Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,822,183 (-0.43%)       Melbourne $1,078,813 (-0.33%)       Brisbane $1,264,391 (-0.87%)       Adelaide $1,112,777 (+0.12%)       Perth $1,149,218 (-1.55%)       Hobart $856,229 (+0.59%)       Darwin $886,634 (-5.18%)       Canberra $1,078,947 (-0.81%)       National Capitals $1,224,455 (-0.79%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $821,384 (-0.41%)       Melbourne $550,948 (-0.31%)       Brisbane $839,757 (+0.74%)       Adelaide $560,009 (-3.62%)       Perth $677,037 (-0.51%)       Hobart $581,017 (-0.34%)       Darwin $465,561 (+5.05%)       Canberra $509,688 (+0.21%)       National Capitals $653,196 (-0.17%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,369 (+370)       Melbourne 16,279 (+411)       Brisbane 7,326 (+232)       Adelaide 2,642 (+103)       Perth 5,799 (+92)       Hobart 869 (+34)       Darwin 127 (+5)       Canberra 1,161 (+61)       National Capitals 47,572 (+1,308)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,191 (+212)       Melbourne 6,775 (+66)       Brisbane 1,471 (+54)       Adelaide 413 (+27)       Perth 1,179 (+39)       Hobart 165 (+5)       Darwin 178 (-3)       Canberra 1,188 (+7)       National Capitals 20,560 (+407)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $830 ($0)       Melbourne $595 (+$5)       Brisbane $700 (+$10)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $640 (-$3)       Darwin $800 (-$10)       Canberra $720 (-$5)       National Capitals $719 (-$1)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $810 (-$10)       Melbourne $580 ($0)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 (-$10)       Hobart $520 (-$30)       Darwin $605 (-$35)       Canberra $598 (-$3)       National Capitals $639 (-$10)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,362 (+159)       Melbourne 7,007 (+228)       Brisbane 3,620 (+124)       Adelaide 1,477 (+64)       Perth 2,297 (+130)       Hobart 240 (+14)       Darwin 49 (+5)       Canberra 399 (+10)       National Capitals 20,451 (+734)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,450 (+241)       Melbourne 4,569 (+74)       Brisbane 1,844 (+33)       Adelaide 418 (-4)       Perth 652 (+14)       Hobart 77 (+9)       Darwin 76 (-4)       Canberra 640 (+41)       National Capitals 16,726 (+404)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.37% (↑)      Melbourne 2.87% (↑)      Brisbane 2.88% (↑)        Adelaide 3.04% (↓)     Perth 3.39% (↑)        Hobart 3.89% (↓)     Darwin 4.69% (↑)      Canberra 3.47% (↑)      National Capitals 3.05% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.13% (↓)     Melbourne 5.47% (↑)        Brisbane 4.02% (↓)     Adelaide 5.11% (↑)        Perth 5.38% (↓)       Hobart 4.65% (↓)       Darwin 6.76% (↓)       Canberra 6.10% (↓)       National Capitals 5.08% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 29.5 (↑)      Melbourne 29.5 (↑)      Brisbane 27.9 (↑)      Adelaide 24.4 (↑)      Perth 34.4 (↑)      Hobart 28.4 (↑)      Darwin 28.6 (↑)      Canberra 28.1 (↑)      National Capitals 28.8 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 28.3 (↑)      Melbourne 28.4 (↑)        Brisbane 26.7 (↓)     Adelaide 21.8 (↑)        Perth 32.8 (↓)     Hobart 31.9 (↑)      Darwin 35.3 (↑)      Canberra 39.7 (↑)      National Capitals 30.6 (↑)            
Share Button

Dating Apps Once Ran on Novelty. For Some Users, the Fun Is Over.

Ad campaigns for online dating companies have become flashpoints for frustrated online daters

By SARA ASHLEY O’BRIEN
Tue, Jun 25, 2024 9:13amGrey Clock 6 min

As online-dating apps court new and younger audiences, some of their marketing efforts are turning off daters instead.

Bumble last month apologised for ads making light of women so frustrated with online dating that they would consider celibacy. The League, a dating app targeting “the overly ambitious,” was called “ick-inducing” for its recent ad campaign, which included taglines like “Date someone with a 5-year-plan that makes you want to ovulate.” And Hinge’s years-long “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign has started to fall flat for longtime users still looking for love on their phones.

Online dating continues to play a lead role in the romantic lives of millions of Americans. Around half of all U.S. adults under 30 have used a dating site or app at some point in their lives, and one in 10 adults with partners say they met their significant other by dating online, according to Pew Research Center data. And the industry’s biggest players, Match Group and Bumble, now generate annual revenues north of $3.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

But the ad campaigns have high stakes for online dating companies trying to achieve the right mix of user acquisition and pricing power to re-interest Wall Street in a saturated sector.

Online-dating growth has been slowing. Paying users declined 6% in the first quarter of the year at Match Group, whose portfolio includes the League, Tinder and Hinge, compared with a 3% dip in the first quarter of 2023. The Bumble app grew paying users 18% in the first quarter, compared with 31% growth in the period a year earlier.

Shares in both have fallen this year even as the S&P 500 rose. And some singles have become perhaps as wary as investors.

Nearly half of all online daters and more than half of female daters say their experiences have been negative, according to Pew , and a growing tide of users are sharing their dissatisfaction in popular Facebook forums and on TikTok. People bemoan a perceived rise in bad dating etiquette such as “ghosting” and the sending of unsolicited sexual messages, and blame the way online romance makes it easier to discard potential partners at a touch of a button. “Hacks,” or tricks designed to game the apps for better dates, abound, demonstrating the shortcomings of their designs.

And the companies’ growing emphasis on pricier premium services is giving users new reasons to scrutinise the algorithmically driven path to romance.

Bumble made its name as a free app that only let women make the first move, for example. But since 2016, it has charged for advantages such as unlimited “swipes” to connect with prospects. The most expensive plan today costs $80 a month. Nonpaying users on Bumble and other apps can hit a limit, which some say leaves them taunted by the nagging fear that their perfect partners are hidden just on the other side of a paywall.

In this environment, new ad campaigns have become a release valve for the tension.

Lidiane Jones, CEO, Bumble, at The Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything Festival in New York on May 21. PHOTO: GARY HE FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Failure to launch

Bumble users had hoped change was on the way after a teaser campaign depicted a discouraged dater joining a convent but happily leaving after being handed the Bumble app. “We’ve changed so you don’t have to,” one of the ads promised.

“At this point, it’s the app’s responsibility not to rebrand, but to pivot technologically,” said Michelle Khouri , the founder of creator platform Recordical , who has been using dating apps on and off for 10 years following her divorce from a man she met through online dating service eHarmony.

But Bumble’s big move wasn’t a fundamental overhaul: The company was letting women put questions on their profiles to which men they matched with could respond without a specific invitation.

Disappointment became backlash when the full ad campaign included billboards that declared, “Thou shalt not give up on dating and become a nun” and “You know full well a vow of celibacy is not the answer.”

Female daters often thinly disguise their dissatisfaction with modern dating by joking about giving it up for a life of spinsterhood, and Bumble had done what all marketers try to do—joined the conversation 

The problem for many was that Bumble’s quips about nunneries located the problem in daters’ resilience, as opposed to the dating apps themselves, and the unfavourable dating culture some users say the apps’ owners have been complicit in fuelling.

“Bumble was a brand that built its identity on empowering women and then they absolutely laughed in our faces,” said Michelle Wintersteen, the founder and chief executive of branding and marketing agency MKW Creative and a former Bumble user who grew frustrated by its paywalls.

Bumble took down the billboards and made several public apologies.

“We just made a mistake in how that landed. It was not good and we felt really terrible about it,” Bumble CEO Lidiane Jones said at a Wall Street Journal event last month.

Jones added in an emailed statement that the company is enhancing its internal and external review processes, and “actively engaging in conversations to ensure our marketing tone matches the 10 years Bumble has dedicated to championing women and creating safe, respectful, and empowering spaces for connection.”

Some online-dating executives and observers think the gripes with dating apps are largely an extension of age-old ennui over the search for lasting love.

“This is not a new phenomenon, and I think that dating apps have crystallised and brought those concerns to the fore, primarily because the prior institutions that were responsible for connecting individuals—such as family, friends, churches, other homes of worship—were not able to assume blame in the same way,” said Jess Carbino, a sociologist who has worked as a consultant for Bumble and Tinder.

Pickup lines

When the League introduced its “Be a GoalDigger” brand campaign in 2023, its first big marketing effort since being acquired by Match Group in 2022, some had visceral reactions.

“Whoever is behind this truly thought they were like, hitting Gen -Z, being super edgy and cool,” said the TikTok user who reported getting the “ick” from its campaign. “In reality, it is the most millennial, cringy thing that makes you want to actually convulse.”

The app has “never been afraid of speaking up or speaking out about the kind of people that The League attracts,” said Lisa Kraynak, senior vice president of marketing for the League, in a statement. In addition to its ad mentioning ovulation, others read: “Find Your Goal Mate” and “Date Someone With Big Goal Energy.”

“We know that we aren’t for everyone, and that is a core part of our value proposition,” Kraynak added, noting that a number of people responded well to it.

Unlike apps such as Tinder and Bumble, the League requires profile approval to join. On the app, users get three to five prospects a day unless they upgrade to become a paying member, which runs $99 a week or $399 for a three-month subscription. Once a match is made in the app, users have 14 days to initiate a conversation before the matches expire.

Fighting flakes

These components, as well as features such as a “flakiness score” indicating which users have a habit of matching but not chatting, are why Kraynak said the League is “designed to combat the dissatisfaction with apps today .”

Tinder has leaned away from the celebration of singledom that it embraced in a 2018 brand campaign that called single “a terrible thing to waste.” While the app has long been associated with hookups, the company has more recently emphasised the various relationships that can result from its app. Its marketing now romanticizes “a toothbrush at their place” and “comfortable silences,” all while it seeks to upsell users.

“It was about shedding a perception that was too narrow and not accurate,” said Melissa Hobley, chief marketing officer at Tinder.

Hinge, the Match Group brand that has long positioned itself as an app for finding relationships rather than hookups, continues to iterate on its “Designed to Be Deleted” campaign launched in 2019. The company has refreshed the campaign every year since then with the same tagline.

On social media, some dissatisfied users say they have deleted the app—not because they found love but because the app didn’t work for them. Hinge said every feature is designed to help daters be intentional and that it is looking for ways to address dating burnout.

Chief Marketing Officer Jackie Jantos said Hinge is the fastest-growing major dating app.

“‘Designed to Be Deleted,’ as an idea and a marketing program, continues to help us build our base of users,” Jantos said.

Match Group said Hinge’s direct revenue grew 50% in the first quarter of the year as paying members increased 31% and revenue per payer rose 14%. It offers two types of subscriptions, Hinge+ and HingeX, which start at $14.99 and $24.99, respectively, a week.

More recently, the company partnered with a social-media brand that interviews couples on the street, to circulate their love stories that involve Hinge.

“We know that our best growth comes from organic success stories of people meeting on Hinge,” added Jantos.



MOST POPULAR

From elevated skincare to handcrafted home pieces, this year’s most thoughtful gifts go beyond the expected.

A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Studies Suggest Red Meat May Help Prevent Alzheimer’s
By ALLYSIA FINLEY 21/04/2026
Lifestyle
ASTON MARTIN VANQUISH TAKES TOP HONOURS AT CAR OF THE YEAR
By Jeni O'Dowd 20/04/2026
Lifestyle
THE MOTHER’S DAY EDIT: GIFTS THAT FEEL PERSONAL, NOT PREDICTABLE
By Jeni O'Dowd 15/04/2026
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon

The lunar flyby would be the deepest humans have traveled in space in decades.

By Micah Maidenberg
Mon, Mar 30, 2026 4 min

It’s go time for the highest-stakes mission at NASA in more than 50 years.  

On April 1, the agency is set to launch four astronauts around the moon, the deepest human spaceflight since the final Apollo lunar landing in 1972.  

The launch window for Artemis II , as the mission is called, opens at 6:24 p.m. ET. 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration teams have been preparing the vehicles to depart from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on the planned roughly 10-day trip. Crew members have trained for years for this moment. 

Reid Wiseman, the NASA astronaut serving as mission commander, said he doesn’t fear taking the voyage. A widower, he does worry at times about what he is putting his daughters through. 

“I could have a very comfortable life for them,” Wiseman said in an interview last September.  

“But I’m also a human, and I see the spirit in their eyes that is burning in my soul too. And so we’ve just got to never stop going.” 

Wiseman’s crewmates on Artemis II are NASA’s Victor Glover and Christina Koch, as well as Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen. 

Photo: NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft being rolled out at night. Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/Getty Images

What are the goals for Artemis II? 

The biggest one: Safely fly the crew on vehicles that have never carried astronauts before.  

The towering Space Launch System rocket has the job of lofting a vehicle called Orion into space and on its way to the moon.  

Orion is designed to carry the crew around the moon and back. Myriad systems on the ship—life support, communications, navigation—will be tested with the astronauts on board. 

SLS and Orion don’t have much flight experience. The vehicles last flew in 2022, when the agency completed its uncrewed Artemis I mission . 

How is the mission expected to unfold? 

Artemis II will begin when SLS takes off from a launchpad in Florida with Orion stacked on top of it.  

The so-called upper stage of SLS will later separate from the main part of the rocket with Orion attached, and use its engine to set up the latter vehicle for a push to the moon. 

After Orion separates from the upper stage, it will conduct what is called a translunar injection—the engine firing that commits Orion to soaring out to the moon. It will fly to the moon over the course of a few days and travel around its far side. 

Orion will face a tough return home after speeding through space. As it hits Earth’s atmosphere, Orion will be flying at 25,000 miles an hour and face temperatures of 5,000 degrees as it slows down. The capsule is designed to land under parachutes in the Pacific Ocean, not far from San Diego. 

Water photo: NASA’s Orion capsule after its splash-down in the Pacific Ocean in 2022 for the Artemis I mission. Mario Tama/Press Pool

Is it possible Artemis II will be delayed? 

Yes.  

For safety reasons, the agency won’t launch if certain tough weather conditions roll through the Cape Canaveral, Fla., area. Delays caused by technical problems are possible, too. NASA has other dates identified for the mission if it doesn’t begin April 1. 

Who are the astronauts flying on Artemis II? 

The crew will be led by Wiseman, a retired Navy pilot who completed military deployments before joining NASA’s astronaut corps. He traveled to the International Space Station in 2014. 

Two other astronauts will represent NASA during the mission: Glover, an experienced Navy pilot, and Koch, who began her career as an electrical engineer for the agency and once spent a year at a research station in the South Pole. Both have traveled to the space station before. 

Hansen is a military pilot who joined Canada’s astronaut corps in 2009. He will be making his first trip to space. 

Koch’s participation in Artemis II will mark the first time a woman has flown beyond orbits near Earth. Glover and Hansen will be the first African-American and non-American astronauts, respectively, to do the same. 

What will the astronauts do during the flight? 

The astronauts will evaluate how Orion flies, practice emergency procedures and capture images of the far side of the moon for scientific and exploration purposes (they may become the first humans to see parts of the far side of the lunar surface). Health-tracking projects of the astronauts are designed to inform future missions. 

Those efforts will play out in Orion’s crew module, which has about two minivans worth of living area.  

On board, the astronauts will spend about 30 minutes a day exercising, using a device that allows them to do dead lifts, rowing and more. Sleep will come in eight-hour stretches in hammocks. 

There is a custom-made warmer for meals, with beef brisket and veggie quiche on the menu.  

Each astronaut is permitted two flavored beverages a day, including coffee. The crew will hold one hourlong shared meal each day.  

The Universal Waste Management System—that’s the toilet—uses air flow to pull fluid and solid waste away into containers. 

What happens after Artemis II? 

Assuming it goes well, NASA will march on to Artemis III, scheduled for next year. During that operation, NASA plans to launch Orion with crew members on board and have the ship practice docking with lunar-lander vehicles that Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin have been developing. The rendezvous operations will occur relatively close to Earth. 

NASA hopes that its contractors and the agency itself are ready to attempt one or more lunar landing missions in 2028. Many current and former spaceflight officials are skeptical that timeline is feasible. 

MOST POPULAR

An opulent Ryde home, packed with cinema, pool, sauna and more, is hitting the auction block with a $1 reserve.

Australia’s market is on the move again, and not always where you’d expect. We’ve found the surprise suburbs where prices are climbing fastest.

Related Stories
Property
BYRON BAY RENOVATION TRANSFORMS COASTAL HOME INTO MULTI-GENERATIONAL RETREAT
By Jeni O'Dowd 26/02/2026
Property
MOSAIC’S $200M BURLEIGH PROJECT NEARS SELL-OUT AFTER $180M IN SALES
By Jeni O'Dowd 10/04/2026
Property
Lowes boss lists $30m Whale Beach super-estate
By Kirsten Craze 05/12/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop