In Retirement, It’s Time to Put Our Costs Under the Microscope
Kanebridge News
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,821,668 (+0.20%)       Melbourne $1,117,530 (+4.25%)       Brisbane $1,257,253 (-1.08%)       Adelaide $1,086,474 (+0.31%)       Perth $1,112,402 (-1.76%)       Hobart $841,529 (-0.29%)       Darwin $897,053 (+0.66%)       Canberra $1,072,958 (+0.73%)       National Capitals $1,219,743 (+0.24%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $826,145 (+0.91%)       Melbourne $552,192 (-0.04%)       Brisbane $817,933 (+2.96%)       Adelaide $583,681 (+1.28%)       Perth $690,078 (-1.10%)       Hobart $568,565 (-1.15%)       Darwin $467,280 (+4.03%)       Canberra $508,924 (-0.38%)       National Capitals $652,859 (+0.89%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 13,174 (-9)       Melbourne 17,168 (+802)       Brisbane 7,142 (+27)       Adelaide 2,581 (-26)       Perth 7,166 (+1,447)       Hobart 882 (-7)       Darwin 119 (-1)       Canberra 1,170 (+4)       National Capitals 49,402 (+2,237)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,095 (-62)       Melbourne 6,743 (-135)       Brisbane 1,427 (+11)       Adelaide 388 (+14)       Perth 1,130 (+42)       Hobart 168 (-1)       Darwin 178 (+2)       Canberra 1,212 (+4)       National Capitals 20,341 (-125)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820 ($0)       Melbourne $590 (+$5)       Brisbane $695 (-$5)       Adelaide $650 ($0)       Perth $750 ($0)       Hobart $630 (+$5)       Darwin $820 (+$10)       Canberra $730 ($0)       National Capitals $720 (+$2)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $820 ($0)       Melbourne $580 ($0)       Brisbane $665 (+$15)       Adelaide $550 ($0)       Perth $700 ($0)       Hobart $550 ($0)       Darwin $650 (+$5)       Canberra $595 (+$5)       National Capitals $650 (+$3)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 5,237 (-43)       Melbourne 6,710 (-78)       Brisbane 3,569 (-102)       Adelaide 1,352 (-46)       Perth 2,105 (-67)       Hobart 207 (-2)       Darwin 49 (+1)       Canberra 387 (+6)       National Capitals 19,616 (-331)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,371 (-32)       Melbourne 4,424 (-73)       Brisbane 1,815 (-24)       Adelaide 401 (+1)       Perth 620 (-30)       Hobart 69 (0)       Darwin 81 (+2)       Canberra 575 (+12)       National Capitals 16,356 (-144)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 2.34% (↓)       Melbourne 2.75% (↓)     Brisbane 2.87% (↑)        Adelaide 3.11% (↓)     Perth 3.51% (↑)      Hobart 3.89% (↑)      Darwin 4.75% (↑)        Canberra 3.54% (↓)     National Capitals 3.07% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND         Sydney 5.16% (↓)     Melbourne 5.46% (↑)        Brisbane 4.23% (↓)       Adelaide 4.90% (↓)     Perth 5.27% (↑)      Hobart 5.03% (↑)        Darwin 7.23% (↓)     Canberra 6.08% (↑)        National Capitals 5.18% (↓)            HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 1.5% (↑)      Brisbane 1.2% (↑)      Adelaide 1.2% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)        Hobart 0.5% (↓)       Darwin 0.7% (↓)     Canberra 1.6% (↑)      National Capitals $1.1% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.4% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.5% (↑)      Adelaide 0.8% (↑)      Perth 0.9% (↑)      Hobart 1.2% (↑)        Darwin 1.4% (↓)     Canberra 2.7% (↑)      National Capitals $1.5% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 27.7 (↑)      Melbourne 27.6 (↑)      Brisbane 26.5 (↑)      Adelaide 23.6 (↑)      Perth 32.9 (↑)      Hobart 24.9 (↑)      Darwin 27.6 (↑)      Canberra 26.3 (↑)      National Capitals 27.1 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 25.6 (↑)      Melbourne 27.0 (↑)      Brisbane 25.5 (↑)        Adelaide 22.4 (↓)     Perth 32.6 (↑)        Hobart 30.6 (↓)       Darwin 27.6 (↓)     Canberra 36.5 (↑)        National Capitals 28.5 (↓)           
Share Button

In Retirement, It’s Time to Put Our Costs Under the Microscope

We discovered all sorts of things we are paying for that we don’t really need or use. But there’s one cost we’re not ready to face.

