China’s Plan to Manage Evergrande: Take It Apart, Slowly
independent title
Kanebridge News
in commercial partnership with
Wall Street
Barrons
Mansion Global
Penta
Global insights from
  • Wall Street
  • Mansion Global
  • Barrons
">
    HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $1,451,814 (-0.59%)       Melbourne $954,733 (+0.50%)       Brisbane $706,830 (+2.69%)       Adelaide $649,510 (+1.37%)       Perth $582,081 (-0.52%)       Hobart $699,668 (-0.28%)       Darwin $636,930 (-0.88%)       Canberra $898,901 (-0.88%)       National $909,177 (-0.19%)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING PRICES AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $590,626 (-0.46%)       Melbourne $473,145 (-0.48%)       Brisbane $369,879 (-1.08%)       Adelaide $305,477 (+1.52%)       Perth $333,363 (-0.31%)       Hobart $487,440 (-6.89%)       Darwin $366,924 (-0.98%)       Canberra $397,038 (-7.49%)       National $434,380 (-2.60%)                HOUSES FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 9,125 (-508)       Melbourne 13,913 (-654)       Brisbane 8,220 (-594)       Adelaide 3,339 (+26)       Perth 11,136 (-136)       Hobart 437 (-7)       Darwin 240 (-6)       Canberra 672 (-20)       National 47,082 (-1,899)                UNITS FOR SALE AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 8,152 (-181)       Melbourne 8,696 (-136)       Brisbane 2,636 (-108)       Adelaide 847 (-27)       Perth 2,634 (+11)       Hobart 83 (-7)       Darwin 369 (-3)       Canberra 480 (+14)       National 23,897 (-437)                HOUSE MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $580 (+$10)       Melbourne $440 ($0)       Brisbane $480 (+$5)       Adelaide $450 ($0)       Perth $470 (+$20)       Hobart $540 (-$10)       Darwin $630 (-$10)       Canberra $675 (-$5)       National $546 ($0)                UNIT MEDIAN ASKING RENTS AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney $480 ($0)       Melbourne $360 (-$5)       Brisbane $440 ($0)       Adelaide $360 ($0)       Perth $410 (+$10)       Hobart $420 (+$30)       Darwin $500 (+$5)       Canberra $550 (+$3)       National $449 (+$4)                HOUSES FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 6,520 (+340)       Melbourne 9,842 (+219)       Brisbane 4,108 (+67)       Adelaide 1,114 (+31)       Perth 1,987 (+27)       Hobart 190 (+17)       Darwin 116 (+9)       Canberra 402 (+37)       National 24,279 (+747)                UNITS FOR RENT AND WEEKLY CHANGE     Sydney 17,331 (+299)       Melbourne 15,809 (-365)       Brisbane 3,104 (-53)       Adelaide 577 (-23)       Perth 988 (-28)       Hobart 77 (+5)       Darwin 273 (+14)       Canberra 495 (-21)       National 38,654 (-172)                HOUSE ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 2.08% (↑)        Melbourne 2.40% (↓)       Brisbane 3.53% (↓)       Adelaide 3.60% (↓)     Perth 4.20% (↑)        Hobart 4.01% (↓)       Darwin 5.14% (↓)     Canberra 3.90% (↑)      National 3.12% (↑)             UNIT ANNUAL GROSS YIELDS AND TREND       Sydney 4.23% (↑)        Melbourne 3.96% (↓)     Brisbane 6.19% (↑)        Adelaide 6.13% (↓)     Perth 6.40% (↑)      Hobart 4.48% (↑)      Darwin 7.09% (↑)      Canberra 7.20% (↑)      National 5.37% (↑)             HOUSE RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 1.7% (↑)      Melbourne 2.4% (↑)      Brisbane 1.0% (↑)      Adelaide 0.7% (↑)      Perth 1.0% (↑)      Hobart 0.9% (↑)      Darwin 0.9% (↑)      Canberra 0.7% (↑)      National 1.5% (↑)             UNIT RENTAL VACANCY RATES AND TREND       Sydney 3.7% (↑)      Melbourne 4.9% (↑)      Brisbane 2.0% (↑)      Adelaide 1.3% (↑)      Perth 1.4% (↑)      Hobart 1.7% (↑)      Darwin 1.0% (↑)      Canberra 1.5% (↑)      National 3.4% (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL HOUSES AND TREND       Sydney 25.0 (↑)      Melbourne 26.4 (↑)        Brisbane 31.0 (↓)       Adelaide 24.8 (↓)     Perth 41.2 (↑)        Hobart 20.1 (↓)       Darwin 36.6 (↓)     Canberra 18.7 (↑)      National 28.0 (↑)             AVERAGE DAYS TO SELL UNITS AND TREND       Sydney 26.4 (↑)      Melbourne 28.8 (↑)        Brisbane 35.0 (↓)     Adelaide 30.3 (↑)        Perth 44.6 (↓)     Hobart 21.7 (↑)      Darwin 41.0 (↑)      Canberra 28.5 (↑)      National 32.0 (↑)            
Share Button

China’s Plan to Manage Evergrande: Take It Apart, Slowly

Beijing is working on a controlled implosion of the real-estate giant.

By Keith Zhai, Elaine Yu and Anniek Bao
Thu, Nov 11, 2021Grey Clock 6 min

Some investors feared that China Evergrande Group, the world’s most indebted real-estate firm, would collapse spectacularly, triggering losses far and wide. Instead, the Chinese state is dismantling the giant developer slowly and behind the scenes, in what amounts to one of the biggest financial challenges Beijing has faced in years.

The plan, according to people familiar with the matter and official government statements, is to manage a controlled implosion by selling off some Evergrande assets to Chinese companies while limiting damage to home buyers and businesses involved in its projects.

Chinese authorities must do this without bringing down the country’s epic property boom. Evergrande is struggling to manage roughly $300 billion in liabilities, including close to $20 billion in outstanding U.S. dollar bonds.

Looking out for foreign investors isn’t a priority, people familiar with the matter say. Still, Beijing is closely monitoring the situation, because authorities need credit markets to be healthy to prevent other property developers from failing and because they worry about China’s image, one of those people said.

It could take years to take the company apart, and many details are still being worked out, people familiar with the matter say. It’s possible some version of Evergrande could survive, though it would likely be much smaller.

Much of the work so far has focused on Evergrande’s hundreds of stalled projects, a process that will likely involve bringing in other developers to take over.

Under orders from Beijing, most of the 200 or so cities with Evergrande projects have set up task forces to help manage the process, people familiar with the matter say. Local authorities have been ordered to assemble accountants to examine Evergrande’s local finances, talk to other developers about completing unfinished projects, and set up law-enforcement teams to monitor any public discontent.

The State Council’s Information Office and China’s Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development didn’t respond to requests for comment. Evergrande has said it’s working hard to resolve its issues, at times with government involvement.

In a WeChat statement on Oct. 31, Evergrande thanked the government “at all levels” for helping it deliver a residential project to home buyers in Zhejiang province. In the past few months, officers from the local housing and urban-rural development bureau had helped solve problems, the company said.

Evergrande said its engineering department had strictly followed government instructions, without elaborating on what they were.

A central concern for the government is making sure people get the properties they paid for.

While some Chinese citizens have ploughed their savings into new homes, many individuals also bought apartments as investments in recent years, without any intention of living in them or renting them out. Chinese developers often collect money from buyers before completing construction, putting that money at risk if projects get abandoned or suspended.

Evergrande presold more than a million apartments that remain unfinished. If those units aren’t completed, many households could suffer painful losses, undermining confidence in the housing market. The industry accounts for roughly one-fourth of the country’s economic activity and the majority of household wealth.

Local authorities have required Evergrande to transfer revenues from unfinished homes to escrow accounts overseen by the government, according to notices reviewed by The Wall Street Journal and Chinese media.

Local governments are funnelling some of that money to Evergrande’s suppliers so construction can continue, according to people familiar with the matter. Evergrande has had to submit applications to the government-managed accounts for the funds to be disbursed, one of the people said.

“We are gradually receiving payments either from Evergrande or from accounts overseen by the government,” said an investor-relations employee of Shenyang Landscape Co., a landscape design and construction services firm that works with Evergrande. He said work has resumed in some cities, echoing statements from Evergrande, which recently said it has restarted construction at a number of sites.

In some places where projects weren’t as far along, local governments have urged Evergrande to scrap work entirely and return payments to home buyers, people familiar with the matter say. Local authorities are talking to other developers about taking over the land, they said.

In Zhejiang province, a county-level government made Evergrande pay back over 50 million yuan, or around $7.8 million, in full refunds to more than 200 owners of unbuilt homes, according to a government release.

The company is sitting on many completed and unsold homes in different locations. It’s less clear what will happen with those.

While Beijing’s program looks well-organized in some cities, it appears to be moving slowly and haphazardly in others. Many suppliers say they’re still waiting for funds. Changsen Building Materials, a wood supplier in the city of Dongguan, hasn’t been paid by Evergrande and has filed a claim against the developer in a local court, the business’s owner told the Journal. He declined to say how much the company is owed.

Several other building-materials companies said in regulatory filings or published notices that they still have large unpaid bills from Evergrande and are working with the company to take over unfinished apartments as payment in kind.

Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction Decoration Co. is working with Evergrande to resolve millions of dollars in outstanding payments, a representative told the Journal. The company said in a recent regulatory filing that there was “significant uncertainty” in how Evergrande would settle its unpaid bills.

Two other major partners, a supplier of waterproof materials and an architecture and interior-design company, told investors in recent months that they were no longer taking on Evergrande projects.

Guangdong Dongpeng Ceramic Co., a tile maker, said in its third-quarter report on Oct. 30 that the main reason for its decline in profit and revenue growth was because Evergrande couldn’t pay its bills.

Some buyers who recently took ownership of Evergrande apartments found problems such as unfinished interiors and gas and water leaks, according to complaints posted on government websites and social media.

At the same time, China’s central government is working to help Evergrande sell off larger parts of its empire.

In September, China’s financial regulators urged Evergrande to sell a nearly 20% stake in Shengjing Bank Co. to a state-owned enterprise, according to a person familiar with the issue. Evergrande soon struck a deal.

The company has previously said it sold property units to suppliers and contractors to settle billions of dollars in outstanding payments. It raised more than $50 million last month by selling two of its private jets and $145 million this month by unloading some of its shares in an online media company.

Evergrande also managed to sell its stake in a residential project called The Vertex in Hong Kong to a partner shareholder, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Evergrande employees were instructed to withdraw from the project in recent days after the deal was completed, internal conversations reviewed by the Journal showed.

A $2.6 billion deal for a majority stake in Evergrande’s property-management unit fell apart last month.

Chinese authorities have publicly suggested they won’t bail out Evergrande or inject money into the company, which would undermine their goal of showing that no private firms are too big to fail in China. They’re also working to discourage real-estate speculation.

“The stage where real-estate companies rely on high leverage and quick turnover to achieve high profits no longer exists,” the Economic Daily, a state newspaper, said in an article in September. “Business operators must change their mentality as soon as possible and actively respond to changes in the situation.”

Beijing helped trigger much of the stress at Evergrande when it imposed new rules last year, known as the “three red lines,” requiring developers to bring down debt levels before they could borrow more.

The rules squeezed Evergrande, which had borrowed heavily as it expanded aggressively in recent years, including into businesses such as healthcare and theme parks.

Evergrande’s billionaire founder, Hui Ka Yan, presented a survival strategy at a company meeting in late October, saying Evergrande would turn an electric-vehicle unit into its core business within a decade, while drastically cutting property sales by more than two-thirds, the state-owned Securities Times reported.

The EV business hasn’t yet generated any revenue from car sales. Although Evergrande recently avoided defaults on some of its dollar bonds by making overdue payments shortly before the end of 30-day grace periods, it remains on the hook for more payments in coming months, including several overdue payments with final deadlines this week.

Officials involved in Evergrande’s cleanup say they believe they have sufficient tools and experience to pull it off without seriously harming the property market, according to people familiar with the matter. They say Beijing has become more adept at managing private-sector meltdowns after handling others in recent years, including conglomerate HNA Group Co.

The risk for Beijing is in overestimating its ability to engineer outcomes in the economy, especially given Evergrande’s size.

The real-estate market is so entwined with China’s economy that any missteps could be dangerous. Home sales have fallen sharply recently, as buyers have become unnerved about the ability of many developers to stay afloat.

Falling land sales to developers are another concern, since such sales are a major source of public funds, accounting for more than 30% of local government revenue in 2020, according to financial-services firm Nomura.

Evergrande’s financial troubles have helped spark a huge selloff in the bonds of Chinese developers. At least six have either defaulted on their dollar debt or asked investors to wait longer for repayment, as credit market conditions have made it impossible for them to sell new bonds.

The average yield on an ICE BofA index of Chinese high-yield bonds this week reached nearly 28%, its highest since the 2009 global financial crisis, reflecting extreme risk aversion among investors.

Regulators recently tried to shore up confidence in Chinese debt markets by publicly encouraging firms to meet offshore debt obligations.

At the same time, authorities have started to moderate some of the stringent measures designed to tame the country’s property boom. State media reports that some regions have scrapped curbs on mortgages. Local governments are also extending subsidies to home buyers and acting to prevent prices from declining.

MOST POPULAR

Melbourne’s prestige market has had an exceptional year.

An influx of people could calm future volatility.

advertisement
Related Stories
Property
By Kanebridge News 06/12/2021
Property
By Terry Christodoulou 03/12/2021
Property
By Konrad Putzier 01/12/2021
advertisement