Boeing, Estée Lauder, and 5 Other Stocks for a Very Confusing Market

It’s been a wonky year for markets so far—but there may be several stocks to play it.

While the Federal Reserve has yet to give a clear signal it will pause interest rate hikes, many investors believe that rates will moderate in 2023 as the central bank works to fight inflation. As a result, stocks have rallied this year, with the S&P 500 up 9% andBig Tech companies generating stellar earnings results all in the face of bank worries and recession fears.

Several fund managers who attended the Morningstar Investment Conference are still looking for bargains—even though many economists such as Bank of America’s Michael Gapen see a case for a mild economic slowdown in 2023. The managers are focused on players in the aerospace industry, given the healthy outlook for travel, and companies with strong pricing power that can weather big swings in consumer demand.

Fidelity Investments portfolio manager Matt Fruhan during a panel on Wednesday said that he’s bullish on U.S. commercial aerospace firms such as Boeing (ticker: BA) and General Electric Company (GE). Passenger air traffic is growing and “we are still in the recovery phase of covid,” said Fruhan, who has been investing in the theme for the past 12 months to 18 months.

Demand for air travel in February—as measured by revenue and distances flown—rose 55.5% versus a year ago, according to the latest air traffic report from the International Air Transport Association, which represents some 300 airlines. That figure, however, is still lower than pre pandemic levels, matching about 85% of global traffic witnessed in February 2019.

Besides the U.S. names, Fruhan also likes French aerospace supplier Safran (SAF.France). It’s an engine manufacturer that also sells units like seats and lavatories and offers repair services, adding a recurring revenue stream.

Nate Velarde, co-portfolio manager of the Chautauqua International Growth Fund, bought Safran shares in 2022. He sees the proliferation of low-cost airlines as a tailwind—and is impressed by the company’s successive price increases in its spare parts business in 2021 and about 10% in November last year.

“Given the broad environment we are faced in, you need to find companies that have the ability to protect margins [through] pricing power,” Velarde told Barron’s at the conference.

Spencer Adair, a portfolio manager and partner at Baillie Gifford, says luxury cosmetic brand stocks are the best examples of pricing power, given makeup stands as “absolutely critical” in any macro environment.

One of his favourites: Estée Lauder (EL), which was a Barron’s pick last year. Shares are down 0.6% so far this year: Results for the December ended quarter showed prolonged Covid-19 lockdowns affected foot traffic at bricks-and-mortar stores in China. However, Adair expects these headwinds to abate, as China’s reopening gathers steam and Estée Lauder accelerates its direct to consumers sales.

Adair, who manages the nearly $300 billion investment firm, also likes Japanese skincare brand Shiseido (SSDOY), which reported a 6% drop in its China business last year. Adair cited demand from Chinese travellers, who are known for their interest in multi-step skincare regimens, as a tailwind.

Natasha Kuhlkin, a large-cap growth equity portfolio manager at Jennison Associates, sees strength in global luxury consumer brands. While sitting on a panel about the disruption of growth stocks with Adair and Fruhan, Kuhlkin named LVMH Moët Hennessey Louis Vuitton (LVMUY) and athleisure brand Lululemon Athletica (LULU). “There’s a controlled supply” of these companies, she said, adding that they “are starting to appeal to more consumers.”

Lululemon trades at 31.6 times forward earnings, lower than its 40.5 times five-year average. LVMH, meanwhile, is trading at 25.6 times nearly matching its average five-year price-to-earnings ratio.

Ultimately, it’s all about customer demand and how far can people stretch their frugality. Switching to a cheaper laundry detergent may work for some, but quitting on their go-to-gym leggings might be asking too much—giving companies with pricing power a leg up.

Reporting season has once again reminded investors that a strong profit does not guarantee a rising share price, and a large loss does not always trigger a sell-off. What matters most is how each result compares with expectations and, increasingly, what management says about the year ahead. During the August 2026 season, companies offering credible turnarounds or unexpectedly strong guidance were rewarded handsomely, while those flagging weaker margins, slowing demand or greater uncertainty were punished.

The following ranking draws on Morningstar’s review of 164 ASX-listed companies and measures each company’s share-price movement on the day it reported. This captures the market’s immediate response to the earnings announcement, before subsequent economic developments, dividends and company-specific news cloud the picture. Here are the five biggest winners, and the five hardest-hit losers, of the season so far.

The five winners

1. Bapcor (ASX:BAP): +41.0%

Bapcor delivered reporting season’s largest relief rally after presenting early evidence that its troubled automotive-parts business was stabilising. Although underlying revenue fell 1.8% to $1.92 billion and underlying NPAT collapsed 85% to $10.8 million, underlying EBITDA of $152.5 million exceeded guidance.

More importantly, working-capital initiatives released $68.5 million in the second half, lifting cash conversion to 109.4% and reducing net debt by 63% to $135 million. The statutory loss was $431.6 million, largely because of non-cash impairments. Investors focused on improving operational momentum, stronger liquidity and management’s expectation of modest FY27 revenue growth.

2. Zip Co (ASX:ZIP): +18.2%

Zip comfortably surpassed its FY26 targets, sending the buy-now-pay-later provider’s shares sharply higher. Transaction volume rose 23% to $16.7 billion, while cash earnings before tax, depreciation and amortisation jumped 58% to a record $268.9 million. Statutory profit climbed 46% to $116.4 million, and the cash operating margin expanded by 4.2 percentage points to 20%.

The strongest signal was guidance for FY27 cash earnings of $340 million—around 26% growth and above analysts’ forecasts. US transaction volume increased 42.5% and now represents three-quarters of group volume, offsetting weaker customer activity in Australia.

3. CSL (ASX:CSL): +17.3%

CSL’s result was hardly spectacular in isolation, but it cleared a market bar that had fallen dramatically following earlier downgrades and restructuring announcements. Underlying NPATA was US$3.1 billion, down 2% in constant-currency terms, while operating cash flow reached US$3.51 billion.

CSL maintained its full-year dividend at US$2.92 per share and completed a A$1 billion buyback. The real catalyst was FY27 guidance for approximately 5% underlying profit growth, compared with market expectations closer to 2%. After an extended period of earnings disappointments, investors interpreted the outlook as evidence that CSL’s core plasma business was approaching a sustainable recovery.

4. Judo Capital (ASX:JDO): +16.9%

Judo Capital demonstrated strong operating leverage as its specialist business-lending franchise expanded. Full-year profit before tax rose 34% to $168.1 million, while pre-provision profit increased 42%. Gross loans and advances grew 18% to $14.7 billion, reaching the top of the bank’s guidance range and comfortably exceeding broader system growth.

Deposits increased 24% to $12.2 billion, return on equity improved by 1.1 percentage points to 6.4%, and earnings per share rose 29% to 9.9 cents. Reaffirmation of the FY27 outlook gave investors confidence that loan growth could continue without sacrificing margins or credit quality.

5. Super Retail Group (ASX:SUL): +15.8%

The owner of Supercheap Auto, rebel, BCF and Macpac reported record sales of $4.2 billion, up 3.2%, despite cautious discretionary spending. Profitability went backwards: normalised profit before tax fell 7% to $306 million and normalised NPAT declined 2.8% to $226 million as transformation spending weighed on margins. Nevertheless, the result exceeded subdued expectations, online sales grew 5.3% and membership across the group’s loyalty programs reached 13.1 million. Investors were also encouraged by positive early FY27 trading, stable gross margins and continued market-share gains. A fully franked 33-cent final dividend added to the appeal.

The five losers

1. Hansen Technologies (ASX:HSN): –21.2%

Hansen’s historic result met expectations, but investors recoiled from its outlook. The utility and communications software provider achieved an underlying EBITDA margin of 31%, exceeding its 30% target, while generating strong cash flow. However, management designated FY27 an “investment and transition year”, signalling a roughly five-percentage-point margin contraction as spending on products, sales capabilities and organisational changes increased.

Revenue had already been broadly flat, leaving investors concerned that the investment program would depress earnings before new growth appeared. Leadership changes, including the chief executive’s departure, added uncertainty. Management expects revenue growth and margins above 30% to return in FY28, but the market was unwilling to wait.

2. Life360 (ASX:360): –19.4%

Life360’s headline growth was impressive: quarterly revenue rose 38% to US$159 million, subscription revenue increased 31%, and adjusted EBITDA climbed 53% to US$31.1 million. Monthly active users reached 102.4 million and paying circles grew 27% to 3.2 million. The sell-off reflected expectations rather than a collapsing business.

Net income fell 18%, the net margin contracted from 6% to 3%, hardware shipments dropped 18%, and full-year EBITDA guidance was merely maintained. After a strong valuation run, investors wanted a larger upgrade and clearer evidence that heavy investment in advertising, international expansion and artificial intelligence would generate additional earnings.

3. PEXA Group (ASX:PXA): –17.0%

PEXA reported a 7% increase in continuing-operations revenue and 12% EBITDA growth to $152 million, accompanied by a two-percentage-point margin expansion. Free cash flow increased 39%, suggesting the core Australian electronic-conveyancing platform remained highly profitable. Investors instead concentrated on management’s warning that property-transfer volumes could decline, alongside regulatory uncertainty surrounding the fees PEXA can charge.

The company is also continuing to invest heavily in its loss-making international expansion. Morningstar considered the market reaction excessive, arguing that structural transfer-volume assumptions had not materially changed, but the combination of softer near-term activity and regulatory risk overwhelmed the respectable headline numbers.

4. SEEK (ASX:SEK): –14.3%

SEEK produced solid FY26 figures, including 10% revenue growth to $1.20 billion, a 15% rise in EBITDA and 28% growth in adjusted earnings per share. It also lifted its fully franked annual dividend by 13% to a record 52 cents. Those achievements were overshadowed by falling paid job-ad volumes and cautious FY27 assumptions.

The statutory accounts included a $201 million loss from the SEEK Growth Fund and $377 million of significant items, making the headline result considerably less attractive. Investors were particularly concerned that economic weakness could limit volumes while the company continued investing in platform integration and artificial-intelligence products.

5. JB Hi-Fi (ASX:JBH): –12.3%

JB Hi-Fi’s full-year result was broadly respectable, with group sales rising 5% to $11.1 billion and underlying earnings per share increasing 6% to $4.48. The damage came from its current-trading update. Australian sales were almost flat during the June quarter and deteriorated further in July, while earnings in the core Australian electronics business fell 3.6%.

Housing-related categories were particularly weak as higher living costs and interest rates constrained household budgets. With JB Hi-Fi entering the season on a demanding valuation, an in-line historic result was not sufficient: the loss of sales momentum prompted investors to rapidly reduce their expectations for FY27.

Overall, the season showed that share prices react less to whether profits rose or fell than to the gap between results and expectations. Bapcor was rewarded for being less troubled than feared, while several fundamentally profitable companies were punished because their outlooks failed to justify elevated valuations.