This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,682,971 (+0.24%)       Melbourne $1,026,232 (+0.18%)       Brisbane $1,127,607 (-0.35%)       Adelaide $1,032,810 (+0.29%)       Perth $1,081,273 (-0.17%)       Hobart $845,389 (+0.45%)       Darwin $830,209 (+1.52%)       Canberra $1,009,978 (-0.59%)       National Capitals $1,136,677 (+0.10%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $808,800 (0%)       Melbourne $553,737 (-0.56%)       Brisbane $736,361 (-1.42%)       Adelaide $576,199 (-0.51%)       Perth $634,955 (+1.03%)       Hobart $586,666 (+1.35%)       Darwin $496,674 (-0.23%)       Canberra $476,191 (-1.45%)       National Capitals $627,529 (-0.22%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 15,214 (+14)       Melbourne 16,401 (-30)       Brisbane 11,924 (+42)       Adelaide 3,958 (+110)       Perth 9,319 (+18)       Hobart 769 (+9)       Darwin 189 (+1)       Canberra 1,277 (+12)       National Capitals 59,051 (+176)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,567 (+11)       Melbourne 6,587 (+14)       Brisbane 2,507 (+33)       Adelaide 637 (+11)       Perth 1,685 (-16)       Hobart 152 (-6)       Darwin 214 (-7)       Canberra 1,249 (+8)       National Capitals 22,598 (+48)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $860 (-$15)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $710 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $620 ($0)       Darwin $825 (+$5)       Canberra $700 (-$20)       National Capitals $725 (-$4)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $800 ($0)       Melbourne $600 (-$10)       Brisbane $670 (+$8)       Adelaide $550 (+$10)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $523 ($0)       Darwin $650 (-$50)       Canberra $580 ($0)       National Capitals $645 (-$6)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,330 (-51)       Melbourne 7,834 (+32)       Brisbane 3,707 (+45)       Adelaide 1,199 (-23)       Perth 2,145 (-43)       Hobart 228 (+1)       Darwin 72 (-1)       Canberra 404 (+3)       National Capitals 21,919 (-37)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 10,152 (-66)       Melbourne 6,206 (-16)       Brisbane 2,155 (+61)       Adelaide 434 (-11)       Perth 679 (-6)       Hobart 80 (0)       Darwin 143 (-1)       Canberra 793 (-1)       National Capitals 20,642 (-40)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.66% (↓)       Melbourne 3.04% (↓)     Brisbane 3.27% (↑)        Adelaide 3.27% (↓)     Perth 3.61% (↑)        Hobart 3.81% (↓)       Darwin 5.17% (↓)       Canberra 3.60% (↓)       National Capitals 3.32% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.14% (↓)       Melbourne 5.63% (↓)     Brisbane 4.73% (↑)      Adelaide 4.96% (↑)        Perth 5.73% (↓)       Hobart 4.63% (↓)       Darwin 6.81% (↓)     Canberra 6.33% (↑)        National Capitals 5.35% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND         Sydney 32.3 (↓)       Melbourne 30.8 (↓)     Brisbane 39.1 (↑)        Adelaide 31.3 (↓)     Perth 43.7 (↑)        Hobart 28.5 (↓)     Darwin 30.4 (↑)        Canberra 31.0 (↓)     National Capitals 33.4 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 30.5 (↓)       Melbourne 28.7 (↓)       Brisbane 34.4 (↓)       Adelaide 33.0 (↓)     Perth 42.3 (↑)        Hobart 28.9 (↓)     Darwin 38.7 (↑)        Canberra 34.1 (↓)       National Capitals 33.8 (↓)           
Share Button

This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.

Many clothing brands say environmentally friendly materials are key to their future, but uptake has been sluggish

By TREFOR MOSS
Tue, Mar 26, 2024 7:00amGrey Clock 4 min

When a Swedish startup launched a new material made from recycled textiles in late 2022, the fashion industry hailed it as a game changer in its efforts to lessen its environmental impact.

Last month, the company, Renewcell, filed for bankruptcy. While some big retailers, including H&M and Zara, were enthusiastic backers, not enough brands committed to buying its material. Having misjudged how quickly the fashion industry would switch to more sustainable sourcing, the company was left with a costly factory running far below capacity.

The plight of Renewcell illustrates the fashion industry’s hesitancy in adopting new materials that may be better for the environment but typically cost more, at least in the short term. It is also another sign of how some companies are putting less emphasis on green initiatives amid a more challenging economic climate.

“There’s a disconnect” between some companies’ stated sustainability ambitions and what they actually do, said Tricia Carey , Renewcell’s chief commercial officer. “Fashion brands have the intention,” Carey said, “but many are lacking the road map to make it happen.”

Making clothes uses a large and growing amount of the planet’s resources. More than 100 billion garments are produced annually and that number is set to rise by one-third by 2030, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a nonprofit. It says the average garment is worn only 10 times before being discarded, often ending up in the trash . The fashion industry is responsible for as much as 8% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion.

Fashion brands have come under growing pressure from consumers and regulators to reduce their environmental impact, posing a dilemma for an industry hardwired to keep increasing sales by churning out more clothes.

To burnish their green credentials, brands have encouraged consumers to repair, recycle or sell old clothes rather than throw them away. They have also invested in so-called next-generation materials that promise to use fewer resources and, in some cases, have the potential to be recycled again and again.

Inditex , the parent company of Zara, says it wants a quarter of the fiber it uses to be made from next-generation materials by 2030. To foster new materials, the company has worked with more than 300 startups, also including Renewcell, through a Sustainability Innovation Hub that it set up four years ago.

H&M says it wants recycled fibers to constitute half of the material it uses by 2030. The company has invested in more than 25 sustainability startups, including Renewcell.

So far, the uptake of greener material has been sluggish. Recycled materials made up 7.9% of global fibre production in 2022, down from 8.5% the year before, according to the Textile Exchange, a nonprofit that advocates the adoption of more environmentally friendly materials. Much of that came from recycled plastic bottles, with less than 1% of all fibre coming from recycled textiles.

That’s despite next-generation materials attracting more than $3 billion of investment over the past decade, according to the Material Innovation Initiative, with dozens of new-textile companies launched during that time.

Founded in 2012, Renewcell became the first chemical textile-to-textile recycler to start producing material on a commercial scale.

Its material is called Circulose, which is produced by treating old textiles with chemicals to create a cellulose pulp. This is dried into sheets, which fibre producers can then dissolve to produce viscose and other materials that are used to make clothes. Unlike mechanically recycled fibres, which fray and ultimately disintegrate, Renewcell’s chemical process breaks old textiles down to the level of individual molecules from which strong, new fibres are made. These can be recycled indefinitely via the same process.

With many fashion companies pledging to invest in new textiles to be more sustainable, Renewcell bet on strong demand for its material.

The company raised $158 million, mostly through a 2020 listing in Stockholm, and invested $125 million to convert an old paper mill in eastern Sweden into a Circulose factory capable of producing 60,000 metric tons a year.

Renewcell also outlined plans for two additional factories that would increase its output sixfold by 2030.

Besides Inditex and H&M, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger owner PVH committed to buying significant quantities of fiber made from Circulose.

But Renewcell hit a brick wall in talks with other big brands. In meetings, brand executives would often express excitement and agree to pilot projects, only to balk at placing commercial-scale orders, said Carey.

Jolts to the economy, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and shaky consumer confidence had made brands risk averse.

Would-be customers fixated on how fiber made from Circulose cost 20% to 45% more than the virgin fibers they typically bought, as well as uncertainty about integrating a new material into their supply chains, Carey said. Fiber typically accounts for about 5% of the retail price of a finished garment.

Renewcell needed its factory to reach full output quickly to become commercially viable, but it achieved only 30% capacity last year as anticipated orders failed to materialize.

By October, the company was running out of cash, and in January it laid off a quarter of its 130 staff. It filed for bankruptcy in February after failing to secure fresh investment.

Renewcell is now seeking a buyer to repay its debts and restart production.

The company’s predicament is a grim sign for a clothing industry that claims to want to transform itself, said Claire Bergkamp, managing director of the Textile Exchange.

“My hope is this will be a wake-up call for the industry,” she said.

Unless fashion companies commit to paying higher prices for new, greener materials, other fiber startups could also struggle, Bergkamp added.

While the transition from gasoline cars to electric vehicles has benefited from billions of dollars in subsidies, the move to new textiles has received practically no government support, making startups reliant on private funding.

That has left some big clothing companies, notably H&M and Inditex, shouldering a relatively large share of the burden of supporting new-material startups.

H&M invested in Renewcell in 2017 and was the first retailer to launch products containing Circulose. It currently sells around three dozen products containing the material.

The retailer wanted to invest more but decided not to commit more cash in recent weeks because of the lack of support from other companies, said H&M Chief Executive Daniel Ervér .

Earlier this month, H&M announced a new investment in Syre, a startup developing a polyester-fabric recycling process, and pledged to buy $600 million worth of its material over seven years—assuming it achieves commercial production.

Demand for recycled polyester is already established, with material made from recycled bottles already commonly used to make clothes. But textile-to-textile recycled polyester is similar to Circulose in that the technology is untested at scale.

To drive a shift to next-generation materials, other companies need to invest and commit to buying new textiles at scale, Ervér said.

“H&M alone cannot provide the scale that is required,” Ervér said. “The industry needs to commit.”



MOST POPULAR

BNW Developments has established a Sydney presence, joining Arada and Sobha Realty among the growing number of UAE developers pursuing Australian buyers and development opportunities.

Australian shares fell on Thursday as Wall Street weakness, rising oil and persistent rate concerns weighed on most of the market. The S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.72 per cent to 8,702. The All Ordinaries lost 0.66 per cent to finish at 8,897. Mining stocks were hit particularly hard, while real estate also dragged on the index. …

Related Stories
Money
ASX falls 0.7 per cent as miners and property stocks retreat
By Ruba Jaajaa 25/09/2026
Money
ASX Wrap: Technology lifts the ASX as falling oil relieves inflation pressure
By Ruba Jaajaa 23/09/2026
Prestige
Rolex revives a collector legend with the Perpetual Padellone
By Ruba Jaajaa 23/09/2026
ASX falls 0.7 per cent as miners and property stocks retreat
By Ruba Jaajaa
Fri, Sep 25, 2026 2 min

Australian shares fell on Thursday as Wall Street weakness, rising oil and persistent rate concerns weighed on most of the market.

The S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.72 per cent to 8,702. The All Ordinaries lost 0.66 per cent to finish at 8,897. Mining stocks were hit particularly hard, while real estate also dragged on the index.

Energy was the notable exception, gaining more than one per cent as Brent crude traded above US$103 a barrel. Oil had moved higher amid uncertainty surrounding potential US diesel-export restrictions and broader geopolitical supply risks. The move supported energy producers but renewed concern about inflation inputs across transport and the wider economy.

Gold shares were weak even as spot bullion remained historically elevated. The All Ordinaries Gold index fell about 2.25 per cent, showing that equity performance can diverge from the commodity because of valuation, currency, operating and company-specific factors.

Zip was a prominent loser, falling 11.38 per cent after the company reported short sales after the previous close. Nine Entertainment also weakened after UBS analysts warned of near-term revenue challenges associated with its advertising-supported subscription tier.

Premier Investments led larger winners despite caution about the retail environment. Breville, in which Premier owns a significant stake, also appeared among leading movers. In the broader ASX 300 screen, Myer gained 11.43 per cent and MAAS Group rose 7.93 per cent, while Lotus Resources fell 10.53 per cent. These percentage moves should be checked against company announcements and trading liquidity before attributing causes.

The Australian dollar was broadly flat at US70.38 cents. Spot gold was around US$4,280 an ounce, Brent crude approximately US$103.08 a barrel and iron ore near US$96.90 a tonne late in the session.

The rate outlook remains the central domestic catalyst. Labour-market weakness has not eliminated the possibility of an RBA increase next week, leaving banks, listed property and other rate-sensitive sectors exposed to changing expectations.

Market dashboard

S&P/ASX 200: 8,702, down 0.72 per cent.

All Ordinaries: 8,897, down 0.66 per cent.

Best sector: Energy, up more than one per cent.

Weakest areas: Real estate and materials were the major drags; confirm final sector percentages before publication.

Material winner: Premier Investments led the large-company gainers. Confirm its final closing move from the ASX before publication.

Material loser: Zip, down 11.38 per cent.

ASX 300 percentage leader: Myer, up 11.43 per cent.

ASX 300 percentage laggard: Zip, down 11.38 per cent.

AUD/USD: Approximately US$0.7038, broadly flat.

MOST POPULAR

The era of the gorgeous golden retriever is over. Today’s most coveted pooches have frightful faces bred to tug at our hearts.

Odd Culture Group brings a new kind of after-dark energy to the CBD, where daiquiris, disco and design collide beneath the city streets.

Related Stories
Prestige
Girard-Perregaux brings Williams F1 blue to the Laureato
By Ruba Jaajaa 21/09/2026
Lifestyle
One Man’s Quest to Reunite With His First Love: A 1971 VW Bug
By A.J. BAIME 01/12/2025
Property
Central Element Breaks Ground On $150 Million Pearl Bondi
By Ruba Jaajaa 07/09/2026
0
Your Cart
Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop