Higher deposits, stretched LVRs & more borrowers needing mortgage insurance
New report shows the challenges involved in buying a home are getting tougher
2 min
The amount of money required for a home deposit is rising and more than half of home buyers had to pay lenders’ mortgage insurance in FY23, according to a new report released by PEXA.
NSW recorded the highest median deposit in FY23 at just below $120,000, up 3.9 percent on FY22. In Victoria, the median deposit was $84,723, down 0.5 percent, and in Queensland it was $78,143, up 8.5 percent.
The time it takes to save these deposits is on the rise. Based on the median family income in each state and a 15 percent savings rate, PEXA found NSW buyers now need an average of almost eight years to save their deposit. This is up a whopping 83 percent since 2020. It takes Victorian buyers a little over five years to save their deposit, up 64 percent since 2020. It takes Queensland buyers just under five years, up 37 percent over two years.
Average deposit-to-value ratios (DVRs) increased to about 20 percent across the three major eastern states as a result of lenders tightening their credit criteria in FY23. The DVR is the amount of cash a buyer contributes to a purchase. The average DVRs in FY23 were 20.4percent in NSW, up 1 percent on FY22; 19.5 percent in Victoria, up 0.8 percent and 19.8percent in Queensland, up 1.5 percent.
The PEXA data shows most borrowers are taking out the maximum possible LVR (loan to value ratio) to fund their purchases. The average LVRs among borrowers in FY23 were 79.6 percent in NSW, 80.5 percent in Victoria and 80.2 percent in Queensland. The research shows the major banks averaged higher LVRs, suggesting they are “more open to lower deposit borrowers, due to their visibility of borrower’s income and expenditure via existing banking relationships”. This also meant more major bank customers had to pay lenders’ mortgage insurance (LMI).
Most lenders will not lend more than 80 percent of a property’s value without forcing the borrower to pay LMI. This insurance protects the bank from default and can be very expensive. Over half of new borrowers had to pay LMI in FY23. The rate was highest in Victoria, where 56.5 percent of new borrowers had to take out LMI.
The PEXA report said rising property prices meant buyers needed higher deposits, making it tougher to buy a home and making the “generational wealth gap more apparent”.
As a result, younger buyers are increasingly tapping the Bank of Mum and Dad to help them achieve the required deposit, as well as taking advantage of government support through various programs.
The 1860s Darlinghurst mansion Stoneleigh could become Sydney’s most expensive home ever sold under the hammer when it goes to auction. Clint Ballard is giving buyers a $28 million guide for the heritage-listed mansion on Darley Street, opposite Iona, the former home of Hollywood royalty Baz Luhrmann. Stoneleigh is being offered for sale for the …
Set on one of the city’s last absolute riverfront sites, The Riversdale by Mosaic combines irreplaceable waterfront ownership with one of Brisbane’s most significant residential opportunities.
Meta is betting on a human-first AI future, but growing legal battles and declining public trust are putting Mark Zuckerberg’s vision to the test.
3 min
“Call us optimists. Call us dreamers. Call us whatever the hell you want, but we’re betting on people, and we like those odds. The future is for everyone.”
That ad copy is from the voice-over of a July Meta Platforms META -3.38%.
spot that’s been part of a public-relations blitz to position Meta as the humanist AI company. The message was undercut by the ad’s inclusion of David Bowie’s “Five Years,” a brooding 1972 song about an impending apocalypse. But this week CEO Mark Zuckerberg left no ambiguity, publishing a 6,500-word manifesto—about 10 times the length of this newsletter—with a title that echoed the ad: “The Future is for Everyone.”
That seems to be Meta’s new tagline. In light of sinking public opinion and the company’s thousands of lawsuits from states, school districts, parents, and users, Meta’s public relations have been defensive. This push represents a return to offense, with a chance to distinguish Meta’s approach to AI from other labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or SpaceX SPCX +9.65%.
“It is surprising that the discourse from many developing AI is so filled with doom,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”
Zuckerberg frames what sort of future we build with AI as the central issue of our time. “We believe that delivering superintelligence to everyone is the way to answer this question,” he says. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”
The flood of words belies the situation on the ground in mid-2026. Americans, at least, have a love-hate affair with social media. A November Pew Research Center poll reported that 71% of U.S. adults used Facebook, and 51% used Instagram. Worldwide, 3.6 billion people use at least one Meta app every day.
But in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in July and August, 61% of respondents said they wanted more government oversight of social media, and two-thirds supported laws to keep children under 16 years old off the platforms. When it comes to Meta in particular, in the 2026 Axios Harris 100, an annual poll about corporate reputation, Meta placed 96th out of 100. It’s only above two other social media companies, Chinese ultracheap retailer Temu, and Spirit Airlines, a defunct air carrier. Regarding ethics, Meta came in last, and it was only ahead of TikTok in trust.
The steady drip of headlines in the teen social media trials isn’t helping. Last week, Meta lost a judgment in New Mexico state court that raised their liability in that relatively small jurisdiction to nearly $1 billion dollars. On Wednesday, jury selection began for a federal case with four states suing Meta over addictive product design, and false marketing that said its platforms were safe for teenagers. In July, Meta claimed that the states are asking for a total of $1.4 trillion in damages, in addition to design changes in the apps. This is part of a multidistrict litigation, where thousands of federal trials with social media defendants are coordinated in Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ district courthouse in Oakland, Calif.
There is a separate such group of thousands of cases in California state court, mostly with individual plaintiffs. The steady drip of bad headlines from the courts will continue unless Meta decides to settle en masse.
Meanwhile, in the second quarter, Meta booked “$2.40 billion of charges related to legal proceedings,” according to its quarterly filing. That may be just the beginning.
Zuckerberg spent 6,500 words getting his utopian message out, but I can sum it up in two: Trust us. The evidence is that Meta has a long way to go to win back that trust.
Odd Culture Group brings a new kind of after-dark energy to the CBD, where daiquiris, disco and design collide beneath the city streets.
An opulent Ryde home, packed with cinema, pool, sauna and more, is hitting the auction block with a $1 reserve.
