Trump Administration Could Bring an Economic ‘Detox.’ What It Means for Stocks.
Investors may have nothing to fear but fear itself. But sometimes fear is more than enough.
Investors may have nothing to fear but fear itself. But sometimes fear is more than enough.
As another week begins with more selling–all three major indexes are falling, with the Nasdaq Composite hit hardest–fear is undoubtedly running high in the market. The Cboe Volatility Index, Wall Street’s fear gauge, jumped 15% to 27 on Monday morning. That would be its highest close since Dec. 18, when it was at 27.62.
Uncertainty about government policy and the health of the economy is overshadowing positive data.
Tariffs are one part of the problem. Not only are they disruptive to global trade and lead to higher prices, but President Donald Trump has walked back their implementation and doubled down enough to give the market whiplash. And then there are worries about huge cuts to federal spending, including mass firings and slashing outlays for programs, with a budget fight that could lead to a government shutdown at the end of the week.
Investors have little incentive to keep the faith, especially because signs of economic weakness are starting to emerge.
“Prior to tariff uncertainty, Momentum factors were leading, and risk factor returns were stable,” notes 22V Research’s Dennis DeBusschere. “ Payrolls and PMI data indicate weaker growth at the same time tariffs are adding to uncertainty about the path of economic data and earnings.” The result is that stocks are swinging wildly, riskier names are out of favor, and defensive shares are the flavor of the month.
According to Sevens Report’s Tom Essaye, “until there’s some movement towards stable policy, the best we can hope for is a churn sideways between around 5,700 and 6,000 in the S&P 500.” The index broke below 5650 in morning trading Monday.
The problem is that the greater the losses, the more the market could be closing in on a “liquidation avalanche,” as Dohmen Capital Research’s Bert Dohmen puts it. The concern is that forced selling, such as to raise cash for margin calls on shares bought with borrowed money, or by money managers desperate to limit losses, creates a downward spiral.
Wall Street famously abhors unpredictability, but even more worrisome may be rhetoric from Washington, D.C., that indicates the Trump administration is fine with causing what it believes will be a short-lived downturn as it pursues long-term goals it considers more important.
Asked whether a recession on the way, the president declined to rule out the possibility. “I hate to predict things like that,” Trump told Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures. “There is a period of transition, because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America.”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, predicted “a natural adjustment as we move away from public spending to private spending, in an interview with CNBC. “The market and the economy have just become hooked, and we’ve become addicted to this government spending, and there’s going to be a detox period. There’s going to be a detox.”
As T.S. Lombard’s Dario Perkins notes, Elon Musk and others in Trump’s orbit have pointed to Argentina as a successful example of this strategy. President Javier Milei imposed strict austerity measures to combat inflation, leading to a brief recession in 2024.
Of course, “copying the policies of a country that had massive endemic corruption and was on the brink of hyperinflation is, er, problematic,” Perkins writes. “Yes, inflation is a bit high, but not so high that Musk and co should deliberately engineer a recession. Perhaps the new U.S. administration has forgotten what a ‘real’ recession is like.”
The 2008-2009 financial crisis was nearly two decades ago, and the U.S. only rebounded from the Covid-19 downturn so quickly and strongly because of huge government spending. That means it is “odd to see US policymakers talk as if they want to inflict damage on the economy, or at least do things that risk causing damage,” he notes.
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Damage could snowball quickly. If big government layoffs continue at a time when hiring is already weak, it could lead to a further loss of confidence and even higher unemployment. And as history shows, recessions aren’t always quick or without damage.
“The US is not Argentina, and it is not facing an imminent debt crisis,” Perkins writes. “In any case, does anyone seriously think a recession in 2025 would lower America’s debt trajectory? Every recession I know has had the exact opposite effect.”
The good news is that we aren’t there yet. Earnings have held up well, and while the mention of tariffs in fourth-quarter conference calls was up 40% from their prior peak in 2018, mentions of a recession fell to their lowest point since the first quarter of 2018, as DataTrek Research’s Nicolas Colas notes.
“The dichotomy between record high ‘tariff’ and near-record low ‘recession’ mentions on investor calls neatly reflects the mood of corporate America,” he writes. “The C-suite is struggling to come to grips with tariff policy but remains fairly optimistic on the US economy. So far, anyway…Any change to the latter view would be unwelcomed.”
For his part, TS Lombard’s Perkins isn’t predicting a recession. Sevens Reports’ Essaye notes that concern about tariffs so far has been worse than their effects. While it makes sense to brace for volatility, “that negative scenario is not a foregone conclusion and actual facts on the economy and earnings [are] hanging on.” he says.
22V Research’s DeBusschere highlights that in aggregate, macroeconomic data still point to a very high probability that the U.S. economy is still expanding. “Over the past few weeks though, market internals have weakened to a level more consistent with economic slowdowns/heightened recession risk,” he says. “Markets are discounting a sharp slowdown that is not evident TODAY in actual data.”
The problem is that as long as chaotic moves in Washington, D.C., continue, that won’t matter for stocks.
“Although the U.S. will still likely avoid a recession this year, investor sentiment does appear to be headed toward another recession scare,” writes Paulsen Perspectives’ Jim Paulsen. “An actual recession would probably result in a bear market, but even an ongoing or worsening ‘fear’ of recession will likely magnify the current stock market correction.”
When the market gets clarity about what comes next, prices can recover. But until then, it is hard to see how stocks can rise consistently. Just the fear of a recession is enough to weigh on markets.
Write to Teresa Rivas at teresa.rivas@barrons.com
Whether it’s a soft butter or a rich shade of mustard, the sunny shade is showing its versatility in interior design.
The cult Australian accessories label has added a playful new collectible to its SABRÉMOJI range, a miniature padlock charm crafted with purpose, personality, and polish.
Industrial assets offer a simple, low-risk entry into commercial real estate.
Falling interest rates are sparking a rebound in interest in commercial property. However, for many first-time investors, commercial property can feel very intimidating. With commercial property, there are typically numerous different numbers, complex leases, and unfamiliar terminology.
But once you understand what to look for, the pathway into commercial becomes much clearer and far more achievable than most people realise. So, what does a smart entry point into commercial property actually look like?
If there’s one standout option, it’s typically an industrial property with value-add potential.
Among all the commercial sectors, industrial is currently the most stable and accessible. Demand is being driven by the trades, small manufacturers, logistics operators and e-commerce businesses, many of which are growing rapidly and need practical space to operate from.
Unlike retail and office properties, industrial assets are typically simpler to understand. They’re often lower maintenance, easier to lease and more resilient to changes in the economy. This makes them well-suited to first-time investors who want to enter the market with confidence.
When looking at entry-level opportunities, many investors make the mistake of prioritising presentation. But it’s generally not the flashiest property that delivers the best returns. It’s the one where you can create the most upside.
That might mean buying a property where the current rent is well below market value. When the lease ends, you have the opportunity to negotiate a new lease at a higher rate, instantly increasing the property’s value.
In other cases, it may be a warehouse with a short-term lease in a high-demand area, providing you the opportunity to renegotiate the terms and secure a better return. Even basic improvements like repainting, improving access, or updating signage can make a big difference to tenant demand.
A common trap for first-time commercial buyers is chasing the highest yield on offer. While yield is an important consideration, it shouldn’t be the only one. A high yield can sometimes signal a risky investment, one with a poor location, limited tenant demand, or low capital growth prospects.
Instead, smart investors focus on balance. A net yield of six to seven per cent in a strong, established area with reliable tenants and good fundamentals is often a far better outcome than a nine per cent yield in a declining market.
Yield is only part of the story. A good commercial investment is one where the income is sustainable, the asset has growth potential, and the risk is well-managed.
Retail and office properties can be suitable for experienced investors, but they’re often more complex and carry higher risk, especially for those just starting out. Retail in particular has faced significant changes in recent years, with e-commerce altering the way consumers shop.
Unless the property is in a high-traffic, local strip with essential services like medical, food or personal care, vacancy risk can be high. Office space is still adapting to the post-COVID shift towards remote work, and in many cases, demand has softened. If you’re entering the commercial market for the first time, it’s better to stick to simple, functional industrial assets in proven locations.
For first-time investors, some of the best opportunities can be found in outer-metro industrial precincts or larger regional centres.
Suburbs in places like Geelong, Logan, Toowoomba or Altona North offer a compelling combination of affordability, strong tenant demand and relatively low vacancy risk.
These areas often have diverse local economies that don’t rely on a single industry and offer entry points between $600,000 and $1 million, a sweet spot where competition from institutional investors is limited and owner-occupiers are still active.
Imagine purchasing an industrial shed for $750,000 with a tenant in place and a current net yield of 6.5 per cent. The lease has about 18 months left, and you know the current rent is around $10,000 below market.
Once the lease expires, you can renegotiate or re-lease at the correct rate, increasing the income and, by extension, the value of the asset.
That’s a textbook example of a good commercial entry point. The property is tenanted, it generates income from day one, and it has a clear path to growing your equity within 12 to 24 months.
Abdullah Nouh is the founder of Mecca Property Group, a boutique buyer’s agency in Melbourne helping Australians build wealth through strategic property investment.
Brighton icon Totnes hits the market with history, luxury and a $9.25m price tag.
Balmain put industrial heritage architecture on the map. But in a suburb known for its historic homes – mainly of the compact worker’s cottage variety – The Timber Mill stands out from the residential crowd. What was once a humble but hardworking softwood mill on Beattie St is now a remarkable reimagined home thanks to the …
Continue reading “Why this house stands out from the residential crowd”