OpenAI in Talks for Huge Investment Round Valuing It Up to $300 Billion
SoftBank would lead $40 billion round for ChatGPT maker, some of which would go to Stargate AI infrastructure venture
2 min
OpenAI is in early talks to raise up to $40 billion in a funding round that would value the ChatGPT maker as high as $300 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.
SoftBank would lead the round and is in discussions to invest between $15 billion and $25 billion. The remaining amount would come from other investors.
The two companies were recently in talks to value OpenAI as high as $340 billion, one of the people familiar with the matter said. After The Wall Street Journal published that figure in an earlier version of this story, the person said newer negotiations lowered the proposed valuation to as much as $300 billion.
The Japanese company is helping assemble investors for the rest of the round, one of the people said. The discussions are still in flux and could fall apart, the person said.
The $300 billion valuation would include the cash OpenAI raises in the round.
OpenAI was last valued at $157 billion in October, when it raised $6.6 billion . Roughly doubling its value in just a few months would be extraordinary even by the standards of Silicon Valley’s current AI boom.
The funding will be used in part to help OpenAI fulfill its roughly $18 billion commitment to Stargate , a joint venture with SoftBank and others to finance the construction of new data centers in the U.S. powering OpenAI’s technology. The startup also expects to use the cash to fund its money-losing business operations.
At $300 billion, OpenAI would be the second-most valuable startup in the world, behind only Elon Musk’s SpaceX, according to the data provider CB Insights. A funding round of this size would be the largest in Silicon Valley history, according to PitchBook, and blow past OpenAI’s previous fundraising record achieved in 2023, when it raised $10 billion from Microsoft .
OpenAI is attempting to raise the cash after AI models released by the Chinese firm DeepSeek led to a selloff in big tech stocks , including Nvidia , earlier this week. DeepSeek’s success with cheaply made and free-to-use AI technology has led many investors and executives to question the big-spending strategies of OpenAI and other U.S. developers.
OpenAI expected to lose around $5 billion last year on revenue of $3.7 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported in October . At the time, it projected its revenue would grow to $11.6 billion this year.
The funding talks mark a quickly deepening relationship between OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son , who appears to have picked the ChatGPT maker as his vehicle to bet big on the AI industry.
SoftBank has separately committed to contribute some $18 billion to Stargate, which Son announced at the White House earlier this month, alongside Altman and Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison . The project’s partners have committed to invest $100 billion in U.S. data center projects for OpenAI and plan to invest up to $500 billion over four years.
In October, SoftBank contributed $500 million to a $6.6 billion funding round for OpenAI. The following month, it launched a $1.5 billion tender offer to purchase existing shares from employees.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
3 min
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.
The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
Paine Schwartz joins BERO as a new investor as the year-old company seeks to triple sales.
When the Writers Festival was called off and the skies refused to clear, one weekend away turned into a rare lesson in slowing down, ice baths included.
