Why Americans Are Obsessed With These Ugly Sandals
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,822,183 (-0.43%)       Melbourne $1,078,813 (-0.33%)       Brisbane $1,264,391 (-0.87%)       Adelaide $1,112,777 (+0.12%)       Perth $1,149,218 (-1.55%)       Hobart $856,229 (+0.59%)       Darwin $886,634 (-5.18%)       Canberra $1,078,947 (-0.81%)       National Capitals $1,224,455 (-0.79%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $821,384 (-0.41%)       Melbourne $550,948 (-0.31%)       Brisbane $839,757 (+0.74%)       Adelaide $560,009 (-3.62%)       Perth $677,037 (-0.51%)       Hobart $581,017 (-0.34%)       Darwin $465,561 (+5.05%)       Canberra $509,688 (+0.21%)       National Capitals $653,196 (-0.17%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,369 (+370)       Melbourne 16,279 (+411)       Brisbane 7,326 (+232)       Adelaide 2,642 (+103)       Perth 5,799 (+92)       Hobart 869 (+34)       Darwin 127 (+5)       Canberra 1,161 (+61)       National Capitals 47,572 (+1,308)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,191 (+212)       Melbourne 6,775 (+66)       Brisbane 1,471 (+54)       Adelaide 413 (+27)       Perth 1,179 (+39)       Hobart 165 (+5)       Darwin 178 (-3)       Canberra 1,188 (+7)       National Capitals 20,560 (+407)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $830 ($0)       Melbourne $595 (+$5)       Brisbane $700 (+$10)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $640 (-$3)       Darwin $800 (-$10)       Canberra $720 (-$5)       National Capitals $719 (-$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $810 (-$10)       Melbourne $580 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 (-$10)       Hobart $520 (-$30)       Darwin $605 (-$35)       Canberra $598 (-$3)       National Capitals $639 (-$10)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,362 (+159)       Melbourne 7,007 (+228)       Brisbane 3,620 (+124)       Adelaide 1,477 (+64)       Perth 2,297 (+130)       Hobart 240 (+14)       Darwin 49 (+5)       Canberra 399 (+10)       National Capitals 20,451 (+734)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,450 (+241)       Melbourne 4,569 (+74)       Brisbane 1,844 (+33)       Adelaide 418 (-4)       Perth 652 (+14)       Hobart 77 (+9)       Darwin 76 (-4)       Canberra 640 (+41)       National Capitals 16,726 (+404)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.37% (↑)      Melbourne 2.87% (↑)      Brisbane 2.88% (↑)        Adelaide 3.04% (↓)     Perth 3.39% (↑)        Hobart 3.89% (↓)     Darwin 4.69% (↑)      Canberra 3.47% (↑)      National Capitals 3.05% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.13% (↓)     Melbourne 5.47% (↑)        Brisbane 4.02% (↓)     Adelaide 5.11% (↑)        Perth 5.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.65% (↓)       Darwin 6.76% (↓)       Canberra 6.10% (↓)       National Capitals 5.08% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 29.5 (↑)      Melbourne 29.5 (↑)      Brisbane 27.9 (↑)      Adelaide 24.4 (↑)      Perth 34.4 (↑)      Hobart 28.4 (↑)      Darwin 28.6 (↑)      Canberra 28.1 (↑)      National Capitals 28.8 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 28.3 (↑)      Melbourne 28.4 (↑)        Brisbane 26.7 (↓)     Adelaide 21.8 (↑)        Perth 32.8 (↓)     Hobart 31.9 (↑)      Darwin 35.3 (↑)      Canberra 39.7 (↑)      National Capitals 30.6 (↑)            
Share Button

Why Americans Are Obsessed With These Ugly Sandals

Margot Fraser’s feet hurt. Then she found Birkenstocks and brought them to the U.S. Now the company is worth billions of dollars.

By BEN COHEN
Sun, Oct 15, 2023 7:00amGrey Clock 6 min

One of the iconic shots of the year’s biggest movie was Margot Robbie’s Barbie character in Birkenstocks.

She was only wearing them because of Margot Fraser.

This woman responsible for bringing the supremely comfy, seductively ugly German footwear to the U.S. was one of the most improbable business figures of her time.

She was an accidental entrepreneur who started distributing Birkenstocks from her California home in the 1960s, when nobody knew what they were or how orthopaedic sandals cured foot pain. The only places that would carry them were health-food stores, where each pair might as well have come with a jar of granola. She was a dressmaker with no clue about shoes, much less crunchy ones, but she grew the company from zero to hundreds of millions of dollars in sales. She would even come to be known as Mrs. Birkenstock.

The sandals that she introduced to Americans have become more popular and the business much bigger than Fraser could have predicted. This week, when Birkenstock went public, the company was valued at $8.6 billion.

It’s fitting that Birkenstock’s initial public offering comes on the heels of a summer ruled by the spending power of women because this is a company whose U.S. business has always been built around their needs.

That’s in large part because of Margot Fraser, the most important woman in the company’s history. She paid attention to women—and it paid off. They were her first customers. They were also her best customers. Birkenstock’s financial documents credit “the breakthrough of modern feminism” as a key driver of its business, and the company’s private-equity backers cite the products’ appeal to women as one of the reasons they invested. In fact, Birkenstock says 72% of its customers are female.

It’s a remarkably high number for a company that explicitly markets its products as unisex. Steve Jobs wore them. Sneaker geeks want them. They were designed by Karl Birkenstock, a son of Carl and grandson of Konrad, descendants of the man who started the family’s tradition of shoemaking 249 years ago. More recently, the private-equity firm and family office of Bernard Arnault, the billionaire chief executive of LVMH’s luxury empire, bought a controlling stake and took the company public.

Anyone can now own stock in BIRK because of its connection to one of the world’s richest men, but Birkenstock never would have been in this position without a pioneering woman.

“It is because of Margot and the foundation she built that the brand is enjoying the success that it is today,” the president of the company’s American division said when she died in 2017.

She was the first to admit that she was an unlikely footwear executive and had to learn how to run the business one step at a time.

“I didn’t know a thing about shoes,” she once said. “What I did know was that my feet were always hurting.”

But that was all she needed to know. She figured that millions of women across the country must have feet that were always hurting, too.

Fraser had a keen sense of the American consumer for someone who grew up in war-torn Germany. The principal of her elementary school in the 1930s taught her that “girls were capable of anything and should follow their dreams,” but not everyone in her life agreed. “My mother thought that was all ridiculous feminist stuff,” Fraser wrote in a book offering business advice. Her father wasn’t exactly Betty Friedan, either. When she told him she wanted to travel the world for business and show people that “not all Germans were bad,” he responded: “My dear, you could never do that as a woman.”

She went to dressmaking school and moved to the countryside to make clothing for farmers, who paid her in eggs and butter. It was the teenager’s first taste of entrepreneurship. When she couldn’t see a future in Germany after World War II, she decided to leave home in pursuit of her childhood dream, and she boarded a trans-Atlantic ship with $25 in her pocket.

But it was only when Fraser returned as a tourist nearly 15 years later that she discovered the shoes that would rescue her feet and transform her life.

She was living in the U.S. when she took a spa trip back to Germany in 1966 and came across “sandals that weren’t pretty to look at.” But after years of trying anything to fix her aching feet—even standing on a phone book and gripping it with her toes—she tried on her first Birkenstocks.

She was pain-free within months.

Fraser realised that her feet were always hurting because of her painful footwear. No amount of standing on phone books would have made a difference for women in constrictive heels with pointed toes. What did make the difference for Fraser were these sandals made with leather, cork and a footbed the Birkenstock men invented. They were following in the footsteps of Johannes Birkenstock, which date back to 1774, when the cobbler was mentioned in the church records of a village near Frankfurt. The company’s first sandals were released in 1963, not long before Fraser slipped them on.

They were so comfortable that she didn’t care if they were ugly. Birkenstocks provided value because they solved a problem. They were basically Hokas for hippies.

Fraser took the sandals back to the U.S. and wrote to the Birkenstock family asking if she could sell them to Americans. They said yes to the dressmaker. At first, it seemed unwise. The owners of local shoe stores wouldn’t talk to her, and doctors treated her like a threat to the podiatry business.

She was desperate when a friend mentioned that a group called the Health Food Association was hosting a national convention nearby, which is how she found herself in a San Francisco hotel pitching sandals to people who sold lentils.

She needed to find people who didn’t mind how their shoes looked. As it turns out, they were the kind of people who owned health-food stores. Because they spent all day on their feet, they chose function over fashion. Fraser knew there would be a market for Birkenstocks when she spotted a woman at the convention shuffling around in nylons while carrying shoes that she couldn’t wear.

“The woman tried on a pair,” she wrote, “and bought them despite her husband’s protests.”

Once she had a foothold, Fraser began working out of her Bay Area home in 1967, calling her distribution company Birkenstock Footprint Sandals. She later renamed it Birkenstock USA.

She couldn’t have picked a better time or place for Birkenstocks to come plodding into the U.S. They would have crossed the ocean eventually, but the sandals became a symbol of rebellion because they landed in the heart of the counterculture, when and where people were allergic to the mainstream and willing to wear their antiestablishment values on their feet. “It was this perfect moment,” said Andrea Schneider-Braunberger, the curator of Birkenstock’s historical archives. “The culture was ready for such modern, convention-breaking shoes.”

Fraser worked closely with the Birkenstock family and shared their complete obsession with Birkenstocks. They made the shoes and decisions for the entire company based on her feedback.

The name of the funny-looking sandal that caught her eye was the “Original Birkenstock-Footbed sandal,” but Fraser told her German partners that American women were never going to buy something called “Original Birkenstock-Footbed sandal.” They took her marketing advice and branded the single-strapped sandal the “Madrid.” It remains one of the company’s top sellers.

It took six years for Fraser to venture beyond health-food stores and move into actual footwear stores. But that timing also turned out to be advantageous. By then, people were ready to buy Birkenstocks, and she was better at selling them.

She knew they intrigued baby boomers who didn’t want to look like their mothers and fathers. As it happens, their children don’t mind looking like them. Now, boomers and millennials make up almost the exact same percentage of Birkenstock’s consumers, and the company’s Arizona sandals and Boston clogs can be found in high schools and retirement homes.

The business is also barely recognisable from when she sold Birkenstock USA to her employees and retired in 2002. It was later folded into the German parent company, which is run by Oliver Reichert, the first person outside the Birkenstock family to be the CEO. Arnault’s L Catterton invested in 2021 with eyes on this week’s IPO.

Birkenstock has expanded into sneakers, boots and sandals in wool, shearling and waterproof material. Its proudly frumpy sandals meant to free women from the norms of fashion have become posh enough for celebrities, models and collaborations with Manolo Blahnik. The people who once turned up their noses at them now put their feet in them. And the company’s dominant market is the U.S.

None of that would have been possible without Margot Fraser.

Neither would the final scene in “Barbie.”

To sell more sandals to more Americans, she was always begging her partners for more colours, so Fraser would have been delighted to see what’s on the feet of another woman named Margot.

She’s wearing a pair of pink Birkenstocks.



MOST POPULAR

From snow-dusted valleys to festival-filled autumns, Bhutan reveals itself as a rare destination where culture, nature and spirituality unfold year-round.

Odd Culture Group brings a new kind of after-dark energy to the CBD, where daiquiris, disco and design collide beneath the city streets.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
SYDNEY’S UNDERGROUND DRINKING SCENE GETS A DISCO REVIVAL
By Jeni O'Dowd 23/04/2026
Lifestyle
Studies Suggest Red Meat May Help Prevent Alzheimer’s
By ALLYSIA FINLEY 21/04/2026
Lifestyle
ASTON MARTIN VANQUISH TAKES TOP HONOURS AT CAR OF THE YEAR
By Jeni O'Dowd 20/04/2026
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon

The lunar flyby would be the deepest humans have traveled in space in decades.

By Micah Maidenberg
Mon, Mar 30, 2026 4 min

It’s go time for the highest-stakes mission at NASA in more than 50 years.  

On April 1, the agency is set to launch four astronauts around the moon, the deepest human spaceflight since the final Apollo lunar landing in 1972.  

The launch window for Artemis II , as the mission is called, opens at 6:24 p.m. ET. 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration teams have been preparing the vehicles to depart from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on the planned roughly 10-day trip. Crew members have trained for years for this moment. 

Reid Wiseman, the NASA astronaut serving as mission commander, said he doesn’t fear taking the voyage. A widower, he does worry at times about what he is putting his daughters through. 

“I could have a very comfortable life for them,” Wiseman said in an interview last September.  

“But I’m also a human, and I see the spirit in their eyes that is burning in my soul too. And so we’ve just got to never stop going.” 

Wiseman’s crewmates on Artemis II are NASA’s Victor Glover and Christina Koch, as well as Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen. 

Photo: NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft being rolled out at night. Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/Getty Images

What are the goals for Artemis II? 

The biggest one: Safely fly the crew on vehicles that have never carried astronauts before.  

The towering Space Launch System rocket has the job of lofting a vehicle called Orion into space and on its way to the moon.  

Orion is designed to carry the crew around the moon and back. Myriad systems on the ship—life support, communications, navigation—will be tested with the astronauts on board. 

SLS and Orion don’t have much flight experience. The vehicles last flew in 2022, when the agency completed its uncrewed Artemis I mission . 

How is the mission expected to unfold? 

Artemis II will begin when SLS takes off from a launchpad in Florida with Orion stacked on top of it.  

The so-called upper stage of SLS will later separate from the main part of the rocket with Orion attached, and use its engine to set up the latter vehicle for a push to the moon. 

After Orion separates from the upper stage, it will conduct what is called a translunar injection—the engine firing that commits Orion to soaring out to the moon. It will fly to the moon over the course of a few days and travel around its far side. 

Orion will face a tough return home after speeding through space. As it hits Earth’s atmosphere, Orion will be flying at 25,000 miles an hour and face temperatures of 5,000 degrees as it slows down. The capsule is designed to land under parachutes in the Pacific Ocean, not far from San Diego. 

Water photo: NASA’s Orion capsule after its splash-down in the Pacific Ocean in 2022 for the Artemis I mission. Mario Tama/Press Pool

Is it possible Artemis II will be delayed? 

Yes.  

For safety reasons, the agency won’t launch if certain tough weather conditions roll through the Cape Canaveral, Fla., area. Delays caused by technical problems are possible, too. NASA has other dates identified for the mission if it doesn’t begin April 1. 

Who are the astronauts flying on Artemis II? 

The crew will be led by Wiseman, a retired Navy pilot who completed military deployments before joining NASA’s astronaut corps. He traveled to the International Space Station in 2014. 

Two other astronauts will represent NASA during the mission: Glover, an experienced Navy pilot, and Koch, who began her career as an electrical engineer for the agency and once spent a year at a research station in the South Pole. Both have traveled to the space station before. 

Hansen is a military pilot who joined Canada’s astronaut corps in 2009. He will be making his first trip to space. 

Koch’s participation in Artemis II will mark the first time a woman has flown beyond orbits near Earth. Glover and Hansen will be the first African-American and non-American astronauts, respectively, to do the same. 

What will the astronauts do during the flight? 

The astronauts will evaluate how Orion flies, practice emergency procedures and capture images of the far side of the moon for scientific and exploration purposes (they may become the first humans to see parts of the far side of the lunar surface). Health-tracking projects of the astronauts are designed to inform future missions. 

Those efforts will play out in Orion’s crew module, which has about two minivans worth of living area.  

On board, the astronauts will spend about 30 minutes a day exercising, using a device that allows them to do dead lifts, rowing and more. Sleep will come in eight-hour stretches in hammocks. 

There is a custom-made warmer for meals, with beef brisket and veggie quiche on the menu.  

Each astronaut is permitted two flavored beverages a day, including coffee. The crew will hold one hourlong shared meal each day.  

The Universal Waste Management System—that’s the toilet—uses air flow to pull fluid and solid waste away into containers. 

What happens after Artemis II? 

Assuming it goes well, NASA will march on to Artemis III, scheduled for next year. During that operation, NASA plans to launch Orion with crew members on board and have the ship practice docking with lunar-lander vehicles that Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin have been developing. The rendezvous operations will occur relatively close to Earth. 

NASA hopes that its contractors and the agency itself are ready to attempt one or more lunar landing missions in 2028. Many current and former spaceflight officials are skeptical that timeline is feasible. 

MOST POPULAR

When the Writers Festival was called off and the skies refused to clear, one weekend away turned into a rare lesson in slowing down, ice baths included.

Three-Michelin-starred chef Massimiliano Alajmo will host an intimate Mediterranean sailing aboard Crystal Serenity, redefining fine dining at sea.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
A NEW CHAPTER FOR AN ICONIC (& VERY COMFORTABLE!) ARMCHAIR
By Jeni O'Dowd 17/09/2025
Money
Gen X Is Stuck in the Middle and Financially Squeezed. How One Financial Adviser Is Helping.
By Anne Field 18/03/2026
Property
NEW WAVE: THE EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIA’S COASTAL LUXURY
By Kirsten Craze 24/11/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop