Young Travellers Say They’ll Live Now, Make Money Later
Gen Z vacationers say they are making rigorous budgets behind the scenes to keep track of costs.
3 min
Cameon Wade felt like the pandemic had robbed her of her early 20s.
So, after getting into a film program at Prague Film Institute, she travelled by herself across Europe this summer. Originally, she was planning to only travel for the program, but ended up going to seven cities in five countries in the course of three weeks to make up for the lack of travelling during the pandemic.
“The whole pandemic, I felt like the years were taken away from what was supposed to be the best years of my life and college,” she said.
Young people have always taken trips during college years, gap years or after college. This year, however, the winding down of Covid-19 travel restrictions in many countries gave many the freedom they didn’t have in the past few years.
Many of these students or recent graduates are now taking more elaborate and in some cases more expensive vacations than they expected to take at this age, say some young graduates. Overall, 72% of Gen Zers between the ages 18 and 25 surveyed in April were likely to take a summer vacation, more than any other age group, a recent Bankrate survey found.
Even so, those taking larger vacations recognize it isn’t an easy decision. In the U.S., young people between the ages of 18 to 34 had the lowest median weekly checking-account balances when compared with older age groups for the past two years, according to a recent study by JPMorgan Chase Institute.
To make up for the extra costs, these young vacationers say they are making rigorous budgets and doing financial planning behind the scenes to keep costs from skyrocketing.
Many say they believe the vacations themselves will deliver justifiable returns down the road. On TikTok, thousands of young people have posted videos of their travels with the phrase “I will make my money back.” Most videos show beautiful landscapes or dinners, but also an awareness in the captions of the financial sacrifice that comes with travelling.
“You want to frame it in such a way that, yes, this is a financial sacrifice,” said Scott Rick, an associate professor of marketing at the University of Michigan, who studies emotional causes and consequences of consumer financial decision-making. “But this is a calculated decision on my part.”
Ms. Wade posted her TikTok video in June with the caption “I’ll make my money back, but I’ll never be 20 scootering around Paris at night again.” More than three million viewers saw the clip.
After getting accepted to the film program, Ms. Wade started doing research about how much she needed to make the trip happen. “Once I realized it was possible, it was a no-brainer,” she said.
She said she paid for all of her expenses herself, using her income from her four poetry books and a part-time job to fund the trip. She also took advantage of student discounts at museums, stayed in cheaper hostels, opted for the cheapest meal options and relied on public transportation to stay on budget.
The idea behind these vacations is that an experience will have a longer lasting social benefit. Cassie Holmes, a professor at UCLA’s Anderson School of Management, said several studies back up the thinking that experiences lead to greater initial happiness and provide greater lasting happiness than material possessions.
As people get older, they start to realize that engaging in experiences will bring them greater happiness, she says. In many ways, the pandemic simply got younger people to realize this benefit earlier.
“Vacations are the experiences that not only sort of generate initial happiness, but they continue to make you feel happier as you revisit them,” Ms. Holmes said.
Isabelle Lieblein, 22, was supposed to study abroad in Germany in 2020, but the pandemic disrupted her plans.
“Before Covid, I said no to trips to save up to go to Germany, and then it didn’t happen. It really changed my outlook,” she said.
Ms. Lieblein kept working throughout the lockdown to build up her savings and spent a semester studying abroad in Germany after the travel restrictions were lifted. She travelled to 19 countries during her study abroad period and paid for the entire trip with her savings.
Throughout her backpacking adventures in Europe, Ms. Lieblein was interviewing for jobs with plans to start after her graduation from Kettering University in Flint, Mich., and her trip. Ms. Lieblein started a full-time job as a quality engineer in February. On TikTok, she shared a video encouraging other young people to invest in experiences such as travel after she ended up making the money she spent back.
Having this experience, she said, is worth the coming financial challenges.
“I wanted to take advantage of it even if that means that I’m eating ramen until I get my first paycheck when I get back, that’s worth it to me,” she said.
Reprinted by permission of The Wall Street Journal, Copyright 2021 Dow Jones & Company. Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Original date of publication: August 19, 2022.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
Chris Dixon, a partner who led the charge, says he has a ‘very long-term horizon’
Americans now think they need at least $1.25 million for retirement, a 20% increase from a year ago, according to a survey by Northwestern Mutual
Government spending, including Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, has helped drive a gap between clean-energy spending and fossil-fuel investments
3 min
Investments in solar power are on course to overtake spending on oil production for the first time, the foremost example of a widening gap between renewable-energy funding and stagnating fossil-fuel industries, according to the head of the International Energy Agency.
More than $1 billion a day is expected to be invested in solar power this year, which is higher than total spending expected for new upstream oil projects, the IEA said in its annual World Energy Investment report.
Spending on so-called clean-energy projects—which includes renewable energy, electric vehicles, low-carbon hydrogen and battery storage, among other things—is rising at a “striking” rate and vastly outpacing spending on traditional fossil fuels, Fatih Birol, the IEA’s executive director said in an interview. The figures should raise hopes that worldwide efforts to keep global warming within manageable levels are heading in the right direction, he said.
Birol pointed to a “powerful alignment of major factors,” driving clean-energy spending higher, while spending on oil and other fossil fuels remains subdued. This includes mushrooming government spending aimed at driving adherence to global climate targets such as President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.
“A new clean global energy economy is emerging,” Birol told The Wall Street Journal. “There has been a substantial increase in a short period of time—I would consider this to be a dramatic shift.”
A total of $2.8 trillion will be invested in global energy supplies this year, of which $1.7 trillion, or more than 60% will go toward clean-energy projects. The figure marks a sharp increase from previous years and highlights the growing divergence between clean-energy spending and traditional fossil-fuel industries such as oil, gas and coal. For every $1 spent on fossil-fuel energy this year, $1.70 will be invested into clean-energy technologies compared with five years ago when the spending between the two was broadly equal, the IEA said.
While investments in clean energy have been strong, they haven’t been evenly split. Ninety percent of the growth in clean-energy spending occurs in the developed world and China, the IEA said. Developing nations have been slower to embrace renewable-energy sources, put off by the high upfront price tag of emerging technologies and a shortage of affordable financing. They are often financially unable to dole out large sums on subsidies and state backing, as the U.S., European Union and China have done.
The Covid-19 pandemic appears to have marked a turning point for global energy spending, the IEA’s data shows. The powerful economic rebound that followed the end of lockdown measures across most of the globe helped prompt the divergence between spending on clean energy and fossil fuels.
The energy crisis that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year has further driven the trend. Soaring oil and gas prices after the war began made emerging green-energy technologies comparatively more affordable. While clean-energy technologies have recently been hit by some inflation, their costs remain sharply below their historic levels. The war also heightened attention on energy security, with many Western nations, particularly in Europe, seeking to remove Russian fossil fuels from their economies altogether, often replacing them with renewables.
While clean-energy spending has boomed, spending on fossil fuels has been tepid. Despite earning record profits from soaring oil and gas prices, energy companies have shown a reluctance to invest in new fossil-fuel projects when demand for them appears to be approaching its zenith.
Energy forecasters are split on when demand for fossil fuels will peak, but most have set out a timeline within the first half of the century. The IEA has said peak fossil-fuel demand could come as soon as this decade. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, a cartel of the world’s largest oil-producing nations, has said demand for crude oil could peak in developed nations in the mid-2020s, but that demand in the developing world will continue to grow until at least 2045.
Investments in clean energy and fossil fuels were largely neck-and-neck in the years leading up to the pandemic, but have diverged sharply since. While spending on fossil fuels has edged higher over the last three years, it remains lower than pre pandemic levels, the IEA said.
Only large state-owned national oil companies in the Middle East are expected to spend more on oil production this year than in 2022. Almost half of the extra spending will be absorbed by cost inflation, the IEA said. Last year marked the first one where oil-and-gas companies spent more on debt repayments, dividends and share buybacks than they did on capital expenditure.
The lack of spending on fossil fuels raises a question mark around rising prices. Oil markets are already tight and are expected to tighten further as demand grows following the pandemic, with seemingly few sources of new supply to compensate. Higher oil prices could further encourage the shift toward clean-energy sources.
“If there is not enough investment globally to reduce the oil demand growth and there is no investment at the same time [in] upstream oil we may see further volatility in global oil prices,” Birol said.
Chris Dixon, a partner who led the charge, says he has a ‘very long-term horizon’
Americans now think they need at least $1.25 million for retirement, a 20% increase from a year ago, according to a survey by Northwestern Mutual
