Too expensive to date: how cost of living pressures are derailing the quest for love
The ‘fake till you make it’ approach to impress a date is a risky strategy for many, experts warn
2 min
More than one in three Australians admit they have spent more than they intended on a date to impress their partners or a new love interest. A Finder survey of 1,070 people found 14 percent have spent more than they could afford on dates, while a further 21 percent say they have also gone over budget but could afford to do so.
Finder’s money expert, Rebecca Pike, said: “Millions of people are finding that their simple quest to find love is derailing their financial wellbeing. Aussies have less disposable income in general due to the cost of living crisis, and spoiling a potential love interest or overspending on a date is adding to the money stress.”
The research found younger singles were more likely to go over budget on dates, with 23 percent of Gen Z respondents and 22 percent of Millennials spending more than they could afford versus just seven percent of Gen Xers and five percent of baby boomers.
Ms Pike said Aussies should start with simple, affordable dates with someone new.
“’Fake it until you make it’ is a risky dating strategy. You may get stuck with some spending habits and decisions that you’re paying off long after the romance has fizzled out.”
While many Australians are prepared to go over budget to woo a beau or belle, another survey shows some people are becoming less inclined to shout a round or pick up the bill when dining out and socialising with family and friends.
A survey of 2,000 Australians by NAB Economics found 54 percent prefer to split the bill these days, with this figure rising to 72 percent among 18 to 29 year-olds.
“Young Australians are embracing ‘loud budgeting’ and getting more comfortable with talking about their financials,” said NAB personal everyday banking executive, Kylie Young. “It isn’t surprising that extends to splitting the bill, as they confidently step away from the social pressure of ‘shouting a round’.”
The majority of older Australians are still paying for each other, with only 32 percent of over-65s saying today’s high cost of living made them more inclined to split the bill. Interestingly, splitting bills is least common among low-income earners (39 percent) and more common among high–income earners (63 percent). When separating the bill, almost four in 10 prefer one person to pay and the others to transfer their share. About three in 10 prefer to pay their share with a debit or credit card.
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
3 min
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.
The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.
Three-Michelin-starred chef Massimiliano Alajmo will host an intimate Mediterranean sailing aboard Crystal Serenity, redefining fine dining at sea.
