Why Smart Developers Are Ditching Traditional Brokers
With capital markets more complex than ever, a new generation of developers is turning to specialist debt advisors for tailored funding strategies, long-term partnerships, and access to alternative capital others can’t reach.
2 min
Debt advisors go beyond brokering deals—they design capital strategies. Acting as portfolio stewards and trusted intermediaries, they align developer objectives with lender requirements to deliver tailored, long-term funding solutions.
Broader Access to Capital Markets
With relationships across a vast network of banks, non-bank financiers, private credit funds, and family offices, debt advisors provide access to alternative capital sources.
This reach enables the construction of customised capital stacks that may include mezzanine facilities, preferred equity, hybrid instruments, and other structured solutions that align with a project’s risk profile and lifecycle.
Especially in a constrained credit environment, this breadth of access often delivers superior pricing, greater leverage, and more flexibility compared to traditional broker-led channels.
Terms That Matter
While headline interest rates draw attention, debt advisors focus on the full picture. They negotiate on critical elements such as covenant headroom, redraw mechanics, amortisation profiles, prepayment terms, and security structures—preserving flexibility and mitigating future risk to improve project outcomes and capital efficiency.
Strategic Portfolio Management
In volatile markets, static debt can become a liability. Debt advisors continuously reassess and recalibrate facilities in response to rate changes, shifting market conditions, and project developments.
They coordinate refinancing, lead repricing discussions, and identify early exit opportunities to safeguard returns, ensuring that developers maintain balance sheet agility and reduce refinancing risk.
Master Interpreters Between Developers & Lenders
One of the most valuable functions a debt advisor performs is acting as an interpreter between developers and lenders. They understand both perspectives. By positioning proposals to align with lender frameworks, including committee metrics, serviceability models, and concentration thresholds, debt advisors use their reputational equity to influence lender decisions in ways that principals often cannot..
Proactive Risk Management
Debt advisors monitor macroeconomic trends, interest rate movements, and evolving credit standards to proactively flag risks within a developer’s portfolio. They identify refinancing inflection points, highlight covenant sensitivities, and build risk-mitigation strategies into the capital stack from day one, leveraging expertise in derivatives, hedging, and alternative security structures.
Regulatory & Market Intelligence
Navigating Australia’s dynamic regulatory landscape, including issues around non-bank lending, capital adequacy, and AML/CTF, debt advisors provide developers with real-time market insights. This intelligence helps avoid pitfalls and seize opportunities in an ever-shifting capital environment.
Efficiency Through Specialisation
Outsourcing the capital function to a specialist debt advisor streamlines operations and reduces internal bandwidth requirements. From managing data rooms and leading negotiations to coordinating legal documentation, debt advisors take on the operational burden, allowing developers to focus on delivery, construction, sales, and execution.
A Long‑Term Partnership Model
With a deep understanding of a developer’s portfolio, including facility history and long-term objectives, debt advisors are well-positioned to secure faster approvals, better terms, and smoother execution. Their established relationships with capital providers, coupled with portfolio insight, lead to more efficient and favourable outcomes across future projects. Over time, this strategic partnership becomes a competitive edge.
In Summary
In today’s selective capital markets, simple transactional brokering is no longer enough. Developers require strategic insight, risk foresight, and a partner who speaks both the lender’s and borrower’s language. Having a trusted advisor is no longer a luxury; it’s a necessity.
Faris Dedic is the Founder and Managing Director of DIG Capital Advisory and COI Capital Management
From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
4 minA sharp technology sell-off has exposed a new anxiety on global markets: whether the enormous borrowing behind the artificial-intelligence infrastructure boom can generate sufficient returns as interest rates rise and Chinese competition intensifies.
The artificial-intelligence investment boom has powered technology shares, semiconductor manufacturers and data-centre operators to extraordinary heights. Last week, investors were given a reminder that much of this expansion is being built with borrowed money.
The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 4.5 per cent over the week ended October 16, its weakest performance since late June. Semiconductor shares suffered an even deeper correction, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index losing about 11.4 per cent.
The selling spread quickly through global markets. Micron Technology fell 14.6 per cent over the week, while South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix dropped approximately 18 per cent and 24 per cent respectively.
This was more than a routine bout of profit-taking. Investors were reassessing three interconnected risks: higher interest rates, the rapidly expanding debt burden attached to AI infrastructure and the prospect of stronger competition from Chinese memory-chip manufacturers.
The debt behind the AI build-out
Artificial intelligence requires a physical infrastructure network of enormous scale. Data centres must be built, advanced processors purchased, power supplies secured and cooling systems installed before customers begin generating meaningful revenue from them.
Technology companies are increasingly supplementing their own cash with corporate bonds, syndicated loans, equipment leases, private credit and project-level financing.
JPMorgan describes the emerging funding model as a combination of conventional corporate borrowing and project finance tied to individual data-centre assets. In Australia, the Reserve Bank estimates that syndicated loans accounted for approximately three-quarters of data-centre financing during 2025 and 2026 to date.
The numbers are becoming large enough to affect broader credit markets. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas has cited Wall Street estimates suggesting AI-related investment-grade bond issuance could approach US$300 billion in 2026 alone.
That borrowing is not automatically problematic. Debt can be an efficient way to finance long-lived infrastructure when future revenue is sufficiently predictable. The concern is that AI technology, customer demand and computing economics are changing much faster than the repayment schedules attached to the assets.
A data centre financed today may carry debt for years. Investors must therefore make assumptions about future utilisation rates, electricity prices, chip performance, customer concentration and the amount businesses will ultimately pay for AI computing.
When interest rates rise, those assumptions become less forgiving.
Inflation changes the calculation
September’s US inflation data intensified the pressure. Consumer prices increased 3.7 per cent over the year, ahead of market expectations and up from 3.4 per cent in August.
The hotter reading reduced confidence that interest rates would fall quickly and pushed bond yields higher. That matters particularly for companies whose valuations depend on profits expected well into the future, as well as highly leveraged infrastructure operators that may need to refinance.
CoreWeave has emerged as a closely watched test case. The specialist cloud-computing company has accumulated substantial debt and lease obligations to build AI capacity, while relying on a concentrated group of large technology customers.
Its shares fell sharply during the sell-off, while the cost of insuring its debt against default climbed. CoreWeave has argued that its contracted backlog more than covers its obligations and that financial markets do not always understand its business model. Nevertheless, its securities have become a proxy for investor confidence in debt-funded AI infrastructure.
Oracle, another major investor in AI computing capacity, fell 8.8 per cent in Friday trading, while CoreWeave dropped 15.5 per cent.
The question is shifting from how much AI infrastructure can be built to how profitably it can be operated.
China adds another source of pressure
Interest rates were not the only catalyst. Reports of advances by Chinese memory-chip producer ChangXin Memory Technologies raised concerns that lower-cost Chinese products could increase competition across the global semiconductor industry.
Memory chips are essential to AI systems, but the industry is historically cyclical. Periods of tight supply and high pricing can encourage rapid investment, eventually producing oversupply and falling margins.
The prospect of a well-funded Chinese competitor expanding its technological capabilities unsettled investors in Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron. It also demonstrated that AI-related demand does not insulate chipmakers from conventional competitive pressures.
That combination—slower rate cuts, more expensive financing and potentially cheaper supply—challenged the assumption that every company exposed to AI would enjoy continually expanding margins.
A reset rather than the end of the boom
The sell-off does not establish that the AI boom is ending. Demand for computing power remains strong, the largest technology companies continue to generate formidable cash flows and many infrastructure projects are backed by long-term customer contracts.
What has changed is the market’s willingness to overlook the price and financing structure of that growth.
The most resilient companies are likely to be those able to fund investment from operating cash flow, secure long-duration customers and demonstrate that new capacity will earn returns comfortably above its financing costs.
More speculative operators may face greater scrutiny, particularly where debt is expensive, customers are concentrated or expected revenue depends on demand that has not yet materialised.
For Australian investors, the lesson extends beyond US technology shares. Local data-centre operators, infrastructure funds, electricity suppliers and property groups are increasingly exposed to the same investment cycle.
Artificial intelligence may remain one of the defining growth themes of the decade. But last week’s correction showed that enthusiasm for the technology does not eliminate financial discipline.
The next stage of the AI boom will be judged not only by computing power, model performance or demand for chips, but by something more traditional: whether the assets being financed can generate enough cash to repay the money borrowed to build them.
Fact box
Nasdaq Composite: Down 4.5 per cent for the week ended October 16, 2026
Philadelphia Semiconductor Index: Down approximately 11.4 per cent
Micron Technology: Down approximately 14.6 per cent
Samsung Electronics: Down approximately 18 per cent
SK Hynix: Down approximately 24 per cent
US September inflation: 3.7 per cent annually
Estimated 2026 AI-related investment-grade issuance: Approximately US$300 billion
From gorilla encounters in Uganda to a reimagined Okavango retreat, Abercrombie & Kent elevates its African journeys with two spectacular lodge transformations.
Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi star in an adaptation of the classic novel that respects the romance’s slow burn.
