How your income will change next week
Millions of Australian workers will see the impact of Stage 3 tax cuts in their next pay packet
Millions of Australian workers will see the impact of Stage 3 tax cuts in their next pay packet
Stage 3 tax cuts will commence on Monday, providing 13.6 million workers with tax savings that they will see in their first pay packets of FY25. The average Australian wage earner on $74,500 per year will receive a $1,540 tax saving over the new financial year. The Superannuation Guarantee is also going up from 11 percent to 11.5 percent from Monday, providing the same worker with a $372 bump per annum to the superannuation payments they receive from their employer.
The Albanese Government amended the Stage 3 tax cuts in January to give every taxpayer a tax cut rather than only those on higher incomes. Many economists have argued the tax cuts will add to inflation, which is proving to be remarkably sticky. Yesterday, the Australian Bureau of Statistics released the May inflation figures showing a 4 percent annual increase in inflation, up from 3.6 percent in April.
The Federal Government decided to amend the legislated tax cuts in January to help more Australians with rising cost of living pressures. Official advice from the Federal Treasury said the amendments were “broadly revenue neutral” because they would cost almost the same amount as the original Stage 3 plan, which had already been factored into inflation forecasts. The amendments reduced the tax break for earners at the top end to enable tax relief for everyone. A Treasury document said the changes “will not add to inflationary pressures and will support labour supply”.
The tables below outline how the tax rates and tax brackets will change from Monday.

At a press conference after the Reserve Bank announced interest rates would remain on hold last week, Governor Michele Bullock said she expects some people would use their tax cuts to cover everyday expenses while others would save it.
“What we do observe in the data is that people who have mortgages – on average, not all – but people on average who have mortgages tend to try and put more into their offset accounts and their redraw facilities because they’re paying quite a high interest rate now on their mortgage and so they want to offset it,” she said.
A Westpac survey found Australians planned to save up to 80 cents for every $1 of tax savings.
“The results suggest consumers will use tax relief as an opportunity to repair their finances and rebuild saving buffers rather than spend,” said senior Westpac economist Matthew Hassan.
If taxpayers followed through on this plan, Mr Hassan said only $4.7 billion of the $23.3 billion in tax relief would be spent, equating to a spending boost of 35 basis points.
From bushland greens to valley reds, the country’s most awarded designers are proving that the best colour palette was never on a swatch card; it was outside the window all along.
The Australian leather house has opened an immersive four-day pop-up in Manhattan, unveiling its Bloom Collection and redefining what a product launch can look like.
The federal budget has rattled property investors. But the biggest mistake isn’t the tax changes, it’s the conclusion many are drawing from them.
The recent budget has forced a reckoning for property investors.
Negative gearing now restricted to new residential builds, the CGT discount gone and on paper, the numbers look different.
And many investors are responding by pivoting toward yield, prioritising cash flow over capital growth in a way that property strategists say misses the point entirely.
“The debate has shifted to yield versus growth as if they are opposing forces,” says Abdullah Nouh, founder of Melbourne-based buyers’ agency Mecca Property Group. “But that framing is itself the mistake.”
Nouh, who works with high-net-worth families and investors on long-term acquisition strategy, argues that capital growth remains the primary driver of genuine wealth creation and that the post-budget environment has made quality assets more important, not less.
The numbers make his case plainly. An additional $500 per week in rental income is welcome. A prestige asset appreciating by $1 million over a market cycle is transformative.
These are not equivalent outcomes, and portfolios built around yield at the expense of location and land value tend to generate income while wealth stands largely still.
The more nuanced shift Nouh is seeing among sophisticated investors is a move toward assets where both outcomes can be engineered simultaneously – established homes on substantial land in quality locations, where the existing dwelling can be repositioned, rental returns improved, and the underlying land value compounds independent of what sits on it.
For investors with existing equity, commercial property is also entering the conversation in a more serious way.
Prestige industrial assets, medical centres and long-leased essential retail offer income profiles that residential property in most capital city markets cannot currently match: longer lease terms, tenants covering outgoings, and greater predictability than the residential tenancy cycle.
“The investors who build lasting wealth are rarely the ones who chased yield or growth exclusively,” says Nouh.
“They are the ones who built a strategy they could sustain – one that generated enough income to hold quality assets through multiple cycles while those assets compounded in value.”
The budget has changed the settings. It has not changed the fundamentals.
When the Writers Festival was called off and the skies refused to clear, one weekend away turned into a rare lesson in slowing down, ice baths included.
A cluster of century-old warehouses beneath the Harbour Bridge has been transformed into a modern workplace hub, now home to more than 100 businesses.