Google Revenue Soars on AI Boom, and Investors Eye Spending Surge
Search giant is spending tens of billions of dollars on infusing its products with artificial-intelligence capabilities.
2 min
Google’s parent company reported a 14% jump in year-over-year revenue, driven by growth in its cloud and search divisions that was tempered by heavy spending on artificial intelligence.
The parent company, Alphabet , had record sales of $96.4 billion in the second quarter but also said capital expenditure expectations for the year would increase by 13% to about $85 billion. That compares with $52.5 billion in 2024.
Alphabet’s shares rose by more than 1% in after-market trading.
Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai and other tech executives have poured tens of billions of dollars into AI development over the past few years as part of the broader AI boom . Much of that money has gone to build new data centres to develop and run AI models.
Google’s results were the first in a series of quarterly tech earnings, with Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and Meta Platforms reporting next week. Investors are keeping a close watch on spending levels at most of the biggest companies, which have ballooned as they seek to stay ahead in an escalating AI arms race.
Google’s results are unique in that its cloud division, which sells computing power in data centres, is a beneficiary of the AI boom, while its search business faces threats from users who are migrating toward AI products such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
Other areas of the company are spending at a fast clip to bring AI tools into its popular products like search and YouTube.
The cloud unit brought in $13.6 billion in second-quarter revenue. That was up 32% from the previous year, compared with 28% in the first quarter.
Alphabet reported total ad sales of $71.3 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 10.4% from the same period a year earlier. Google’s search division, which is core to the advertising business, grew 11.7%.
MoffettNathanson analyst Michael Nathanson said Google executives helped to allay shareholder concerns about the future of its search business, even if traffic volume declines.
“What people worry about is just the math around search,” he said. “Isn’t AI going to be a negative to search? And they went out of the way many times on the call to say, ‘That’s not what we’re seeing.’”
Google has for years been working to cut costs to help fund AI spending. The company at several points this year extended voluntary buyout offers to employees in multiple divisions.
To get ahead in the AI race, Google has been improving the capabilities of its own AI model and chatbot, known as Gemini, and adding AI features to many of its products. In May, it overhauled its classic search engine with the U.S. introduction of “AI Mode,” which answers search queries in a chatbot-style conversation with fewer links.
Investors have expressed concern about the potential outcome of an antitrust lawsuit targeting Google’s search dominance. A U.S. district judge overseeing the case is expected to rule next month on whether he should impose limits on Google, including putting curbs on how it competes in AI.
The decision will come after a monthslong trial that dealt extensively with just how much new AI players may erode Google’s search monopoly.
The Justice Department, which brought the case against Google in 2020, has proposed forcing the sale of its Chrome browser, preventing Google from being able to pay Apple to be its default search engine and requiring it to share data with competitors.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
3 min
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.
The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
A cluster of century-old warehouses beneath the Harbour Bridge has been transformed into a modern workplace hub, now home to more than 100 businesses.
High-end homeowners are choosing to upgrade rather than relocate, investing in bespoke design, premium finishes and long-term lifestyle value.
