Best Stock-Fund Managers of 2022
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,797,295 (-0.31%)       Melbourne $1,075,632 (-0.17%)       Brisbane $1,249,605 (-0.00%)       Adelaide $1,097,216 (-0.97%)       Perth $1,122,957 (-1.33%)       Hobart $865,909 (+0.08%)       Darwin $845,396 (-2.25%)       Canberra $1,062,919 (-0.56%)       National Capitals $1,207,421 (-0.51%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820,260 (+0.40%)       Melbourne $553,256 (+0.31%)       Brisbane $796,351 (-1.62%)       Adelaide $595,818 (+3.94%)       Perth $683,075 (-0.20%)       Hobart $581,624 (-0.60%)       Darwin $496,326 (+5.24%)       Canberra $499,963 (+0.25%)       National Capitals $650,385 (+0.27%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,543 (-93)       Melbourne 16,685 (+164)       Brisbane 7,546 (+68)       Adelaide 2,737 (+47)       Perth 5,954 (+96)       Hobart 847 (-33)       Darwin 130 (+7)       Canberra 1,219 (+19)       National Capitals 48,661 (+275)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,158 (-16)       Melbourne 6,926 (+89)       Brisbane 1,459 (-16)       Adelaide 413 (-7)       Perth 1,233 (+17)       Hobart 165 (+6)       Darwin 174 (-3)       Canberra 1,201 (+42)       National Capitals 20,729 (+112)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $850 (+$10)       Melbourne $600 (+$5)       Brisbane $700 ($0)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $643 (-$8)       Darwin $720 (-$30)       Canberra $740 (+$20)       National Capitals $714 (+$)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820 (+$10)       Melbourne $585 (+$5)       Brisbane $650 ($0)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $520 ($0)       Darwin $640 (+$30)       Canberra $595 ($0)       National Capitals $645 (+$6)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,384 (-35)       Melbourne 6,776 (-135)       Brisbane 3,626 (-33)       Adelaide 1,453 (+34)       Perth 2,269 (+4)       Hobart 224 (+8)       Darwin 43 (-12)       Canberra 426 (+6)       National Capitals 20,201 (-163)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,462 (+24)       Melbourne 4,615 (+49)       Brisbane 1,888 (+11)       Adelaide 430 (+6)       Perth 659 (+2)       Hobart 79 (+1)       Darwin 74 (+2)       Canberra 650 (+1)       National Capitals 16,857 (+96)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.46% (↑)      Melbourne 2.90% (↑)      Brisbane 2.91% (↑)      Adelaide 3.08% (↑)      Perth 3.47% (↑)        Hobart 3.86% (↓)       Darwin 4.43% (↓)     Canberra 3.62% (↑)      National Capitals 3.08% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 5.20% (↑)      Melbourne 5.50% (↑)      Brisbane 4.24% (↑)        Adelaide 4.80% (↓)     Perth 5.33% (↑)      Hobart 4.65% (↑)        Darwin 6.71% (↓)       Canberra 6.19% (↓)     National Capitals 5.16% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 32.8 (↑)      Melbourne 32.3 (↑)      Brisbane 30.6 (↑)      Adelaide 26.4 (↑)      Perth 36.7 (↑)      Hobart 29.8 (↑)        Darwin 26.1 (↓)     Canberra 32.5 (↑)      National Capitals 30.9 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 31.4 (↑)      Melbourne 30.6 (↑)      Brisbane 29.8 (↑)      Adelaide 24.1 (↑)      Perth 35.2 (↑)      Hobart 29.6 (↑)        Darwin 30.4 (↓)       Canberra 39.1 (↓)       National Capitals 31.3 (↓)           
Share Button

Best Stock-Fund Managers of 2022

In a brutal year for investing, a handful of stock pickers managed to post positive returns. The winner was up nearly 32%.

By SUZANNE MCGEE
Wed, Jan 11, 2023 9:20amGrey Clock 6 min

Well at least it wasn’t as dreadful as the Great Depression. Or even the financial crisis of 2008.

But for any mutual-fund manager trying to cope with the sea of red ink that flooded financial markets in 2022, that’s meagre consolation. In a year when soaring interest rates and sky-high inflation left the S&P 500 index with a 19% loss and triggered an even worse year for the bond market, an estimated $8.2 trillion of stock-market wealth in the U.S. simply evaporated.

Even most of those value- and income-focused mutual-fund managers who “outperformed” the broad index did so by confining their losses to the single digits—little comfort for investors.

Indeed, of the 1,410 actively managed mutual funds that met the criteria for inclusion in the Winners’ Circle, The Wall Street Journal’s quarterly survey of top-performing stock managers on a 12-month basis, a mere 40 wrapped up 2022 in positive territory. The average loss for the whole group, according to data provided by Morningstar Direct, was 18.2%.

To outperform in 2022 required a fund’s manager to have taken outsize positions in the energy sector—the only one of the 10 industries that make up the S&P 500 to record a gain in 2022. In fact, the magnitude of the rally in energy resulted in the sector coming within a whisker of doubling in its weight within that large-cap market index, hitting 5.23%.

And energy bets were what powered three Kinetics funds to top positions in the Winners’ Circle—not only the winning fund, but the runner-up and the No. 4 finisher.

 

“It seems as if we’re always a contrarian, but recently that has been working for us,” says James Davolos, a portfolio manager at Horizon Kinetics LLC, who serves on the investment committee for the three Kinetics funds. Between 30% and 60% of the assets of No. 1 fund Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX), runner-up Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and No. 4 finisher Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKNX) were invested in energy-related holdings over the course of 2022, he says.

Kinetics Small Cap took home the crown with its 31.9% gain. The Paradigm fund gained 29.2%, and Market Opportunities gained nearly 15%.

Contest requirements

To qualify for inclusion in this Winners’ Circle survey, funds must be actively managed U.S.-stock funds with more than $50 million in assets and a record of three years or more, as well as meet a handful of other criteria. The survey excludes index and sector funds, funds that employ leverage strategies and most quantitative funds. The results are calculated by Morningstar Direct.

Important to note: These are stock funds that outperformed in specific market environments, and may have elements that make them unsuitable for some investors, ranging from their fee structure to their longer-term performance or volatility.

Mr. Davolos says he has no plans to abandon his highly concentrated and contrarian investment approach with the dawn of a new calendar year.

“The world isn’t going to quickly revert back to the way it was in 2018 or 2019,” he says. “We think we’re in the early stages of a transition to a five- or seven-year transition period. We were positioned for that in areas like energy and other hard assets that we thought would be more resilient. And we believe that most businesses will continue to face a difficult operating environment and a compression in their profit margins.”

That’s why Mr. Davolos and his team have designed the Kinetics portfolios to have hefty overweight positions in companies and industries that he believes will be able to demonstrate more-resilient profit margins. Energy royalty companies—and especially Texas Pacific Land Corp., which represented anywhere from 50.9% of assets in the Market Opportunities Fund to as much as 64.8% of the Paradigm fund’s holdings—will remain a focus, he says. Texas Pacific is one of the biggest landowners in Texas and funnels oil-and-gas royalties that it earns from those drilling on its land directly to investors.

But Mr. Davolos is also looking for opportunities to invest in other areas he believes will be equally robust in face of economic headwinds, whose stocks don’t reflect that potential.

One sector that he finds of particular interest is precious metals, and once again, he’s emphasising royalty income as a way to profit from what he sees as strong fundamentals for the sector with lower risk.

“Gold, in particular, is likely to do well in a period of draconian risk aversion and higher or rising interest rates, as people look for a store of value,” says Mr. Davolos. He also expects precious metals to respond positively to any geopolitical shocks or uncertainty, just as energy did in 2022. But he prefers to avoid exploration and production companies and the cyclicality and risk inherent in the profit cycle of these businesses, and instead looks to companies like Franco-Nevada Corp., another royalty play. “Streams of royalty income are more predictable and rewarding,” he insists.

While none of the top-performing Kinetics funds could be described as being diversified, Mr. Davolos also is keeping an eye open for opportunities to add other inflation-resistant, value-priced securities to these portfolios. For instance, noting that “government contracts are likely to be immune to inflation,” he has established and built on positions in CACI International Inc., a defence contractor that emphasises communications, cybersecurity and other technology services. He also likes Brookfield Asset Management as a way to indirectly profit from government spending on infrastructure, and has hung on to holdings in financial exchanges like CME Group Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. “Any company that provides an intermediary service—connecting two counterparties that are trying to manage their own risks—will remain critical” to the economy, he argues.

A faithful finish

Unsurprisingly, other top-performing managers in the 2022 year-end Winners’ Circle also beat the odds and triumphed by bucking conventional wisdom.

The year’s third-place finisher is one of the smallest funds in the survey. Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) may have only $51.7 million in assets, but it turned in an impressive return for its investors, wrapping up the year with a 21.2% gain. And the fund is managed by Schwartz Investment Counsel in Plymouth, Mich., which oversees a universe of other portfolios, including Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX), the Catholic-values fund that ended the year with a 4.2% advance, putting it in 11th place in our survey.

