5 reasons why Australia’s inflation rate will not follow the US uptick
The latest US inflation figures came in hotter than expected
2 min
Inflation in Australia is unlikely to follow last week’s surprising uptick in the United States, according to AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina. US inflation increased 0.4 percent in March, pushing the yearly inflation rate to 3.5 percent, up from 3.2 percent in February. This is well above the US Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target, and prompted analysts to push back their predictions on the timing of a US interest rate cut. The official US cash rate range is currently 5.25 to 5.5 percent.
Australian and US inflation are now at similar levels. Our annual inflation rate is currently 3.4 percent, as per the monthly report for February. The rate was the same in January. Ms Mousina said Australian inflation peaked in December 2022, which was about six months after the US economy. While analysts have been watching US trends ever since for insights as to what may happen here, Ms Mousina said it was unlikely that Australia would also record an uptick in inflation for March.
“… we think Australian inflation will see a further slowing from here, unlike the recent pattern in the US,” Ms Mousina said. There are five key reasons for this, starting with how domestic conditions in the US and Australia have been impacted differently by monetary policy. Firstly, most US home loans are on long-term fixed interest rates. Most Australian mortgages are on variable rates, so mortgage repayments have lifted considerably and eaten into household budgets for living expenses.
“US outstanding mortgage rates have risen by 0.5 percentage points, compared to 3.2 percentage points in Australia. This is despite Australia increasing interest rates by 1 percent less than the US. As a result, households are in worse shape in Australia than the US.”
Ms Mousina said retail trading, real household disposable income and consumer confidence were down in Australia but rising in the US. “A softer consumer weighs on spending and inflation,” she said.
Ms Mousina also said high US wages growth was keeping services inflation elevated. Australian wages growth has also increased, to its highest level since 2009, but is likely to taper off from here. “… the unemployment rate is expected to lift as labour demand has slowed,” she said. “Softer wages growth in 2024 will see a softening in services inflation.”
Prices in regular US price surveys have recently recorded an uptick, while prices in Australia have been trending down. Additionally, Australian pipeline inflation pressure, which gives a four-month lead on inflation trends, continues to head lower. Pipeline pressure is measured using energy and agricultural commodities prices, shipping rates, price surveys, advertised salaries on Seek and the China Producer Price Index. “… when we look at our Australian pipeline indicator, there is still a further slowing in inflation likely to occur, whereas progress in the US inflation indicator has stalled,” Ms Mousina said.
The last reason why Australia is unlikely to record an uptick in inflation is technical differences in the measurement of inflation between the two countries. The US CPI data has a high weighting to housing at 33 percent, including both rents and ‘owners’ equivalent rent’ which reflects property values. In Australia, only rents are included in the CPI index, with a weighting of just 5.8 percent. “Both rents and owners’ equivalent rent have had high inflation in the US,” she said. “If Australia had a higher weighting to rents, then services inflation would remain higher for longer, as very elevated Australian population growth is keeping rental inflation high.”
From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
Elon Musk is exploring a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX, a deal that could reshape the future of AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles and space technology. With a combined valuation potentially reaching $3.5 trillion, the move could bring Musk’s vision of an interconnected technology ecosystem closer to reality, although a deal remains uncertain.
5 min
Elon Musk has engineered ties between Tesla TSLA 3.41%increase; up pointing triangle and SpaceX SPCX 7.79%increase; up pointing triangle that are hard to break, and now he wants to fuse them together permanently.
Musk has run both Tesla and SpaceX concurrently over the past two decades, using a schedule that dictated which days he spent focused on each business.
The companies have often shared resources and personnel, signaling their close ties. Last year, SpaceX looked into creating a spacesuit for Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus, a person familiar with the matter said. Tesla last week showed off its new Roadster, a vehicle featuring SpaceX rocket thrusters that it hopes to soon bring to market.
And in recent months, Musk has repositioned both companies by expanding beyond their core operations toward a shared mission centered on artificial intelligence.
The world’s richest man on Tuesday signaled his interest in tying up SpaceX and Tesla, marking what would be the biggest corporate merger of all time. Because he serves as chief executive of SpaceX and Tesla, Musk said committees of independent directors at both companies are evaluating a possible deal, adding that a transaction might not come to fruition.
The committees will likely evaluate, with lawyers and bankers, how each company would fare in a potential deal and how a deal might best be structured. They then present their conclusions to their respective boards, who typically vote on whether to proceed.
“It’s an odd Kabuki dance where two groups of people are talking and I can’t be in the conversation,” Musk told SpaceX investors on Tuesday in response to an analyst’s question about a potential deal.
For Musk, the merger supports his vision of a world full of autonomous cars, humanoid robots and weekly rocket launches, as well as the data centers and satellites required to keep the whole thing running.
Some investors and analysts said they expect a transaction would be structured as an all-stock deal, with SpaceX potentially paying a modest premium for Tesla shares.
SpaceX, which has a market value of about $2 trillion, said it is seeing sharp growth in revenue across its businesses, which include operating data centers, launching rockets and operating satellite networks such as the internet service Starlink. Tesla is valued at about $1.5 trillion and is expanding its operations beyond its automotive and energy business. Shares in both companies traded higher following the news Tuesday.
Musk’s substantial ownership stakes in both companies, along with voting control at SpaceX, has enabled him to set the deal in motion. Analysts and investors said the deal will probably face regulatory scrutiny internationally, though some see Musk’s close relationship with the Trump administration as an asset to getting approval.
Blurred lines
The companies haven’t said which directors are on the special committees evaluating a potential deal. Several SpaceX and Tesla board members have either personal or business ties to Musk. And like Musk, venture capitalist Ira Ehrenpreis sits on both boards.
In a filing this week, Tesla outlined millions of dollars in business agreements with SpaceX and its subsidiaries last year, including $143 million in car sales to SpaceX, $3.3 million in advertising that it bought on the social-media platform X and $430 million in revenue from the sale of Megapack batteries for SpaceX’s data centers.
The companies also split the cost of resources including the use of Musk’s SpaceX jet and the bill for his personal security, which he runs through a private company.
Employees at both companies routinely move between companies to work on special projects, and some executives have dual roles, including Charles Kuehmann, vice president of materials engineering at both SpaceX and Tesla, and Ashok Elluswamy, the vice president of AI software at Tesla who runs a joint venture with SpaceX called Digital Optimus.
Over the years, Musk has launched new startups within his empire, including brain-implant company Neuralink, underground-tunnel developer the Boring Company and xAI, the AI startup that merged with SpaceX in February.
It is that AI business that Musk thinks can serve a market worth tens of trillions of dollars, justifying the need for a merger.
The business case goes like this: Tesla is developing robotaxis and robots, which it calls “physical AI.” SpaceX is working on the back end of physical AI: the data-center capacity and internet connection required for those robotaxis and robots to operate continuously.
“I don’t see what the value of Tesla is if it’s not merged with SpaceX,” said investment adviser Ross Gerber, a former Tesla bull turned critic invested in both companies. “If they don’t merge, the brains of everything that runs Tesla is owned by another company.”
On top of it all, both companies face constraints on the supply chains they need to make this world a reality, particularly when it comes to chips. To address this, Musk earlier this year announced a joint venture between Tesla, SpaceX and Intel to design and manufacture chips in Texas. “The most epic chip-building exercise by far,” he has said.
Musk at the wheel
For Musk, a merger would also solve two problems: demands on his attention and his lack of control at Tesla.
Tesla for years was Musk’s only public company, a status that came with greater scrutiny. There, Musk reports to a public board, as well as individual investors who make up around 30% of Tesla’s voting power, according to FactSet.
The question of Musk’s attention became a particular focus for investors and the board in recent years after he acquired Twitter in 2022 and launched xAI in 2023, and again in 2025 as he spent time in Washington, D.C., running the Department of Government Efficiency in the early months of President Trump’s second term.
As Tesla’s car business suffered in 2025, Musk threatened to take his AI ambitions outside the company if he wasn’t granted 25% voting control. Last November, Tesla shareholders approved a new pay package for Musk, which created a path for him to vastly expand his stake.
As of Sept. 30, Musk owned a roughly 20% stake in Tesla, according to the company’s proxy filing.
The SpaceX IPO gave Musk a different path. When SpaceX went public in June, the deal’s structure enabled him to have more than 80% voting power at the company—so much that he can’t be fired and decisions can’t be made without his support.
If SpaceX acquires Tesla, he will likely stay in control.
Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.
The grand harbourside residence combines sweeping Sydney Heads views, resort-style entertaining and refined designer finishes with a reported $36 million price guide.
