Michele Bullock to become next RBA governor

The Federal Government has announced that Michele Bullock will replace Philip Lowe as governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia. She will be the ninth governor and the first woman appointed to the role in the central bank’s 62-year history. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said in a press conference today that Ms Bullock will take on the role from September 18 following a consultative process with cabinet, the business community and the opposition.

The news that Philip Lowe will step down comes after 14 months and 12 interest rate hikes that have taken some borrowers off guard. However, Mr Chalmers was careful to thank Dr Lowe for his work over a long career.

“We thank Phil Lowe for more than four decades of dedication and commitment and service to the country,” Mr Chalmers said. “He goes with our respect and gratitude and dignity. I have really valued my working relationship with Phil. He is a terrific guy and he has handled himself impeccably.”

While most central banks around the world failed to predict the persistent inflation rises, most analysts point to Dr Lowe’s messaging around potential interest rate increases as sealing his fate. Prior to the rises in the cash rate that started in May 2022, Dr Lowe had told borrowers that interest rates would remain steady until 2024, leading many to believe that it was a safe time to borrow. Instead, repayments for an average mortgage have risen by $1,264 since increases began. At least 25 percent of mortgage holders are now believed to be experiencing mortgage distress.

Speculation has been rife for weeks now that Dr Lowe’s tenure would not be extended and three front runners had emerged including Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy and Finance Department secretary Jenny Wilkinson. However, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he would not support candidates with close ties to government. Ms Bullock is perceived as a more independent choice. Mr Chalmers described the Michele Bullock as a “first class economist”.

“This is the right call but it is not an easy call,” he said. “This is one of the most important appointments that we will make as a government,” he said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described Ms Bullock as “imminently qualified”.

“Michele Bullock is an accomplished economist with wide experience at the Reserve Bank,” he said. “I very much congratulate Michele Bullock on this appointment.”

For decades, Australia has leaned into its reputation as the lucky country. But luck, as it turns out, is not an economic strategy.

What once looked like resilience now appears increasingly fragile. Beneath the surface of rising property values and steady headline growth, the Australian economy is showing signs of strain that can no longer be ignored.

Recent data paints a sobering picture. Australia has recorded one of the largest declines in real household disposable income per capita among advanced economies.

Wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, meaning many Australians are working harder for less. On a per capita basis, income growth has stalled and, at times, reversed.

And yet, on paper, things still look relatively solid. GDP is growing. Unemployment remains low. But that growth is increasingly being driven by population expansion rather than productivity.

More people are contributing to output, but not necessarily improving living standards.

That distinction matters.

For years, Australia’s economic success rested on a powerful combination: a once-in-a-generation mining boom, a credit-fuelled housing market, strong migration and a property sector that rarely faltered. Between 1991 and 2020, the country avoided recession entirely, building enormous wealth in the process.

But much of that wealth is tied to property. Around two-thirds of household wealth sits in real estate, inflated by leverage and sustained by demand. It has worked, until now.

The problem is the supply side of the economy has not kept up.

Housing supply is falling behind population growth. Rental vacancies are near record lows.

Construction firms are collapsing at an elevated rate. At the same time, massive infrastructure pipelines are competing with residential projects for labour and materials, pushing costs higher and delaying delivery.

The result is a system under pressure from all angles.

Despite near full employment, productivity growth has stagnated for years. In simple terms, Australians are putting in more hours without generating more output per hour. The economy is running faster, butgoing nowhere.

Meanwhile, government spending continues to expand. Public debt is approaching $1 trillion, with spending now accounting for a record share of GDP.

The gap between spending and revenue has been filled by borrowing for decades, adding further pressure to an already stretched system.

This is where the uncomfortable question emerges.

Has Australia become too reliant on a model driven by rising property values, expanding credit and population growth?

As asset prices rise, households feel wealthier and borrow more. Banks lend more. Governments collect more revenue. Migration fuels demand. The cycle reinforces itself.

But when productivity stalls and debt outpaces real income, the system begins to depend on constant expansion just to stay stable.

It is not a collapse scenario. But it is not particularly stable either.

Nowhere is this more evident than in housing.

The National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet current completion rates are well below that pace. With approvals falling and construction costs rising, the gap between supply and demand is widening, not narrowing.

Housing is also one of the largest contributors to inflation, with costs rising sharply across rents, construction and utilities. Yet the private sector, from small investors to major developers, is struggling to make projects stack up in the current environment.

This brings the policy debate into sharper focus.

Tax settings such as negative gearing and capital gains concessions have undoubtedly boosted demand over the past two decades. But they have also supported supply. Removing them may ease prices briefly, but risks deepening the supply shortage over time.

That is the paradox.

Policies designed to make housing more affordable can, in practice, make the shortage worse if they discourage development. The optics may appeal, but the economics are far less forgiving.

It is also worth remembering that most property investors are not institutional players. The majority own just one investment property. They are, in many cases, ordinary Australians using real estate as their primary wealth-building tool.

Undermining that system without replacing it with a viable alternative risks unintended consequences, from reduced supply to higher rents and increased inflation.

So where does that leave Australia?

At a crossroads.

The country can continue to rely on population growth and rising asset prices to drive economic activity. Or it can shift towards a model built on productivity, innovation and sustainable growth.

The latter is harder. It requires structural reform, long-term thinking and political discipline.

But it is also the only path that leads to genuine, lasting prosperity.

The question is no longer whether Australia has been lucky.

It is whether it can evolve before that luck runs out.

Paul Miron is the Co-Founder & Fund Manager of Msquared Capital.

Michele Bullock to become next RBA governor

The decision to replace Philip Lowe follows criticism of his messaging around rises in the cash rate

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.