About the author: Patrick L. Springer is an institutional-equities business developer and Japan and Asia market specialist. He worked at Morgan Stanley in management roles for more than 20 years.
Japan just concluded a 34-year trek in the wilderness of deflation and ended its nearly 20-year negative interest-rate policy. The stock market has responded by achieving new all-time highs, last seen in 1989, rising 35% in the past year.
This might look like the top, but a closer look at Japan’s market suggests that the end is just the beginning for the world’s third-largest market. This year likely marks the beginning of a multiyear Japan market revival that will start a major new capital markets cycle. Japan’s companies are just beginning to celebrate a long-awaited return of pricing power supported by an enamoured global investor base looking for international ideas in a friendly market.
Investors should focus on two trends. First, new micro and macro forces are at work to make Japan a preferred non-U.S. destination for several years. With the U.S. dollar at 20-year highs, portfolio managers know that it is typically time to diversify and buy cheaper overseas markets, but where to go? Europe is cheap but challenging, and the I of India is what currently remains best of the emerging markets BRICS grouping. Exposure to Asia is important for global portfolios given it is 45% of global gross domestic product. Yet strategists say that we now live in a “multipolar world,” a euphemism for the highest level of geopolitical risks in the world in decades. This limits China investment allocations for now.
But Japan is a pre-eminent security partner for the U.S. Japan also is quickly becoming a key partner in U.S. re-shoring strategies, especially as an alternative supplier of semiconductors and technology components. The re-shoring trend is compounded by the yen’s weakness. At nearly 152 yen to the dollar, Japan’s currency is trading at the lowest ratio since 1990. That means Japan is also likely to regain market share that it lost over the past 20 years to China in automobile components, industrial products, and machinery. Status as a security partner matters to investors now, which will keep allocations to Japan higher for longer.
Second, Japan’s differentiated market structure may provide more alpha-idea opportunities than investors might expect from an older, developed economy. In the U.S., megacaps and the Magnificent Seven rule the world for investors—and for good reason, given their recent outperformance. The high level of exchange-traded fund penetration in the U.S. also favours large-caps over small- and medium-capitalisation stocks. But in Japan, the list of Japan’s largest companies remains unchanged: Excluding SoftBank, all were established pre-1960.
According to Abrdn Investments, 45% of Japan’s benchmark Topix Index of 2000 constituents have no analyst research coverage, compared with just 3% of the Russell 3000 universe for the U.S. As inflation sparks growth, earnings surprises and inflections of Japan’s under researched companies will lead to significantly higher alpha capture opportunities.
Additionally, the Japanese government and the Tokyo Stock Exchange have initiated important corporate-governance reforms, and 26% of all listed companies have submitted specific plans to improve their stock valuation. But many more companies have yet to respond, providing more opportunities for investors.
Sorting Japan’s nearly 3,900 stocks into market segments is revealing. Japanese mid-cap and small-cap stocks have lagged behind large-cap stocks by 40% and 60% year to date, respectively, and have lagged by 25% and 46% on a one-year basis.
Such underperformance by itself is one thing, but for the many investors who have never seen inflation, wage growth, and domestic sales gains in Japan, they may find a discovery universe of new stocks with interesting characteristics such as these:
Organo , a $2 billion market-cap water treatment company that has traded over $60 million a day on some days and counts Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing as one of its key growth customers.
Nakanishi , a $1.5 billion dental-equipment and precision-tools maker that grew sales 23% last year, sports a 2.5% yield and a 24% return on equity, and has 12% of its stock price in net cash.
Chugoku Marine Paints , a global top-three maker of marine paints that has a 20% global share and a 15% return on investment capital, sells at nearly 11 times earnings, and has a 2.6% dividend yield.
Overall, this analysis finds nearly 100 companies with a market cap above $1 billion with net cash equal to 20% or more of their stock price.
The bottom line is that Japan’s culture of innovation, combined with an end to deflation, is likely to produce a new wave of capitalisations. During the decades of deflation, corporates and consumers alike were incentivised to save more, spend less, and underinvest. But with nominal GDP growth now running at a whopping 5% and record wage growth, inflation incentivises new capital investment, stimulating a new investment-banking cycle of financing.
There are risks to this outlook. Double-digit market rallies can lead to pullbacks, and investors need to watch for threats to Japan’s inflation and currency levels and to its appetite for reform. But what’s most important for investors to realise about Japan is how much has changed there, amid a changing world.
Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron’s newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors.
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.

The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
Here’s how they are looking at artificial intelligence, interest rates and economic pressures.
Chinese carmaker GAC will expand its Australian electric vehicle line-up with the city-focused AION UT hatchback.











