Trump Administration Could Bring an Economic ‘Detox.’ What It Means for Stocks.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,766,872 (+0.21%)       Melbourne $1,063,597 (+0.19%)       Brisbane $1,235,996 (-0.71%)       Adelaide $1,100,588 (+1.40%)       Perth $1,114,234 (+0.36%)       Hobart $869,301 (-0.74%)       Darwin $915,158 (+0.08%)       Canberra $1,030,597 (+1.34%)       National Capitals $1,197,064 (+0.25%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $817,869 (+0.11%)       Melbourne $552,138 (-0.21%)       Brisbane $784,920 (-1.69%)       Adelaide $585,744 (+1.59%)       Perth $658,340 (-1.87%)       Hobart $565,063 (-1.53%)       Darwin $494,206 (+0.53%)       Canberra $485,800 (-1.53%)       National Capitals $640,344 (-0.70%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 14,003 (-141)       Melbourne 16,852 (-119)       Brisbane 7,876 (+60)       Adelaide 2,794 (-13)       Perth 6,084 (+33)       Hobart 771 (-22)       Darwin 139 (+2)       Canberra 1,196 (+25)       National Capitals 49,715 (-175)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,308 (-9)       Melbourne 6,777 (-31)       Brisbane 1,556 (-5)       Adelaide 434 (-6)       Perth 1,292 (+16)       Hobart 154 (-9)       Darwin 198 (+7)       Canberra 1,191 (+1)       National Capitals 20,910 (-36)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $850 ($0)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $628 (+$3)       Darwin $850 ($0)       Canberra $750 ($0)       National Capitals $733 (+$)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $800 ($0)       Melbourne $590 ($0)       Brisbane $670 ($0)       Adelaide $560 (+$5)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $503 (-$38)       Darwin $650 ($0)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $646 (-$2)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,466 (-47)       Melbourne 6,685 (-129)       Brisbane 3,539 (-24)       Adelaide 1,337 (+2)       Perth 2,237 (-54)       Hobart 240 (+8)       Darwin 38 (-10)       Canberra 431 (+10)       National Capitals 19,973 (-244)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,715 (+45)       Melbourne 4,547 (+16)       Brisbane 1,877 (-18)       Adelaide 430 (0)       Perth 686 (+10)       Hobart 66 (-5)       Darwin 65 (-5)       Canberra 721 (+2)       National Capitals 17,107 (+45)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.50% (↓)       Melbourne 2.93% (↓)     Brisbane 2.94% (↑)        Adelaide 3.07% (↓)       Perth 3.50% (↓)     Hobart 3.75% (↑)        Darwin 4.83% (↓)       Canberra 3.78% (↓)       National Capitals 3.19% (↓)            UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.09% (↓)     Melbourne 5.56% (↑)      Brisbane 4.44% (↑)        Adelaide 4.97% (↓)     Perth 5.53% (↑)        Hobart 4.62% (↓)       Darwin 6.84% (↓)     Canberra 6.42% (↑)      National Capitals 5.24% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND         Sydney 33.5 (↓)       Melbourne 32.6 (↓)     Brisbane 33.4 (↑)      Adelaide 26.4 (↑)        Perth 37.8 (↓)       Hobart 29.4 (↓)     Darwin 27.8 (↑)        Canberra 30.0 (↓)       National Capitals 31.4 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 31.4 (↓)       Melbourne 29.8 (↓)       Brisbane 32.2 (↓)     Adelaide 26.2 (↑)        Perth 37.5 (↓)       Hobart 31.4 (↓)     Darwin 37.4 (↑)        Canberra 38.7 (↓)       National Capitals 33.1 (↓)           
Share Button

Trump Administration Could Bring an Economic ‘Detox.’ What It Means for Stocks.

Investors may have nothing to fear but fear itself. But sometimes fear is more than enough.

By TERESA RIVAS
Tue, Mar 11, 2025 9:34amGrey Clock 4 min

As another week begins with more selling–all three major indexes are falling, with the Nasdaq Composite hit hardest–fear is undoubtedly running high in the market. The Cboe Volatility Index, Wall Street’s fear gauge, jumped 15% to 27 on Monday morning. That would be its highest close since Dec. 18, when it was at 27.62.

Uncertainty about government policy and the health of the economy is overshadowing positive data.

Tariffs are one part of the problem. Not only are they disruptive to global trade and lead to higher prices, but President Donald Trump has walked back their implementation and doubled down enough to give the market whiplash. And then there are worries about huge cuts to federal spending, including mass firings and slashing outlays for programs, with a budget fight that could lead to a government shutdown at the end of the week.

Investors have little incentive to keep the faith, especially because signs of economic weakness are starting to emerge.

“Prior to tariff uncertainty, Momentum factors were leading, and risk factor returns were stable,” notes 22V Research’s Dennis DeBusschere. “ Payrolls and PMI data indicate weaker growth at the same time tariffs are adding to uncertainty about the path of economic data and earnings.” The result is that stocks are swinging wildly, riskier names are out of favor, and defensive shares are the flavor of the month.

According to Sevens Report’s Tom Essaye, “until there’s some movement towards stable policy, the best we can hope for is a churn sideways between around 5,700 and 6,000 in the S&P 500.” The index broke below 5650 in morning trading Monday.

The problem is that the greater the losses, the more the market could be closing in on a “liquidation avalanche,” as Dohmen Capital Research’s Bert Dohmen puts it. The concern is that forced selling, such as to raise cash for margin calls on shares bought with borrowed money, or by money managers desperate to limit losses, creates a downward spiral.

Wall Street famously abhors unpredictability, but even more worrisome may be rhetoric from Washington, D.C., that indicates the Trump administration is fine with causing what it believes will be a short-lived downturn as it pursues long-term goals it considers more important.

Asked whether a recession on the way, the president declined to rule out the possibility. “I hate to predict things like that,” Trump told Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures. “There is a period of transition, because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, predicted “a natural adjustment as we move away from public spending to private spending, in an interview with CNBC. “The market and the economy have just become hooked, and we’ve become addicted to this government spending, and there’s going to be a detox period. There’s going to be a detox.”

As T.S. Lombard’s Dario Perkins notes, Elon Musk and others in Trump’s orbit have pointed to Argentina as a successful example of this strategy. President Javier Milei imposed strict austerity measures to combat inflation, leading to a brief recession in 2024.

Of course, “copying the policies of a country that had massive endemic corruption and was on the brink of hyperinflation is, er, problematic,” Perkins writes. “Yes, inflation is a bit high, but not so high that Musk and co should deliberately engineer a recession. Perhaps the new U.S. administration has forgotten what a ‘real’ recession is like.”

The 2008-2009 financial crisis was nearly two decades ago, and the U.S. only rebounded from the Covid-19 downturn so quickly and strongly because of huge government spending. That means it is “odd to see US policymakers talk as if they want to inflict damage on the economy, or at least do things that risk causing damage,” he notes.

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Damage could snowball quickly. If big government layoffs continue at a time when hiring is already weak, it could lead to a further loss of confidence and even higher unemployment. And as history shows, recessions aren’t always quick or without damage.

“The US is not Argentina, and it is not facing an imminent debt crisis,” Perkins writes. “In any case, does anyone seriously think a recession in 2025 would lower America’s debt trajectory? Every recession I know has had the exact opposite effect.”

The good news is that we aren’t there yet. Earnings have held up well, and while the mention of tariffs in fourth-quarter conference calls was up 40% from their prior peak in 2018, mentions of a recession fell to their lowest point since the first quarter of 2018, as DataTrek Research’s Nicolas Colas notes.

“The dichotomy between record high ‘tariff’ and near-record low ‘recession’ mentions on investor calls neatly reflects the mood of corporate America,” he writes. “The C-suite is struggling to come to grips with tariff policy but remains fairly optimistic on the US economy. So far, anyway…Any change to the latter view would be unwelcomed.”

For his part, TS Lombard’s Perkins isn’t predicting a recession. Sevens Reports’ Essaye notes that concern about tariffs so far has been worse than their effects. While it makes sense to brace for volatility, “that negative scenario is not a foregone conclusion and actual facts on the economy and earnings [are] hanging on.” he says.

22V Research’s DeBusschere highlights that in aggregate, macroeconomic data still point to a very high probability that the U.S. economy is still expanding. “Over the past few weeks though, market internals have weakened to a level more consistent with economic slowdowns/heightened recession risk,” he says. “Markets are discounting a sharp slowdown that is not evident TODAY in actual data.”

The problem is that as long as chaotic moves in Washington, D.C., continue, that won’t matter for stocks.

“Although the U.S. will still likely avoid a recession this year, investor sentiment does appear to be headed toward another recession scare,” writes Paulsen Perspectives’ Jim Paulsen. “An actual recession would probably result in a bear market, but even an ongoing or worsening ‘fear’ of recession will likely magnify the current stock market correction.”

When the market gets clarity about what comes next, prices can recover. But until then, it is hard to see how stocks can rise consistently. Just the fear of a recession is enough to weigh on markets.

Write to Teresa Rivas at teresa.rivas@barrons.com



MOST POPULAR

Ophora Tallawong has launched its final release of quality apartments priced under $700,000.

International AI strategist Justin Kabbani will headline the Kanebridge Property Summit in Sydney on June 18, with tickets selling fast.

Related Stories
Money
Celebrity-backed fund nears US$50m as investor demand builds 
By Jeni O'Dowd 02/06/2026
Money
Jet-Fuel Prices Are Spiking and Trump’s Advisers Are Worried
By Brian Schwartz & Alison Sider 07/05/2026
Property
AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY BOOM IS MASKING A DEEPER ECONOMIC PROBLEM
By Paul Miron, Opinion 01/05/2026
Celebrity-backed fund nears US$50m as investor demand builds 

With US$40 million already committed, the Global Talent Fund is attracting investor attention with a strategy focused on building globally scalable consumer brands alongside high-profile talent. 

By Jeni O'Dowd
Tue, Jun 2, 2026 2 min

A new investment fund targeting celebrity-founded consumer brands has secured US$40 million in commitments and is rapidly approaching its US$50 million fundraising target, signalling growing investor appetite for alternative opportunities beyond traditional asset classes. 

The Global Talent Fund, which has a maximum raise of US$100 million, focuses on building and investing in consumer businesses alongside celebrities, athletes, and influential personalities who play an active role as co-founders rather than simply endorsing products. 

The strategy is based on the belief that changes in consumer behaviour, particularly the rise of social media and digital engagement, have fundamentally altered how brands are built and scaled. 

GTF founding partner Jeremy Hunt, who is helping lead the fund’s strategy, said consumers increasingly feel connected to personalities they follow online and are more willing to support products developed by those individuals. 

“Consumers are searching for content to engage with, and when a celebrity they like or follow takes them on the journey of creating a product or brand, they genuinely feel part of that process,” he said. 

The fund is targeting high-growth consumer sectors including wellness, hydration, beauty and recovery, areas Hunt believes continue to benefit from strong global demand and ongoing innovation. 

Rather than backing celebrity endorsement deals, the fund is seeking businesses where talent is deeply involved in product development, brand creation and long-term growth. 

According to Hunt, authenticity remains one of the biggest differentiators between successful celebrity-backed brands and those that fail. 

“The consumer can see clearly if someone is simply being paid to promote a product,” he said. “The winners are typically the brands where the celebrity has genuinely helped build the business from the ground up.” 

The model has attracted support from several prominent Australian investors and business families, reflecting broader interest in alternative investments with global growth potential. 

Hunt said consumer brands offered a level of tangibility that many investors found appealing. 

“Consumer brands are what we touch, feel, smell and taste every day,” he said. “Our investors understand the growth potential in the model, but they also want to be part of the journey.” 

The fund’s rapid progress towards its fundraising target comes amid growing recognition that celebrity influence, when combined with strong commercial execution and scalable business models, can create significant enterprise value. 

With several high-profile celebrity-founded businesses generating billion-dollar exits in recent years, supporters of the strategy believe the opportunity remains in its early stages. 

For more information, contact marc@kanerbridge.com.au

MOST POPULAR

From gorilla encounters in Uganda to a reimagined Okavango retreat, Abercrombie & Kent elevates its African journeys with two spectacular lodge transformations.

Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Amanoi Unveils First Ocean Pool Residence in Vietnam
By Staff Writer 18/09/2025
Property
RETAIL PROPERTY BOOM FACES NEW RISKS AS GEOPOLITICS CLOUDS OUTLOOK
By Jeni O'Dowd 04/05/2026
Property
BLOCKBUSTER CRED MAKES THIS HOME A STAR
By Kirsten Craze 08/08/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop