Amazon shares gained ground in late trading Thursday after the company posted better-than-expected financial results for the September quarter.
Amazon (ticker: AMZN) said third-quarter sales were $143.1 billion, up 13% from a year ago, accelerating from 11% growth in the June quarter, and above the high end of the company’s guidance range.
Profits were 94 cents a share, well above the consensus of 58 cents. Net income of $9.9 billion included a $1.1 billion pretax noncash gain on the company’s stake in Rivian Automotive (RIVN).
Amazon Web Services revenue was $23.1 billion, up 12.3% from a year ago, which was about in line with Wall Street estimates, and consistent with the 12.2% increase one quarter earlier.
Amazon CFO Brian Olsavsky said in a call with reporters that the company increased AWS revenue by about $900 million versus three months earlier. He also noted that customers continue to focus on spending optimisation, but that the process is slowing down. He declined to say whether the growth rate for AWS has now bottomed.
Amazon shares were trading around breakeven heading into the company’s conference call late Thursday, but they moved higher after CEO Andy Jassy said on the call that AWS booked some large contracts late in the third quarter. They won’t start showing up in results until the fourth quarter, he said.
The stock was up 4.6% in late trading as of 6:15 p.m.
Heading into the earnings report, AWS growth had decelerated for six straight quarters, falling to 12.2% in the June quarter, from 39.5% in the last quarter of 2021. The slowing growth reflects a recent focus from cloud customers on “optimising” their cloud spending, figuring out how to get more value from their growing cloud outlays.
This week’s results from cloud rivals Alphabet (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) both noted that the optimization trend is continuing. The Google Cloud business posted disappointing results in the quarter, while Microsoft topped expectations. Amazon largely split the difference. Amazon bulls have expected AWS growth to begin accelerating soon as corporate spending budgets loosen and a focus on AI workloads expands, but there was no big jump in the latest quarter.
Operating income was $11.2 billion, well above the company’s forecast range of $5.5 billion to $8.5 billion. That incudes an operating profit in North America of $4.3 billion, reversing a loss of $400 million in the year ago quarter. AWS had an operating profit of $7 billion, up from $5.4 billion in the year-earlier period.
“We had a strong third quarter as our cost to serve and speed of delivery in our stores business took another step forward, our AWS growth continued to stabilise, our advertising revenue grew robustly, and overall operating income and free cash flow rose significantly,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy in a press release.
Shares of Amazon were up 3.4% in late trading following the report.
Online store sales were $57.3 billion, up 7%, improving from 4% growth in the June quarter, while third-party services revenue was $343 billion, up 20%, versus 18% growth in the June quarter.
Amazon said subscription services revenue—mostly Amazon Prime—was $10.2 billion, up 14%. Sales at physical stores were $5 billion, up 6%.
Advertising revenue jumped 26% in the quarter, from 22% in the June quarter, to $12.1 billion. Olsavsky said the company isn’t seeing an impact from geopolitics. That’s a contrast from Meta, which noted on its earnings call Wednesday that the company was seeing some slowdown in spending tied to the outbreak of violence in the Middle East.
Olsavsky noted that ad growth has outpaced overall company growth, driven by improved targeting and higher click-through rates.
For the fourth quarter, Amazon sees sales of between $160 billion and $167 billion, with operating income ranging from $7 billion to $11 billion. Wall Street estimates for the quarter have called for revenue of $167.2 billion, up 12%, with operating income of $8.7 billion.
Amazon shares were down 1.5% in Thursday’s regular session.
Chris Dixon, a partner who led the charge, says he has a ‘very long-term horizon’
Millennials and Gen Z are turning to peers instead of professionals for financial advice. They don’t trust banks, and they are tired of information overload.
Colin Saint-Vil got his money education at the dim sum cart, over a steamy plate of pork buns and turnip cake.
A friend offered to pick up the whole tab on her credit card, “for the points.” At the time, six years ago, “for the points” meant nothing to Saint-Vil, now a 30-year-old planning manager in Brooklyn, so he pressed for more details. They lingered over the dim sum meal as a larger conversation unfolded about annual percentage rates, credit-card debt, payment schedules and more.
Millennials and members of Gen Z prefer to seek financial advice from each other than from parents or from financial professionals. They don’t like overwhelming spreadsheets and marketing material written in seemingly foreign languages. They don’t trust big banks and institutions trying to sell them on investment strategies—as many were raised around the late 2000s financial-crisis. And, they are not wrong: There is a lot to be learned from comparing numbers with peers—from sharing salaries to talking out big decisions like home or car purchases.
Saint-Vil said when his father was his age, he had already begun investing in real estate, but with property prices now so high and mortgage rates only just beginning to fall, he said he couldn’t imagine being able to follow in his father’s footsteps. He, like many millennials and Gen Z-ers, describe their finances as “fairly good” these days, though they hold a negative picture of the greater economy, according to a new poll of 18 to 29-year-olds from the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School.
Millennials are still reeling from the impact of back-to-back recessions, all while large bank closures and investing scams dominate the headlines. Younger people report a feeling of “financial avoidance” exacerbated by high inflation and the pandemic-era budgeting.
As of June 2023, Gallup polling revealed a historically low faith in U.S. institutions, with younger generations voicing high skepticism. According to Gallup, only 9% of respondents aged 18 to 34 expressed “a great deal” of confidence in banks; meanwhile, 47% and 28% said they have “some” or “very little,” respectively.
But when it comes to winning back young consumers, these same financial institutions haven’t quite given up, and are rolling out new outreach programs and robo advisors, some of which have helped bridge a connection with Gen Z and millennials, said Keith Niedermeier, clinical professor of marketing at Indiana University. But many young people still say they prefer do-it-yourself investing platforms like Robinhood and Acorns over traditional advisers at more established wealth-management firms.
Andrew Ragusa, a real-estate broker based on Long Island, blamed the twin problems of low housing inventory and high home prices for postponing younger buyers’ ownership. The median age of a first-time home buyer in the U.S. is 35-years old as of 2023, according to data from the National Association of Realtors. That is slightly down from an record high of 36 in 2022, but still two years older than the median age in 2021, which is representative of an ageing first-time buyer trend.
When he talks with younger clients now, he detects a gloomy sentiment. “They try to be optimistic, but the overall sentiment is ‘This is supposed to be the American dream: we get a house and we get some financial security and I just have to have faith it will all work out in the end.’ But they don’t have faith it will.”
Fear and shame around being able to buy or accomplish as much as one’s parents might have financially can crop up when millennials talk to elders about their financial frustrations, said Jodi Kaus, director of Kansas State University’s student financial planning centre, Powercat Financial. She’s found that lessons and advice from friends are often more constructive.
Kaus leads a peer-to-peer financial planning centre that pairs up students to work through financial issues. She works to pair people with similar backgrounds: graduate students with graduate students or international students with international students. Talking with someone only a few years removed from your current situation means you’re better able to internalize the messages and execute on their advice, Kaus said.
“Early on, parents even say ‘Are you sure students can help my child?’” she said. “And I say ‘I am more than confident that they can help each other.’
Sharing money tips and financial know-how with your friends doesn’t only benefit the asker, Kaus said. In the Kansas State University peer-to-peer group, the advice giver also learns a lot from their own position, because sharing their story and bonding with a peer helps them to build their own confidence and belief in their financial acumen.
Lindsay Clark, a 34-year-old director of external affairs in Washington, D.C., recalls one lesson she shared with a friend carrying student loans from pharmacy school. Clark works at Savi, a student loan platform, and she offered to cook her friend dinner while they sorted through his loan repayment options. Long after they’d cleaned their dinner plates, they sat together at Clark’s kitchen island, lingering over a plate of homemade hummus and chatting about everything from financial goals to Costco card benefits.
“Those conversations blossom from the transparency, and the visibility makes both people feel really good,” she said. “That creates better relationships overall.”
When you’re talking about money issues with friends, Clark said, you’re not artificially inflating your salary or pretending to know more than you do. And most important, you’re not worried about their ulterior motives.
“You feel safe in that conversation, knowing their intentions are good and they’re not trying to make money off of you,” she said. “And that’s going to lead to better results, because we’re working with the reality here.”
Skepticism of pronounced experts and criticism of established financial institutions is especially common among millennials and Gen Z, Neidermeier said. Studies show people across generations are much likelier to take a friend or colleague’s recommendation to heart over that of a faceless institution, he said; people who spend time on social media just have a greater opportunity to source those answers and field questions.
“What people say to each other over the picket fence is what is the most influential,” he said.
At a certain point, however, talking solely to friends and peers for your financial lessons can be very limiting, said Sarah Behr, founder of Simplify Financial Planning in San Francisco. Relying on your social circle can also put a strain on those relationships; no one wants to be responsible for your disappointment when a financial decision that worked out well for them doesn’t fit as well in your own life.
Behr recommends tuning into your own emotional reactions when assessing peer advice: does the road map they followed align with your own financial values? Does it put pressure on you to live outside your means or challenge your personal risk tolerance? If the answer doesn’t feel clear, that could be a time to outsource to a financial professional who has no emotional connection to you or your financial status.
“‘People have been telling me do this, but I just don’t know if it’s the right thing for me’—I get a lot of calls like that,” said Behr.
Saint-Vil said he and his friends share tips on what high-yield savings accounts offer the best rates, and when he did his credit card research, he chose a card recommended by a friend. When it comes time to work with a financial adviser or even one day a wealth manager, he’ll likely work with someone recommended through a peer. Behr said close to 90% of her business comes by way of client referrals.
Since that first conversation over dim sum, Saint-Vil has thrown his own card onto the table at meals and shared his knowledge with other pals who look confused.
“I have a real wide range of friends who are in many different financial places, but I would say a rising tide lifts all ships,” he said.
Julia Carpenter is the co-author, with Bourree Lam, of The Wall Street Journal’s “The New Rules of Money: A Playbook for Planning Your Financial Future,” a personal-finance workbook published this week by Clarkson Potter, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group.
Chris Dixon, a partner who led the charge, says he has a ‘very long-term horizon’