Shein’s Bargain-App Formula Crumbles Under Trump
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,730,998 (-1.35%)       Melbourne $1,052,750 (-0.63%)       Brisbane $1,213,162 (-0.55%)       Adelaide $1,088,669 (-1.01%)       Perth $1,109,065 (-0.03%)       Hobart $857,011 (-0.15%)       Darwin $850,231 (-5.88%)       Canberra $1,057,418 (+2.13%)       National Capitals $1,179,457 (-0.85%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $812,882 (-0.02%)       Melbourne $547,522 (-0.39%)       Brisbane $775,633 (-1.81%)       Adelaide $583,866 (+1.25%)       Perth $661,533 (-0.91%)       Hobart $583,528 (+2.34%)       Darwin $488,291 (-0.29%)       Canberra $502,282 (+1.20%)       National Capitals $640,074 (-0.20%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 14,388 (-149)       Melbourne 16,400 (-697)       Brisbane 9,524 (+147)       Adelaide 2,995 (+70)       Perth 7,340 (+170)       Hobart 758 (-2)       Darwin 142 (+4)       Canberra 1,228 (-5)       National Capitals 52,775 (-462)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,737 (+19)       Melbourne 6,931 (-54)       Brisbane 1,794 (+10)       Adelaide 449 (+21)       Perth 1,390 (+12)       Hobart 145 (-6)       Darwin 212 (+3)       Canberra 1,245 (+31)       National Capitals 21,903 (+36)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $870 ($0)       Melbourne $610 (+$10)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $625 ($0)       Darwin $875 (+$25)       Canberra $730 (-$20)       National Capitals $739 (+$3)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $815 (-$5)       Melbourne $630 ($0)       Brisbane $680 ($0)       Adelaide $555 (-$5)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $545 (+$45)       Darwin $655 (+$5)       Canberra $600 ($0)       National Capitals $658 (+$3)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,162 (+59)       Melbourne 7,192 (+17)       Brisbane 3,645 (-54)       Adelaide 1,428 (+38)       Perth 2,339 (-34)       Hobart 280 (+15)       Darwin 38 (-7)       Canberra 456 (+28)       National Capitals 21,540 (+62)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,135 (+92)       Melbourne 5,909 (+25)       Brisbane 1,996 (+38)       Adelaide 446 (-20)       Perth 714 (-5)       Hobart 70 (+3)       Darwin 78 (+8)       Canberra 695 (-26)       National Capitals 19,043 (+115)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.61% (↑)      Melbourne 3.01% (↑)      Brisbane 3.00% (↑)      Adelaide 3.10% (↑)      Perth 3.52% (↑)      Hobart 3.79% (↑)      Darwin 5.35% (↑)        Canberra 3.59% (↓)     National Capitals 3.26% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.21% (↓)     Melbourne 5.98% (↑)      Brisbane 4.56% (↑)        Adelaide 4.94% (↓)     Perth 5.50% (↑)      Hobart 4.86% (↑)      Darwin 6.98% (↑)        Canberra 6.21% (↓)     National Capitals 5.34% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 32.7 (↑)      Melbourne 32.4 (↑)        Brisbane 33.3 (↓)     Adelaide 27.4 (↑)        Perth 37.9 (↓)       Hobart 27.4 (↓)     Darwin 27.7 (↑)      Canberra 29.7 (↑)      National Capitals 31.1 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 30.5 (↓)     Melbourne 29.9 (↑)      Brisbane 33.2 (↑)        Adelaide 21.3 (↓)       Perth 38.5 (↓)     Hobart 31.1 (↑)        Darwin 38.7 (↓)       Canberra 38.0 (↓)       National Capitals 32.6 (↓)           
Share Button

Shein’s Bargain-App Formula Crumbles Under Trump

Chinese fashion giant faces a double whammy of steep U.S. tariffs and an end to its duty-free shipping.

By Raffaele Huang & Shen Lu
Fri, Apr 11, 2025 11:23amGrey Clock 4 min

The meteoric popularity among American shoppers of China-founded app Shein was greatly helped by duty-free shipping of its ultra-cheap fashion. After President Trump closed that option for Chinese goods, its clothes will now bear the full impact of his new tariffs.

The U.S. tariffs imposed on Wednesday and China’s retaliation throw a wet blanket over all goods trade between the two countries. For Shein, the additional impact of Trump’s move to end the so-called de mini m is exemption for China means a double hit and perhaps the most pivotal challenge for the fashion giant, whose links to China have long landed it at the center of U.S.-China tensions.

The fashion giant had already shifted its plans for an initial public offering from New York to London, where it had hoped to list by June. But Trump’s new tariffs on China and elimination of duty-free exemption for China on goods valued at $800 or less effective May 2 makes its prospects of going public at all increasingly dim.

The nimble supply chain that Shein prides itself on now faces enormous pressure to keep costs low.

“Shein will probably have to reinvent the wheel,” said Vinci Zhang , an analyst at research and analytics firm M Science. “It’s almost certain they will raise the price, otherwise they won’t survive.”

Shein didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Because Trump only ended the de minimis option for China, Shein could still ship wares to the U.S. tariff-free from other countries. Shein had encouraged some suppliers to move their factories to Vietnam, but Trump’s announcement last week of 46% tariffs on goods from Vietnam has undermined such efforts. On Wednesday, Trump authorized a 90-day delay on most tariffs while increasing tariffs on China.

Cathy Lin , who runs a Guangzhou-based contract manufacturer that supplies Shein and its Chinese rival Temu, has put on hold her plan to set up a factory in Vietnam. “Moving there might not be a once-and-for-all solution,” she said. Lin said she has found two partners in Macau and Vietnam who can temporarily help ship parcels to the U.S.

Trump first tried to end the duty-free exemption for China in February, but had to delay the crackdown to let the Commerce Department set up a system to process inspections and levies on the shipments. Shein, now based in Singapore, has argued that the de minimis exemption isn’t critical to its success. Nevertheless, during the two-month reprieve, Shein has scrambled to prepare.

Shein, whose clothing, on average, costs 20% to 35% less than fast-fashion rivals such as Zara and H&M , has raised prices on some items in the past two months. Eight sellers on Shein and Temu, which also increased some prices, said orders from the U.S. have fallen by 20% to 50% in March compared with January.

After Trump’s latest tariff announcement, Brian Luo , who runs a U.S. delivery company that helps companies such as Shein and Temu get parcels to U.S. customers, said the delivery orders he received for Monday plunged to 1,600 from a daily average of 4,000.

“Once the tariffs are added, people might shift back to Amazon , especially because their delivery speed is faster,” Luo said.

Under the new U.S. tariffs, apparel imported from China could face total levies close to 150%, according to Sheng Lu, professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware.

Shein has no customers in China, though it subcontracts with thousands of factories there to power its enormous selection of cheap apparel and respond to fleeting consumer tastes. The company has been diversifying its supply chain in the past few years and now also manufactures in Brazil and Turkey, closer to its consumers in North America and Europe.

In recent months, Shein has been in talks with manufacturers in the U.S. to produce some of its clothing there, people familiar with the matter said. More than one-third of Temu’s U.S. orders are now fulfilled by sellers with inventory in the U.S.

In a rare public comment, commerce officials in Guangzhou, where many Shein suppliers are based, told a Communist Party-controlled newspaper that Shein was increasing investments in China and denied that its suppliers are moving out of China.

Nonetheless, Goldman Sachs analysts on Monday lowered forecasts for Temu’s gross sales by as much as a third to a range of $63 billion to $84 billion.

Temu, owned by Chinese e-commerce company PDD Holdings , didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Last year, companies sent small packages worth $46 billion to the U.S. from China under the de minimis exception, representing 11% of U.S. imports from China, Nomura economists estimated.

While the U.S. is one of its biggest markets, Shein sells to more than 150 countries.

In a chat group on WeChat with more than 200 merchants who sell to American consumers on Shein or Temu, vendors raced to come up with contingency plans. “If I can’t sell to the U.S., that’s OK. There are still other good markets,” said Wang Xianwei , a kitchen-utensil seller in China.

But Shein has run into regulatory and political issues around the world. The European Union is also looking to close its own version of the de minimis provision, and some countries have already ended similar loopholes.

Shein’s revenue grew 19% to around $38 billion in 2024, below the increases of 40% or more that the company had seen in the past few years, people familiar with the retailer said.

Since its New York listing plans collapsed, Shein has strengthened its focus on compliance to meet political and regulatory challenges. Its London IPO application has been awaiting approval from Chinese and British regulators since last June.

“Trump’s tariffs and other policies are closing the window for the IPO,” said a person close to Beijing’s thinking.



MOST POPULAR

A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.

As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.

Related Stories
Money
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians
By Opinion, Anthony Hunt 22/06/2026
Money
WHY COMING HOME CAN BE MORE FINANCIALLY COMPLICATED THAN LEAVING
By Brett Evans, Opinion 15/06/2026
Money
Everything You Need to Know About the SpaceX Trading Debut
By CORRIE DRIEBUSCH 12/06/2026
The Budget Wake-Up Call for Wealthy Australians

The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.

By Opinion, Anthony Hunt
Mon, Jun 22, 2026 3 min

For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.

The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:

Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?

In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.

The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.

This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.

The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.

For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.

We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.

Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.

They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.

The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.

The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.

Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.

Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.

And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.

Anthony Hunt

The real issue is complacency.

Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.

Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.

We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.

Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.

At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.

How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?

How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?

These are the questions families should be asking now.

The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.

But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.

Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.

The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.

They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.

Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.

It is about preparing for it.

Because the greatest risk is not change itself.

It is losing the ability to respond to it.

Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer

MOST POPULAR

French luxury-goods giant’s results are a sign that shoppers weren’t splurging on its collections of high-end garments in the run-up to the holiday season.

A&K Sanctuary unveils Kitirua Plains Lodge, a sustainability-focused luxury property shaped by landscape, local craft and contemporary safari architecture.

Related Stories
Money
The Hottest Business Strategy This Summer Is Buying Crypto
By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN & VICKY GE HUANG 11/08/2025
Property
REVEALED: THE REAL OPPORTUNITIES IN AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY MARKET
By Staff Writer 28/04/2026
Property
Drew Barrymore Puts Westchester Home on the Market Two Years After Buying It
By Katherine Clarke 26/03/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop