THE BUSINESS OF BEING OSCAR PIASTRI
Formula 1 may be the world’s most glamorous sport, but for Oscar Piastri, it’s also one of the most lucrative. At just 24, Australia’s highest-paid athlete is earning more than US$40 million a year.
3 min
In the high-octane world of international sport, homegrown Formula 1 star Oscar Piastri is big business. After a trailblazing 2025 season, Piastri is on track to be one of our most successful athletes ever. Almost certainly, he’ll be the richest.
The 24-year-old Melbourne-born driver inked a lucrative deal with McLaren reportedly worth US$41 million a year, making him Australia’s highest-paid athlete. Not bad for a Brighton boy who left home at 14.
Driving all the way to the bank
When Piastri lines up on the F1 grid at Melbourne’s Albert Park this year, the world’s eyes will be on him as he attempts to achieve what no other Australian driver has by winning the Australian Grand Prix. Football might have the most fans (an estimated 3.5 billion), but F1 still commands around 430 million devoted followers.
According to F1 owner, US giant Liberty Media, the motorsport generated a whopping US$3.65 billion in 2024. While some of that revenue comes from ticket sales, media rights account for roughly a third of the pie. These include broadcasting deals with television networks that know the adrenaline-charged drama of F1 racing translates into ratings-winning viewing.
Adding to the fascination is the Netflix docuseries “Formula 1: Drive to Survive,” which tracks the lives of drivers, managers, and team owners both on and off the circuit. The big screen joined the party in 2025 with F1: The Movie, starring Brad Pitt as an ageing driver attempting a comeback, which proved a hit with cinemagoers, grossing US$624 million (A$946 million) worldwide.
Much like Grand Slam tennis, which counts Rolex and Emirates among its sponsors, F1 attracts prestigious brands such as Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon and TAG Heuer. It’s no surprise F1 drivers can command enviable salaries.
At the end of Piastri’s second season with McLaren, in 2024, the Aussie is reported to have pocketed US$34.5 million, including a base pay of US$7.8 million plus US$26.7 million in bonuses. His current deal with McLaren will see him in the team’s famous papaya orange colours until at least 2028.
Piastri also benefits from team sponsors such as Mastercard, as well as personal deals with companies including Quad Lock, software group Dubber, burger chain Grill’d and his father Chris Piastri’s automotive software company HP Tuners.
Piastri is undoubtedly a champion in a cut-throat sport where split-second decision-making at more than 300 km/h can mean the difference between a chequered flag and crashing out. But it’s his future marketability and brand potential where the young driver could outshine his rivals.
It may not, however, be as simple as saying more wins equal more money, according to Hans Westerbeek, Professor of International Sport Business at Victoria University.
“In modern F1, the financial equation is far more complex,” Westerbeek says. “A driver’s value to a team and to sponsors isn’t just measured by podium finishes. It’s about their ability to generate global attention, connect with fans, and represent the brand values of their team and sponsors.”
In the age of “algorithmic fandom”, Westerbeek says digital engagement through social media matters just as much.
“A spectacular overtake that goes viral on TikTok may deliver more commercial value than a quiet second place,” he argues. “Teams and sponsors now monitor real-time sentiment data on how fans react online to every race weekend, and this affects negotiations and commercial deals.
“So, Oscar’s growth in earning potential depends on a combination of performance and digital visibility.”
When Piastri crashed out in the Azerbaijan Grand Prix in September, he was understandably deflated, telling Sky Sports F1 the race was “not my finest moment”. And yet Piastri’s first-lap exit drew most of the headlines, not rival Max Verstappen’s win.
“In many ways, F1 drivers are no longer just athletes; they’re content creators,” Westerbeek says. “An unexpected post-race interview that resonates globally might drive as much sponsor interest as a podium finish.
“The sport’s economics are shifting from pure sporting results to a hybrid model of performance plus digital storytelling.”
Read the full story here.
For Central Element, the start of work at Pearl represents another step in the company’s growing eastern suburbs pipeline.
All three vehicles will form part of a broader charitable initiative benefiting Big Brothers Big Sisters of America, the American Red Cross and Starlight Children’s Foundation
Overall, the season showed that share prices react less to whether profits rose or fell than to the gap between results and expectations
5 min
Reporting season has once again reminded investors that a strong profit does not guarantee a rising share price, and a large loss does not always trigger a sell-off. What matters most is how each result compares with expectations and, increasingly, what management says about the year ahead. During the August 2026 season, companies offering credible turnarounds or unexpectedly strong guidance were rewarded handsomely, while those flagging weaker margins, slowing demand or greater uncertainty were punished.
The following ranking draws on Morningstar’s review of 164 ASX-listed companies and measures each company’s share-price movement on the day it reported. This captures the market’s immediate response to the earnings announcement, before subsequent economic developments, dividends and company-specific news cloud the picture. Here are the five biggest winners, and the five hardest-hit losers, of the season so far.
The five winners
1. Bapcor (ASX:BAP): +41.0%
Bapcor delivered reporting season’s largest relief rally after presenting early evidence that its troubled automotive-parts business was stabilising. Although underlying revenue fell 1.8% to $1.92 billion and underlying NPAT collapsed 85% to $10.8 million, underlying EBITDA of $152.5 million exceeded guidance.
More importantly, working-capital initiatives released $68.5 million in the second half, lifting cash conversion to 109.4% and reducing net debt by 63% to $135 million. The statutory loss was $431.6 million, largely because of non-cash impairments. Investors focused on improving operational momentum, stronger liquidity and management’s expectation of modest FY27 revenue growth.
2. Zip Co (ASX:ZIP): +18.2%
Zip comfortably surpassed its FY26 targets, sending the buy-now-pay-later provider’s shares sharply higher. Transaction volume rose 23% to $16.7 billion, while cash earnings before tax, depreciation and amortisation jumped 58% to a record $268.9 million. Statutory profit climbed 46% to $116.4 million, and the cash operating margin expanded by 4.2 percentage points to 20%.
The strongest signal was guidance for FY27 cash earnings of $340 million—around 26% growth and above analysts’ forecasts. US transaction volume increased 42.5% and now represents three-quarters of group volume, offsetting weaker customer activity in Australia.
3. CSL (ASX:CSL): +17.3%
CSL’s result was hardly spectacular in isolation, but it cleared a market bar that had fallen dramatically following earlier downgrades and restructuring announcements. Underlying NPATA was US$3.1 billion, down 2% in constant-currency terms, while operating cash flow reached US$3.51 billion.
CSL maintained its full-year dividend at US$2.92 per share and completed a A$1 billion buyback. The real catalyst was FY27 guidance for approximately 5% underlying profit growth, compared with market expectations closer to 2%. After an extended period of earnings disappointments, investors interpreted the outlook as evidence that CSL’s core plasma business was approaching a sustainable recovery.
4. Judo Capital (ASX:JDO): +16.9%
Judo Capital demonstrated strong operating leverage as its specialist business-lending franchise expanded. Full-year profit before tax rose 34% to $168.1 million, while pre-provision profit increased 42%. Gross loans and advances grew 18% to $14.7 billion, reaching the top of the bank’s guidance range and comfortably exceeding broader system growth.
Deposits increased 24% to $12.2 billion, return on equity improved by 1.1 percentage points to 6.4%, and earnings per share rose 29% to 9.9 cents. Reaffirmation of the FY27 outlook gave investors confidence that loan growth could continue without sacrificing margins or credit quality.
5. Super Retail Group (ASX:SUL): +15.8%
The owner of Supercheap Auto, rebel, BCF and Macpac reported record sales of $4.2 billion, up 3.2%, despite cautious discretionary spending. Profitability went backwards: normalised profit before tax fell 7% to $306 million and normalised NPAT declined 2.8% to $226 million as transformation spending weighed on margins. Nevertheless, the result exceeded subdued expectations, online sales grew 5.3% and membership across the group’s loyalty programs reached 13.1 million. Investors were also encouraged by positive early FY27 trading, stable gross margins and continued market-share gains. A fully franked 33-cent final dividend added to the appeal.
The five losers
1. Hansen Technologies (ASX:HSN): –21.2%
Hansen’s historic result met expectations, but investors recoiled from its outlook. The utility and communications software provider achieved an underlying EBITDA margin of 31%, exceeding its 30% target, while generating strong cash flow. However, management designated FY27 an “investment and transition year”, signalling a roughly five-percentage-point margin contraction as spending on products, sales capabilities and organisational changes increased.
Revenue had already been broadly flat, leaving investors concerned that the investment program would depress earnings before new growth appeared. Leadership changes, including the chief executive’s departure, added uncertainty. Management expects revenue growth and margins above 30% to return in FY28, but the market was unwilling to wait.
2. Life360 (ASX:360): –19.4%
Life360’s headline growth was impressive: quarterly revenue rose 38% to US$159 million, subscription revenue increased 31%, and adjusted EBITDA climbed 53% to US$31.1 million. Monthly active users reached 102.4 million and paying circles grew 27% to 3.2 million. The sell-off reflected expectations rather than a collapsing business.
Net income fell 18%, the net margin contracted from 6% to 3%, hardware shipments dropped 18%, and full-year EBITDA guidance was merely maintained. After a strong valuation run, investors wanted a larger upgrade and clearer evidence that heavy investment in advertising, international expansion and artificial intelligence would generate additional earnings.
3. PEXA Group (ASX:PXA): –17.0%
PEXA reported a 7% increase in continuing-operations revenue and 12% EBITDA growth to $152 million, accompanied by a two-percentage-point margin expansion. Free cash flow increased 39%, suggesting the core Australian electronic-conveyancing platform remained highly profitable. Investors instead concentrated on management’s warning that property-transfer volumes could decline, alongside regulatory uncertainty surrounding the fees PEXA can charge.
The company is also continuing to invest heavily in its loss-making international expansion. Morningstar considered the market reaction excessive, arguing that structural transfer-volume assumptions had not materially changed, but the combination of softer near-term activity and regulatory risk overwhelmed the respectable headline numbers.
4. SEEK (ASX:SEK): –14.3%
SEEK produced solid FY26 figures, including 10% revenue growth to $1.20 billion, a 15% rise in EBITDA and 28% growth in adjusted earnings per share. It also lifted its fully franked annual dividend by 13% to a record 52 cents. Those achievements were overshadowed by falling paid job-ad volumes and cautious FY27 assumptions.
The statutory accounts included a $201 million loss from the SEEK Growth Fund and $377 million of significant items, making the headline result considerably less attractive. Investors were particularly concerned that economic weakness could limit volumes while the company continued investing in platform integration and artificial-intelligence products.
5. JB Hi-Fi (ASX:JBH): –12.3%
JB Hi-Fi’s full-year result was broadly respectable, with group sales rising 5% to $11.1 billion and underlying earnings per share increasing 6% to $4.48. The damage came from its current-trading update. Australian sales were almost flat during the June quarter and deteriorated further in July, while earnings in the core Australian electronics business fell 3.6%.
Housing-related categories were particularly weak as higher living costs and interest rates constrained household budgets. With JB Hi-Fi entering the season on a demanding valuation, an in-line historic result was not sufficient: the loss of sales momentum prompted investors to rapidly reduce their expectations for FY27.
Overall, the season showed that share prices react less to whether profits rose or fell than to the gap between results and expectations. Bapcor was rewarded for being less troubled than feared, while several fundamentally profitable companies were punished because their outlooks failed to justify elevated valuations.
From Italy’s $93,000-a-night villas to a $20,000 Bowral château, a new global ranking showcases the priciest Airbnbs available in 2026.
Limited to 630 units, Lamborghini’s latest Urus Capsule pushes personalisation further than ever, blending hybrid performance with over 70 bespoke design combinations.
