This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,652,125 (+0.36%)       Melbourne $1,015,932 (-0.01%)       Brisbane $1,056,185 (+0.90%)       Adelaide $949,564 (-0.31%)       Perth $930,113 (-0.43%)       Hobart $758,047 (-0.12%)       Darwin $770,874 (+0.08%)       Canberra $974,828 (+1.29%)       National $1,080,843 (+0.32%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $773,554 (-0.54%)       Melbourne $476,399 (-0.13%)       Brisbane $647,991 (+0.62%)       Adelaide $518,665 (+5.34%)       Perth $529,479 (+0.45%)       Hobart $532,297 (+1.33%)       Darwin $383,399 (-0.28%)       Canberra $503,041 (-0.52%)       National $567,716 (+0.54%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 12,442 (+293)       Melbourne 15,352 (+169)       Brisbane 8,617 (-52)       Adelaide 2,903 (+8)       Perth 7,845 (+199)       Hobart 1,292 (+64)       Darwin 178 (-2)       Canberra 1,222 (-28)       National 49,851 (+651)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,437 (+198)       Melbourne 6,911 (+35)       Brisbane 1,658 (-47)       Adelaide 431 (+6)       Perth 1,719 (+11)       Hobart 228 (+4)       Darwin 285 (+1)       Canberra 1,195 (+24)       National 21,864 (+232)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $795 (-$5)       Melbourne $590 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $630 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $575 (+$8)       Darwin $790 (-$10)       Canberra $700 ($0)       National $688 (-$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $730 ($0)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $620 (-$5)       Adelaide $520 ($0)       Perth $650 ($0)       Hobart $490 ($0)       Darwin $560 (+$10)       Canberra $570 ($0)       National $601 (+$)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,996 (-7)       Melbourne 7,677 (+16)       Brisbane 3,782 (-11)       Adelaide 1,351 (+11)       Perth 2,134 (+95)       Hobart 234 (0)       Darwin 106 (-5)       Canberra 573 (+7)       National 21,853 (+106)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 7,911 (-78)       Melbourne 5,695 (-60)       Brisbane 1,735 (-76)       Adelaide 345 (+11)       Perth 693 (+44)       Hobart 95 (-6)       Darwin 121 (-15)       Canberra 520 (-15)       National 17,115 (-195)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.50% (↓)     Melbourne 3.02% (↑)        Brisbane 3.20% (↓)     Adelaide 3.45% (↑)      Perth 3.91% (↑)      Hobart 3.94% (↑)        Darwin 5.33% (↓)       Canberra 3.73% (↓)       National 3.31% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 4.91% (↑)      Melbourne 6.55% (↑)        Brisbane 4.98% (↓)       Adelaide 5.21% (↓)       Perth 6.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.79% (↓)     Darwin 7.60% (↑)      Canberra 5.89% (↑)        National 5.50% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.0% (↑)      Melbourne 1.9% (↑)      Brisbane 1.4% (↑)      Adelaide 1.3% (↑)      Perth 1.2% (↑)      Hobart 1.0% (↑)      Darwin 1.6% (↑)      Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National 1.7% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 2.4% (↑)      Melbourne 3.8% (↑)      Brisbane 2.0% (↑)      Adelaide 1.1% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.4% (↑)      Darwin 2.8% (↑)      Canberra 2.9% (↑)      National 2.2% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 26.6 (↑)        Melbourne 27.2 (↓)       Brisbane 27.1 (↓)       Adelaide 23.6 (↓)       Perth 32.7 (↓)       Hobart 25.3 (↓)     Darwin 27.6 (↑)      Canberra 26.9 (↑)        National 27.1 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 24.0 (↑)        Melbourne 26.2 (↓)     Brisbane 26.5 (↑)        Adelaide 22.0 (↓)       Perth 34.7 (↓)     Hobart 23.8 (↑)      Darwin 33.6 (↑)        Canberra 29.4 (↓)     National 27.5 (↑)            
Share Button

This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.

Many clothing brands say environmentally friendly materials are key to their future, but uptake has been sluggish

By TREFOR MOSS
Tue, Mar 26, 2024 7:00amGrey Clock 4 min

When a Swedish startup launched a new material made from recycled textiles in late 2022, the fashion industry hailed it as a game changer in its efforts to lessen its environmental impact.

Last month, the company, Renewcell, filed for bankruptcy. While some big retailers, including H&M and Zara, were enthusiastic backers, not enough brands committed to buying its material. Having misjudged how quickly the fashion industry would switch to more sustainable sourcing, the company was left with a costly factory running far below capacity.

The plight of Renewcell illustrates the fashion industry’s hesitancy in adopting new materials that may be better for the environment but typically cost more, at least in the short term. It is also another sign of how some companies are putting less emphasis on green initiatives amid a more challenging economic climate.

“There’s a disconnect” between some companies’ stated sustainability ambitions and what they actually do, said Tricia Carey , Renewcell’s chief commercial officer. “Fashion brands have the intention,” Carey said, “but many are lacking the road map to make it happen.”

Making clothes uses a large and growing amount of the planet’s resources. More than 100 billion garments are produced annually and that number is set to rise by one-third by 2030, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a nonprofit. It says the average garment is worn only 10 times before being discarded, often ending up in the trash . The fashion industry is responsible for as much as 8% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion.

Fashion brands have come under growing pressure from consumers and regulators to reduce their environmental impact, posing a dilemma for an industry hardwired to keep increasing sales by churning out more clothes.

To burnish their green credentials, brands have encouraged consumers to repair, recycle or sell old clothes rather than throw them away. They have also invested in so-called next-generation materials that promise to use fewer resources and, in some cases, have the potential to be recycled again and again.

Inditex , the parent company of Zara, says it wants a quarter of the fiber it uses to be made from next-generation materials by 2030. To foster new materials, the company has worked with more than 300 startups, also including Renewcell, through a Sustainability Innovation Hub that it set up four years ago.

H&M says it wants recycled fibers to constitute half of the material it uses by 2030. The company has invested in more than 25 sustainability startups, including Renewcell.

So far, the uptake of greener material has been sluggish. Recycled materials made up 7.9% of global fibre production in 2022, down from 8.5% the year before, according to the Textile Exchange, a nonprofit that advocates the adoption of more environmentally friendly materials. Much of that came from recycled plastic bottles, with less than 1% of all fibre coming from recycled textiles.

That’s despite next-generation materials attracting more than $3 billion of investment over the past decade, according to the Material Innovation Initiative, with dozens of new-textile companies launched during that time.

Founded in 2012, Renewcell became the first chemical textile-to-textile recycler to start producing material on a commercial scale.

Its material is called Circulose, which is produced by treating old textiles with chemicals to create a cellulose pulp. This is dried into sheets, which fibre producers can then dissolve to produce viscose and other materials that are used to make clothes. Unlike mechanically recycled fibres, which fray and ultimately disintegrate, Renewcell’s chemical process breaks old textiles down to the level of individual molecules from which strong, new fibres are made. These can be recycled indefinitely via the same process.

With many fashion companies pledging to invest in new textiles to be more sustainable, Renewcell bet on strong demand for its material.

The company raised $158 million, mostly through a 2020 listing in Stockholm, and invested $125 million to convert an old paper mill in eastern Sweden into a Circulose factory capable of producing 60,000 metric tons a year.

Renewcell also outlined plans for two additional factories that would increase its output sixfold by 2030.

Besides Inditex and H&M, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger owner PVH committed to buying significant quantities of fiber made from Circulose.

But Renewcell hit a brick wall in talks with other big brands. In meetings, brand executives would often express excitement and agree to pilot projects, only to balk at placing commercial-scale orders, said Carey.

Jolts to the economy, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and shaky consumer confidence had made brands risk averse.

Would-be customers fixated on how fiber made from Circulose cost 20% to 45% more than the virgin fibers they typically bought, as well as uncertainty about integrating a new material into their supply chains, Carey said. Fiber typically accounts for about 5% of the retail price of a finished garment.

Renewcell needed its factory to reach full output quickly to become commercially viable, but it achieved only 30% capacity last year as anticipated orders failed to materialize.

By October, the company was running out of cash, and in January it laid off a quarter of its 130 staff. It filed for bankruptcy in February after failing to secure fresh investment.

Renewcell is now seeking a buyer to repay its debts and restart production.

The company’s predicament is a grim sign for a clothing industry that claims to want to transform itself, said Claire Bergkamp, managing director of the Textile Exchange.

“My hope is this will be a wake-up call for the industry,” she said.

Unless fashion companies commit to paying higher prices for new, greener materials, other fiber startups could also struggle, Bergkamp added.

While the transition from gasoline cars to electric vehicles has benefited from billions of dollars in subsidies, the move to new textiles has received practically no government support, making startups reliant on private funding.

That has left some big clothing companies, notably H&M and Inditex, shouldering a relatively large share of the burden of supporting new-material startups.

H&M invested in Renewcell in 2017 and was the first retailer to launch products containing Circulose. It currently sells around three dozen products containing the material.

The retailer wanted to invest more but decided not to commit more cash in recent weeks because of the lack of support from other companies, said H&M Chief Executive Daniel Ervér .

Earlier this month, H&M announced a new investment in Syre, a startup developing a polyester-fabric recycling process, and pledged to buy $600 million worth of its material over seven years—assuming it achieves commercial production.

Demand for recycled polyester is already established, with material made from recycled bottles already commonly used to make clothes. But textile-to-textile recycled polyester is similar to Circulose in that the technology is untested at scale.

To drive a shift to next-generation materials, other companies need to invest and commit to buying new textiles at scale, Ervér said.

“H&M alone cannot provide the scale that is required,” Ervér said. “The industry needs to commit.”



MOST POPULAR

Luxury carmaker delivers historic revenues, record global sales, and robust profitability amid ambitious product transformation.

Fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, but missed estimates.

Related Stories
Money
Temu Owner PDD Posts Slowest Revenue Growth Since Early 2022
By JIAHUI HUANG 21/03/2025
Money
Even Rich People Are Starting to Get Nervous About Trump’s Economy
By ABBY SCHULTZ 20/03/2025
Money
The Japanese Sake Masters Swimming Against a Rising Tide of Whisky
By DON NICO FORBES 19/03/2025
Temu Owner PDD Posts Slowest Revenue Growth Since Early 2022

Fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, but missed estimates.

By JIAHUI HUANG
Fri, Mar 21, 2025 2 min

The Chinese owner of bargain app Temu reported slower quarterly profit and revenue growth, capping a turbulent year for the e-commerce giant as it faced stiff competition at home, geopolitical tensions abroad and U.S. tariff uncertainties.

PDD Holdings on Thursday said fourth-quarter revenue climbed 24% to 110.61 billion yuan, equivalent to $15.30 billion, missing a Visible Alpha estimate of 117.83 billion yuan. It was the slowest pace of growth since the first quarter of 2022.

Net profit rose 18% from a year earlier to 27.45 billion yuan, topping analysts’ expectations of 27.00 billion yuan. However, the growth was slower than the 61% rise in the third quarter and the more than twofold increase a year earlier.

“Looking ahead, we will continue to prioritize investments in the platform ecosystem as the cornerstone of our long-term value creation strategy,” said Jun Liu, PDD’s vice president of finance.

Jefferies analysts in a note said PDD’s top-line miss was due to slower-than-expected revenue growth from transaction services, while revenue from online marketing services and others was in line with consensus.

The easing momentum contrasted sharply with the stunning growth rates the company delivered in past years. PDD last year repeatedly warned of a slowdown, pointing to intensifying competition and external challenges.

Pinduoduo, the company’s discount platform in China, has grown rapidly since it launched nearly a decade ago, taking market share from e-commerce stalwarts Alibaba and JD.com . Its sister platform Temu burst onto the international scene in 2022 and swiftly gained attention in the U.S., attracting customers with low prices.

However, Temu has also encountered regulatory scrutiny as it expands overseas. U.S. President Trump in February delayed his plan to end a provision for China imports that lets platforms avoid paying import duties and customs inspections on low-value packages, offering the likes of Temu a brief reprieve.

For the full year, PDD’s total revenue rose 59% to 393.84 billion yuan and net profit climbed 87% to 60.03 billion yuan.

Last month, rival Alibaba posted its fastest pace of revenue growth since late 2023, with revenue for the latest quarter rising 7.6% to 280 billion yuan. Online retailer JD.com earlier this month nearly tripled its quarterly net profit as revenue climbed 13% to 346.99 billion yuan.

U.S.-listed PDD was recently 6.5% lower in premarket trading after the results.

MOST POPULAR

Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot star in an awkward live-action attempt to modernize the 1937 animated classic.

With the debut of DeepSeek’s buzzy chatbot and updates to others, we tried applying the technology—and a little human common sense—to the most mind-melting aspect of home cooking: weekly meal planning.

Related Stories
Money
Bitcoin, Other Cryptos Tick Up After Earlier Loss
By ELSA OHLEN & ANITA HAMILTON 05/03/2025
Property
OWN A MELBOURNE MASTERPIECE BY BYRON’S RECORD-BREAKING ARCHITECTS
By Kirsten Craze 14/03/2025
Property
Australian House Prices Retreat for First Time in Nearly Two Years
By James Glynn 02/01/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop