When It Comes to Marriage and Money, Opposites Attract
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,797,295 (-0.31%)       Melbourne $1,075,632 (-0.17%)       Brisbane $1,249,605 (-0.00%)       Adelaide $1,097,216 (-0.97%)       Perth $1,122,957 (-1.33%)       Hobart $865,909 (+0.08%)       Darwin $845,396 (-2.25%)       Canberra $1,062,919 (-0.56%)       National Capitals $1,207,421 (-0.51%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820,260 (+0.40%)       Melbourne $553,256 (+0.31%)       Brisbane $796,351 (-1.62%)       Adelaide $595,818 (+3.94%)       Perth $683,075 (-0.20%)       Hobart $581,624 (-0.60%)       Darwin $496,326 (+5.24%)       Canberra $499,963 (+0.25%)       National Capitals $650,385 (+0.27%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,543 (-93)       Melbourne 16,685 (+164)       Brisbane 7,546 (+68)       Adelaide 2,737 (+47)       Perth 5,954 (+96)       Hobart 847 (-33)       Darwin 130 (+7)       Canberra 1,219 (+19)       National Capitals 48,661 (+275)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,158 (-16)       Melbourne 6,926 (+89)       Brisbane 1,459 (-16)       Adelaide 413 (-7)       Perth 1,233 (+17)       Hobart 165 (+6)       Darwin 174 (-3)       Canberra 1,201 (+42)       National Capitals 20,729 (+112)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $850 (+$10)       Melbourne $600 (+$5)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $643 (-$8)       Darwin $720 (-$30)       Canberra $740 (+$20)       National Capitals $714 (+$)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820 (+$10)       Melbourne $585 (+$5)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $520 ($0)       Darwin $640 (+$30)       Canberra $595 ($0)       National Capitals $645 (+$6)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,384 (-35)       Melbourne 6,776 (-135)       Brisbane 3,626 (-33)       Adelaide 1,453 (+34)       Perth 2,269 (+4)       Hobart 224 (+8)       Darwin 43 (-12)       Canberra 426 (+6)       National Capitals 20,201 (-163)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,462 (+24)       Melbourne 4,615 (+49)       Brisbane 1,888 (+11)       Adelaide 430 (+6)       Perth 659 (+2)       Hobart 79 (+1)       Darwin 74 (+2)       Canberra 650 (+1)       National Capitals 16,857 (+96)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.46% (↑)      Melbourne 2.90% (↑)      Brisbane 2.91% (↑)      Adelaide 3.08% (↑)      Perth 3.47% (↑)        Hobart 3.86% (↓)       Darwin 4.43% (↓)     Canberra 3.62% (↑)      National Capitals 3.08% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 5.20% (↑)      Melbourne 5.50% (↑)      Brisbane 4.24% (↑)        Adelaide 4.80% (↓)     Perth 5.33% (↑)      Hobart 4.65% (↑)        Darwin 6.71% (↓)       Canberra 6.19% (↓)     National Capitals 5.16% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 32.8 (↑)      Melbourne 32.3 (↑)      Brisbane 30.6 (↑)      Adelaide 26.4 (↑)      Perth 36.7 (↑)      Hobart 29.8 (↑)        Darwin 26.1 (↓)     Canberra 32.5 (↑)      National Capitals 30.9 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 31.4 (↑)      Melbourne 30.6 (↑)      Brisbane 29.8 (↑)      Adelaide 24.1 (↑)      Perth 35.2 (↑)      Hobart 29.6 (↑)        Darwin 30.4 (↓)       Canberra 39.1 (↓)       National Capitals 31.3 (↓)           
Share Button

When It Comes to Marriage and Money, Opposites Attract

Spouses reshape each others’ financial behaviour, for richer and poorer, marriage research suggests

By JULIA CARPENTER
Tue, Jan 24, 2023 8:56amGrey Clock 3 min

The person you marry will often change your relationship to money.

We tend to choose our partners based on shared values, in-common traits and other similarities, marriage researchers say. But money-management styles are one case in which opposites do attract, said Jenny Olson, an assistant professor of marketing at Indiana University who studies couples’ financial decision-making.

We are drawn to people who can check and balance our own rigid rules about money, Prof. Olson said. Someone who feels they are too focused on saving and not focused enough on using money to enjoy life might look for a partner who can help them feel more comfortable with an occasional splurge.

