The top 10 Australian locations at highest flood and bushfire risk
A new report finds higher flood and bushfire property premiums are leaving more homeowners and investors struggling to insure their assets
3 min
More extreme weather events are affecting property values and home insurance costs, with a new report highlighting the impact of bushfire, riverine flooding and coastal erosion risk on homes and the need for buyers to assess disaster risk in their purchasing processes.
The 2024 Perils Report from Domain Research has found there is a direct relationship between the value of a home and its susceptibility to natural disasters. It revealed that 5.6 million Australian homes are at risk of bushfire — almost half of the entire residential housing stock. More than 32,000 homes, or 0.3 percent of stock, have high bushfire risk ratings. The researchers estimate that a home’s value decreases by 2 percent with every increase in its bushfire rating.
The report also found that 953,000 homes, or 8.1 percent of housing stock, face flood risk. Almost 141,000 homes have a high risk, and for every percentage point increase in the risk of a 50-centimetre flood, a property’s value drops by 0.8 percent. About 160,000 homes are within 150 metres of the coastline, and about one in 10 are at risk of erosion. However, the report finds there is no significant price impact given buyers place a high priority on waterside locations and views.
“This report is almost like a snapshot in time, looking at what is that landscape currently today, but we know that these natural disasters are escalating because of climate change,” said Domain chief of research and economics, Dr Nicola Powell. “The impacts in the future could [be] greater, impacting more homes and communities.”
Domain Research said evaluating a property’s risk is increasingly important for buyers. Home purchasers can access information from local councils and state governments, and some information may be included in the contract of sale. Buyers can also pay for a risk report to be done.
A recent report by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council described climate change as an ‘emerging trend’ affecting values and insurance costs. “The price differential between flood-affected and non-flood affected homes has been estimated to be up to 35 percent a year after a flooding event,” the report said. “Furthermore, the RBA estimates around 7.5 percent of properties are in areas that could experience price falls of at least 5 percent due to climate change by 2050.”
The report said more than one million households are struggling to afford home insurance today, and more homes are uninsured as a result. The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) says premiums are rising due to the impact of more severe natural disasters and a significant increase in construction costs that have gone well above the rate of inflation, making repairs more expensive.
The ICA said four declared insurance events in 2022 alone resulted in 302,000 claims costing $7.28 billion in insured losses. Six billion was from a single event – the Northern NSW and South-East Queensland floods – which was the second costliest insured event in the world that year and the costliest insured event in Australia’s history.
ICA CEO Andrew Hall says governments at all levels need to invest in more protection measures to mitigate the impact of extreme weather, thereby helping to keep insurance premiums lower.
“Governments must also amend land use planning legislation to include a mandatory requirement for planning approvals to consider property and community resilience to extreme weather, and improve building codes so future homes are made more resilient,” Mr Hall said.
Top 10 areas with the highest chance of a 50cm flood per year
1 Ballina NSW 3.9 percent
2 Tweed Heads South NSW 3.7 percent
3 Grafton NSW 2.7 percent
4 Coonamble NSW 2.3 percent
5 Tweed Heads NSW 2.2 percent
6 York-Beverley WA 1.9 percent
7 Maclean-Yamba-Iluka NSW 1.9 percent
8 Lismore NSW 1.8 percent
9 Tingalpa QLD 1.7 percent
10 Far South West QLD 1.6 percent
Source: Domain Research
Top 10 areas with the highest bushfire risk (out of 10) per year
1 Upper Yarra Valley VIC 7.7
2 Ashendon-Lesley WA 5.5
3 Mount Dandenong-Olinda VIC 5.4
4 Ettrema-Sassafras-Budawang NSW 4.6
5 Mount Wellington TAS 4.3
6 Glen Forrest-Darlington WA 4.0
7 Bilpin-Colo-St Albans NSW 3.9
8 Calga-Kulnura NSW 3.9
9 Deua-Wadbilliga NSW 3.9
10 Belgrave-Selby VIC 3.8
Source: Domain Research
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
Australia’s housing affordability crisis is being fuelled by chronic undersupply, planning delays and rising development costs, as politicians continue to focus on the wrong solutions.
3 min
Australia’s housing crisis will not be solved by first-home buyer incentives or tax changes alone, with leading property figures warning governments must tackle supply constraints if affordability is to improve.
Speaking at the Kanebridge Quarterly Property Leadership Summit in Sydney last week, expert project marketing specialist Sam Elbanna, property investor and fund manager Paul Miron and property consultant Karla McNeice said that a lack of housing supply remained the central issue facing the market.
Elbanna, Director of CPM Realty with more than 30 years’ experience in project sales, argued that successive governments had focused too heavily on stimulating demand rather than addressing the barriers preventing new housing from being delivered.
“The misconception is that politicians think the way to solve the housing crisis is to drive demand,” he said.
“The reality is that’s not the way. This is a supply-side problem, and it needs to be solved on the supply side.”
Drawing on his experience in project sales, Elbanna said policies designed to help first-home buyers often had unintended consequences, pointing to previous grants that ultimately flowed through to higher property prices.
Instead, he said developers were facing increasing red tape, approval delays and rising costs, which were discouraging new housing supply.
“In the absence of stock, demand exceeds supply,” he said.
Miron, a Co-Founder and Fund Manager of Msquared Capital, said the housing debate had become overly focused on tax policy while overlooking broader structural issues.
He argued that affordability challenges stemmed from a combination of factors, including planning constraints, supply shortages, migration levels and interest rates.
“No-one can be 100 per cent certain on the real reason for property prices is going up,” he said.
“The reason why property prices are higher is a combination of interest rates, lack of supply, migration, vacancy rates and maybe taxes play a role.”
Miron was critical of recent federal housing policy changes, warning they could reduce the number of new homes being built and further constrain supply that was even highlighted in the budget.
He also highlighted the importance of the property sector to the broader economy, noting that residential real estate and related industries employed more than one million Australians.
McNeice, who advises developers on sales strategy and market intelligence, said understanding buyers had become increasingly important as affordability pressures intensified.
While affordability remained a major consideration, she said today’s buyers were focused on value rather than simply price.
“People are looking for value for money,” she said.
She said buyers were increasingly evaluating factors such as transport connections, walkability, nearby amenities and flexible living spaces that could accommodate changing family needs.
“What infrastructure is going on? Can I walk to the shops? Can I meet people at the local cafe?” she said.
The panel also discussed the mounting pressures facing developers, with Elbanna arguing that many projects become financially unviable from the moment a site is purchased.
“The viability of a development happens at the moment the site is bought,” he said.
He said rising construction costs, higher interest rates and overly optimistic feasibility assumptions had left some developers exposed as market conditions changed.
While acknowledging the growing number of smaller and first-time developers entering the market, Elbanna said property development required expertise across finance, construction, marketing and legal disciplines.
“It is actually a business that requires a level of expertise,” he said.
Looking ahead, the panel agreed opportunities remained in the market despite current challenges.
Miron said property should continue to be viewed as a long-term investment and cautioned against trying to time short-term market movements.
McNeice said success would increasingly depend on identifying projects that genuinely met changing buyer expectations.
Elbanna said affordable housing remained achievable, but developers needed to deliver more than just homes.
“We can provide affordable housing in this country,” he said.
“But we’ve got to wrap that affordable housing with the things that people want.”
As Australia’s housing affordability debate intensifies, the panellists agreed on one point: without a meaningful increase in housing supply, demand-side measures alone are unlikely to solve the nation’s property challenges.
Travellers are swapping traditional sightseeing for immersive experiences, with Africa emerging as a must-visit destination.
A luxury lifestyle might cost more than it used to, but how does it compare with cities around the world?
