 (+3)       Canberra 1,245 (+31)       National Capitals 21,903 (+36)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $870 ($0)       Melbourne $610 (+$10)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $625 ($0)       Darwin $875 (+$25)       Canberra $730 (-$20)       National Capitals $739 (+$3)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $815 (-$5)       Melbourne $630 ($0)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $555 (-$5)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $545 (+$45)       Darwin $655 (+$5)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $658 (+$3)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,162 (+59)       Melbourne 7,192 (+17)       Brisbane 3,645 (-54)       Adelaide 1,428 (+38)       Perth 2,339 (-34)       Hobart 280 (+15)       Darwin 38 (-7)       Canberra 456 (+28)       National Capitals 21,540 (+62)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,135 (+92)       Melbourne 5,909 (+25)       Brisbane 1,996 (+38)       Adelaide 446 (-20)       Perth 714 (-5)       Hobart 70 (+3)       Darwin 78 (+8)       Canberra 695 (-26)       National Capitals 19,043 (+115)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.61% (↑)      Melbourne 3.01% (↑)      Brisbane 3.00% (↑)      Adelaide 3.10% (↑)      Perth 3.52% (↑)      Hobart 3.79% (↑)      Darwin 5.35% (↑)        Canberra 3.59% (↓)     National Capitals 3.26% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.21% (↓)     Melbourne 5.98% (↑)      Brisbane 4.56% (↑)        Adelaide 4.94% (↓)     Perth 5.50% (↑)      Hobart 4.86% (↑)      Darwin 6.98% (↑)        Canberra 6.21% (↓)     National Capitals 5.34% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 32.7 (↑)      Melbourne 32.4 (↑)        Brisbane 33.3 (↓)     Adelaide 27.4 (↑)        Perth 37.9 (↓)       Hobart 27.4 (↓)     Darwin 27.7 (↑)      Canberra 29.7 (↑)      National Capitals 31.1 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 30.5 (↓)     Melbourne 29.9 (↑)      Brisbane 33.2 (↑)        Adelaide 21.3 (↓)       Perth 38.5 (↓)     Hobart 31.1 (↑)        Darwin 38.7 (↓)       Canberra 38.0 (↓)       National Capitals 32.6 (↓)           
Share Button

Meet the HENRYS: The Six-Figure Earners Who Don’t Feel Rich

When you’re a HENRY—high earner, not rich yet—a hefty salary isn’t enough to buy freedom from financial pressure

By CALLUM BORCHERS
Mon, Oct 7, 2024 11:09amGrey Clock 4 min

Fifteen years ago if you’d told April Little that she’d make $300,000 a year, she would have pictured a life free of financial stress.

“The white picket fence—I have the whole visual in my head,” says Little, 38 years old, a human-resources executive turned career coach in Rochester, N.Y. “I don’t want to sound ungrateful, but when I got to that proverbial mountaintop I realised there’s a lot of expenses. And I still don’t own a home.”

So go the plush-but-not-too-plush lives of the Americans who qualify as HENRY—high earner, not rich yet.

Little makes multiple six figures running her own business but carries $90,000 of college and grad-school debt. Child care and education for her three children would be so costly that she and her husband decided the better option was for him to leave his radio job to parent and home-school full time.

New census data show 14.4% of U.S. households bring in $200,000 or more a year, a near record. Yet the money doesn’t have the buying power those earners wish it did, partly due to the rising prices hammering us all and partly due to the supercharged costs of things like houses and cars. HENRYs describe feeling stuck on a hamster wheel—a nice one that other hamsters envy—but running in place nonetheless.

Oh come on, you’re thinking . You’re asking me to feel sympathy for Audi-driving, Chase Sapphire-loving, Whole Foods-shopping consultant types with kids in private school?

Well…not exactly. But what they’re feeling is a version of what a lot of Americans at every income level face—making more money but not feeling like there’s a surplus. The essence of being a HENRY is feeling a gap between what you have and what you think you need to be comfortable.

What these high earners consider essentials might be termed luxuries (or nonsense) by the rest of us, but it’s also true that it takes more money to feel rich these days. And their great fear is becoming a HENRE: high earner, not rich ever .

Short of expectations

Attorney Joshua Siegel doesn’t expect sympathy as he motors around Los Angeles in his Lexus SUV. He just figured at age 40, having risen to partner and chair of the transactional tax group at Albrecht Law, that he might be driving from a house he owns to a country club where he’s a member.

Instead, his occasional golf outings take him from his rental home to a public course. Raising three kids in one of the country’s most expensive cities has been a reality check, he says. He’s also realised that a lot of people with jobs like his come from wealthy families where trust funds and down-payment assistance give them financial head starts.

The son of an electrician and a dental assistant, Siegel is making his own way in the white-collar world.

“It really just feels like treading water,” he says.

Monique So, a 40-year-old financial consultant, says she and her husband, a software engineer, have a net worth in the mid-seven figures. But she likely won’t breathe easy until, or if, they accumulate an eight-figure net worth. Daycare for their 2-year-old takes a $30,000 bite out of their family budget.

“I have this scarcity mindset that is very common,” she says.

What it takes to feel rich

Caitlin Frederick, director of financial planning at Ullmann Wealth Partners in Jacksonville Beach, Fla., says many of her mid career clients are less affluent than their salaries suggest. She advises a lot of prototypical millennials who racked up student loans in hopes of vaulting into high-paying jobs. They delayed buying houses and starting families while climbing professional ladders.

The first part of their plans worked, she says. The degrees led to hefty incomes. Now that they’re having kids, shopping for real estate and wishing to upgrade their Camrys, they’re discovering that many of life’s major expenses shot up faster than the overall rate of inflation.

Lifestyle creep is a factor too, she says, noting clients who overspend on trips and restaurants.

“It is easy for people to just continue to increase their lifestyle every time they get a promotion,” Frederick says.

Then again, they watched their slightly older co-workers spend freely, and buy lake houses, too. The good life requires more money than it used to, she adds.

In 2009, the median home price was $220,900, according to the Federal Reserve, and a new car cost an average of $23,276, according to the Energy Department. Had prices increased at the rate of the consumer-price index, the average house would cost $322,000 today and a car would cost $34,000. Instead, the Fed reports an average house goes for $412,000 today, and a typical new car is $48,000, according to Kelley Blue Book.

The national going rate for a babysitter 15 years ago was $10.50 an hour, according to Care.com. Now it’s $18.38, 20% more than if the cost had tracked the consumer-price index.

Budget-conscious HENRYs tell me it’s often hard to find mid tier options in, well, anything, as companies push luxury versions of everything from high-end water bottles to $1,000-a-night hotel rooms .

Another big-ticket item

Another financial curveball comes up frequently in my conversations with high earners: school costs.

Nearly half of American private schools increased enrolment in the last academic year, according to the Cato Institute. Parents who originally planned to send their children to public school tell me they’ve gone private for reasons that include pandemic learning disruptions, public schools’ difficulty retaining good teachers and budget problems . Some say they’re convinced private schools are the only places their kids will thrive, though more than 80% of American kids attend public school.

Brad Gyger and his wife shuttle their three children around in a 2014 GMC Yukon with 130,000 miles—not exactly the late-model, luxury ride he expected to own as a three-time chief revenue officer in the tech sector. Then again, he didn’t anticipate annual private-school tuition payments roughly equivalent to the price of a new, fully loaded Cadillac Escalade.

Gyger, now an independent sales consultant in California, says he didn’t consider private education until a few years ago, when he and his wife concluded their oldest child would thrive in a more academically challenging environment. The school could also accommodate their second child’s learning needs. And how could they leave out the youngest?

Gyger, 46, says his family is fortunate to even have education options. The trade-off is living more modestly than his résumé might suggest.

He gave up gym and tennis-club memberships, opting to stay fit on the cheap by cycling and lifting dumbbells in his garage. And forget about upgrading from the home the couple bought in 2015.

“We’re probably never moving,” says Gyger. He hopes they’ll remodel the kitchen. Someday.



MOST POPULAR

A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.

As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.

Related Stories
Money
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians
By Opinion, Anthony Hunt 22/06/2026
Money
WHY COMING HOME CAN BE MORE FINANCIALLY COMPLICATED THAN LEAVING
By Brett Evans, Opinion 15/06/2026
Money
Everything You Need to Know About the SpaceX Trading Debut
By CORRIE DRIEBUSCH 12/06/2026
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians

The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.

By Opinion, Anthony Hunt
Mon, Jun 22, 2026 3 min

For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.

The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:

Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?

In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.

The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.

This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.

The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.

For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.

We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.

Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.

They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.

The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.

The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.

Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.

Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.

And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.

Anthony Hunt

The real issue is complacency.

Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.

Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.

We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.

Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.

At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.

How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?

How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?

These are the questions families should be asking now.

The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.

But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.

Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.

The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.

They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.

Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.

It is about preparing for it.

Because the greatest risk is not change itself.

It is losing the ability to respond to it.

Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer

MOST POPULAR

New research suggests that bonuses make employees feel more like a mere cog in a wheel.

A survey of people with at least $1 million in investable assets found women in their 30s and 40s look nothing like older generations in terms of assets and priorities

Related Stories
Money
Capital Haus buys Baker Young in billion-dollar push to reshape Australian wealth advice
By Jeni O'Dowd 01/12/2025
Lifestyle
Is the Weight-Loss Drug Revolution Causing a Frailty Epidemic?
By Natasha Dangoor 18/05/2026
Prestige
Prestige Property Of The Week: Rare Newport Beachfront Estate Hits Market
By Staff Writer 14/05/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop