The World’s Richest Are Getting Richer Again
3 min
A resilient global economy is leading to a rise in wealth once again for the world’s richest individuals, despite plenty of economic and geopolitical uncertainty, according to a new report.
Globally, the population of those with at least US$1 million in investable assets rose by 5.1% last year to 22.8 million, while their wealth rose 4.7% to US$86.8 trillion, according to the 28th annual World Wealth Report from Capgemini Research Institute, a global think tank division of Paris-based Capgemini.
It’s a sharp difference from a year earlier, when global wealth fell 3.3% to US$83 trillion.
The growth trend was particularly evident in the U.S. last year, where economic resilience, slowing inflation, and soaring U.S. stocks led to a 7.3% increase in the population of those with at least US$1 million in investable assets to 7.5 million, Capgemini said. The wealth of these individuals rose 7% to US$26.1 trillion.
“We are back in business,” says Elias Ghanem, global head of Capgemini Research Institute for Financial Services. “It’s a good message for the economy, it’s a good message for the people, and it’s a good message that growth is back on stage.”
Among the ultra wealthy—those with at least US$30 million in investable assets—the global population rose by 5% to 220,000, while their wealth grew by 3.9% to about US$29.4 trillion. That represents 34% of total global wealth, according to Capgemini.
A big reason for the upturn in wealth was a strong recovery in global stocks, and the fact that the wealthy moved their assets out of cash and cash equivalents. Globally, this population’s average allocation to cash was 34% as of January 2023; by January this year, cash allocations dropped to 25% on average.
“There’s a move in the high-net-worth mind from wealth preservation back to growth, and that’s good,” Ghanem says.
Although average global stock allocations dropped to 21% as of January this year from 23% a year earlier, the wealthy boosted their allocations to fixed-income by 5 percentage points to 20%, to lock in higher rates, Ghanem says. They also moved money into real estate as prices declined, increasing that investment, on average, by 4 percentage points to 19%.
“As interest rates went up, the real estate to be sold increased, and thus the price went down, and high-net-worth individuals leveraged the opportunity to invest,” Ghanem says. That investment has a positive ripple effect on the broader economy, he says.
The wealthy also boosted their allocations to alternative investments, mostly private equity and private credit, by 2 percentage points to 15%. That’s money that funds the private sector, where businesses are engaged in creating industries and products “that are essential to transforming our economy,” Ghanem says.
The message all these moves make: “Money is circulating again and money circulating is growth for everyone,” he says.
Capgemini’s annual report doesn’t predict the future, but the shifts in asset allocation point to a new perspective by the wealthy that takes into account the shocks of the recent past, from the pandemic, to inflation, and war.
“The business environment has considered these factors and is able to manage them,” Ghanem says.
Whether China reopens for business remains “a big question mark,” however, he says. Though the Nasdaq stock index in the U.S. gained 43% in 2023, after tumbling 34% a year earlier, the Shanghai Stock Index posted a decline of 3.7% last year, better than a nearly 15% drop a year earlier, but still sluggish.
As a result, Asia has yet to regain its status as the world’s wealthiest region—which it was from 2017-19, on the strength of growth in both China and India, Ghanem says.
The report was based on a survey of 3,119 individuals (including more than 1,300 ultra-wealthy) living in 26 markets in North America, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific, the firm said.
The findings are aimed at wealth management firms serving these elite populations across the globe. Among the uber-wealthy, Capgemini warns these firms have competition from family offices that are better positioned to orchestrate non-financial services, such as education or travel, and to bargain among banks to get the best deals, and services. That’s reflected in the fact the number of wealth management firms hired by the ultra-wealthy has risen to seven on average from three in 2020, Capgemini found.
“With their diverse operating models fully aligned with the objectives of the families they service, family offices are becoming more visible and are significantly challenging traditional wealth management firms,” the report said.
Capgemini’s conclusion: Wealth management firms need to decide if they want to compete against family offices or collaborate with them.
One way the report urges them to compete is by developing behavioural finance technology driven by artificial intelligence. These systems can be trained to understand biases and identify them early on to help individuals avoid making bad decisions, Ghanem says.
“One of the strongest messages of the report is that it’s time for the banks to leverage AI-powered behavioral finance to interact better with their clients,” he says.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
Mirzaian is a senior director within CBRE’s Development NSW business, operating across the company’s Western Sydney and North Sydney offices
Singapore’s Formula 1 weekend has always looked different. Held beneath floodlights on the Marina Bay Street Circuit, the race transforms the city into a nocturnal spectacle of speed, heat and saturated colour. It is this distinctive atmosphere — and one of Singapore’s most important natural symbols — that has shaped IWC Schaffhausen’s latest motorsport-inspired watch. …
Continue reading “IWC’s purple Formula 1 chronograph pays tribute to Singapore after dark”
Wall Street’s hottest momentum trade has reversed sharply, as former winners tumble and heavily shorted stocks surge.
3 min
Wall Street’s hottest trade has gone ice cold.
For years, it paid off to buy stocks that were rising in price—and bet against struggling shares. The momentum trade was especially profitable this year, as investors piled into hot stocks including Micron Technology, Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices and other artificial-intelligence darlings while wagering against those likely to be hurt by the embrace of AI.
The S&P 500 Momentum Index soared 44% in the second quarter, its best quarterly performance on record, and it surged 133% over the past five years, nearly double the broad market’s performance.
Mega funds and rookie investors alike piled into the trade, some using leverage and options contracts in an effort to amplify their returns, propelling the underlying shares higher.
“It is a self-fulfilling prophecy,” said Matthew Tym, managing director at Cantor Fitzgerald, of the trade.
Suddenly, the trade is a loser. The momentum index has tumbled more than 9% since July 1, lagging behind the S&P 500’s 2.8% gain. The index—which tracks stocks in the S&P 500 based on a “momentum score”—is on track for the biggest quarterly underperformance in 25 years. July was the second-worst month for the momentum trade in around 40 years, according to Bank of America estimates; the only month worse was April 2009, in the teeth of the global financial crisis.
Hedge funds that bought momentum shares while shorting low-momentum stocks suffered even more. At the same time, a basket of the most popular stocks held by hedge funds tracked by Goldman Sachs recorded its biggest one-month underperformance in July relative to the S&P 500 in more than 20 years, according to the bank’s analysts.
Momentum trading is based on a rather simple observation: Investments that go up tend to keep outperforming; those that underperform often remain laggards. This kind of trading might seem too simple a stock-picking strategy to work. Yet it often has.
“For decades, it didn’t take a lot of sophistication to run a momentum strategy and make a decent living at it,” says Agustin Lebron, senior researcher at EquiLibre, a trading firm.
Part of the reason: It takes a while for corporate and other information to spread to various investors, so they slowly build positions, producing buying momentum.
“A huge pension fund can’t flip around its positions in a day,” says Lebron. “Behavioral biases also account for some of the effect, as well—people tend to sell their winners too early and hold losers too long.”
Fans of the strategy point to the human tendency to extrapolate from past results—and chase investment returns—noting that momentum patterns have been evident in markets for decades, even centuries. They also say that some of the worst months for momentum strategies are during longer periods of outperformance.
Some have been doing the trade by buying the strongest investments in a sector while shorting the weakest; others lean in to rising markets or asset classes. Still others use a quantitative approach or turn to banks or others who sell ways to make distinct wagers on momentum as a “tradable factor” or a “thematic basket.”
The fans remain believers. “Any strategy has disappointing periods,” says Antti Ilmanen, global co-head of the portfolio solutions group at AQR Capital Management.
The surge in Moderna and other biotech stocks helped crush the momentum trade. These shares were among the most heavily shorted in recent years, but positive news on a cancer vaccine from Moderna and Merck sent those stocks flying, crushing some quant and other hedge funds. Moderna is up around 150% so far this month.
These traders had an especially rough day on Aug. 19, which Goldman Sachs told its clients was the worst day for “systematic long-short managers” in more than two years. About half of the losses were because of momentum trades, the bank said.
Some traders have begun to short, or bet against, the very stocks that propelled the momentum trade earlier this year. Net short positions in futures tied to the Nasdaq-100 index among speculators recently climbed to some of the highest levels of the past two decades, according to data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The about-face is a sign of how markets have become more treacherous for investors, even as indexes keep climbing. Part of the issue: the recent meltdown of Situational Awareness, a hedge fund that had piled into some of the most popular momentum shares, including chip stocks. After a period of market tumult, Nvidia shares rocketed almost 9% after its earnings, showing how quickly sentiment can shift.
Some investors say the run-up in share prices driving tech stocks higher reminds them at times of the dot-com frenzy decades ago.
Mike Ogborne, the founder of San Francisco-based Ogborne Capital Management, said he has grown more cautious on technology stocks and is keeping more of his portfolio in cash than he typically does.
And he is nervous about the surge in spending by technology giants and quarterly capital expenditures that keep rising.
“It is a little bit like Cinderella and the clock striking midnight. You don’t know when midnight is going to come around,” Ogborne said. “They don’t send a memo around telling you when the capex cycle is over.”
New research suggests that bonuses make employees feel more like a mere cog in a wheel.
Many of the most-important events have slipped from our collective memories. But their impacts live on.
