Creating An Inviting Living Room Around A Fireplace
Kanebridge News
Share Button

Creating An Inviting Living Room Around A Fireplace

Cozy sofas, built-ins and art groupings encourage a warm, welcoming space.

By Tracy Kaler
Thu, Nov 4, 2021 10:43amGrey Clock 3 min

Fireplaces have been adorning houses for centuries. While there’s the practical element of heating a home, a fireplace also sets the tone for a room, kindling atmosphere and interaction between people.

“It is human nature to be attracted to a fireplace—the experience is warm, inspiring and luxurious,” says Elliot March, co-founder of March and White Design in New York.

From a classic wood mantle to a sleek surround, a fireplace is likely the focal point in a room. Mr. March says no matter the style, this architectural element is a natural centrepiece and starting point for a room’s design and decor.

We asked several design pros for their thoughts on creating an inviting living room around a fireplace, and here’s what they suggested.

Anchor the Space with Seating

“We always say that great design is about people, not buildings. Know who will be using the room and how they’ll use it, then design a welcoming experience that connects with them emotionally. If a room features a fireplace, it will be the heart of that connection.

“The process starts with the idea of anchoring a space—or a sequence of spaces—around the fireplace. As Frank Lloyd Wright said, ‘The hearth is the psychological center of the home.’ Not only will the fireplace serve as a focal point, but it will also create a foundation for a seating grouping—and as a result, the way people will engage with the room.”

— Elliot March of March and White Design in New York

Strike a Balance with Built-ins and Shelves

“A fireplace wall is a strong way to make a visual impact in a room while keeping the space functional. My first rule of thumb is to always blend function with form. Scale matters; if you have high ceilings, play into them. If you have a particularly large wall to play with, then use it all. I always think about the mantel itself when designing, but the accessorizing of it happens after the bones of the room are complete.

“I love using natural stone for fireplaces; it is a great way to bring some dimension into a room. You want something with character and texture that will either completely stand out as a design statement of its own or blend into the room naturally.

“Furniture placement is critical. Depending on how large your space is, you’ll want two couches or a very large sectional. It really depends on the flow of the room, but ultimately your goal is to create a gathering area in front of the fireplace where people can enjoy the warmth and coziness it provides.

“Built-ins are a great opportunity to style and showcase gorgeous objects and add polish to a space, but many clients also want built-ins for extra storage, so I find that a mix of open shelving with closed cabinets and drawers strikes this perfect balance. Open shelving is also very functional and can work well in a variety of settings. Keep it personal: artwork, books, or collectibles picked up from your travels are good storytelling pieces.”

— Amy Leferink, Owner and Principal Designer at Interior Impressions in Woodbury, Minnesota

Try Asymmetry When Accessorising

“It is important to be sure that the fireplace surround respects the integrity of the architecture, so when designing a fireplace in a new construction home, we ensure that it ‘fits’ with the rest of the home. When working with an existing fireplace, much can be done to update the surround to ensure that the end look is cohesive.

“I like the appearance of a fireplace wall that isn’t wholly symmetrical. Whether that’s utilizing and playing up built-ins on one side of the fireplace or how the mantel is decorated, I like the visual heft of difference. A lacquered bookcase built-in next to a fireplace is a stand-out on its own, in the same way that a blank wall next to a fireplace is a wonderful space for groupings of smaller artwork.

“I find mantels more interesting with fewer accessories—and what accessories are there, I prefer to be asymmetrical. Often the artwork utilized above the mantel will dictate the smaller accessories: a small piece of art paired with a larger decorative accessory, or a large piece of art with a set of smaller accessories.”

— Interior Designer Meg Lonergan in Houston

 

Reprinted by permission of Mansion Global. Copyright 2021 Dow Jones & Company. Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Original date of publication:  November 3, 2021.



MOST POPULAR
11 ACRES ROAD, KELLYVILLE, NSW

This stylish family home combines a classic palette and finishes with a flexible floorplan

35 North Street Windsor

Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
The Uglification of Everything
By Peggy Noonan 26/04/2024
Money
Personal Wardrobe of the Iconic Late Fashion Designer Vivienne Westwood Goes up for Auction
By CASEY FARMER 25/04/2024
Money
Rediscovered John Lennon Guitar Heads to Auction, Expected to Set Records
By Eric Grossman 24/04/2024
The Uglification of Everything

Artistic culture has taken a repulsive turn. It speaks of a society that hates itself, and hates life.

By Peggy Noonan
Fri, Apr 26, 2024 5 min

I wish to protest the current ugliness. I see it as a continuing trend, “the uglification of everything.” It is coming out of our culture with picked-up speed, and from many media silos, and I don’t like it.

You remember the 1999 movie “The Talented Mr. Ripley,” from the Patricia Highsmith novel. It was fabulous—mysteries, murders, a sociopath scheming his way among high-class expats on the Italian Riviera. The laid-back glamour of Jude Law, the Grace Kelly-ness of Gwyneth Paltrow, who looks like a Vogue magazine cover decided to take a stroll through the streets of 1950s Venice, the truly brilliant acting of Matt Damon, who is so well-liked by audiences I’m not sure we notice anymore what a great actor he is. The director, Anthony Minghella, deliberately showed you pretty shiny things while taking you on a journey to a heart of darkness.

There’s a new version, a streaming series from Netflix, called “Ripley.” I turned to it eagerly and watched with puzzlement. It is unrelievedly ugly. Grimy, gloomy, grim. Tom Ripley is now charmless, a pale and watchful slug slithering through ancient rooms. He isn’t bright, eager, endearing, only predatory. No one would want to know him! Which makes the story make no sense. Again, Ripley is a sociopath, but few could tell because he seemed so sweet and easy. In the original movie, Philip Seymour Hoffman has an unforgettable turn as a jazz-loving, prep-schooled, in-crowd snob. In this version that character is mirthless, genderless, hidden. No one would want to know him either. Marge, the Paltrow role in the movie, is ponderous and plain, like a lost 1970s hippie, which undercuts a small part of the tragedy: Why is the lovely woman so in love with a careless idler who loves no one?

The ugliness seemed a deliberate artistic decision, as did the air of constant menace, as if we all know life is never nice.

I go to the No. 1 program on Netflix this week, “Baby Reindeer.” People speak highly of it. It’s about a stalker and is based on a true story, but she’s stalking a comic so this might be fun. Oh dear, no. It is again unrelievedly bleak. Life is low, plain and homely. No one is ever nice or kind; all human conversation is opaque and halting; work colleagues are cruel and loud. Everyone is emotionally incapable and dumb. No one laughs except for the morbidly obese stalker, who cackles madly. The only attractive person is the transgender girlfriend, who has a pretty smile and smiles a lot, but cries a lot too and is vengeful.

Good drama always makes you think. I thought: Do I want to continue living?

I go to the Daily Mail website, once my guilty pleasure. High jinks of the rich and famous, randy royals, fast cars and movie stars, models and rock stars caught in the drug bust. It was great! But it seems to have taken a turn and is more about crime, grime, human sadness and degradation—child abuse, mothers drowning their babies, “Man murders family, self.” It is less a portal into life’s mindless, undeserved beauty, than a testimony to its horrors.

I go to the new “Cabaret.” Who doesn’t love “Cabaret”? It is dark, witty, painful, glamorous. The music and lyrics have stood the test of time. The story’s backdrop: The soft decadence of Weimar is being replaced by the hard decadence of Nazism.

It is Kander and Ebb’s masterpiece, revived again and again. And this revival is hideous. It is ugly, bizarre, inartistic, fundamentally stupid. Also obscene but in a purposeless way, without meaning.

I had the distinct feeling the producers take their audience to be distracted dopamine addicts with fractured attention spans and no ability to follow a story. They also seemed to have no faith in the story itself, so they went with endless pyrotechnics. This is “Cabaret” for the empty-headed. Everyone screams. The songs are slowed, because you might need a moment to take it in. Almost everyone on stage is weirdly hunched, like a gargoyle, everyone overacts, and all of it is without art.

On the way in, staffers put stickers on the cameras of your phone, “to protect our intellectual property,” as one said.

It isn’t an easy job to make the widely admired Eddie Redmayne unappealing, but by God they did it. As he’s a producer I guess he did it, too. He takes the stage as the Emcee in a purple leather skirt with a small green cone on his head and appears further on as a clown with a machine gun and a weird goth devil. It is all so childish, so plonkingly empty.

Here is something sad about modern artists: They are held back by a lack of limits.

Bob Fosse, the director of the classic 1972 movie version, got to push against society’s limits and Broadway’s and Hollywood’s prohibitions. He pushed hard against what was pushing him, which caused friction; in the heat of that came art. Directors and writers now have nothing to push against because there are no rules or cultural prohibitions, so there’s no friction, everything is left cold, and the art turns in on itself and becomes merely weird.

Fosse famously loved women. No one loves women in this show. When we meet Sally Bowles, in the kind of dress a little girl might put on a doll, with heavy leather boots and harsh, garish makeup, the character doesn’t flirt, doesn’t seduce or charm. She barks and screams, angrily.

Really it is harrowing. At one point Mr. Redmayne dances with a toilet plunger, and a loaf of Italian bread is inserted and removed from his anal cavity. I mentioned this to my friend, who asked if I saw the dancer in the corner masturbating with a copy of what appeared to be “Mein Kampf.”

That’s what I call intellectual property!

In previous iterations the Kit Kat Club was a hypocrisy-free zone, a place of no boundaries, until the bad guys came and it wasn’t. I’m sure the director and producers met in the planning stage and used words like “breakthrough” and “a ‘Cabaret’ for today,” and “we don’t hide the coming cruelty.” But they do hide it by making everything, beginning to end, lifeless and grotesque. No innocence is traduced because no innocence exists.

How could a show be so frantic and outlandish and still be so tedious? It’s almost an achievement.

And for all that there is something smug about it, as if they’re looking down from some great, unearned height.

I left thinking, as I often do now on seeing something made ugly: This is what purgatory is going to be like. And then, no, this is what hell is going to be like—the cackling stalker, the pale sociopath, Eddie Redmayne dancing with a plunger.

Why does it all bother me?

Because even though it isn’t new, uglification is rising and spreading as an artistic attitude, and it can’t be good for us. Because it speaks of self-hatred, and a society that hates itself, and hates life, won’t last. Because it gives those who are young nothing to love and feel soft about. Because we need beauty to keep our morale up.

Because life isn’t merde, in spite of what our entertainment geniuses say.

 

MOST POPULAR
35 North Street Windsor

Just 55 minutes from Sydney, make this your creative getaway located in the majestic Hawkesbury region.

Consumers are going to gravitate toward applications powered by the buzzy new technology, analyst Michael Wolf predicts

Related Stories
Money
Why No One Wants to Pay for the Green Transition
By GREG IP 02/12/2023
Money
The Improbably Strong Economy
By JUSTIN LAHART 06/11/2023
Money
Midnight Blue Gown Highlights Biggest Sale of Princess Diana’s Belongings Since 1997
By CASEY FARMER 12/04/2024
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop