Amazon Earnings Top Estimates but the Cloud Business Is Just OK

Amazon shares gained ground in late trading Thursday after the company posted better-than-expected financial results for the September quarter.

Amazon (ticker: AMZN) said third-quarter sales were $143.1 billion, up 13% from a year ago, accelerating from 11% growth in the June quarter, and above the high end of the company’s guidance range.

Profits were 94 cents a share, well above the consensus of 58 cents. Net income of $9.9 billion included a $1.1 billion pretax noncash gain on the company’s stake in Rivian Automotive (RIVN).

Amazon Web Services revenue was $23.1 billion, up 12.3% from a year ago, which was about in line with Wall Street estimates, and consistent with the 12.2% increase one quarter earlier.

Amazon CFO Brian Olsavsky said in a call with reporters that the company increased AWS revenue by about $900 million versus three months earlier. He also noted that customers continue to focus on spending optimisation, but that the process is slowing down. He declined to say whether the growth rate for AWS has now bottomed.

Amazon shares were trading around breakeven heading into the company’s conference call late Thursday, but they moved higher after CEO Andy Jassy said on the call that AWS booked some large contracts late in the third quarter. They won’t start showing up in results until the fourth quarter, he said.

The stock was up 4.6% in late trading as of 6:15 p.m.

Heading into the earnings report, AWS growth had decelerated for six straight quarters, falling to 12.2% in the June quarter, from 39.5% in the last quarter of 2021. The slowing growth reflects a recent focus from cloud customers on “optimising” their cloud spending, figuring out how to get more value from their growing cloud outlays.

This week’s results from cloud rivals Alphabet (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) both noted that the optimization trend is continuing. The Google Cloud business posted disappointing results in the quarter, while Microsoft topped expectations. Amazon largely split the difference. Amazon bulls have expected AWS growth to begin accelerating soon as corporate spending budgets loosen and a focus on AI workloads expands, but there was no big jump in the latest quarter.

Operating income was $11.2 billion, well above the company’s forecast range of $5.5 billion to $8.5 billion. That incudes an operating profit in North America of $4.3 billion, reversing a loss of $400 million in the year ago quarter. AWS had an operating profit of $7 billion, up from $5.4 billion in the year-earlier period.

“We had a strong third quarter as our cost to serve and speed of delivery in our stores business took another step forward, our AWS growth continued to stabilise, our advertising revenue grew robustly, and overall operating income and free cash flow rose significantly,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy in a press release.

Shares of Amazon were up 3.4% in late trading following the report.

Online store sales were $57.3 billion, up 7%, improving from 4% growth in the June quarter, while third-party services revenue was $343 billion, up 20%, versus 18% growth in the June quarter.

Amazon said subscription services revenue—mostly Amazon Prime—was $10.2 billion, up 14%. Sales at physical stores were $5 billion, up 6%.

Advertising revenue jumped 26% in the quarter, from 22% in the June quarter, to $12.1 billion. Olsavsky said the company isn’t seeing an impact from geopolitics. That’s a contrast from Meta, which noted on its earnings call Wednesday that the company was seeing some slowdown in spending tied to the outbreak of violence in the Middle East.

Olsavsky noted that ad growth has outpaced overall company growth, driven by improved targeting and higher click-through rates.

For the fourth quarter, Amazon sees sales of between $160 billion and $167 billion, with operating income ranging from $7 billion to $11 billion. Wall Street estimates for the quarter have called for revenue of $167.2 billion, up 12%, with operating income of $8.7 billion.

Amazon shares were down 1.5% in Thursday’s regular session.

Reporting season has once again reminded investors that a strong profit does not guarantee a rising share price, and a large loss does not always trigger a sell-off. What matters most is how each result compares with expectations and, increasingly, what management says about the year ahead. During the August 2026 season, companies offering credible turnarounds or unexpectedly strong guidance were rewarded handsomely, while those flagging weaker margins, slowing demand or greater uncertainty were punished.

The following ranking draws on Morningstar’s review of 164 ASX-listed companies and measures each company’s share-price movement on the day it reported. This captures the market’s immediate response to the earnings announcement, before subsequent economic developments, dividends and company-specific news cloud the picture. Here are the five biggest winners, and the five hardest-hit losers, of the season so far.

The five winners

1. Bapcor (ASX:BAP): +41.0%

Bapcor delivered reporting season’s largest relief rally after presenting early evidence that its troubled automotive-parts business was stabilising. Although underlying revenue fell 1.8% to $1.92 billion and underlying NPAT collapsed 85% to $10.8 million, underlying EBITDA of $152.5 million exceeded guidance.

More importantly, working-capital initiatives released $68.5 million in the second half, lifting cash conversion to 109.4% and reducing net debt by 63% to $135 million. The statutory loss was $431.6 million, largely because of non-cash impairments. Investors focused on improving operational momentum, stronger liquidity and management’s expectation of modest FY27 revenue growth.

2. Zip Co (ASX:ZIP): +18.2%

Zip comfortably surpassed its FY26 targets, sending the buy-now-pay-later provider’s shares sharply higher. Transaction volume rose 23% to $16.7 billion, while cash earnings before tax, depreciation and amortisation jumped 58% to a record $268.9 million. Statutory profit climbed 46% to $116.4 million, and the cash operating margin expanded by 4.2 percentage points to 20%.

The strongest signal was guidance for FY27 cash earnings of $340 million—around 26% growth and above analysts’ forecasts. US transaction volume increased 42.5% and now represents three-quarters of group volume, offsetting weaker customer activity in Australia.

3. CSL (ASX:CSL): +17.3%

CSL’s result was hardly spectacular in isolation, but it cleared a market bar that had fallen dramatically following earlier downgrades and restructuring announcements. Underlying NPATA was US$3.1 billion, down 2% in constant-currency terms, while operating cash flow reached US$3.51 billion.

CSL maintained its full-year dividend at US$2.92 per share and completed a A$1 billion buyback. The real catalyst was FY27 guidance for approximately 5% underlying profit growth, compared with market expectations closer to 2%. After an extended period of earnings disappointments, investors interpreted the outlook as evidence that CSL’s core plasma business was approaching a sustainable recovery.

4. Judo Capital (ASX:JDO): +16.9%

Judo Capital demonstrated strong operating leverage as its specialist business-lending franchise expanded. Full-year profit before tax rose 34% to $168.1 million, while pre-provision profit increased 42%. Gross loans and advances grew 18% to $14.7 billion, reaching the top of the bank’s guidance range and comfortably exceeding broader system growth.

Deposits increased 24% to $12.2 billion, return on equity improved by 1.1 percentage points to 6.4%, and earnings per share rose 29% to 9.9 cents. Reaffirmation of the FY27 outlook gave investors confidence that loan growth could continue without sacrificing margins or credit quality.

5. Super Retail Group (ASX:SUL): +15.8%

The owner of Supercheap Auto, rebel, BCF and Macpac reported record sales of $4.2 billion, up 3.2%, despite cautious discretionary spending. Profitability went backwards: normalised profit before tax fell 7% to $306 million and normalised NPAT declined 2.8% to $226 million as transformation spending weighed on margins. Nevertheless, the result exceeded subdued expectations, online sales grew 5.3% and membership across the group’s loyalty programs reached 13.1 million. Investors were also encouraged by positive early FY27 trading, stable gross margins and continued market-share gains. A fully franked 33-cent final dividend added to the appeal.

The five losers

1. Hansen Technologies (ASX:HSN): –21.2%

Hansen’s historic result met expectations, but investors recoiled from its outlook. The utility and communications software provider achieved an underlying EBITDA margin of 31%, exceeding its 30% target, while generating strong cash flow. However, management designated FY27 an “investment and transition year”, signalling a roughly five-percentage-point margin contraction as spending on products, sales capabilities and organisational changes increased.

Revenue had already been broadly flat, leaving investors concerned that the investment program would depress earnings before new growth appeared. Leadership changes, including the chief executive’s departure, added uncertainty. Management expects revenue growth and margins above 30% to return in FY28, but the market was unwilling to wait.

2. Life360 (ASX:360): –19.4%

Life360’s headline growth was impressive: quarterly revenue rose 38% to US$159 million, subscription revenue increased 31%, and adjusted EBITDA climbed 53% to US$31.1 million. Monthly active users reached 102.4 million and paying circles grew 27% to 3.2 million. The sell-off reflected expectations rather than a collapsing business.

Net income fell 18%, the net margin contracted from 6% to 3%, hardware shipments dropped 18%, and full-year EBITDA guidance was merely maintained. After a strong valuation run, investors wanted a larger upgrade and clearer evidence that heavy investment in advertising, international expansion and artificial intelligence would generate additional earnings.

3. PEXA Group (ASX:PXA): –17.0%

PEXA reported a 7% increase in continuing-operations revenue and 12% EBITDA growth to $152 million, accompanied by a two-percentage-point margin expansion. Free cash flow increased 39%, suggesting the core Australian electronic-conveyancing platform remained highly profitable. Investors instead concentrated on management’s warning that property-transfer volumes could decline, alongside regulatory uncertainty surrounding the fees PEXA can charge.

The company is also continuing to invest heavily in its loss-making international expansion. Morningstar considered the market reaction excessive, arguing that structural transfer-volume assumptions had not materially changed, but the combination of softer near-term activity and regulatory risk overwhelmed the respectable headline numbers.

4. SEEK (ASX:SEK): –14.3%

SEEK produced solid FY26 figures, including 10% revenue growth to $1.20 billion, a 15% rise in EBITDA and 28% growth in adjusted earnings per share. It also lifted its fully franked annual dividend by 13% to a record 52 cents. Those achievements were overshadowed by falling paid job-ad volumes and cautious FY27 assumptions.

The statutory accounts included a $201 million loss from the SEEK Growth Fund and $377 million of significant items, making the headline result considerably less attractive. Investors were particularly concerned that economic weakness could limit volumes while the company continued investing in platform integration and artificial-intelligence products.

5. JB Hi-Fi (ASX:JBH): –12.3%

JB Hi-Fi’s full-year result was broadly respectable, with group sales rising 5% to $11.1 billion and underlying earnings per share increasing 6% to $4.48. The damage came from its current-trading update. Australian sales were almost flat during the June quarter and deteriorated further in July, while earnings in the core Australian electronics business fell 3.6%.

Housing-related categories were particularly weak as higher living costs and interest rates constrained household budgets. With JB Hi-Fi entering the season on a demanding valuation, an in-line historic result was not sufficient: the loss of sales momentum prompted investors to rapidly reduce their expectations for FY27.

Overall, the season showed that share prices react less to whether profits rose or fell than to the gap between results and expectations. Bapcor was rewarded for being less troubled than feared, while several fundamentally profitable companies were punished because their outlooks failed to justify elevated valuations.