Charitable Gift Annuities Are 0n The Rise

Move over, charitable trusts. Make way for the charitable gift annuity.

Typically viewed as entry-level gifting methods thanks to low minimum contribution amounts, low cost, and simplicity, charitable gift annuities have had a spike in inflows from wealthy donors lately. According to a BNY Mellon Wealth Management study, in 2019, assets in gift annuities were up 21% over the prior year, and the average gift was 56% larger. Assets continued to flow into charitable trusts, but at only a slightly higher level than in 2018.

The surge in popularity in gift annuities is likely a result of people’s desire for a guaranteed lifetime annuity at a time when yields are at historic lows in the fixed-income market, and a hesitation to sock money into a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT).

A CRAT is the gift annuity’s equivalent in the trust world, and typically a popular tool. But ultralow interest rates and high valuations in the stock market make for a lousy environment for CRATs, says Crystal Thompkins, national director of gift planning services at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, who expects gift annuities’ popularity to extend through this year.

As winds shift in the economy, the markets, and regulatory environment, it’s not uncommon for the popularity of different charitable planning tools to rise and fall. Given the surge in popularity of gift annuities, it’s worth a look at how they size up these days relative to their closest charitable trust cousin.

Charitable Gift Annuities

A charitable gift annuity is a simple contract guaranteeing that if you give a nonprofit organisation a lump sum, it will pay you a fixed, lifetime annuity based on actuarial factors—a host of market factors combined with your life expectancy. Minimum donations are around $2,000 and, unlike a trust, no attorney is required to set one up (hence no attorney fees).

Even if you live beyond your life expectancy, after your lump-sum equivalent has been paid out, you continue to receive the annuity. Depending on the contract, the annuity can continue to pay out to a surviving spouse. If you and your spouse die before your lump sum has been paid out, the charity keeps the balance in its coffers.

Payments can be deferred, which increases the amount paid out in the future annuity. A partial donation for the gift can be taken upfront. Capital gains taxes on the growth of underlying assets are spread over the annuity payments. When interest rates are low, the future capital gains’ bite out of annuity payments is lower, leaving more intact as income, Thompkins says.

Nonprofit groups that offer charitable annuities have large infrastructures, such as museums and universities. “We’re talking those with hundreds of millions in assets that are segregated to support their annuity programs,” Thompkins says. “These are diverse pools designed to absorb potential risk. It’s like managing a pension.”

The downside is that not all nonprofits offer gift annuities, and they aren’t customised, says Pam Lucina, chief fiduciary officer at Northern Trust.

Charitable Remainder Trusts

In contrast, trusts can pay out to a number of different charities, over a specified period of time instead of a lifetime, and can be used to transfer assets to heirs. The CRAT is the most similar to a gift annuity: It turns a lump sum into an annuity, and what’s left at the end goes to charity—at least 10% of assets transferred to the trust is required to be left as a gift.

But the CRAT has lost its luster lately, Thompkins says. The annuity and future gift are dependent on the high probability of the underlying invested assets performing within certain parameters. With stock market valuations high, and the economy in ragged shape due to Covid-19, there’s good reason for concern that the market could enter a sustained bear market.

“In 2008 and 2009, there were trusts that were exhausted with no benefit to either the charity or the donor,” Thompkins says. “Many people are leery now.”

China’s economic recovery isn’t gaining the momentum money managers are awaiting.

Data from China Beige Book show that the economic green shoots glimpsed in August didn’t sprout further in September. Job growth and consumer spending faltered, while orders for exports came in at the lowest level since March, according to a monthly flash survey of more than 1,300 companies the independent research firm released Thursday evening.

Consumers’ initial revenge spending after Covid restrictions eased could be waning, the results indicate, with the biggest pullbacks in food and luxury items. While travel remains a bright spot ahead of the country’s Mid-Autumn Festival, hospitality firms and chain restaurants saw a sharp decline in sales, according to the survey.

And although policy makers have shown their willingness to stabilise the property market, the data showed another month of slower sales and lower prices in both the residential and commercial sectors.

Even more troubling are the continued problems at Evergrande Group, which has scuttled a plan to restructure itself, raising the risk of a liquidation that could further destabilise the property market and hit confidence about the economy. The embattled developer said it was notified that the company’s chairman Hui Ka Yan, who is under police watch, is suspected of committing criminal offences.

Nicole Kornitzer, who manages the $750 million Buffalo International Fund (ticker: BUIIX), worries about a “recession of expectations” as confidence continues to take a hit, discouraging people and businesses from spending. Kornitzer has only a fraction of the fund’s assets in China at the moment.

Before allocating more to China, Kornitzer said, she needs to see at least a couple quarters of improvement in spending, with consumption broadening beyond travel and dining out. Signs of stabilisation in the housing market would be encouraging as well, she said.

She isn’t alone in her concern about spending. Vivian Lin Thurston, manager for William Blair’s emerging markets and China strategies, said confidence among both consumers and small- and medium-enterprises is still suffering.

“Everyone is still out and about but they don’t buy as much or buy lower-priced goods so retail sales aren’t recovering as strongly and lower-income consumers are still under pressure because their employment and income aren’t back to pre-COVID levels,” said Thurston, who just returned from a visit to China.

“A lot of small- and medium- enterprises are struggling to stay afloat and are definitely taking a wait-and-see approach on whether they can expand. A lot went out of business during Covid and aren’t back yet. So far the stimulus measures have been anemic.”

Beijing needs to do more, especially to stabilise the property sector, Thurston said. The view on the ground is that more help could come in the fourth quarter—or once the Federal Reserve is done raising rates.

The fact that the Fed is raising rates while Beijing is cutting them is already putting pressure on the renminbi. If policy makers in China wait until the Fed is done, that would alleviate one source of pressure before their fiscal stimulus adds its own.