 

Both funds are overseen by a team headed by George Schwartz, the founder, chairman and CEO of Schwartz Investment Counsel. He and son Tim, the firm’s chief investment officer, began adding energy stocks to Schwartz Value a few years ago, just as the pressure on pension funds and other mutual funds to divest their fossil-fuel holdings began to take effect.

“Our focus is on buying out-of-favour stocks when they are cheap, and when we believe they have a great recovery potential,” the elder Mr. Schwartz says. “When the energy sector had gotten so depressed it was ridiculous, we bought those stocks aggressively.” By the end of 2022, 41% of Schwartz Value’s assets were invested in an array of energy companies. “That decision has been a big boon for us,” he says.

Like Mr. Davolos, Mr. Schwartz is a fan of Texas Pacific Land, by far the fund’s single largest holding at 27.6% of fund assets. But he adopts a more, ahem, catholic (as in “all encompassing”) approach to energy investing, allocating capital to major global integrated producers and refiners like Chevron Corp., exploration-and-production companies such as Devon Energy Corp. and service companies like Schlumberger NV.

A Yeti fan

And he, too, is casting a (slightly) wider net. While hanging on to precious metals investments (Franco-Nevada and producer Barrick Gold) and what he sees as core value holdings in Berkshire Hathaway, last year Mr. Schwartz added new positions in an array of specialty manufacturing companies like A.O. Smith Corp. (water treatment and heating) and Yeti Holdings Inc. (drink coolers, drinkware and related gear). One of his largest new holdings is in RH, formerly known as Restoration Hardware, the specialty retailer of luxury furniture. “We like companies that are out of the mainstream,” he says, adding that RH shares now change hands for 15% more than the average price Schwartz Counsel paid to establish its position starting in September 2022.

 

Scott Barbee, manager of the No. 5 fund in the Winners’ Circle, Aegis Value Fund (AVALX), echoes his fellow outperformers in crediting the energy sector with his portfolio’s 2022 return of 10.5%.

“Back in the early stages of the pandemic, when investors were flocking to the big-name technology stocks, energy stood out like a sore thumb,” he says. Selling pressure from sustainable-investing funds and others trying to avoid fossil fuels “frightened everyone away from the sector.” But Mr. Barbee, who seeks out cyclically depressed businesses that he believes are poised for a rebound, opted to invest in the sector beginning in early 2021. “They were trading cheaply, they had long-lived asset bases, and their balance sheets are in amazing condition,” he says. The latter consideration became particularly important as interest rates began to soar last year; companies with lower debt levels remain insulated from this source of pressure.

By the end of 2022, Aegis Value had 37% of its assets invested in the fossil-fuels area, in holdings ranging from coal producer Hallador Energy Co., to International Petroleum Corp. and Akita Drilling Ltd.

“The tailwinds for this sector are likely to be with us for some time,” Mr. Barbee says. But he’s taking some of his energy holdings off the table, and redeploying that capital into other sectors. He added to the fund’s exposure to the metals mining industry (its largest position has been copper giant Amerigo Resources Ltd.) and boosted its stake in precious metals by investing in Centerra Gold Inc.—adding to a list of gold producers that already included Orezone Gold Corp. and Equinox Gold Corp. “This is another neglected corner of the market, and we believe our holdings will do well at current gold prices and phenomenally if gold goes higher” in response to inflation and interest-rate trends, he says.

None of the top-performing managers of 2022 voiced much optimism about the likelihood of seeing a broad market recovery in 2023.

“How much will be needed to bring inflation under control?” says Mr. Barbee, referring to the prospect of further interest-rate increases. “That’s why we emphasise companies with strong balance sheets, since they’re more likely to get through whatever we’ve got coming.”



MOST POPULAR

Automobili Lamborghini and Babolat have expanded their collaboration with five new colourways for the ultra-exclusive BL.001 racket, limited to just 50 pieces worldwide.

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.

Related Stories
Property
AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY BOOM IS MASKING A DEEPER ECONOMIC PROBLEM
By Paul Miron, Opinion 01/05/2026
Money
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon
By Micah Maidenberg 30/03/2026
Money
Saudi Arabia Sees a Spike to $180 Oil if Energy Shock Persists Past April
By SUMMER SAID, RYAN DEZEMBER AND DAVID UBERTI 20/03/2026
AUSTRALIA’S PROPERTY BOOM IS MASKING A DEEPER ECONOMIC PROBLEM

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.

