For years, the wealth management industry has been rising on a geyser of assets under management. From an estimated $27 trillion in 2018, assets are estimated at $64 trillion today and are projected by Statista Market Insights to hit $87 trillion in 2028.
But fast-growing industries face challenges. For this week’s Big Q , we asked industry professionals to identify some of them. The question: What are the biggest challenges facing the wealth management industry and why are they so important?
Alan Moore, CEO, XY Planning Network and AdvicePay: A major change is the shift from product sales to advice. It means you have to actually train on finances and advice, not just learn sales. It’s creating a spike in demand for CFP professionals—we just had the largest cycle of exam takers in the past 12 months—after the CFP has been around for 50 years. And there’s a shortage of talent who can handle being advisors.
Product organizations hired for salespeople for years and now have to adapt to hiring advice givers. It’s causing products to be reinvented with no-commission alternatives. It’s leading people to switch channels and break away—because broker-dealers are technically securities product/sales distribution platforms, and you don’t need one if you’re in the advice business.
The shift to advice has been under way for over 30 or 40 years. But the vast majority of the industry, probably 90%-plus, is still built around a product distribution business model, not around advice. You see this in recruitment efforts, where folks are being recruited into sales roles and you lose 90% to 95% of your new hires because they don’t make the cut. We don’t have 90% or 95% turnover on new hires into advice roles, but people who want to work in the advice industry are very different from the folks who want to do sales.
Ryan Parker, CEO, EP Wealth Advisors: My one-word answer as far as the biggest challenge is “people.” This has always been a talent industry. It’s about people serving people. But increasingly, the talent opportunity and challenge is getting more and more complicated and nuanced. To serve clients, it’s no longer sufficient to just have the best advisors. Plus, the best advisors are increasingly difficult to attract and to develop and to cultivate. That’s either because they’re happy with where they are, or once they get in a good situation, they probably do serve clients well by staying the course.
The talent that surrounds the client and enables the advisor, that’s where the war is really heating up. And it’s not just the financial planning or tax or estate, but it’s the technical talent—people who understand and can deploy the different technologies that are inside our industry and increasingly ubiquitous across industries. I really think that whatever your time horizon is, the ability to attract, develop, align, and then reward and retain the best talent throughout the organization is critical.
I think it starts with the front lines who are interfacing with clients every day, but it goes now to every single position. That is what’s going to separate those who are able to build something of scale and significance over time. Clients are going to go where the best talent resides. So to compete, I’m going to go for the best people.
Daniel Burke, founding partner, investment management, Callan Family Office: One of the biggest challenges facing the industry is managing the complexity and volume of all clients’ personal data.
An ultrahigh net worth family or family office often has data everywhere—siloed at multiple providers and custodians, old tax returns, et cetera. As advisors, we have to help them manage this data in order to provide good advice and execute across their full balance sheet. We’re investing more and more in data processes, data quality, and technology to help families make decisions across a clean, comprehensive set of data.
The challenge is that even if we invest to collect all of that data, the systems downstream, the third-party applications, CRMs, trading systems, reporting systems, and financial planning software, this whole ecosystem of apps and fintech investments, can’t necessarily work with all that data. The fact that so many of the technology players are focused on solving for the mass affluent leaves a real gap in the process for the ultrahigh net worth. And that’s a challenge for the industry to try to solve.
Mitch Avnet, CEO and managing partner, Compliance Risk Concepts: We provide outsourced, ongoing compliance support to asset management firms and independent investment advisors, and to the institutional folks and to broker dealers as well. To me the challenge is figuring out how to embrace new technology concepts out there, whether it’s AI, crypto, or anything else coming on the horizon Advisors have to really be thoughtful, careful and pragmatic in terms of how they leg into this stuff.
One of the biggest concerns I think any regulator or compliance officer would have when a firm gets into the world of what I call one-offs, like AI or crypto, is having the operational infrastructure expertise or capabilities to support it in place.
It’s great to say that you’re going to embrace AI. But how is that built into your overall model, specific to portfolio management? Are you just turning over the keys to a machine, or are you using it as a tool in how your team does their overall analysis and how they implement strategies? I think early entrants can get caught with their pants down when there’s a flight to a new, shiny object, if they haven’t really thought about what the potential ramifications are if something goes wrong.
A long-standing cultural cruise and a new expedition-style offering will soon operate side by side in French Polynesia.
The pandemic-fuelled love affair with casual footwear is fading, with Bank of America warning the downturn shows no sign of easing.
The pandemic-fuelled love affair with casual footwear is fading, with Bank of America warning the downturn shows no sign of easing.
The boom in casual footware ushered in by the pandemic has ended, a potential problem for companies such as Adidas that benefited from the shift to less formal clothing, Bank of America says.
The casual footwear business has been on the ropes since mid-2023 as people began returning to office.
Analyst Thierry Cota wrote that while most downcycles have lasted one to two years over the past two decades or so, the current one is different.
It “shows no sign of abating” and there is “no turning point in sight,” he said.
Adidas and Nike alone account for almost 60% of revenue in the casual footwear industry, Cota estimated, so the sector’s slower growth could be especially painful for them as opposed to brands that have a stronger performance-shoe segment. Adidas may just have it worse than Nike.
Cota downgraded Adidas stock to Underperform from Buy on Tuesday and slashed his target for the stock price to €160 (about $187) from €213. He doesn’t have a rating for Nike stock.
Shares of Adidas listed on the German stock exchange fell 4.5% Tuesday to €162.25. Nike stock was down 1.2%.
Adidas didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Cota sees trouble for Adidas both in the short and long term.
Adidas’ lifestyle segment, which includes the Gazelles and Sambas brands, has been one of the company’s fastest-growing business, but there are signs growth is waning.
Lifestyle sales increased at a 10% annual pace in Adidas’ third quarter, down from 13% in the second quarter.
The analyst now predicts Adidas’ organic sales will grow by a 5% annual rate starting in 2027, down from his prior forecast of 7.5%.
The slower revenue growth will likewise weigh on profitability, Cota said, predicting that margins on earnings before interest and taxes will decline back toward the company’s long-term average after several quarters of outperforming. That could result in a cut to earnings per share.
Adidas stock had a rough 2025. Shares shed 33% in the past 12 months, weighed down by investor concerns over how tariffs, slowing demand, and increased competition would affect revenue growth.
Nike stock fell 9% throughout the period, reflecting both the company’s struggles with demand and optimism over a turnaround plan CEO Elliott Hill rolled out in late 2024.
Investors’ confidence has faded following Nike’s December earnings report, which suggested that a sustained recovery is still several quarters away. Just how many remains anyone’s guess.
But if Adidas’ challenges continue, as Cota believes they will, it could open up some space for Nike to claw back any market share it lost to its rival.
Investors should keep in mind, however, that the field has grown increasingly crowded in the past five years. Upstarts such as On Holding and Hoka also present a formidable challenge to the sector’s legacy brands.
Shares of On and Deckers Outdoor , Hoka’s parent company, fell 11% and 48%, respectively, in 2025, but analysts are upbeat about both companies’ fundamentals as the new year begins.
The battle of the sneakers is just getting started.
The PG rating has become the king of the box office. The entertainment business now relies on kids dragging their parents to theatres.
A divide has opened in the tech job market between those with artificial-intelligence skills and everyone else.










