Impact Investing’s Next Challenge
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,652,125 (+0.36%)       Melbourne $1,015,932 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $1,056,185 (+0.90%)       Adelaide $949,564 (-0.31%)       Perth $930,113 (-0.43%)       Hobart $758,047 (-0.12%)       Darwin $770,874 (+0.08%)       Canberra $974,828 (+1.29%)       National $1,080,843 (+0.32%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $773,554 (-0.54%)       Melbourne $476,399 (-0.13%)       Brisbane $647,991 (+0.62%)       Adelaide $518,665 (+5.34%)       Perth $529,479 (+0.45%)       Hobart $532,297 (+1.33%)       Darwin $383,399 (-0.28%)       Canberra $503,041 (-0.52%)       National $567,716 (+0.54%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 12,442 (+293)       Melbourne 15,352 (+169)       Brisbane 8,617 (-52)       Adelaide 2,903 (+8)       Perth 7,845 (+199)       Hobart 1,292 (+64)       Darwin 178 (-2)       Canberra 1,222 (-28)       National 49,851 (+651)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,437 (+198)       Melbourne 6,911 (+35)       Brisbane 1,658 (-47)       Adelaide 431 (+6)       Perth 1,719 (+11)       Hobart 228 (+4)       Darwin 285 (+1)       Canberra 1,195 (+24)       National 21,864 (+232)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $795 (-$5)       Melbourne $590 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $630 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $575 (+$8)       Darwin $790 (-$10)       Canberra $700 ($0)       National $688 (-$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $730 ($0)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $620 (-$5)       Adelaide $520 ($0)       Perth $650 ($0)       Hobart $490 ($0)       Darwin $560 (+$10)       Canberra $570 ($0)       National $601 (+$)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,996 (-7)       Melbourne 7,677 (+16)       Brisbane 3,782 (-11)       Adelaide 1,351 (+11)       Perth 2,134 (+95)       Hobart 234 (0)       Darwin 106 (-5)       Canberra 573 (+7)       National 21,853 (+106)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 7,911 (-78)       Melbourne 5,695 (-60)       Brisbane 1,735 (-76)       Adelaide 345 (+11)       Perth 693 (+44)       Hobart 95 (-6)       Darwin 121 (-15)       Canberra 520 (-15)       National 17,115 (-195)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.50% (↓)     Melbourne 3.02% (↑)        Brisbane 3.20% (↓)     Adelaide 3.45% (↑)      Perth 3.91% (↑)      Hobart 3.94% (↑)        Darwin 5.33% (↓)       Canberra 3.73% (↓)       National 3.31% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 4.91% (↑)      Melbourne 6.55% (↑)        Brisbane 4.98% (↓)       Adelaide 5.21% (↓)       Perth 6.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.79% (↓)     Darwin 7.60% (↑)      Canberra 5.89% (↑)        National 5.50% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.0% (↑)      Melbourne 1.9% (↑)      Brisbane 1.4% (↑)      Adelaide 1.3% (↑)      Perth 1.2% (↑)      Hobart 1.0% (↑)      Darwin 1.6% (↑)      Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National 1.7% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.4% (↑)      Melbourne 3.8% (↑)      Brisbane 2.0% (↑)      Adelaide 1.1% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.4% (↑)      Darwin 2.8% (↑)      Canberra 2.9% (↑)      National 2.2% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 26.6 (↑)        Melbourne 27.2 (↓)       Brisbane 27.1 (↓)       Adelaide 23.6 (↓)       Perth 32.7 (↓)       Hobart 25.3 (↓)     Darwin 27.6 (↑)      Canberra 26.9 (↑)        National 27.1 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 24.0 (↑)        Melbourne 26.2 (↓)     Brisbane 26.5 (↑)        Adelaide 22.0 (↓)       Perth 34.7 (↓)     Hobart 23.8 (↑)      Darwin 33.6 (↑)        Canberra 29.4 (↓)     National 27.5 (↑)            
Share Button

Impact Investing’s Next Challenge

There’s now another major hurdle to the mainstreaming of impact investing.

By Karen Hube
Thu, Sep 16, 2021 2:03pmGrey Clock 3 min

Since the term “impact investing” was coined by the Rockefeller Foundation 15 years ago, the approach has challenged the common narrative that investors must settle for lower returns if they want to bring about change.

But there’s now another major hurdle to the mainstreaming of impact investing: standardising impact measurements to equip investors to make choices that best align with their goals.

“In financial markets, we have a whole infrastructure that allows any investor to make financial comparisons. But to determine impact we don’t yet have the same tools and resources available,” says Sophia Sunderji, research manager at the Global Impact Investing Network, an industry research and analytics nonprofit group.

Much like investors can compare mutual funds with similar styles and objectives, investors should be able to make decisions about investments by comparing impact, Sunderji says.

The challenge is twofold. The first is accurately measuring impact—it can take years for an investment to produce results, and it can be difficult to prove direct cause and effect.

Possibly even more challenging is standardising the data so that one investment’s impact results can be fairly contrasted with another’s.

But the industry is making strides. Sunderji is leading GIIN’s effort to establish a go-to industry resource for due diligence on impact. This involves establishing core metrics for each type of impact goal from infrastructure and education to climate change and ocean pollution. With a combination of industry research and detailed reporting by impact investments, GIIN is crunching the data and quantifying impact.

The objective is to standardize data—using factors relevant to the area of intended impact—on GIIN’s existing database called Iris Plus (IRIS+) to make it easily comparable.

For example, for impact investors who want to help the estimated 1.7 billion adults globally without access to basic financial services, relevant metrics may be how many loans were issued to small businesses in underserved areas or the number of people who accessed financial services for the first time. Such data are finely sliced and diced by factors such as gender, region, asset, or credit size to be more meaningful for comparative purposes.

GIIN’s standardization process also seeks to evaluate future outcomes, Sunderji says. An investor might issue an impressive number of microloans, but how many of their recipients went on to create successful enterprises?

Tools are also evolving to measure the impact of investing in opportunity zones, which were established in 2018 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The law provides capital-gains tax incentives for investments in opportunity zones, which are areas identified as economically distressed.

The industry has seen average annual capital growth in the past three years of about 17% to just over $700 billion, driven in part by rising interest among institutional investors. Last year, insurance companies and pension funds each accounted for about 4% of impact capital, up from nearly nil five years ago, according to GIIN.

“Institutional investors are fiduciaries—they are finance-first and impact-second because they can’t

be sacrificing returns,” says Vikram Gandhi, founder and CEO of New Delhi-based VSG Capital Advisors and senior lecturer at the Harvard Business School. “They wouldn’t be investing if they didn’t think they could make market-rate returns.”

A next big driver of capital will be the estimated $40 trillion in wealth that will transfer from baby boomers to younger heirs over the next two decades, Gandhi says, adding that subsequent generations are more than three times more likely to include impact investments in their portfolios.

As tools to measure and compare impact are honed, enabling investors to choose effective investments, it is not just the capital that will be magnified—but its effectiveness in bringing about change.

Reprinted by permission of Penta. Copyright 2021 Dow Jones & Company. Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Original date of publication: September 15, 2021



MOST POPULAR

Luxury carmaker delivers historic revenues, record global sales, and robust profitability amid ambitious product transformation.

Fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, but missed estimates.

Related Stories
Money
Temu Owner PDD Posts Slowest Revenue Growth Since Early 2022
By JIAHUI HUANG 21/03/2025
Money
Even Rich People Are Starting to Get Nervous About Trump’s Economy
By ABBY SCHULTZ 20/03/2025
Money
The Japanese Sake Masters Swimming Against a Rising Tide of Whisky
By DON NICO FORBES 19/03/2025
Temu Owner PDD Posts Slowest Revenue Growth Since Early 2022

Fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, but missed estimates.

By JIAHUI HUANG
Fri, Mar 21, 2025 2 min

The Chinese owner of bargain app Temu reported slower quarterly profit and revenue growth, capping a turbulent year for the e-commerce giant as it faced stiff competition at home, geopolitical tensions abroad and U.S. tariff uncertainties.

PDD Holdings on Thursday said fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, missing a Visible Alpha estimate of 117.83 billion yuan. It was the slowest pace of growth since the first quarter of 2022.

Net profit rose 18% from a year earlier to 27.45 billion yuan, topping analysts’ expectations of 27.00 billion yuan. However, the growth was slower than the 61% rise in the third quarter and the more than twofold increase a year earlier.

“Looking ahead, we will continue to prioritize investments in the platform ecosystem as the cornerstone of our long-term value creation strategy,” said Jun Liu, PDD’s vice president of finance.

Jefferies analysts in a note said PDD’s top-line miss was due to slower-than-expected revenue growth from transaction services, while revenue from online marketing services and others was in line with consensus.

The easing momentum contrasted sharply with the stunning growth rates the company delivered in past years. PDD last year repeatedly warned of a slowdown, pointing to intensifying competition and external challenges.

Pinduoduo, the company’s discount platform in China, has grown rapidly since it launched nearly a decade ago, taking market share from e-commerce stalwarts Alibaba and JD.com . Its sister platform Temu burst onto the international scene in 2022 and swiftly gained attention in the U.S., attracting customers with low prices.

However, Temu has also encountered regulatory scrutiny as it expands overseas. U.S. President Trump in February delayed his plan to end a provision for China imports that lets platforms avoid paying import duties and customs inspections on low-value packages, offering the likes of Temu a brief reprieve.

For the full year, PDD’s total revenue rose 59% to 393.84 billion yuan and net profit climbed 87% to 60.03 billion yuan.

Last month, rival Alibaba posted its fastest pace of revenue growth since late 2023, with revenue for the latest quarter rising 7.6% to 280 billion yuan. Online retailer JD.com earlier this month nearly tripled its quarterly net profit as revenue climbed 13% to 346.99 billion yuan.

U.S.-listed PDD was recently 6.5% lower in premarket trading after the results.

MOST POPULAR

Fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, but missed estimates.

The 25-room mansion was built for an heiress and later belonged to a socialite and architect on the Empire State Building.

Related Stories
Property of the Week
Property of the Week: 26-27 Olola Rd, Vaucluse
By KIRSTEN CRAZE 13/12/2024
Lifestyle
REVEALED: HOW TO DISCOVER THE BEST AUSTRALIAN WINES
By Jeni O'dowd 03/03/2025
Lifestyle
Precision Meets Prestige at the 3rd Annual Citizen Kanebridge Open
By Jeni O'Dowd 26/02/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop