Why Family Offices Are Emerging as Preferred Partners for CRED Managers
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,799,148 (-1.16%)       Melbourne $1,083,414 (-0.23%)       Brisbane $1,236,876 (-0.27%)       Adelaide $1,092,511 (+0.69%)       Perth $1,084,878 (+1.97%)       Hobart $834,326 (-0.48%)       Darwin $875,741 (-1.39%)       Canberra $1,055,398 (+0.64%)       National Capitals $1,201,463 (-0.31%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $812,132 (-0.35%)       Melbourne $540,667 (+0.92%)       Brisbane $807,630 (-0.94%)       Adelaide $589,228 (+0.18%)       Perth $667,040 (+1.09%)       Hobart $555,533 (+1.92%)       Darwin $497,512 (-2.06%)       Canberra $487,627 (+1.19%)       National Capitals $643,525 (+0.00%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 11,721 (+1,984)       Melbourne 14,125 (+215)       Brisbane 6,277 (+177)       Adelaide 2,279 (+67)       Perth 4,706 (-614)       Hobart 858 (+25)       Darwin 117 (+8)       Canberra 1,149 (+36)       National Capitals $41,232 (+1,898)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,592 (+152)       Melbourne 6,506 (+54)       Brisbane 1,245 (+61)       Adelaide 341 (+3)       Perth 989 (+64)       Hobart 163 (+10)       Darwin 174 (-2)       Canberra 1,214 (-1)       National Capitals $19,224 (+341)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $800 (-$10)       Melbourne $580 ($0)       Brisbane $690 (+$10)       Adelaide $640 (+$5)       Perth $730 ($0)       Hobart $598 (+$5)       Darwin $750 (+$20)       Canberra $713 (-$3)       National Capitals $695 (+$3)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $790 (-$10)       Melbourne $600 ($0)       Brisbane $675 ($0)       Adelaide $550 (+$10)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $495 ($0)       Darwin $635 (+$5)       Canberra $590 (+$10)       National Capitals $641 (+$1)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,765 (-167)       Melbourne 7,373 (-117)       Brisbane 3,700 (-240)       Adelaide 1,429 (-124)       Perth 2,205 (-80)       Hobart 220 (+8)       Darwin 64 (-12)       Canberra 380 (-53)       National Capitals $21,136 (-785)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 7,655 (-667)       Melbourne 5,934 (-248)       Brisbane 2,018 (-65)       Adelaide 427 (-34)       Perth 598 (-37)       Hobart 95 (+7)       Darwin 120 (-25)       Canberra 517 (-35)       National Capitals $17,364 (-1,104)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.31% (↓)     Melbourne 2.78% (↑)      Brisbane 2.90% (↑)      Adelaide 3.05% (↑)        Perth 3.50% (↓)     Hobart 3.72% (↑)      Darwin 4.45% (↑)        Canberra 3.51% (↓)     National Capitals $3.01% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.06% (↓)       Melbourne 5.77% (↓)     Brisbane 4.35% (↑)      Adelaide 4.85% (↑)        Perth 5.46% (↓)       Hobart 4.63% (↓)     Darwin 6.64% (↑)      Canberra 6.29% (↑)      National Capitals $5.18% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND         Sydney 29.2 (↓)       Melbourne 29.9 (↓)       Brisbane 26.6 (↓)       Adelaide 23.8 (↓)       Perth 35.4 (↓)       Hobart 28.7 (↓)       Darwin 33.5 (↓)       Canberra 29.4 (↓)       National Capitals $29.6 (↓)            AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND         Sydney 25.1 (↓)       Melbourne 29.7 (↓)       Brisbane 24.0 (↓)       Adelaide 23.5 (↓)       Perth 30.0 (↓)       Hobart 23.1 (↓)     Darwin 20.9 (↑)        Canberra 38.4 (↓)       National Capitals $26.8 (↓)           
Share Button

Why Family Offices Are Emerging as Preferred Partners for CRED Managers

As Australia’s family offices expand their presence in private credit, a growing number of commercial real estate debt (CRED) managers are turning to them as flexible, strategic funding partners.

