This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.
Many clothing brands say environmentally friendly materials are key to their future, but uptake has been sluggish
Many clothing brands say environmentally friendly materials are key to their future, but uptake has been sluggish
When a Swedish startup launched a new material made from recycled textiles in late 2022, the fashion industry hailed it as a game changer in its efforts to lessen its environmental impact.
Last month, the company, Renewcell, filed for bankruptcy. While some big retailers, including H&M and Zara, were enthusiastic backers, not enough brands committed to buying its material. Having misjudged how quickly the fashion industry would switch to more sustainable sourcing, the company was left with a costly factory running far below capacity.
The plight of Renewcell illustrates the fashion industry’s hesitancy in adopting new materials that may be better for the environment but typically cost more, at least in the short term. It is also another sign of how some companies are putting less emphasis on green initiatives amid a more challenging economic climate.
“There’s a disconnect” between some companies’ stated sustainability ambitions and what they actually do, said Tricia Carey , Renewcell’s chief commercial officer. “Fashion brands have the intention,” Carey said, “but many are lacking the road map to make it happen.”
Making clothes uses a large and growing amount of the planet’s resources. More than 100 billion garments are produced annually and that number is set to rise by one-third by 2030, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a nonprofit. It says the average garment is worn only 10 times before being discarded, often ending up in the trash . The fashion industry is responsible for as much as 8% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion.
Fashion brands have come under growing pressure from consumers and regulators to reduce their environmental impact, posing a dilemma for an industry hardwired to keep increasing sales by churning out more clothes.
To burnish their green credentials, brands have encouraged consumers to repair, recycle or sell old clothes rather than throw them away. They have also invested in so-called next-generation materials that promise to use fewer resources and, in some cases, have the potential to be recycled again and again.
Inditex , the parent company of Zara, says it wants a quarter of the fiber it uses to be made from next-generation materials by 2030. To foster new materials, the company has worked with more than 300 startups, also including Renewcell, through a Sustainability Innovation Hub that it set up four years ago.
H&M says it wants recycled fibers to constitute half of the material it uses by 2030. The company has invested in more than 25 sustainability startups, including Renewcell.
So far, the uptake of greener material has been sluggish. Recycled materials made up 7.9% of global fibre production in 2022, down from 8.5% the year before, according to the Textile Exchange, a nonprofit that advocates the adoption of more environmentally friendly materials. Much of that came from recycled plastic bottles, with less than 1% of all fibre coming from recycled textiles.
That’s despite next-generation materials attracting more than $3 billion of investment over the past decade, according to the Material Innovation Initiative, with dozens of new-textile companies launched during that time.
Founded in 2012, Renewcell became the first chemical textile-to-textile recycler to start producing material on a commercial scale.
Its material is called Circulose, which is produced by treating old textiles with chemicals to create a cellulose pulp. This is dried into sheets, which fibre producers can then dissolve to produce viscose and other materials that are used to make clothes. Unlike mechanically recycled fibres, which fray and ultimately disintegrate, Renewcell’s chemical process breaks old textiles down to the level of individual molecules from which strong, new fibres are made. These can be recycled indefinitely via the same process.
With many fashion companies pledging to invest in new textiles to be more sustainable, Renewcell bet on strong demand for its material.
The company raised $158 million, mostly through a 2020 listing in Stockholm, and invested $125 million to convert an old paper mill in eastern Sweden into a Circulose factory capable of producing 60,000 metric tons a year.
Renewcell also outlined plans for two additional factories that would increase its output sixfold by 2030.
Besides Inditex and H&M, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger owner PVH committed to buying significant quantities of fiber made from Circulose.
But Renewcell hit a brick wall in talks with other big brands. In meetings, brand executives would often express excitement and agree to pilot projects, only to balk at placing commercial-scale orders, said Carey.
Jolts to the economy, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and shaky consumer confidence had made brands risk averse.
Would-be customers fixated on how fiber made from Circulose cost 20% to 45% more than the virgin fibers they typically bought, as well as uncertainty about integrating a new material into their supply chains, Carey said. Fiber typically accounts for about 5% of the retail price of a finished garment.
Renewcell needed its factory to reach full output quickly to become commercially viable, but it achieved only 30% capacity last year as anticipated orders failed to materialize.
By October, the company was running out of cash, and in January it laid off a quarter of its 130 staff. It filed for bankruptcy in February after failing to secure fresh investment.
Renewcell is now seeking a buyer to repay its debts and restart production.
The company’s predicament is a grim sign for a clothing industry that claims to want to transform itself, said Claire Bergkamp, managing director of the Textile Exchange.
“My hope is this will be a wake-up call for the industry,” she said.
Unless fashion companies commit to paying higher prices for new, greener materials, other fiber startups could also struggle, Bergkamp added.
While the transition from gasoline cars to electric vehicles has benefited from billions of dollars in subsidies, the move to new textiles has received practically no government support, making startups reliant on private funding.
That has left some big clothing companies, notably H&M and Inditex, shouldering a relatively large share of the burden of supporting new-material startups.
H&M invested in Renewcell in 2017 and was the first retailer to launch products containing Circulose. It currently sells around three dozen products containing the material.
The retailer wanted to invest more but decided not to commit more cash in recent weeks because of the lack of support from other companies, said H&M Chief Executive Daniel Ervér .
Earlier this month, H&M announced a new investment in Syre, a startup developing a polyester-fabric recycling process, and pledged to buy $600 million worth of its material over seven years—assuming it achieves commercial production.
Demand for recycled polyester is already established, with material made from recycled bottles already commonly used to make clothes. But textile-to-textile recycled polyester is similar to Circulose in that the technology is untested at scale.
To drive a shift to next-generation materials, other companies need to invest and commit to buying new textiles at scale, Ervér said.
“H&M alone cannot provide the scale that is required,” Ervér said. “The industry needs to commit.”
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.
Geoffrey Hinton hopes the prize will add credibility to his claims about the dangers of AI technology he pioneered
The newly minted Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton has a message about the artificial-intelligence systems he helped create: get more serious about safety or they could endanger humanity.
“I think we’re at a kind of bifurcation point in history where, in the next few years, we need to figure out if there’s a way to deal with that threat,” Hinton said in an interview Tuesday with a Nobel Prize official that mixed pride in his life’s work with warnings about the growing danger it poses.
The 76-year-old Hinton resigned from Google last year in part so he could talk more about the possibility that AI systems could escape human control and influence elections or power dangerous robots. Along with other experienced AI researchers, he has called on such companies as OpenAI, Meta Platforms and Alphabet -owned Google to devote more resources to the safety of the advanced systems that they are competing against each other to develop as quickly as possible.
Hinton’s Nobel win has provided a new platform for his doomsday warnings at the same time it celebrates his critical role in advancing the technologies fueling them. Hinton has argued that advanced AI systems are capable of understanding their outputs, a controversial view in research circles.
“Hopefully, it will make me more credible when I say these things really do understand what they’re saying,” he said of the prize.
Hinton’s views have pitted him against factions of the AI community that believe dwelling on doomsday scenarios needlessly slows technological progress or distracts from more immediate harms, such as discrimination against minority groups .
“I think that he’s a smart guy, but I think a lot of people have way overhyped the risk of these things, and that’s really convinced a lot of the general public that this is what we should be focusing on, not the more immediate harms of AI,” said Melanie Mitchell, a professor at the Santa Fe Institute, during a panel last year.
Hinton visited Google’s Silicon Valley headquarters Tuesday for an informal celebration, and some of the company’s top AI executives congratulated him on social media.
On Wednesday, other prominent Googlers specialising in AI were also awarded a Nobel Prize. Demis Hassabis, chief executive of Google DeepMind, and John M. Jumper, director at the AI lab, were part of a group of three scientists who won the chemistry prize for their work on predicting the shape of proteins.
Hinton is sharing the Nobel Prize in physics with John Hopfield of Princeton University for their work since the 1980s on neural networks that process information in ways inspired by the human brain. That work is the basis for many of the AI technologies in use today, from ChatGPT’s humanlike conversations to Google Photos’ ability to recognise who is in every picture you take.
“Their contributions to connect fundamental concepts in physics with concepts in biology, not just AI—these concepts are still with us today,” said Yoshua Bengio , an AI researcher at the University of Montreal.
In 2012, Hinton worked with two of his University of Toronto graduate students, Alex Krizhevsky and Ilya Sutskever, on a neural network called AlexNet programmed to recognise images in photos. Until that point, computer algorithms had often been unable to tell that a picture of a dog was really a dog and not a cat or a car.
AlexNet’s blowout victory at a 2012 contest for image-recognition technology was a pivotal moment in the development of the modern AI boom, as it proved the power of neural nets over other approaches.
That same year, Hinton started a company with Krizhevsky and Sutskever that turned out to be short-lived. Google acquired it in 2013 in an auction against competitors including Baidu and Microsoft, paying $44 million essentially to hire the three men, according to the book “Genius Makers.” Hinton began splitting time between the University of Toronto and Google, where he continued research on neural networks.
Hinton is widely revered as a mentor for the current generation of top AI researchers including Sutskever, who co-founded OpenAI before leaving this spring to start a company called Safe Superintelligence.
Hinton received the 2018 Turing Award, a computer-science prize, for his work on neural networks alongside Bengio and a fellow AI researcher, Yann LeCun . The three are often referred to as the modern “godfathers of AI.”
By 2023, Hinton had become alarmed about the consequences of building more powerful artificial intelligence. He began talking about the possibility that AI systems could escape the control of their creators and cause catastrophic harm to humanity. In doing so, he aligned himself with a vocal movement of people concerned about the existential risks of the technology.
“We’re in a situation that most people can’t even conceive of, which is that these digital intelligences are going to be a lot smarter than us, and if they want to get stuff done, they’re going to want to take control,” Hinton said in an interview last year.
Hinton announced he was leaving Google in spring 2023, saying he wanted to be able to freely discuss the dangers of AI without worrying about consequences for the company. Google had acted “very responsibly,” he said in an X post.
In the subsequent months, Hinton has spent much of his time speaking to policymakers and tech executives, including Elon Musk , about AI risks.
Hinton cosigned a paper last year saying companies doing AI work should allocate at least one-third of their research and development resources to ensuring the safety and ethical use of their systems.
“One thing governments can do is force the big companies to spend a lot more of their resources on safety research, so that for example companies like OpenAI can’t just put safety research on the back burner,” Hinton said in the Nobel interview.
An OpenAI spokeswoman said the company is proud of its safety work.
With Bengio and other researchers, Hinton supported an artificial-intelligence safety bill passed by the California Legislature this summer that would have required developers of large AI systems to take a number of steps to ensure they can’t cause catastrophic damage. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently vetoed the bill , which was opposed by most big tech companies including Google.
Hinton’s increased activism has put him in opposition to other respected researchers who believe his warnings are fantastical because AI is far from having the capability to cause serious harm.
“Their complete lack of understanding of the physical world and lack of planning abilities put them way below cat-level intelligence, never mind human-level,” LeCun wrote in a response to Hinton on X last year.
This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan
Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.