By KAREN KREIDER YODER
Mon, Nov 4, 2024 7:00amGrey Clock 4 min

The first couple of years in retirement are often the most difficult. But they also can set the stage for how you’ll fill the years ahead—both financially and psychologically. Stephen Kreider Yoder, 67, a longtime Wall Street Journal editor, joined his wife, Karen Kreider Yoder, 68, in retirement in late 2022. In this monthly  Retirement Rookies   column, they chronicle some of the issues they are dealing with early in retirement .

Karen

“Um, Karen?” Steve said without looking away from his computer. He was using the unnaturally neutral tone that means he’s trying not to sound judgmental.

“Oh, no,” I responded. “What is it?”

His screen showed the month’s credit-card statement. “What’s this bill for $28?” he asked. Then, after a few clicks: “Hmm, looks like it’s each month since August last year.”

We were in the study pouring over our spending records to smoke out what we call “parasites”—recurring costs that quietly suck dollars and give little or nothing in return.

I had no idea what the $28 was for, I said, racking my brain for several minutes. “Oh, wait. Yes, last August was when my sewing machine stopped working.” I had found a website that promised advice on how to fix my Bernina Sport 802. It didn’t help, I took the machine to an expert and I forgot about the advice site.

Here it was, much later, leaching a monthly fee. I must have used the credit card thinking it was a one-off.

Parasites like this were also infesting us back when we were working. But ever since our salaries stopped, each dollar seems to have grown in value. And retirement has given us the time to finally ferret out the freeloaders and to analyse what a drain they are on our wallets.

We decided to review every credit-card transaction and bank debit of the past year—and cancel as many recurring charges as we can.

Some parasites are unwitting, like the help-site bill. Others are for services we once wanted and don’t use anymore—like our Netflix account, which we’d been talking about canceling for two years. It was just $15.49 a month, so did we really want to lose it? Yes. We pulled the plug in October. (Sorry, kids, if you were still tapping in.)

Some sponges aren’t obvious from our statements alone. I recently realised that boxes of our eco-friendly dishwasher detergent were piling up. I thought I was buying online when we ran out but had mistakenly OK’d a monthly subscription instead.

Even where a service is useful, there are sometimes free alternatives. I was paying $14.95 a month for audio books. I canceled and now borrow them free of charge from the San Francisco Public Library. We’ll save nearly $180 a year.

We began looking for leaches more broadly and identified a subspecies: the lost-opportunity parasite. After we retired, we began riding city buses and local rail more often, pulling out adult-rate transit cards we’d accumulated. Then it occurred to us that we were leaving money on the table by not getting half-price senior passes: $1.25 for the bus instead of $2.50. Duh!

More lost opportunity awaited in a stack of gift cards I had rubber-banded together in my desk drawer including several from Barnes & Noble bookstores and Peet’s Coffee. I took a bus to the nearest Barnes & Noble, learned there was $30 on the cards and did some early Christmas shopping. All together, the gift cards were storing $225.

The $28-a-month parasite tracing to my sewing machine proved easy to exterminate. I called the customer-care number, negotiated a partial refund of $84 and canceled the subscription.

That will save $336 a year, enough to pay an expert to fix my Bernina several times over.

Steve

There’s a parasite down in the garage, it occurred to me after a bill came in the mail from the DMV.

The letter asked for $162 to renew the registration on my vintage Honda CB750 for a year. I nearly paid it, as I’ve done annually, each year vowing to tune the bike up and get it back on the road within months.

It’s one of two old Honda motorcycles that I’ve written about before—how they once brought me joy in the restoring but now are mostly garage gewgaws.

Our anti-parasite crusade forced me to get honest with myself last month. I could no longer use the excuse that I’ll get to the 750 after I retire. I’ve had two years, and I’m not likely to get to it next year.

So I registered the bike for non operation at $27, saving $135. Now I need to phone our insurer and back out of the $436-a-year policy on the bike. Between those two parasitic bills, I have probably paid more than the value of the bike over the seven years that I haven’t ridden it.

Maybe I can get the other bike on the road, the CB350F. If not, I’ll assign non operational status to it when the DMV bills me for it.

Still, the hardest parasite to face may be the biggest one of all: our house.

We love being retired in San Francisco, and our thriving neighbourhood has proved to be the perfect environment for a couple of aging city slickers. We are walking distance to restaurants, shops, libraries, parks and pickleball courts, and a 20-minute bike ride to the beach or nearly any other place in a city full of vibrant districts. Circles of friends are nearby.

Our home is a Victorian museum piece with a classic San Francisco feel that makes us feel even more part of our city.

But it’s too big, and it is increasingly becoming a financial and psychological drain. What we dish out in mortgage payments, home and earthquake insurance, utilities and property taxes could rent us a decent house in the Midwest with money left over to travel half the year.

There’s also the constant maintenance, the bane of a vintage-house owner. Tourists and residents alike love this city’s Painted Ladies, but we owners must fight constant entropy to keep them made up with paint jobs and preserved detail.

That’s not to mention the costs within. A decrepit old breaker box had been nagging at me from the garage wall for years, silently reminding me every time I walked past that we needed to replace it with a higher-amp box that was up to modern code.

I put off the task because of the cost. I could do it myself when I had time, I imagined, and avoided thinking about it—easy to do when life was busy with workplace and family demands.

I finally hired an electrician, who came in September to replace the breaker box and the wiring that fed it. There’s still the balky ancient redwood gutter to fix, and some plumbing issues.

We’re not ready to sell out and move to the Midwest, which we might eventually do when we’re in our slower years. And we can’t stomach the pain of looking for a smaller place in San Francisco.

So we’ll live with this big parasite for now, the elephant in the room as we hunt down smaller leaches.



MOST POPULAR

A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.

Rugged coastal drives and fireside drams define a slow, indulgent journey through Scotland’s far north.

Related Stories
Money
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon
By Micah Maidenberg 30/03/2026
Money
Saudi Arabia Sees a Spike to $180 Oil if Energy Shock Persists Past April
By SUMMER SAID, RYAN DEZEMBER AND DAVID UBERTI 20/03/2026
Money
Gen X Is Stuck in the Middle and Financially Squeezed. How One Financial Adviser Is Helping.
By Anne Field 18/03/2026
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon

The lunar flyby would be the deepest humans have traveled in space in decades.

By Micah Maidenberg
Mon, Mar 30, 2026 4 min

It’s go time for the highest-stakes mission at NASA in more than 50 years.  

On April 1, the agency is set to launch four astronauts around the moon, the deepest human spaceflight since the final Apollo lunar landing in 1972.  

The launch window for Artemis II , as the mission is called, opens at 6:24 p.m. ET. 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration teams have been preparing the vehicles to depart from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on the planned roughly 10-day trip. Crew members have trained for years for this moment. 

Reid Wiseman, the NASA astronaut serving as mission commander, said he doesn’t fear taking the voyage. A widower, he does worry at times about what he is putting his daughters through. 

“I could have a very comfortable life for them,” Wiseman said in an interview last September.  

“But I’m also a human, and I see the spirit in their eyes that is burning in my soul too. And so we’ve just got to never stop going.” 

Wiseman’s crewmates on Artemis II are NASA’s Victor Glover and Christina Koch, as well as Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen. 

Photo: NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft being rolled out at night. Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/Getty Images

What are the goals for Artemis II? 

The biggest one: Safely fly the crew on vehicles that have never carried astronauts before.  

The towering Space Launch System rocket has the job of lofting a vehicle called Orion into space and on its way to the moon.  

Orion is designed to carry the crew around the moon and back. Myriad systems on the ship—life support, communications, navigation—will be tested with the astronauts on board. 

SLS and Orion don’t have much flight experience. The vehicles last flew in 2022, when the agency completed its uncrewed Artemis I mission . 

How is the mission expected to unfold? 

Artemis II will begin when SLS takes off from a launchpad in Florida with Orion stacked on top of it.  

The so-called upper stage of SLS will later separate from the main part of the rocket with Orion attached, and use its engine to set up the latter vehicle for a push to the moon. 

After Orion separates from the upper stage, it will conduct what is called a translunar injection—the engine firing that commits Orion to soaring out to the moon. It will fly to the moon over the course of a few days and travel around its far side. 

Orion will face a tough return home after speeding through space. As it hits Earth’s atmosphere, Orion will be flying at 25,000 miles an hour and face temperatures of 5,000 degrees as it slows down. The capsule is designed to land under parachutes in the Pacific Ocean, not far from San Diego. 

Water photo: NASA’s Orion capsule after its splash-down in the Pacific Ocean in 2022 for the Artemis I mission. Mario Tama/Press Pool

Is it possible Artemis II will be delayed? 

Yes.  

For safety reasons, the agency won’t launch if certain tough weather conditions roll through the Cape Canaveral, Fla., area. Delays caused by technical problems are possible, too. NASA has other dates identified for the mission if it doesn’t begin April 1. 

Who are the astronauts flying on Artemis II? 

The crew will be led by Wiseman, a retired Navy pilot who completed military deployments before joining NASA’s astronaut corps. He traveled to the International Space Station in 2014. 

Two other astronauts will represent NASA during the mission: Glover, an experienced Navy pilot, and Koch, who began her career as an electrical engineer for the agency and once spent a year at a research station in the South Pole. Both have traveled to the space station before. 

Hansen is a military pilot who joined Canada’s astronaut corps in 2009. He will be making his first trip to space. 

Koch’s participation in Artemis II will mark the first time a woman has flown beyond orbits near Earth. Glover and Hansen will be the first African-American and non-American astronauts, respectively, to do the same. 

What will the astronauts do during the flight? 

The astronauts will evaluate how Orion flies, practice emergency procedures and capture images of the far side of the moon for scientific and exploration purposes (they may become the first humans to see parts of the far side of the lunar surface). Health-tracking projects of the astronauts are designed to inform future missions. 

Those efforts will play out in Orion’s crew module, which has about two minivans worth of living area.  

On board, the astronauts will spend about 30 minutes a day exercising, using a device that allows them to do dead lifts, rowing and more. Sleep will come in eight-hour stretches in hammocks. 

There is a custom-made warmer for meals, with beef brisket and veggie quiche on the menu.  

Each astronaut is permitted two flavored beverages a day, including coffee. The crew will hold one hourlong shared meal each day.  

The Universal Waste Management System—that’s the toilet—uses air flow to pull fluid and solid waste away into containers. 

What happens after Artemis II? 

Assuming it goes well, NASA will march on to Artemis III, scheduled for next year. During that operation, NASA plans to launch Orion with crew members on board and have the ship practice docking with lunar-lander vehicles that Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin have been developing. The rendezvous operations will occur relatively close to Earth. 

NASA hopes that its contractors and the agency itself are ready to attempt one or more lunar landing missions in 2028. Many current and former spaceflight officials are skeptical that timeline is feasible. 

MOST POPULAR

Three completed developments bring a quieter, more thoughtful style of luxury living to Mosman, Neutral Bay and Crows Nest.

A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.

Related Stories
Money
What Is Artemis II? The NASA Mission to Fly Astronauts Around the Moon
By Micah Maidenberg 30/03/2026
Property
Melbourne set to overtake Sydney as Australia’s biggest city as property demand surges
By Jeni O'Dowd 10/03/2026
Property
Why the next three years could be the best time to invest in property
By Abdullah Nouh, Opinion 25/11/2025
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop