Amazon shares gained ground in late trading Thursday after the company posted better-than-expected financial results for the September quarter.
Amazon (ticker: AMZN) said third-quarter sales were $143.1 billion, up 13% from a year ago, accelerating from 11% growth in the June quarter, and above the high end of the company’s guidance range.
Profits were 94 cents a share, well above the consensus of 58 cents. Net income of $9.9 billion included a $1.1 billion pretax noncash gain on the company’s stake in Rivian Automotive (RIVN).
Amazon Web Services revenue was $23.1 billion, up 12.3% from a year ago, which was about in line with Wall Street estimates, and consistent with the 12.2% increase one quarter earlier.
Amazon CFO Brian Olsavsky said in a call with reporters that the company increased AWS revenue by about $900 million versus three months earlier. He also noted that customers continue to focus on spending optimisation, but that the process is slowing down. He declined to say whether the growth rate for AWS has now bottomed.
Amazon shares were trading around breakeven heading into the company’s conference call late Thursday, but they moved higher after CEO Andy Jassy said on the call that AWS booked some large contracts late in the third quarter. They won’t start showing up in results until the fourth quarter, he said.
The stock was up 4.6% in late trading as of 6:15 p.m.
Heading into the earnings report, AWS growth had decelerated for six straight quarters, falling to 12.2% in the June quarter, from 39.5% in the last quarter of 2021. The slowing growth reflects a recent focus from cloud customers on “optimising” their cloud spending, figuring out how to get more value from their growing cloud outlays.
This week’s results from cloud rivals Alphabet (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) both noted that the optimization trend is continuing. The Google Cloud business posted disappointing results in the quarter, while Microsoft topped expectations. Amazon largely split the difference. Amazon bulls have expected AWS growth to begin accelerating soon as corporate spending budgets loosen and a focus on AI workloads expands, but there was no big jump in the latest quarter.
Operating income was $11.2 billion, well above the company’s forecast range of $5.5 billion to $8.5 billion. That incudes an operating profit in North America of $4.3 billion, reversing a loss of $400 million in the year ago quarter. AWS had an operating profit of $7 billion, up from $5.4 billion in the year-earlier period.
“We had a strong third quarter as our cost to serve and speed of delivery in our stores business took another step forward, our AWS growth continued to stabilise, our advertising revenue grew robustly, and overall operating income and free cash flow rose significantly,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy in a press release.
Shares of Amazon were up 3.4% in late trading following the report.
Online store sales were $57.3 billion, up 7%, improving from 4% growth in the June quarter, while third-party services revenue was $343 billion, up 20%, versus 18% growth in the June quarter.
Amazon said subscription services revenue—mostly Amazon Prime—was $10.2 billion, up 14%. Sales at physical stores were $5 billion, up 6%.
Advertising revenue jumped 26% in the quarter, from 22% in the June quarter, to $12.1 billion. Olsavsky said the company isn’t seeing an impact from geopolitics. That’s a contrast from Meta, which noted on its earnings call Wednesday that the company was seeing some slowdown in spending tied to the outbreak of violence in the Middle East.
Olsavsky noted that ad growth has outpaced overall company growth, driven by improved targeting and higher click-through rates.
For the fourth quarter, Amazon sees sales of between $160 billion and $167 billion, with operating income ranging from $7 billion to $11 billion. Wall Street estimates for the quarter have called for revenue of $167.2 billion, up 12%, with operating income of $8.7 billion.
Amazon shares were down 1.5% in Thursday’s regular session.
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
The Federal Budget may have softened some of its proposed tax reforms, but it has exposed a bigger issue: too many families are relying on wealth structures that no longer reflect the realities of modern life.
For many Australians, the 2026 Federal Budget initially felt like a direct challenge to the way wealth is created, held and transferred between generations.
The headlines were immediate: changes to capital gains tax, reforms to discretionary trusts, restrictions on negative gearing and increased scrutiny of investment structures. Unsurprisingly, affluent families, business owners and investors began asking the same question:
Is the way we hold our wealth still fit for purpose?
In recent days, the government has announced several significant amendments following industry consultation and public feedback, including exempting testamentary trusts from the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax and expanding capital gains tax concessions for small businesses.
The backdown is welcome. But it also highlights something much bigger.
This Budget has accelerated a conversation that many Australian families have been postponing for years.
The conversation is not really about tax. It is about wealth stewardship.
For decades, Australians have built wealth through businesses, property, investments and careful long-term planning. Yet many families have not revisited the legal structures surrounding those assets in years, sometimes decades.
We often see clients who have spent years building significant wealth, only to discover their legal arrangements no longer reflect their current circumstances.
Their children are now adults. They may own multiple properties.
They may have sold a business, entered a second marriage, become grandparents or accumulated digital assets that did not exist when their original estate plans were prepared.
The trust that distributes income may need to be reconsidered. The bucket company may no longer be so attractive.
The Budget has simply exposed a reality that already existed: wealth structures cannot remain static while life continues to evolve.
Importantly, trusts themselves are not the issue.
Trusts are legitimate planning tools that provide flexibility, protection and continuity. When used appropriately, they allow families to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
And neither is tax the issue, really. Getting the fundamentals right is more important for long-term, sustainable wealth than a few favourable tax treatments around the edges.

The real issue is complacency.
Too often, families create structures and assume the job is done. It isn’t.
Estate planning is no longer a document you sign once and file away in a drawer. It is an ongoing process that should evolve alongside your life.
We are also seeing a broader shift in how Australians define wealth itself. It is no longer just the family home and an investment portfolio.
Modern wealth includes businesses, digital assets, cryptocurrency, intellectual property, frequent flyer points and increasingly complex family arrangements.
At the same time, Australians are living longer than ever before, meaning wealth may need to support multiple generations simultaneously. This creates new responsibilities and new risks.
How do you help your children enter the property market without exposing family wealth to relationship breakdowns?
How do you structure wealth so that it remains a source of opportunity rather than future conflict?
These are the questions families should be asking now.
The recent debate surrounding testamentary trusts also serves as an important reminder that policy decisions can have unintended consequences for vulnerable Australians. It is encouraging that the government has listened to feedback and clarified its position.
But the lesson remains: the wealth landscape is changing.
Increasingly, governments, regulators and tax authorities are paying closer attention to how wealth is held and transferred. That means families cannot afford to adopt a “set-and-forget” approach to their structures.
The families who will be best placed for the future are not necessarily those with the greatest wealth.
They are the families with the greatest clarity. Clarity around ownership, succession and governance. And clarity around how wealth will transition from one generation to the next.
Ultimately, preserving wealth is not about avoiding change.
It is about preparing for it.
Because the greatest risk is not change itself.
It is losing the ability to respond to it.
Anthony Hunt is Co-Founder of Wealth Lawyers and former COO of Westpac Private Bank. He advises business owners, investors and affluent Australian families on wealth protection, succession planning and intergenerational wealth transfer
With two waterfronts, bushland surrounds and a $35 million price tag, this Belongil Beach retreat could become Byron’s most expensive home ever.
A resurgence in high-end travel to Egypt is being driven by museum openings, private river journeys and renewed long-term investment along the Nile.











