Young Australians cut back on essentials while Baby Boomers spend freely
The spending gap between young and old Australians is growing, a new report reveals
3 min
Younger Australians in their mid-to-late-twenties have cut back on spending more than any other age group, while Baby Boomers aged over 65 years continue to spend above inflation, according to the latest CommBank iQ Cost of Living Insights Report. Those aged 25-29 years have reduced spending by 3.5 percent compared to last year, and they’re the only age group to have cut back on both essential and discretionary expenses.
CommBank and artificial intelligence company Quantium use de-identified payments data from CBA’s seven million customers every quarter to evaluate how Australians are spending their money and responding to today’s higher costs of living. One of the strongest trends is Australians reallocating more of their funds to cover essential expenses such as groceries and insurance and cutting back on discretionary items like apparel.
However, young Australians aged 25 to 29 are the only age cohort cutting back on essentials as well as discretionary items. During the March quarter, they spent 10 percent less on health insurance than they did in the March 2023 quarter, with CommBank saying this was the result of a 12 percent reduction in the number of people having coverage. They spent 7 percent less on utilities, 4 percent less on supermarket groceries and 3 percent less on insurance. The national trend encompassing all age groups was the opposite. Examples include a 3 percent increase in spending on groceries and an 8 percent increase on insurance.
“Compared to the national experience, where most people have had to increase spending on essentials, we are seeing the opposite trend amongst those in their twenties, with essential spending falling at a similar rate as discretionary,” said CommBank iQ Head of Innovation and Analytics Wade Tubman.
“This highlights the difficult choices people in this age bracket are making, with some having to make larger lifestyle changes like foregoing their health insurance altogether. The decrease in utilities spending could also suggest young Aussies are moving back in with parents or into shared accommodation to split costs.”
The average Australian is spending 3.6 percent more on essentials at an average of $1,472 per month, led by an 8 percent increase on insurance, 5 percent on medical and pharmacy, and a 3 percent bump on utilities, supermarket groceries and transport.
“Many Australians are having to allocate more of their wallet to essential living expenses, rather than other areas where they may prefer to direct their spending. The cost-of-living initiatives announced in the Federal Budget, for example the energy bill rebate, reflect the increased spending by Australians on essential items like energy,” Mr Tubman said.
The data showed continued growth in spending among Baby Boomers. “The wide gap in spending patterns across age groups continues to persist, with Australians in the 60 and older age bracket spending above inflation, especially on activities like travel, which is up 11 percent, general retail up 9 percent and eating out, up 7 percent,” Mr Tubman said.
The data shows that the older Australians are, the more money they are spending. Those aged 75-plus are spending 6.5 percent more at $2,408 per month. Those aged 70-74 are spending 5.1 percent more at $2,762 per month. Those aged 65-69 are spending 4.4 percent more at $3,253 per month and those aged 60-64 are spending 3.7 percent more at $3,331 per month. At the other end of the scale, Australians aged 25-29 are spending 3.5 percent less at $2,099 per month and those aged 30-34 are spending 0.6 percent less at $2,568 per month.
Australians living in regional areas are holding up better amid today’s high cost of living.
“While spending in regional areas continues to outpace that of metro areas, this gap has narrowed when compared to previous quarters. This raises the question whether people in metro locations have downsized their wallets to adjust to higher prices, and what spending growth remains is now ‘the new normal’,” Mr Tubman said.
Spending was most resilient in Queensland, the ACT and South Australia. The data shows per capita spending on travel and other discretionaries in Queensland was higher than the national average. Interestingly, both Queensland and South Australia have the fastest-growing retiree populations in Australia. Data just released by the Bureau of Statistics shows Queensland saw the highest increase in retiree residents between FY21 and FY23while South Australia saw the largest rise in the proportion of its population that is retired.
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
3 min
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.
The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
Three-Michelin-starred chef Massimiliano Alajmo will host an intimate Mediterranean sailing aboard Crystal Serenity, redefining fine dining at sea.
Travellers are swapping traditional sightseeing for immersive experiences, with Africa emerging as a must-visit destination.