By Opinion: Faris Dedic
Fri, May 23, 2025 10:17amGrey Clock 3 min

Family offices are increasingly asserting their dominance in Australia’s private credit markets, particularly in the commercial real estate debt (CRED) segment.

With more than 2,000 family offices now operating nationally—an increase of over 150% in the past decade, according to KPMG—their influence is not only growing in scale, but also in strategic sophistication.

Traditionally focused on preserving intergenerational wealth, COI Capital has found that family offices have broadened their mandates to include more active and yield-driven deployment of capital, particularly through private credit vehicles.

This shift is underpinned by a defensive allocation rationale: enhanced risk-adjusted returns, predictable income, and collateral-backed structures offer an attractive alternative to the volatility of public markets.

The Competitive Landscape for Manager Mandates

As family offices increase their exposure to private credit, the dynamic between managers and capital providers is evolving. Family offices are highly discerning capital allocators.

They expect enhanced reporting, real-time visibility into asset performance, and access to decision-makers are key differentiators for successful managers. Co-investment rights, performance-based fees, and downside protection mechanisms are increasingly standard features.

While typically fee-sensitive, many family offices are willing to accept standard management and performance fee structures when allocating $5M+ tickets, recognising the sourcing advantage and risk oversight provided by experienced managers. This has created a tiered market where only managers with demonstrated execution capability, origination networks, and robust governance frameworks are considered suitable partners.

Notably, many are competing by offering differentiated access models, such as segregated mandates, debt tranches, or tailored securitisation vehicles.

Onshore vs. Offshore Family Offices

There are important distinctions between onshore and offshore family offices in the context of CRED participation:

  • Onshore Family Offices: Typically have deep relationships with local stakeholders (brokers, valuers, developers) and a more intuitive understanding of planning, legal, and enforcement frameworks in Australian real estate markets. They are more likely to engage directly or via specialised mandates with domestic managers.

  • Offshore Family Offices: While often attracted to the yield premium and legal protections offered in Australia, they face structural barriers in accessing deal flow. Currency risk, tax treatment, and regulatory unfamiliarity are key concerns. However, they bring diversification and scale, often via feeder vehicles, special-purpose structures, or syndicated participation with Tier 1 managers.

COI Capital Management has both an offshore and onshore strategy to assist and suit both distinct Family Office needs.

Faris Dedic

Impact on the Broader CRED Market

The influx of family office capital into private credit markets has several systemic implications:

  • Family offices, deploying capital in significant tranches, have enhanced liquidity across the mid-market CRE sector.

  • Their ability to move quickly with minimal conditionality has contributed to yield compression, particularly on low-LVR, income-producing assets.

  • As a few family offices dominate large allocations, concerns emerge around pricing power, governance, and systemic concentration risk.

Unlike ADIs or superannuation funds, family offices operate outside the core prudential framework, raising transparency and risk management questions, particularly in a stress scenario.

So what is the answer? Are Family Offices the most Attractive?

Yes—family offices are arguably among the most attractive funding partners for CRED managers today. Their capital is not only flexible and long-term focused, but also often deployed with a strategic mindset.

Many family offices now have a deep understanding of the risk-return profile of CRE debt, making them highly engaged and informed investors.

They’re typically open to co-investment, bespoke structuring, and are less bogged down by institutional red tape, allowing them to move quickly and decisively when the right opportunity presents itself. For managers, this combination of agility, scale, and sophistication makes them a valuable and increasingly sought-after partner in the private credit space.

For high-performing CRED managers with demonstrable origination, governance, and reporting frameworks, family offices offer not only a reliable source of capital but also a collaborative partnership model capable of supporting large-scale deployments across market cycles.

Faris Dedic is the Founder and Managing Director of DIG Capital Advisory and COI Capital Management



MOST POPULAR

Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi star in an adaptation of the classic novel that respects the romance’s slow burn.

High-end homeowners are choosing to upgrade rather than relocate, investing in bespoke design, premium finishes and long-term lifestyle value.

Related Stories
Money
Pinterest Tumbles as Advertiser Pullback Weighs on Fourth-Quarter Earnings, Guidance
By ELIAS SCHISGALL 13/02/2026
Money
The AI Boom Is Coming for Apple’s Profit Margins
By ROLFE WINKLER & YANG JIE 02/02/2026
Money
Louis Vuitton Owner LVMH Closes Year-End Quarter With Weak Sales Growth
By MAURO ORRU 28/01/2026
Pinterest Tumbles as Advertiser Pullback Weighs on Fourth-Quarter Earnings, Guidance

The social-media company’s revenue increased 14%, falling short of estimates.

By ELIAS SCHISGALL
Fri, Feb 13, 2026 2 min

Pinterest shares tumbled after the company projected that revenue growth would slow in the first quarter, amid an advertiser pullback that weighed on its fourth-quarter earnings.

Shares slid 18.5% to $15.10 in after-hours trading after closing the market session down 2.9% at $18.54.

Pinterest reported a 14% increase in fourth-quarter revenue to $1.32 billion, up from $1.15 billion a year earlier, but short of analysts’ estimate of $1.33 billion, according to FactSet. The company posted 17% revenue growth in the third quarter.

The company expects growth to decelerate further in the current first quarter, projecting growth between 11% and 14%. It’s forecasting revenue between $951 million and $971 million.

Chief Executive Officer William Ready said the company needs to broaden its revenue mix and accelerate sales going forward.

“We are not satisfied with our Q4 revenue performance and believe it does not reflect what Pinterest can deliver over time,” he told analysts on a call Thursday. “We are moving with urgency to return over time to the mid-to-high-teens growth, or better than what we have been consistently delivering.”

Pinterest on Thursday recorded a profit of $277.1 million, or 41 cents a share, compared with its profit of $1.85 billion, or $2.68 a share, a year earlier. The $1.85 billion profit in 2024 included a $1.6 billion benefit from deferred tax assets.

Stripping out certain one-time items, Pinterest logged adjusted earnings of 67 cents a share, in line with analyst expectations, according to FactSet.

Ready said the company continues to see headwinds from larger retailers pulling back on advertising spending to protect their margins amid the impact from President Trump’s tariffs.

“We saw continued softness from this cohort of large retailers,” Ready said. “While we see opportunity over the long term, the near-term outlook for this cohort on our platform remains pressured given these headwinds.”

Ready said the company has expanded its footprint among mid-market and small-to-medium business advertisers, as well as international businesses. Still, he said Pinterest had a ways to go to offset the headwinds from larger advertisers, which may become even more pronounced in the current quarter.

Chief Financial Officer Julia Donnelly added that the company is looking to increase its investments in sales and research and development related to artificial-intelligence following the launch of its restructuring effort in January. Pinterest said last month that it would cut about 15% of its workforce, or approximately 700 jobs.

 

MOST POPULAR

Pure Amazon has begun journeys deep into Peru’s Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve, combining contemporary design, Indigenous craftsmanship and intimate wildlife encounters in one of the richest ecosystems on Earth.

Advertising legend John Singleton unveils an exclusive 16-residence Caroline Bay development, marking his latest high-end property play on the Central Coast.

Related Stories
Property
Dubai Luxury Home Sales Boomed in 2025, Hitting a Record 500 Deals
By Casey Farmer 13/01/2026
Property
NOOSA IGNITES WITH RECORD TROPHY HOMES
By Staff Writer 23/09/2025
Property of the Week
TOWERING AMBITION BY THE BAY ON THE MARKET
By Kirsten Craze 23/01/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop