More Big Companies Bet They Can Still Grow Without Hiring
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,731,538 (-0.25%)       Melbourne $1,040,593 (-0.17%)       Brisbane $1,204,041 (-0.76%)       Adelaide $1,079,187 (+0.05%)       Perth $1,113,651 (-0.63%)       Hobart $855,644 (+1.08%)       Darwin $851,607 (-1.16%)       Canberra $1,023,183 (-1.12%)       National Capitals $1,173,096 (-0.39%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $803,745 (+0.11%)       Melbourne $548,529 (+0.01%)       Brisbane $778,836 (-0.65%)       Adelaide $566,249 (-1.21%)       Perth $648,393 (-0.80%)       Hobart $578,199 (-0.74%)       Darwin $485,727 (-1.82%)       Canberra $478,493 (-3.31%)       National Capitals $632,901 (-0.70%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,833 (-151)       Melbourne 16,281 (+103)       Brisbane 9,762 (-14)       Adelaide 3,041 (+1)       Perth 7,334 (-57)       Hobart 733 (-23)       Darwin 150 (+2)       Canberra 1,182 (-63)       National Capitals 52,316 (-202)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,556 (-132)       Melbourne 6,850 (-29)       Brisbane 1,858 (-3)       Adelaide 436 (-19)       Perth 1,382 (-16)       Hobart 157 (+7)       Darwin 222 (+5)       Canberra 1,240 (-15)       National Capitals 21,701 (-202)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $885 (+$5)       Melbourne $620 ($0)       Brisbane $708 (+$8)       Adelaide $660 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $620 ($0)       Darwin $850 ($0)       Canberra $725 (-$5)       National Capitals $739 (+$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820 ($0)       Melbourne $630 ($0)       Brisbane $675 (+$5)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $520 (+$3)       Darwin $650 ($0)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $655 (+$1)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,216 (-51)       Melbourne 7,128 (-96)       Brisbane 3,637 (+29)       Adelaide 1,427 (-19)       Perth 2,365 (+21)       Hobart 285 (+16)       Darwin 50 (+6)       Canberra 449 (-5)       National Capitals 21,557 (-99)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,260 (-11)       Melbourne 5,879 (0)       Brisbane 1,955 (-12)       Adelaide 451 (-6)       Perth 736 (+20)       Hobart 78 (+16)       Darwin 71 (-15)       Canberra 718 (-24)       National Capitals 19,148 (-32)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.66% (↑)      Melbourne 3.10% (↑)      Brisbane 3.06% (↑)        Adelaide 3.18% (↓)     Perth 3.50% (↑)        Hobart 3.77% (↓)     Darwin 5.19% (↑)      Canberra 3.68% (↑)      National Capitals 3.28% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.31% (↓)       Melbourne 5.97% (↓)     Brisbane 4.51% (↑)      Adelaide 5.05% (↑)      Perth 5.61% (↑)      Hobart 4.68% (↑)      Darwin 6.96% (↑)      Canberra 6.52% (↑)      National Capitals 5.38% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 35.2 (↑)      Melbourne 34.3 (↑)      Brisbane 36.8 (↑)        Adelaide 28.0 (↓)     Perth 40.8 (↑)      Hobart 29.4 (↑)        Darwin 26.8 (↓)     Canberra 34.9 (↑)      National Capitals 33.3 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 32.0 (↑)      Melbourne 32.2 (↑)      Brisbane 33.9 (↑)      Adelaide 23.2 (↑)      Perth 39.9 (↑)      Hobart 33.2 (↑)        Darwin 29.8 (↓)     Canberra 42.3 (↑)      National Capitals 33.3 (↑)            
Share Button

More Big Companies Bet They Can Still Grow Without Hiring

JPMorgan Chase has a ‘strong bias’ against adding staff, while Walmart is keeping its head count flat. Major employers are in a new, ultra lean era.

By CHIP CUTTER
Mon, Oct 27, 2025 12:52pmGrey Clock 3 min

It’s the corporate gamble of the moment: Can you run a company, increasing sales and juicing profits, without adding people?

American employers are increasingly making the calculation that they can keep the size of their teams flat—or shrink through layoffs—without harming their businesses.

Part of that thinking is the belief that artificial intelligence will be used to pick up some of the slack and automate more processes. Companies are also hesitant to make any moves in an economy many still describe as uncertain.

JPMorgan Chase’s chief financial officer told investors recently that the bank now has a “very strong bias against having the reflective response” to hire more people for any given need. Aerospace and defense company RTX boasted last week that its sales rose even without adding employees.

Goldman Sachs , meanwhile, sent a memo to staffers this month saying the firm “will constrain head count growth through the end of the year” and reduce roles that could be more efficient with AI. Walmart , the nation’s largest private employer, also said it plans to keep its head count roughly flat over the next three years, even as its sales grow.

“If people are getting more productive, you don’t need to hire more people,” Brian Chesky , Airbnb’s chief executive, said in an interview. “I see a lot of companies pre-emptively holding the line, forecasting and hoping that they can have smaller workforces.”

Airbnb employs around 7,000 people, and Chesky says he doesn’t expect that number to grow much over the next year. With the help of AI, he said he hopes that “the team we already have can get considerably more work done.”

Many companies seem intent on embracing a new, ultralean model of staffing, one where more roles are kept unfilled and hiring is treated as a last resort. At Intuit , every time a job comes open, managers are pushed to justify why they need to backfill it, said Sandeep Aujla , the company’s chief financial officer. The new rigor around hiring helps combat corporate bloat.

“That typical behavior that settles in—and we’re all guilty of it—is, historically, if someone leaves, if Jane Doe leaves, I’ve got to backfill Jane,” Aujla said in an interview. Now, when someone quits, the company asks: “Is there an opportunity for us to rethink how we staff?”

Intuit has chosen not to replace certain roles in its finance, legal and customer-support functions, he said. In its last fiscal year, the company’s revenue rose 16% even as its head count stayed flat, and it is planning only modest hiring in the current year.

The desire to avoid hiring or filling jobs reflects a growing push among executives to see a return on their AI spending. On earnings calls, mentions of ROI and AI investments are increasing, according to an analysis by AlphaSense, reflecting heightened interest from analysts and investors that companies make good on the millions they are pouring into AI.

Many executives hope that software coding assistants and armies of digital agents will keep improving—even if the current results still at times leave something to be desired.

The widespread caution in hiring now is frustrating job seekers and leading many employees within organizations to feel stuck in place, unable to ascend or take on new roles, workers and bosses say.

Inside many large companies, HR chiefs also say it is becoming increasingly difficult to predict just how many employees will be needed as technology takes on more of the work.

Some employers seem to think that fewer employees will actually improve operations.

Meta Platforms this past week said it is cutting 600 jobs in its AI division, a move some leaders hailed as a way to cut down on bureaucracy.

“By reducing the size of our team, fewer conversations will be required to make a decision, and each person will be more load-bearing and have more scope and impact,” Alexandr Wang , Meta’s chief AI officer, wrote in a memo to staff seen by The Wall Street Journal.

Though layoffs haven’t been widespread through the economy, some companies are making cuts. Target on Thursday said it would cut about 1,000 corporate employees, and close another 800 open positions, totaling around 8% of its corporate workforce. Michael Fiddelke , Target’s incoming CEO, said in a memo sent to staff that too “many layers and overlapping work have slowed decisions, making it harder to bring ideas to life.”

A range of other employers, from the electric-truck maker Rivian to cable and broadband provider Charter Communications , have announced their own staff cuts in recent weeks, too.

Operating with fewer people can still pose risks for companies by straining existing staffers or hurting efforts to develop future leaders, executives and economists say. “It’s a bit of a double-edged sword,” said Matthew Martin , senior U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. “You want to keep your head count costs down now—but you also have to have an eye on the future.”



MOST POPULAR

A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.

As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.

Related Stories
Money
Why Chasing Yield After the Budget Could Cost You Everything
By Jeni O'Dowd 30/06/2026
Money
$3.6 Million an Hour—and Other Ways to Measure Elon Musk’s Fortune
By THEO FRANCIS, JULIET CHUNG & MAX RUST 29/06/2026
Money
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians
By Opinion, Anthony Hunt 22/06/2026
Why Chasing Yield After the Budget Could Cost You Everything

The federal budget has rattled property investors. But the biggest mistake isn’t the tax changes, it’s the conclusion many are drawing from them.

By Jeni O'Dowd
Tue, Jun 30, 2026 2 min

The recent budget has forced a reckoning for property investors.

Negative gearing now restricted to new residential builds, the CGT discount gone and on paper, the numbers look different.

And many investors are responding by pivoting toward yield, prioritising cash flow over capital growth in a way that property strategists say misses the point entirely.

“The debate has shifted to yield versus growth as if they are opposing forces,” says Abdullah Nouh, founder of Melbourne-based buyers’ agency Mecca Property Group. “But that framing is itself the mistake.”

Nouh, who works with high-net-worth families and investors on long-term acquisition strategy, argues that capital growth remains the primary driver of genuine wealth creation and that the post-budget environment has made quality assets more important, not less.

The numbers make his case plainly. An additional $500 per week in rental income is welcome. A prestige asset appreciating by $1 million over a market cycle is transformative.

These are not equivalent outcomes, and portfolios built around yield at the expense of location and land value tend to generate income while wealth stands largely still.

The more nuanced shift Nouh is seeing among sophisticated investors is a move toward assets where both outcomes can be engineered simultaneously – established homes on substantial land in quality locations, where the existing dwelling can be repositioned, rental returns improved, and the underlying land value compounds independent of what sits on it.

For investors with existing equity, commercial property is also entering the conversation in a more serious way.

Prestige industrial assets, medical centres and long-leased essential retail offer income profiles that residential property in most capital city markets cannot currently match: longer lease terms, tenants covering outgoings, and greater predictability than the residential tenancy cycle.

“The investors who build lasting wealth are rarely the ones who chased yield or growth exclusively,” says Nouh.

“They are the ones who built a strategy they could sustain – one that generated enough income to hold quality assets through multiple cycles while those assets compounded in value.”

The budget has changed the settings. It has not changed the fundamentals.

MOST POPULAR

Sydney Children’s Hospitals Foundation CEO Kristina Keneally says Australia’s culture of large-scale philanthropy is becoming more sophisticated as Gold Dinner raises $75.5 million for children’s health, research and innovation.

Paine Schwartz joins BERO as a new investor as the year-old company seeks to triple sales.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
The Workers Opting to Retire Instead of Taking on AI
By Lauren Weber & Ray A. Smith 07/04/2026
Money
The Hottest Business Strategy This Summer Is Buying Crypto
By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN & VICKY GE HUANG 11/08/2025
Money
Louis Vuitton Owner LVMH Closes Year-End Quarter With Weak Sales Growth
By MAURO ORRU 28/01/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop