This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,822,183 (-0.43%)       Melbourne $1,078,813 (-0.33%)       Brisbane $1,264,391 (-0.87%)       Adelaide $1,112,777 (+0.12%)       Perth $1,149,218 (-1.55%)       Hobart $856,229 (+0.59%)       Darwin $886,634 (-5.18%)       Canberra $1,078,947 (-0.81%)       National Capitals $1,224,455 (-0.79%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $821,384 (-0.41%)       Melbourne $550,948 (-0.31%)       Brisbane $839,757 (+0.74%)       Adelaide $560,009 (-3.62%)       Perth $677,037 (-0.51%)       Hobart $581,017 (-0.34%)       Darwin $465,561 (+5.05%)       Canberra $509,688 (+0.21%)       National Capitals $653,196 (-0.17%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,369 (+370)       Melbourne 16,279 (+411)       Brisbane 7,326 (+232)       Adelaide 2,642 (+103)       Perth 5,799 (+92)       Hobart 869 (+34)       Darwin 127 (+5)       Canberra 1,161 (+61)       National Capitals 47,572 (+1,308)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,191 (+212)       Melbourne 6,775 (+66)       Brisbane 1,471 (+54)       Adelaide 413 (+27)       Perth 1,179 (+39)       Hobart 165 (+5)       Darwin 178 (-3)       Canberra 1,188 (+7)       National Capitals 20,560 (+407)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $830 ($0)       Melbourne $595 (+$5)       Brisbane $700 (+$10)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $640 (-$3)       Darwin $800 (-$10)       Canberra $720 (-$5)       National Capitals $719 (-$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $810 (-$10)       Melbourne $580 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 (-$10)       Hobart $520 (-$30)       Darwin $605 (-$35)       Canberra $598 (-$3)       National Capitals $639 (-$10)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,362 (+159)       Melbourne 7,007 (+228)       Brisbane 3,620 (+124)       Adelaide 1,477 (+64)       Perth 2,297 (+130)       Hobart 240 (+14)       Darwin 49 (+5)       Canberra 399 (+10)       National Capitals 20,451 (+734)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,450 (+241)       Melbourne 4,569 (+74)       Brisbane 1,844 (+33)       Adelaide 418 (-4)       Perth 652 (+14)       Hobart 77 (+9)       Darwin 76 (-4)       Canberra 640 (+41)       National Capitals 16,726 (+404)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.37% (↑)      Melbourne 2.87% (↑)      Brisbane 2.88% (↑)        Adelaide 3.04% (↓)     Perth 3.39% (↑)        Hobart 3.89% (↓)     Darwin 4.69% (↑)      Canberra 3.47% (↑)      National Capitals 3.05% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.13% (↓)     Melbourne 5.47% (↑)        Brisbane 4.02% (↓)     Adelaide 5.11% (↑)        Perth 5.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.65% (↓)       Darwin 6.76% (↓)       Canberra 6.10% (↓)       National Capitals 5.08% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 29.5 (↑)      Melbourne 29.5 (↑)      Brisbane 27.9 (↑)      Adelaide 24.4 (↑)      Perth 34.4 (↑)      Hobart 28.4 (↑)      Darwin 28.6 (↑)      Canberra 28.1 (↑)      National Capitals 28.8 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 28.3 (↑)      Melbourne 28.4 (↑)        Brisbane 26.7 (↓)     Adelaide 21.8 (↑)        Perth 32.8 (↓)     Hobart 31.9 (↑)      Darwin 35.3 (↑)      Canberra 39.7 (↑)      National Capitals 30.6 (↑)            
Share Button

This Startup Promised to Help Fashion Go Green. Brands Didn’t Want to Pay for It.

Many clothing brands say environmentally friendly materials are key to their future, but uptake has been sluggish

By TREFOR MOSS
Tue, Mar 26, 2024 7:00amGrey Clock 4 min

When a Swedish startup launched a new material made from recycled textiles in late 2022, the fashion industry hailed it as a game changer in its efforts to lessen its environmental impact.

Last month, the company, Renewcell, filed for bankruptcy. While some big retailers, including H&M and Zara, were enthusiastic backers, not enough brands committed to buying its material. Having misjudged how quickly the fashion industry would switch to more sustainable sourcing, the company was left with a costly factory running far below capacity.

The plight of Renewcell illustrates the fashion industry’s hesitancy in adopting new materials that may be better for the environment but typically cost more, at least in the short term. It is also another sign of how some companies are putting less emphasis on green initiatives amid a more challenging economic climate.

“There’s a disconnect” between some companies’ stated sustainability ambitions and what they actually do, said Tricia Carey , Renewcell’s chief commercial officer. “Fashion brands have the intention,” Carey said, “but many are lacking the road map to make it happen.”

Making clothes uses a large and growing amount of the planet’s resources. More than 100 billion garments are produced annually and that number is set to rise by one-third by 2030, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a nonprofit. It says the average garment is worn only 10 times before being discarded, often ending up in the trash . The fashion industry is responsible for as much as 8% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion.

Fashion brands have come under growing pressure from consumers and regulators to reduce their environmental impact, posing a dilemma for an industry hardwired to keep increasing sales by churning out more clothes.

To burnish their green credentials, brands have encouraged consumers to repair, recycle or sell old clothes rather than throw them away. They have also invested in so-called next-generation materials that promise to use fewer resources and, in some cases, have the potential to be recycled again and again.

Inditex , the parent company of Zara, says it wants a quarter of the fiber it uses to be made from next-generation materials by 2030. To foster new materials, the company has worked with more than 300 startups, also including Renewcell, through a Sustainability Innovation Hub that it set up four years ago.

H&M says it wants recycled fibers to constitute half of the material it uses by 2030. The company has invested in more than 25 sustainability startups, including Renewcell.

So far, the uptake of greener material has been sluggish. Recycled materials made up 7.9% of global fibre production in 2022, down from 8.5% the year before, according to the Textile Exchange, a nonprofit that advocates the adoption of more environmentally friendly materials. Much of that came from recycled plastic bottles, with less than 1% of all fibre coming from recycled textiles.

That’s despite next-generation materials attracting more than $3 billion of investment over the past decade, according to the Material Innovation Initiative, with dozens of new-textile companies launched during that time.

Founded in 2012, Renewcell became the first chemical textile-to-textile recycler to start producing material on a commercial scale.

Its material is called Circulose, which is produced by treating old textiles with chemicals to create a cellulose pulp. This is dried into sheets, which fibre producers can then dissolve to produce viscose and other materials that are used to make clothes. Unlike mechanically recycled fibres, which fray and ultimately disintegrate, Renewcell’s chemical process breaks old textiles down to the level of individual molecules from which strong, new fibres are made. These can be recycled indefinitely via the same process.

With many fashion companies pledging to invest in new textiles to be more sustainable, Renewcell bet on strong demand for its material.

The company raised $158 million, mostly through a 2020 listing in Stockholm, and invested $125 million to convert an old paper mill in eastern Sweden into a Circulose factory capable of producing 60,000 metric tons a year.

Renewcell also outlined plans for two additional factories that would increase its output sixfold by 2030.

Besides Inditex and H&M, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger owner PVH committed to buying significant quantities of fiber made from Circulose.

But Renewcell hit a brick wall in talks with other big brands. In meetings, brand executives would often express excitement and agree to pilot projects, only to balk at placing commercial-scale orders, said Carey.

Jolts to the economy, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and shaky consumer confidence had made brands risk averse.

Would-be customers fixated on how fiber made from Circulose cost 20% to 45% more than the virgin fibers they typically bought, as well as uncertainty about integrating a new material into their supply chains, Carey said. Fiber typically accounts for about 5% of the retail price of a finished garment.

Renewcell needed its factory to reach full output quickly to become commercially viable, but it achieved only 30% capacity last year as anticipated orders failed to materialize.

By October, the company was running out of cash, and in January it laid off a quarter of its 130 staff. It filed for bankruptcy in February after failing to secure fresh investment.

Renewcell is now seeking a buyer to repay its debts and restart production.

The company’s predicament is a grim sign for a clothing industry that claims to want to transform itself, said Claire Bergkamp, managing director of the Textile Exchange.

“My hope is this will be a wake-up call for the industry,” she said.

Unless fashion companies commit to paying higher prices for new, greener materials, other fiber startups could also struggle, Bergkamp added.

While the transition from gasoline cars to electric vehicles has benefited from billions of dollars in subsidies, the move to new textiles has received practically no government support, making startups reliant on private funding.

That has left some big clothing companies, notably H&M and Inditex, shouldering a relatively large share of the burden of supporting new-material startups.

H&M invested in Renewcell in 2017 and was the first retailer to launch products containing Circulose. It currently sells around three dozen products containing the material.

The retailer wanted to invest more but decided not to commit more cash in recent weeks because of the lack of support from other companies, said H&M Chief Executive Daniel Ervér .

Earlier this month, H&M announced a new investment in Syre, a startup developing a polyester-fabric recycling process, and pledged to buy $600 million worth of its material over seven years—assuming it achieves commercial production.

Demand for recycled polyester is already established, with material made from recycled bottles already commonly used to make clothes. But textile-to-textile recycled polyester is similar to Circulose in that the technology is untested at scale.

To drive a shift to next-generation materials, other companies need to invest and commit to buying new textiles at scale, Ervér said.

“H&M alone cannot provide the scale that is required,” Ervér said. “The industry needs to commit.”



MOST POPULAR

From elevated skincare to handcrafted home pieces, this year’s most thoughtful gifts go beyond the expected.

A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.

Related Stories
Money
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon
By Micah Maidenberg 30/03/2026
Money
Saudi Arabia Sees a Spike to $180 Oil if Energy Shock Persists Past April
By SUMMER SAID, RYAN DEZEMBER AND DAVID UBERTI 20/03/2026
Money
Gen X Is Stuck in the Middle and Financially Squeezed. How One Financial Adviser Is Helping.
By Anne Field 18/03/2026
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon

The lunar flyby would be the deepest humans have traveled in space in decades.

By Micah Maidenberg
Mon, Mar 30, 2026 4 min

It’s go time for the highest-stakes mission at NASA in more than 50 years.  

On April 1, the agency is set to launch four astronauts around the moon, the deepest human spaceflight since the final Apollo lunar landing in 1972.  

The launch window for Artemis II , as the mission is called, opens at 6:24 p.m. ET. 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration teams have been preparing the vehicles to depart from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on the planned roughly 10-day trip. Crew members have trained for years for this moment. 

Reid Wiseman, the NASA astronaut serving as mission commander, said he doesn’t fear taking the voyage. A widower, he does worry at times about what he is putting his daughters through. 

“I could have a very comfortable life for them,” Wiseman said in an interview last September.  

“But I’m also a human, and I see the spirit in their eyes that is burning in my soul too. And so we’ve just got to never stop going.” 

Wiseman’s crewmates on Artemis II are NASA’s Victor Glover and Christina Koch, as well as Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen. 

Photo: NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft being rolled out at night. Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/Getty Images

What are the goals for Artemis II? 

The biggest one: Safely fly the crew on vehicles that have never carried astronauts before.  

The towering Space Launch System rocket has the job of lofting a vehicle called Orion into space and on its way to the moon.  

Orion is designed to carry the crew around the moon and back. Myriad systems on the ship—life support, communications, navigation—will be tested with the astronauts on board. 

SLS and Orion don’t have much flight experience. The vehicles last flew in 2022, when the agency completed its uncrewed Artemis I mission . 

How is the mission expected to unfold? 

Artemis II will begin when SLS takes off from a launchpad in Florida with Orion stacked on top of it.  

The so-called upper stage of SLS will later separate from the main part of the rocket with Orion attached, and use its engine to set up the latter vehicle for a push to the moon. 

After Orion separates from the upper stage, it will conduct what is called a translunar injection—the engine firing that commits Orion to soaring out to the moon. It will fly to the moon over the course of a few days and travel around its far side. 

Orion will face a tough return home after speeding through space. As it hits Earth’s atmosphere, Orion will be flying at 25,000 miles an hour and face temperatures of 5,000 degrees as it slows down. The capsule is designed to land under parachutes in the Pacific Ocean, not far from San Diego. 

Water photo: NASA’s Orion capsule after its splash-down in the Pacific Ocean in 2022 for the Artemis I mission. Mario Tama/Press Pool

Is it possible Artemis II will be delayed? 

Yes.  

For safety reasons, the agency won’t launch if certain tough weather conditions roll through the Cape Canaveral, Fla., area. Delays caused by technical problems are possible, too. NASA has other dates identified for the mission if it doesn’t begin April 1. 

Who are the astronauts flying on Artemis II? 

The crew will be led by Wiseman, a retired Navy pilot who completed military deployments before joining NASA’s astronaut corps. He traveled to the International Space Station in 2014. 

Two other astronauts will represent NASA during the mission: Glover, an experienced Navy pilot, and Koch, who began her career as an electrical engineer for the agency and once spent a year at a research station in the South Pole. Both have traveled to the space station before. 

Hansen is a military pilot who joined Canada’s astronaut corps in 2009. He will be making his first trip to space. 

Koch’s participation in Artemis II will mark the first time a woman has flown beyond orbits near Earth. Glover and Hansen will be the first African-American and non-American astronauts, respectively, to do the same. 

What will the astronauts do during the flight? 

The astronauts will evaluate how Orion flies, practice emergency procedures and capture images of the far side of the moon for scientific and exploration purposes (they may become the first humans to see parts of the far side of the lunar surface). Health-tracking projects of the astronauts are designed to inform future missions. 

Those efforts will play out in Orion’s crew module, which has about two minivans worth of living area.  

On board, the astronauts will spend about 30 minutes a day exercising, using a device that allows them to do dead lifts, rowing and more. Sleep will come in eight-hour stretches in hammocks. 

There is a custom-made warmer for meals, with beef brisket and veggie quiche on the menu.  

Each astronaut is permitted two flavored beverages a day, including coffee. The crew will hold one hourlong shared meal each day.  

The Universal Waste Management System—that’s the toilet—uses air flow to pull fluid and solid waste away into containers. 

What happens after Artemis II? 

Assuming it goes well, NASA will march on to Artemis III, scheduled for next year. During that operation, NASA plans to launch Orion with crew members on board and have the ship practice docking with lunar-lander vehicles that Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin have been developing. The rendezvous operations will occur relatively close to Earth. 

NASA hopes that its contractors and the agency itself are ready to attempt one or more lunar landing missions in 2028. Many current and former spaceflight officials are skeptical that timeline is feasible. 

MOST POPULAR

Many of the most-important events have slipped from our collective memories. But their impacts live on.

New research suggests that bonuses make employees feel more like a mere cog in a wheel.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
BMW LAUNCHES NEUE KLASSE WITH GLOBAL DEBUT OF ELECTRIC iX3
By Jeni O'Dowd 08/09/2025
Property
Luxury apartment ‘rightsizing’ boom reshapes prestige property market
By Jeni O'Dowd 10/03/2026
Property
Newport icon with oceanfront poise shatters sale records
By Kirsten Craze 31/10/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop