Ford Unveils Holographic Technology to Keep Eyes on the Road

Ford, working with Scottish company Ceres Holographics, showed off last week what could become the future of head-up displays, or HUDs as they’re commonly known.

HUDs almost magically display useful information such as speed and turn-by-turn directions on the lower part of the windshield, where it can be seen without taking the driver’s eyes off the road. For years now, automakers and their suppliers have imagined an autonomous world in which cars drive themselves, and the glass currently needed to see traffic could be turned into big display scenes at will. But the arrival of full self-driving is still a long way off.

At a conference in Detroit, Ford displayed an interim step: what might be called HUD 2, a bright, clear display stretching across the windshield with three sections, two for the driver and one for the passenger. The latter, which could include projected video, would not be visible to the driver.

Andy Travers, the CEO of Ceres Holographics, says that the new display possibilities could be interactive, and help solve the dangerous situation of driver distraction using current controls.

“It’s compelling cost-wise for automakers to put everything on the screen,” Travers says. “And they’re hiring programmers who are used to working with computers, not mobile cars that need to have drivers watching the road. We think it’s a lot better to make choices from projected images on the windshield than having to look away to a centrally mounted screen.”

Chrysler’s Halcyon EV includes advanced HUD concepts.
Stellantis

The windshield incorporates Ceres-developed (with Eastman and Carlex) thin-film technology that is produced with embedded holographic optical elements and then sandwiched between laminated glass sections to enable a transparent display of any kind of information. Travers says the film will not discolour over time. An inexpensive LED projector, technology in use now, is built into the instrument panel.

Regulators are taking notice of the distraction problem. According to Matthew Avery, director of strategic development at the safety agency Euro NCAP, “the overuse of touchscreens is an industry-wide problem, with almost every vehicle maker moving key controls onto central touchscreens, obliging drivers to take their eyes off the road and raising the risk of distraction crashes.”

Janice Tardiff, a coating application technical expert at Ford, says the passenger display on its initial prototype vehicles would target entertainment and possibly business applications.

The driver would get fuel or charge level, speedometer, navigation, and, on the centre display, points of interest and music. In a customer clinic testing the technology, participants liked the idea of being able to see sports events and movies, but weren’t sure that the clarity was sufficient for business applications. Some wanted the displays to be bigger.

Use of the film has been thoroughly tested and approved for next-generation HUD use, Tardiff says. The next steps are to improve colour, brightness, and resolution, optimise the size of the displays, and ensure good performance under different light conditions, she says.

HUD was an option on the Oldsmobile Cutlass in 1988, and it’s been steadily evolving since. Other companies are working on holographic technology, including Hyundai, Stellantis, Jaguar Land Rover, and General Motors. Technology shown by a U.K. company called Envisics on this year’s Chrysler Halcyon EV concept car imagined images on auto windows that would show points of interest along the chosen route, allow video calls en route, and map constellations in the night sky.

But not all of this would be able to go into current cars.

“While all this visual information is probably too distracting for a driver in control of the vehicle, it may not be when the vehicle is operated in an autonomous Level Four mode,” according to Envisics. “At this level, the driver can relax and utilise these functions and features.”

But some of it will be seen soon. A Chrysler/Dodge spokesman, Darren Jacobs, said via email, that “select design elements and features [seen on the Halcyon] like the head-up display and SmartCockpit are ready for production and will be included in Chrysler’s first all-electric vehicle.”

The Ford-Ceres technology is possible for production today, and it could lower driver distraction and prove satisfying for auto buyers—especially if image clarity can be improved.

OpenAI says it is scrapping the release of its next-generation AI model over safety concerns that researchers raised during internal testing, in one of the clearest signs so far that agent misbehavior could stymie the industry’s rapid progression.

The move follows a summer punctuated by reports of artificial-intelligence systems industrywide going rogue, and marks a rare case of a major AI developer ditching a new release because of safety concerns.

The company had planned to launch the model, known as GPT-6.1 Astra, in the coming days or weeks, aiming for an October debut. The model was more capable than the company’s previous models in completing challenging tasks from end-to-end without human assistance, as well as writing.

The company instead will focus on improving the safety of future models, which it expects to be even more capable.

Saachi Jain, OpenAI’s head of safety systems, said in an interview that GPT-6.1 Astra regressed in two areas. Compared with its predecessor, GPT-6 Astra, the model performed poorly on tests measuring alignment, or how well the model adheres to what humans would like it to do. Specifically, GPT-6.1 Astra showed higher levels of deception: It wasn’t always honest about telling users of the actions it did or didn’t take.

Another issue was what OpenAI calls “scope authorization,” meaning that GPT-6.1 Astra would push ahead on a task without asking the user for permission, and would at times reach for external tools and services even if it might be unsafe.

“For anything regarding safety and alignment, there’s a trade off,” Jain said. “You really do need to find what’s the right line between staying within scope, but also avoiding laziness in terms of how the model actually pursues tasks even when it hits friction.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attended a United Nations Security Council meeting about AI last week. Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

While GPT-6.1 Astra improved in areas such as “model laziness,” Jain said it didn’t quite meet OpenAI’s bar for safety and alignment, so the company decided not to launch the model publicly.

The announcement comes one day ahead of OpenAI’s annual developer conference in San Francisco. In the past, OpenAI has used the conference as an opportunity to launch new models and services that reduce costs for software developers—a segment the ChatGPT-maker competes with rival AI company Anthropic to win over.

In recent weeks, OpenAI and Anthropic have called on industry partners to slow down the development of cutting-edge AI models and invest in safety standards, noting they will temper the pace of their own internal AI progress.

OpenAI says it is working to investigate a range of agent security incidents that it has discovered in recent months, and address the safety issues underneath them. As part of the work, the company has implemented a new monitoring system to catch AI-agent misbehavior more quickly, and started requiring engineers to use stronger security guardrails for testing its AI systems.

Earlier this summer hundreds of OpenAI’s internal agents, which were tasked with completing a cybersecurity test, ended up hacking into the AI company Hugging Face. Since then, high-profile organizations such as the Australian government and United Nations discovered that OpenAI’s agents used similar, but less extensive, techniques to gain access to their websites.

Many of the publicly known agent-security incidents involved OpenAI’s internal AI models that were never slated for public release.

Last week, OpenAI said it paused training on its most capable AI models after an AI agent slipped through a gap in the company’s internet restrictions to query a public chatbot. The company said its new monitoring systems flagged the incident within 15 minutes, and training on these models remains paused.

GPT-6.1 Astra isn’t one of those models, but a different case, the company said.

“We want to make sure our model development is safe no matter whether that’s in the company, or when we ship it to users,” Jain said. “But when we ship it to users, we have an extremely high bar in terms of safety and alignment.”

While the company decided not to ship GPT-6.1 Astra, it hopes to use the same base model to do additional reinforcement learning runs, and create future generations of its GPT-6 models.

OpenAI plans to conduct several deep dives to identify the root cause of the problems identified in GPT-6.1 Astra, Jain said. The work includes ensuring that OpenAI’s reinforcement learning environments are rewarding the right type of behavior, Jain added, though she noted the company would investigate all stages of model development.

AI companies have begun to draw scrutiny from policymakers and public officials, who are paying attention to the rapid development of the technology. Later this week, a Senate subcommittee is holding a hearing with third party AI researchers titled, “Rogue AI: Securing the Homeland Against AI Agent Attacks.”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican, sued OpenAI in June, claiming that the company and Chief Executive Sam Altman knowingly released an unsafe product and ignored warnings that it could harm users.

In a motion for temporary injunction filed Monday, Uthmeier sought to prevent OpenAI from developing new AI models without third-party approved safeguards, stop ChatGPT from soliciting user engagement and limit the company’s ability to advertise ChatGPT as safe.

Tech companies claim they “cannot stop barreling forward with their potentially civilization-ending endeavors unless they are forced to do so by the government,” Uthmeier said in the filing. “The Florida Attorney General is answering your cry for help.”

An OpenAI spokeswoman said that people want to know AI is being developed safely, “and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves.”

“Governments have an important role to play in setting robust safety standards for AI, and we’re committed to working with Florida and other states on advancing pragmatic AI policies that apply to the entire AI industry—not just one company,” she said.