By Paul Miron, Opinion
Fri, May 1, 2026 3 min

For decades, Australia has leaned into its reputation as the lucky country. But luck, as it turns out, is not an economic strategy. 

What once looked like resilience now appears increasingly fragile. Beneath the surface of rising property values and steady headline growth, the Australian economy is showing signs of strain that can no longer be ignored. 

Recent data paints a sobering picture. Australia has recorded one of the largest declines in real household disposable income per capita among advanced economies.  

Wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, meaning many Australians are working harder for less. On a per capita basis, income growth has stalled and, at times, reversed. 

And yet, on paper, things still look relatively solid. GDP is growing. Unemployment remains low. But that growth is increasingly being driven by population expansion rather than productivity.  

More people are contributing to output, but not necessarily improving living standards. 

That distinction matters. 

For years, Australia’s economic success rested on a powerful combination: a once-in-a-generation mining boom, a credit-fuelled housing market, strong migration and a property sector that rarely faltered. Between 1991 and 2020, the country avoided recession entirely, building enormous wealth in the process. 

But much of that wealth is tied to property. Around two-thirds of household wealth sits in real estate, inflated by leverage and sustained by demand. It has worked, until now. 

The problem is the supply side of the economy has not kept up. 

Housing supply is falling behind population growth. Rental vacancies are near record lows.  

Construction firms are collapsing at an elevated rate. At the same time, massive infrastructure pipelines are competing with residential projects for labour and materials, pushing costs higher and delaying delivery. 

The result is a system under pressure from all angles. 

Despite near full employment, productivity growth has stagnated for years. In simple terms, Australians are putting in more hours without generating more output per hour. The economy is running faster, butgoing nowhere. 

Meanwhile, government spending continues to expand. Public debt is approaching $1 trillion, with spending now accounting for a record share of GDP.  

The gap between spending and revenue has been filled by borrowing for decades, adding further pressure to an already stretched system. 

This is where the uncomfortable question emerges. 

Has Australia become too reliant on a model driven by rising property values, expanding credit and population growth? 

As asset prices rise, households feel wealthier and borrow more. Banks lend more. Governments collect more revenue. Migration fuels demand. The cycle reinforces itself. 

But when productivity stalls and debt outpaces real income, the system begins to depend on constant expansion just to stay stable. 

It is not a collapse scenario. But it is not particularly stable either. 

Nowhere is this more evident than in housing. 

The National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet current completion rates are well below that pace. With approvals falling and construction costs rising, the gap between supply and demand is widening, not narrowing. 

Housing is also one of the largest contributors to inflation, with costs rising sharply across rents, construction and utilities. Yet the private sector, from small investors to major developers, is struggling to make projects stack up in the current environment. 

This brings the policy debate into sharper focus. 

Tax settings such as negative gearing and capital gains concessions have undoubtedly boosted demand over the past two decades. But they have also supported supply. Removing them may ease prices briefly, but risks deepening the supply shortage over time. 

That is the paradox. 

Policies designed to make housing more affordable can, in practice, make the shortage worse if they discourage development. The optics may appeal, but the economics are far less forgiving. 

It is also worth remembering that most property investors are not institutional players. The majority own just one investment property. They are, in many cases, ordinary Australians using real estate as their primary wealth-building tool. 

Undermining that system without replacing it with a viable alternative risks unintended consequences, from reduced supply to higher rents and increased inflation. 

So where does that leave Australia? 

At a crossroads. 

The country can continue to rely on population growth and rising asset prices to drive economic activity. Or it can shift towards a model built on productivity, innovation and sustainable growth. 

The latter is harder. It requires structural reform, long-term thinking and political discipline. 

But it is also the only path that leads to genuine, lasting prosperity. 

The question is no longer whether Australia has been lucky. 

It is whether it can evolve before that luck runs out. 

Paul Miron is the Co-Founder & Fund Manager of Msquared Capital. 

MOST POPULAR

A luxury lifestyle might cost more than it used to, but how does it compare with cities around the world?

Powerhouse real estate couple Avi Khan and Kaylea Sayer welcome their daughter while balancing record-breaking careers, proving success and family can grow side by side.

Related Stories
Travel
BHUTAN IN EVERY SEASON: A KINGDOM OF TIMELESS DISCOVERY
By Staff Writer 23/04/2026
Property
Lowes boss lists $30m Whale Beach super-estate
By Kirsten Craze 05/12/2025
Lifestyle
DIVE INTO LUXURY WITH FIJI’S CORAL GARDENER EXPERIENCE
By Jeni O'Dowd 02/09/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop