The Luxury Home Market Confronts Its New Reality: Not Enough Buyers and Sellers
Kanebridge News
Share Button

The Luxury Home Market Confronts Its New Reality: Not Enough Buyers and Sellers

Sales at the high end continue to decline, as homeowners pull back on listing properties and would-be buyers grapple with high interest rates and recession fears

By KATHERINE CLARKE and E.B. SOLOMONT
Thu, Jul 27, 2023 9:07amGrey Clock 8 min

When Joan Dangerfield, wife of the late comedian Rodney Dangerfield, first walked into her Los Angeles home in the early 2000s, she knew immediately that she would buy it. The Art Deco-style estate, perched in the coveted Bird Streets above L.A.’s Sunset Strip, had dramatic views spanning Downtown Los Angeles to the ocean and Catalina Island.

“I stepped 3 feet into the house and I knew it was the place for me,” said Dangerfield, who paid $6.25 million for the property. “It swept me away.”

Roughly two decades later, Dangerfield, 70, is trying to sell the home—and finding that would-be buyers aren’t as eager as she once was. The $17.8 million listing for her property has been active since February and while she has received several full-price offers, they have come with complicated contingencies, such as requiring her to provide seller financing, she said.

“I figured it would sell in a week, but didn’t quite work out that way,” she said of the house, which is comparably priced with other homes in the area. “It was a shock for me to just watch it sit there on the market.”

Joan Dangerfield PHOTO: OLIVIA ALONSO GOUGH FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Luxury sellers across the country are finding themselves in similar circumstances, as the high-end real-estate market faces a perfect storm of rising interest rates, recession fears and population shifts in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sales of luxury homes nationwide, defined as the top 5% of homes based on estimated market value, declined by 24.13% in the three months ended June 30, compared with the same period last year, according to a new report by brokerage Redfin. Inventory of luxury homes was down 2.39% during that same period, while the median sales price for a luxury home was up by 4.55%. In many metros, homeowners appear to have pulled back on listing homes in light of the market shift. New luxury listings were down by 17.08% year-over-year in the three months ended June 30, Redfin’s data shows.

Sales of non luxury homes also fell during the same period, but that drop—19.42%—was smaller than the decline in the luxury market, according to Redfin.

“The luxury market is definitely hurting in terms of transactions,” said Daryl Fairweather, Redfin’s chief economist. “Even when you compare it to the rest of the market, it’s looking like luxury has really cooled off.”

The report marks the continuation of a market slide that began in earnest last spring, following an unprecedented deal-making frenzy during the pandemic. Redfin’s data shows that sales began to plummet significantly as early as June 2022, as buyers began to grapple with inflation and a volatile stock market. In the first quarter of 2023, luxury sales volume was down by 33.3% year-over-year.

Some of the biggest drops in sales volume over the three months ended June 30 were in markets that seemed unstoppable during the pandemic. The Miami metro area saw the largest drop in activity, for instance, with a 40.14% year-over-year reduction in luxury transaction volume for the three months ended June 30, according to Redfin.

Other metro areas with large drops included Nassau County on New York’s Long Island, where luxury sales volume dropped 39.34% year-over-year, followed by New York City, down 35.98%, Los Angeles, down 36.17%, and Chicago, which was down 34.13%.

Real-estate agents and industry experts said the luxury market’s performance has been uneven. That often comes down to pricing: In areas where sellers have capitulated to the declining market and dropped prices, transaction activity is holding relatively steady. But in markets where sellers are clinging to pandemic-era prices, activity has taken a nosedive.

In the San Francisco area, for instance, where median sales prices for luxury homes were down by 12.73%, there was only a 4.04% drop in transaction volume. “Because the prices have fallen, it’s opened up the opportunity for people who say, ‘I might finally be able to buy,’ ” Fairweather said.

In contrast, in markets like New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, prices have remained consistent or even risen slightly from last year, but transaction activity is way down. “There’s less demand, but it’s not enough of a pullback in demand to draw down prices,” Fairweather said.

In Miami, industry insiders say it is lack of supply, not lack of demand, that has caused the drop in activity. That’s thanks in large part to the mass migration to Miami and buying frenzy during Covid. “People who are going to sell have already sold,” Fairweather said, noting that new luxury listings in the Miami area were down by 33.1% year-over-year in the three months ended June 30. “There are definitely people who are moving to Miami who want to buy homes, but there are not necessarily homes for sale.”

Heigo Paartalu is among those buyers frustrated by a lack of inventory properties.

Paartalu, a Cigarette boat dealer and CEO of YachtWay, a digital boat show company, said he and his wife purchased a modern, five-bedroom house on Hibiscus Island, a gated island in Miami Beach, for $6 million in late 2021. The home value shot up 25% after about a year, so they cashed out and sold the house for $7.5 million in early 2023. Now, with a budget of around $10 million, they are looking for a waterfront property in the area without luck. “The inventory is very low and we’re not seeing the prices come down, which is what we were hoping for,” he said. The couple is currently renting in Miami’s Edgewater neighbourhood for $24,000 a month.

Jeff Miller of ONE Sotheby’s International Realty, Paartalu’s broker, said some homeowners aren’t selling because prices have gotten so high they won’t be able to buy something else in the area. Others don’t want to walk away from low mortgage rates. “It’s creating a huge shortage in our supply of available inventory and homes,” he said.

Even with a limited supply of inventory in Miami, Dina Goldentayer of Douglas Elliman said buyers have more leverage than they did last year for things like home inspections and closing credits. “I’m no longer taking the position of, ‘Take it or leave it,’ ” she said. “There are clear shifts that are making it seem like a normal market.”

In Los Angeles, the issues in the luxury market go far beyond an inventory crunch. Real-estate agent Juliette Hohnen of Douglas Elliman estimated that her business is down roughly 50% in that market from this time last year. At the height of the pandemic-fuelled market, she said, she had signed as many as 10 deals in a month. This July, she has only one so far. She chalked up the drop to rising interest rates, an outward migration from Los Angeles to lower-tax states, the introduction of a new mansion tax and more recently, the strike by both the actors’ and writers’ unions. She said she was slated to show an Oscar-winning writer around L.A. homes this month, but he called off his search in favour of renting amid the strikes.

The rising interest rates are keeping inventory low and stymying sales activity, Hohnen said. “Anyone who bought in the last few years has got these crazy low interest rates, usually between two and three percent,” she said. If those buyers sell now, they’ll be incurring rates that are almost double and potentially taking a loss on the sale.

Hohnen said she bought a $2.525 million home in 2021 in the Sag Harbor area of the Hamptons, securing an interest rate of just 1.875% for an adjustable-rate mortgage. Normally, she would buy, renovate and flip, but not this time, she said. “I’m never going to sell that house. I could never afford it if I was buying now. The monthly expenses on a new house would be too high.”

Dangerfield said she didn’t foresee how detrimental the mansion tax would be for her home’s prospects. The new measure, which was implemented April 1, requires sellers to pay 4% on sales of homes priced between $5 million and $10 million, and 5.5% on sales of properties at $10 million or above. “We were flooded with shoppers in March. Then, things just came to a screeching halt. It was such a change in the amount of people coming to view the home that it felt like it wasn’t even on the market,” she said.

One of Dangerfield’s agents, Marcy Roth of the Eklund Gomes team at Douglas Elliman, said the ULA tax “tainted buyer sentiment,” especially when combined with other issues like rising interest rates. “Everything is muddy and offers are complicated,” she said. “There aren’t a lot of quick, clean deals.”

In Chicago, real-estate agent Katherine Malkin of Compass said the city’s downtown area and so-called Gold Coast have been most affected by the slowdown. She said quality of life concerns like crime and an outward migration of some of the city’s businesses has put a damper on sales. Citadel, for instance, the hedge fund headed by billionaire Ken Griffin, recently left the city and moved to Miami. Other businesses that recently relocated their headquarters from Chicago include Boeing.

“You have businesses that are leaving because of the taxes,” Malkin said, noting that some prominent Chicago philanthropists and entrepreneurs have also left the city in the past few years. “They went to Florida, they went to Texas, they went to states that had a much lower tax circumstance. That’s been a difficult thing for people to grasp.”

Some sellers, Malkin said, have been reluctant to lower prices significantly—median luxury sales prices were actually up by more than 6.82% in Chicago in the three months ended June 30—which has been a further drag on sales. “No person of means wants to give their property away when they feel that they’ve invested in it,” she said.

When sellers have capitulated to the market, it has led to activity, Malkin said. She said one of her clients, who public records identify as private-equity executive John Weaver “Jay” Jordan II, recently lowered the price of a roughly 20,000-square-foot townhome in the Gold Coast neighbourhood to $15.75 million from the $18.75 million it listed for in 2020. While the home hasn’t yet sold, the price cut resulted in a new wave of interest, Malkin said. Jordan, who paid $1.8 million for the house in 1996 and remodelled it extensively, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Although luxury median sale prices in the New York metro area are up by 7.69% for the three months ended June 30 compared with the year-earlier period, the slower pace of sales has allowed some opportunistic buyers to ink great deals. Vanessa Lucin of the Corcoran Group recently worked with buyers who paid $6 million for an Upper West Side apartment that was first listed for $7.495 million in June 2022. The roughly 3,383-square-foot apartment has two private balconies and is currently configured as a four bedroom, according to StreetEasy. Lucin said the couple is relocating to New York from California and began searching in January, when the market had slowed from its Covid peak. “There was another offer on the table but it wasn’t going anywhere,” she said.

Daniel Parker, co-head of Compass New Development Marketing Group, said some recent condo closings reflect deals struck during the more robust market in 2021 and 2022. In pockets of the city, such as Billionaires’ Row and Hudson Yards, developers have offered significant discounts. “They are embracing the market we have rather than the market they wish we had,” he said.

However, there are signs of life. Agents in New York reported a recent pickup in big-ticket deals this summer; in particular, large downtown condos have been the “golden sweet spot” of the market, said luxury real-estate agent Donna Olshan. A string of mega deals downtown over the past few weeks include the $52 million off-market sale of a penthouse at 150 Charles Street, the $50 million off-market sale of penthouse at 151 Wooster Street, and a signed contract for a penthouse asking $52 million at One High Line in Chelsea.

Sylvia Hughes, Lucin’s client, said she and her husband, John Hughes, saw several apartments before making an offer on their new four-bedroom on the Upper West Side. “I think the seller was motivated. This apartment had languished,” she said. By the time they saw it, the original $7.495 million asking price had been reduced to $6.195 million and their offer of $6 million was accepted. “I was beginning to wonder if we should have offered less.”



MOST POPULAR

The 1860s Darlinghurst mansion Stoneleigh could become Sydney’s most expensive home ever sold under the hammer when it goes to auction. Clint Ballard is giving buyers a $28 million guide for the heritage-listed mansion on Darley Street, opposite Iona, the former home of Hollywood royalty Baz Luhrmann. Stoneleigh is being offered for sale for the …

Set on one of the city’s last absolute riverfront sites, The Riversdale by Mosaic combines irreplaceable waterfront ownership with one of Brisbane’s most significant residential opportunities.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
Meta PR Goes Back to Playing Offense
By Adam Levine 13/08/2026
Lifestyle
From the First Non-Stick Pan to the Modern Connected Home: Tefal Celebrates 70 Years
By Mathilde Pont 11/08/2026
Lifestyle
Why Apple Stock Just Got Downgraded to Sell
By 11/08/2026
Meta PR Goes Back to Playing Offense

Meta is betting on a human-first AI future, but growing legal battles and declining public trust are putting Mark Zuckerberg’s vision to the test.

By Adam Levine
Thu, Aug 13, 2026 3 min

“Call us optimists. Call us dreamers. Call us whatever the hell you want, but we’re betting on people, and we like those odds. The future is for everyone.”

That ad copy is from the voice-over of a July Meta Platforms META -3.38%.

 spot that’s been part of a public-relations blitz to position Meta as the humanist AI company. The message was undercut by the ad’s inclusion of David Bowie’s “Five Years,” a brooding 1972 song about an impending apocalypse. But this week CEO Mark Zuckerberg left no ambiguity, publishing a 6,500-word manifesto—about 10 times the length of this newsletter—with a title that echoed the ad: “The Future is for Everyone.”

That seems to be Meta’s new tagline. In light of sinking public opinion and the company’s thousands of lawsuits from states, school districts, parents, and users, Meta’s public relations have been defensive. This push represents a return to offense, with a chance to distinguish Meta’s approach to AI from other labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or SpaceX SPCX +9.65%.

“It is surprising that the discourse from many developing AI is so filled with doom,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”

Zuckerberg frames what sort of future we build with AI as the central issue of our time. “We believe that delivering superintelligence to everyone is the way to answer this question,” he says. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”

The flood of words belies the situation on the ground in mid-2026. Americans, at least, have a love-hate affair with social media. A November Pew Research Center poll reported that 71% of U.S. adults used Facebook, and 51% used Instagram. Worldwide, 3.6 billion people use at least one Meta app every day.

But in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in July and August, 61% of respondents said they wanted more government oversight of social media, and two-thirds supported laws to keep children under 16 years old off the platforms. When it comes to Meta in particular, in the 2026 Axios Harris 100, an annual poll about corporate reputation, Meta placed 96th out of 100. It’s only above two other social media companies, Chinese ultracheap retailer Temu, and Spirit Airlines, a defunct air carrier. Regarding ethics, Meta came in last, and it was only ahead of TikTok in trust.

The steady drip of headlines in the teen social media trials isn’t helping. Last week, Meta lost a judgment in New Mexico state court that raised their liability in that relatively small jurisdiction to nearly $1 billion dollars. On Wednesday, jury selection began for a federal case with four states suing Meta over addictive product design, and false marketing that said its platforms were safe for teenagers. In July, Meta claimed that the states are asking for a total of $1.4 trillion in damages, in addition to design changes in the apps. This is part of a multidistrict litigation, where thousands of federal trials with social media defendants are coordinated in Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ district courthouse in Oakland, Calif.

There is a separate such group of thousands of cases in California state court, mostly with individual plaintiffs. The steady drip of bad headlines from the courts will continue unless Meta decides to settle en masse.

Meanwhile, in the second quarter, Meta booked “$2.40 billion of charges related to legal proceedings,” according to its quarterly filing. That may be just the beginning.

Zuckerberg spent 6,500 words getting his utopian message out, but I can sum it up in two: Trust us. The evidence is that Meta has a long way to go to win back that trust.

MOST POPULAR

Scotch whisky expert, luxury hospitality strategist and Keeper of the Quaich inductee Ross Blainey is bringing a new philosophy of luxury experiences to Citizen Kanebridge.

From elevated skincare to handcrafted home pieces, this year’s most thoughtful gifts go beyond the expected.

Related Stories
Property
Secure your Brand New Broadbeach apartment for under $50,000 *
By Partner Post 22/07/2026
Money
THE BUSINESS OF BEING OSCAR PIASTRI
By Stephen Downie 01/12/2025
Money
Australia’s Top 10 Finance Influencers of 2026
By Kanebridge News Editorial 03/08/2026
0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop