A Bel-Air Home that Blends Modern and Historic Elements Asks $31.5m

In Los Angeles, a home with a rare combination of historic and contemporary architectural pedigree is coming on the market for $31.5 million.

The circa-1949 house in Bel-Air was originally designed, and later owned, by architect John Elgin Woolf, known for his Hollywood Regency-style. More recently, it was renovated and restored by the architect and landscape guru Mark Rios and his husband, reproductive endocrinologist Dr. Guy Ringler. Rios, one of the architects behind the renovation of the Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles, has designed homes for entertainment heavyweights like Clive Davis and television producer Darren Star.

Rios and Ringler paid $12 million for the roughly 8,400-square-foot, five-bedroom property in 2021 and embarked on an 18-month renovation. They moved into the house in 2023.

“We wanted to make it contemporary, but still not change the spirit and iconic quality of the architecture,” Rios said. “I kept on thinking, ‘If Jack Woolf were alive today, what would he do?’ And then also, ‘What would Mark Rios do?’”

When they purchased the property, Rios said, the home had fallen into disrepair. The layout was a relic of decades past, with servants’ quarters and separate primary-bedroom suites. A prior owner had installed an elevator from the kitchen to her dressing room to facilitate mid-party wardrobe changes.

The couple revamped the layout, converting a library into a media room with bright red walls. The new centerpiece of the home is a lounge with a fireplace and bar.

Outside, the couple aimed to make the pool area a more social setting for entertaining. They turned a pool pavilion into a Moroccan-style sitting area, which they jokingly refer to it as “the drug room” because of the psychedelic colors, Rios said.

For a recent dinner party, the couple re-created the menu from a New Year’s Eve party thrown at the house in the 1960s, serving beef wellington and “some kind of seafood mousse,” Rios said. They even hired a musician to impersonate the 1960s trumpeter and pianist Herb Alpert.

They are selling because they are spending more time at their home in Montecito, Calif., Rios said. The property is listed by Linda May of Carolwood, an affiliate of Forbes Global Properties.

Bel-Air, which was largely unaffected by the recent Los Angeles wildfires, has seen a handful of deals close at $30 million or more over the past year, Zillow shows. A nearby estate with an addition by architect Paul Williams sold for $39 million in November.

Write to Katherine Clarke at Katherine.Clarke@wsj.com

For decades, Australia has leaned into its reputation as the lucky country. But luck, as it turns out, is not an economic strategy.

What once looked like resilience now appears increasingly fragile. Beneath the surface of rising property values and steady headline growth, the Australian economy is showing signs of strain that can no longer be ignored.

Recent data paints a sobering picture. Australia has recorded one of the largest declines in real household disposable income per capita among advanced economies.

Wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, meaning many Australians are working harder for less. On a per capita basis, income growth has stalled and, at times, reversed.

And yet, on paper, things still look relatively solid. GDP is growing. Unemployment remains low. But that growth is increasingly being driven by population expansion rather than productivity.

More people are contributing to output, but not necessarily improving living standards.

That distinction matters.

For years, Australia’s economic success rested on a powerful combination: a once-in-a-generation mining boom, a credit-fuelled housing market, strong migration and a property sector that rarely faltered. Between 1991 and 2020, the country avoided recession entirely, building enormous wealth in the process.

But much of that wealth is tied to property. Around two-thirds of household wealth sits in real estate, inflated by leverage and sustained by demand. It has worked, until now.

The problem is the supply side of the economy has not kept up.

Housing supply is falling behind population growth. Rental vacancies are near record lows.

Construction firms are collapsing at an elevated rate. At the same time, massive infrastructure pipelines are competing with residential projects for labour and materials, pushing costs higher and delaying delivery.

The result is a system under pressure from all angles.

Despite near full employment, productivity growth has stagnated for years. In simple terms, Australians are putting in more hours without generating more output per hour. The economy is running faster, butgoing nowhere.

Meanwhile, government spending continues to expand. Public debt is approaching $1 trillion, with spending now accounting for a record share of GDP.

The gap between spending and revenue has been filled by borrowing for decades, adding further pressure to an already stretched system.

This is where the uncomfortable question emerges.

Has Australia become too reliant on a model driven by rising property values, expanding credit and population growth?

As asset prices rise, households feel wealthier and borrow more. Banks lend more. Governments collect more revenue. Migration fuels demand. The cycle reinforces itself.

But when productivity stalls and debt outpaces real income, the system begins to depend on constant expansion just to stay stable.

It is not a collapse scenario. But it is not particularly stable either.

Nowhere is this more evident than in housing.

The National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet current completion rates are well below that pace. With approvals falling and construction costs rising, the gap between supply and demand is widening, not narrowing.

Housing is also one of the largest contributors to inflation, with costs rising sharply across rents, construction and utilities. Yet the private sector, from small investors to major developers, is struggling to make projects stack up in the current environment.

This brings the policy debate into sharper focus.

Tax settings such as negative gearing and capital gains concessions have undoubtedly boosted demand over the past two decades. But they have also supported supply. Removing them may ease prices briefly, but risks deepening the supply shortage over time.

That is the paradox.

Policies designed to make housing more affordable can, in practice, make the shortage worse if they discourage development. The optics may appeal, but the economics are far less forgiving.

It is also worth remembering that most property investors are not institutional players. The majority own just one investment property. They are, in many cases, ordinary Australians using real estate as their primary wealth-building tool.

Undermining that system without replacing it with a viable alternative risks unintended consequences, from reduced supply to higher rents and increased inflation.

So where does that leave Australia?

At a crossroads.

The country can continue to rely on population growth and rising asset prices to drive economic activity. Or it can shift towards a model built on productivity, innovation and sustainable growth.

The latter is harder. It requires structural reform, long-term thinking and political discipline.

But it is also the only path that leads to genuine, lasting prosperity.

The question is no longer whether Australia has been lucky.

It is whether it can evolve before that luck runs out.

Paul Miron is the Co-Founder & Fund Manager of Msquared Capital.

A Bel-Air Home that Blends Modern and Historic Elements Asks $31.5m

Architect Mark Rios and his husband, Dr. Guy Ringler, spent 18 months renovating the house, which was originally designed by John Elgin Woolf.

As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.