Over the decades, however, spouses often grow more alike. The spendthrifts married to the tightwads manage to find some middle ground, learning from one another in the process, said Scott Rick, a marketing professor at the University of Michigan whose studies marital finances.

“The spouses who don’t converge have a harder time and those marriages are probably more fragile and could end in divorce,” Prof. Rick said, referencing his analysis of 1,303 couples, which will be published in a forthcoming book.

This mutual influence along with the built-in financial accountability couples get when they pool their assets are partly why married couples have a financial advantage over their single counterparts, researchers say. The median net worth of married couples 25 to 34 years old was nearly nine times as much as the median net worth of single households in 2019, up from four times as much in 2010, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

When Kristen James, a 33-year-old product manager in Austin, Texas, first started dating her now-husband, Ben, a 35-year-old startup co-founder, she noticed they came to the relationship with different approaches to their finances. Mr. James considered himself much more of a financial risk-taker; Ms. James preferred to manage her money more conservatively.

Instead of their differences erupting in conflict, Ms. James said her husband’s approach had a positive influence. After talking it over as a couple, Ms. James made the leap to change her career, moving into the technology industry and ultimately earning a higher salary as a result. Without her husband’s encouragement, she said she wouldn’t have felt secure making such a huge life change.

“He said, ‘You’re worth far more than what you’re making,’ and he pushed me to take on more risk and challenge myself in different ways,” she said.

Couples who communicate about the differences in their financial beliefs are better able to make decisions together, as tedious as that practice may initially feel, said Matt Lundquist, a psychotherapist and the clinical director of Tribeca Therapy, a psychotherapy practice based in New York.

He points to clients who take a regular weekend trip and have made it a habit to use the driving time to discuss their finances. While the children snooze in the back of the car, the parents review the state of their budgets and check in on progress toward longer-term goals.

Talking as a pair also prevents an imbalance of power in which one partner appoints themselves money manager, said Adrian Ward, a marketing professor at the University of Texas at Austin.

In his own research looking at how couples manage their money, Prof. Ward found that one partner often takes charge of the finances, not because they’re better equipped to do so, but because they have more time for the job. The in-house money manager—whom Prof. Ward calls “the household CFO”—often shuts the other partner out of the decision-making. Sometimes, the other person is relieved, but over time, that partner’s financial literacy suffers.

“Even though it’s hard to make decisions together and we’re both busy, and it would be way easier for one of us to just do it, it’s the best long-term way to care for each other,” he said.

Marcella Mollon-Williams, a behavioural financial adviser based in Bowie, Md., runs a premarital financial counselling session for couples.

The main issue she sees early on in relationships: Couples too often talk about the things one partner wants the other to avoid doing with their money, as opposed to the things they want to do together.

“Talk about the desires money brings, the things you want to accomplish,” she said. “When you start dreaming together, identifying the things money can buy, it’ll become easier. It’s sort of looking ahead and then working backwards.”

To stay on the same page financially, Kristen and Ben James set a monthly family finance meeting. Talking about their goals, reviewing financial allocations and having time to connect on those topics helps them keep their sights trained on the bigger picture, Ms. James said.

When she’s tempted to scroll through Redfin real-estate listings, she relies on her husband to hold her accountable.

“We have each other to say ‘We’re not buying a new house right now’ or ‘We’re not buying a new car right now’—you have that other person to ground you,” she said.



MOST POPULAR

Automobili Lamborghini and Babolat have expanded their collaboration with five new colourways for the ultra-exclusive BL.001 racket, limited to just 50 pieces worldwide.

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.

Related Stories
Property
AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY BOOM IS MASKING A DEEPER ECONOMIC PROBLEM
By Paul Miron, Opinion 01/05/2026
Money
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon
By Micah Maidenberg 30/03/2026
Money
Saudi Arabia Sees a Spike to $180 Oil if Energy Shock Persists Past April
By SUMMER SAID, RYAN DEZEMBER AND DAVID UBERTI 20/03/2026
AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY BOOM IS MASKING A DEEPER ECONOMIC PROBLEM

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.

By Paul Miron, Opinion
Fri, May 1, 2026 3 min

For decades, Australia has leaned into its reputation as the lucky country. But luck, as it turns out, is not an economic strategy. 

What once looked like resilience now appears increasingly fragile. Beneath the surface of rising property values and steady headline growth, the Australian economy is showing signs of strain that can no longer be ignored. 

Recent data paints a sobering picture. Australia has recorded one of the largest declines in real household disposable income per capita among advanced economies.  

Wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, meaning many Australians are working harder for less. On a per capita basis, income growth has stalled and, at times, reversed. 

And yet, on paper, things still look relatively solid. GDP is growing. Unemployment remains low. But that growth is increasingly being driven by population expansion rather than productivity.  

More people are contributing to output, but not necessarily improving living standards. 

That distinction matters. 

For years, Australia’s economic success rested on a powerful combination: a once-in-a-generation mining boom, a credit-fuelled housing market, strong migration and a property sector that rarely faltered. Between 1991 and 2020, the country avoided recession entirely, building enormous wealth in the process. 

But much of that wealth is tied to property. Around two-thirds of household wealth sits in real estate, inflated by leverage and sustained by demand. It has worked, until now. 

The problem is the supply side of the economy has not kept up. 

Housing supply is falling behind population growth. Rental vacancies are near record lows.  

Construction firms are collapsing at an elevated rate. At the same time, massive infrastructure pipelines are competing with residential projects for labour and materials, pushing costs higher and delaying delivery. 

The result is a system under pressure from all angles. 

Despite near full employment, productivity growth has stagnated for years. In simple terms, Australians are putting in more hours without generating more output per hour. The economy is running faster, butgoing nowhere. 

Meanwhile, government spending continues to expand. Public debt is approaching $1 trillion, with spending now accounting for a record share of GDP.  

The gap between spending and revenue has been filled by borrowing for decades, adding further pressure to an already stretched system. 

This is where the uncomfortable question emerges. 

Has Australia become too reliant on a model driven by rising property values, expanding credit and population growth? 

As asset prices rise, households feel wealthier and borrow more. Banks lend more. Governments collect more revenue. Migration fuels demand. The cycle reinforces itself. 

But when productivity stalls and debt outpaces real income, the system begins to depend on constant expansion just to stay stable. 

It is not a collapse scenario. But it is not particularly stable either. 

Nowhere is this more evident than in housing. 

The National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet current completion rates are well below that pace. With approvals falling and construction costs rising, the gap between supply and demand is widening, not narrowing. 

Housing is also one of the largest contributors to inflation, with costs rising sharply across rents, construction and utilities. Yet the private sector, from small investors to major developers, is struggling to make projects stack up in the current environment. 

This brings the policy debate into sharper focus. 

Tax settings such as negative gearing and capital gains concessions have undoubtedly boosted demand over the past two decades. But they have also supported supply. Removing them may ease prices briefly, but risks deepening the supply shortage over time. 

That is the paradox. 

Policies designed to make housing more affordable can, in practice, make the shortage worse if they discourage development. The optics may appeal, but the economics are far less forgiving. 

It is also worth remembering that most property investors are not institutional players. The majority own just one investment property. They are, in many cases, ordinary Australians using real estate as their primary wealth-building tool. 

Undermining that system without replacing it with a viable alternative risks unintended consequences, from reduced supply to higher rents and increased inflation. 

So where does that leave Australia? 

At a crossroads. 

The country can continue to rely on population growth and rising asset prices to drive economic activity. Or it can shift towards a model built on productivity, innovation and sustainable growth. 

The latter is harder. It requires structural reform, long-term thinking and political discipline. 

But it is also the only path that leads to genuine, lasting prosperity. 

The question is no longer whether Australia has been lucky. 

It is whether it can evolve before that luck runs out. 

Paul Miron is the Co-Founder & Fund Manager of Msquared Capital. 

MOST POPULAR

Limited to 630 units, Lamborghini’s latest Urus Capsule pushes personalisation further than ever, blending hybrid performance with over 70 bespoke design combinations.

A 30-metre masterpiece unveiled in Monaco brings Lamborghini’s supercar drama to the high seas, powered by 7,600 horsepower and unmistakable Italian design.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Compact electric hatch set to join Australia’s EV market
By Jeni O'Dowd 19/01/2026
Lifestyle
Wealthy Families Are Writing Mission Statements to Avoid Fights, Lost Fortunes
By JULIET CHUNG 22/10/2025
Property
Revealed: Australia’s most expensive houses & the records they’re smashing
By Staff Writer 14/10/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop